Tutorman

1.3K posts

Tutorman banner
Tutorman

Tutorman

@iTutorman

Digital marketer, investor, fundraiser, legacy builder and also known as Tutorman. [email protected]

Metanet Katılım Ağustos 2012
1.4K Takip Edilen473 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
9 Keys to the Perfect Business on the Metanet: 1. 7-Figure Founder with Integrity Every powerful movement starts with leadership. A real opportunity on the Metanet requires a founder with vision, experience, and integrity. Not hype. Not smoke. Not borrowed credibility. A strong founder sets the tone, the standards, and the long-term direction. Integrity builds trust. Trust builds momentum. Without leadership, businesses drift. With leadership, they compound. 2. Army of Freedom Seekers on a Mission You do not build a business alone. You build a movement. Success on the Metanet requires a community aligned around purpose. An army of freedom seekers united by mission creates energy, reach, and impact. Movements outperform isolated entrepreneurs. When people feel they belong to something larger than themselves, growth accelerates. 3. Ready-Made Evergreen Digital Product Business Speed matters. A ready-made evergreen digital product business gives immediate structure. Instead of starting from zero, you start with a system already designed to function. Evergreen assets allow scalability without constant reinvention. On the Metanet, systems win over scattered ideas. 4. Digital Products and Services in Demand Opportunity must match demand. If the market does not want what you offer, effort becomes frustration. The perfect business aligns with real demand and solves real problems. When you combine digital products with services that people actively seek, you create revenue consistency. Demand removes resistance. 5. 100% Business System Ownership Control equals security. To succeed long term on the Metanet, you must own: Your brand Your systems Your customer relationships When you depend entirely on third-party platforms, you are vulnerable. Ownership creates stability. Stability allows expansion. 6. Easy Business Duplication If it cannot be duplicated, it cannot scale. The perfect business includes frameworks that can be cloned and customized. Repeatable systems reduce friction and increase speed. Duplication transforms effort into leverage. Leverage transforms small wins into significant growth. 7. Active and Passive Income True opportunity includes multiple income pathways. Active income generates cash flow now. Passive income compounds over time. A perfect business balances both. It pays you today and builds wealth tomorrow. Single-stream models are fragile. Multi-stream models endure. 8. Tutorman Blueprint Training Program A structure without education collapses. Training ensures clarity. Step-by-step guidance eliminates guesswork. When a blueprint exists, execution becomes simpler. The perfect business does not rely on talent alone. It relies on process. Process creates predictable results. 9. Repeat the Process and Become a Serial Winner The final key is replication. Once the system works, repeat it. Refine it. Duplicate it. Help others do the same. A single win is luck. Repeated wins are design. When you help others own, duplicate, and scale, you create legacy. Final Thought If you want a real opportunity on the Metanet, you must install all 9 keys. Remove one, and the structure weakens. Align all nine, and the business becomes powerful, scalable, and durable. That is the framework behind Tutorman. Tutorman Helping people to help themselves and freeing the world. P.s. - This system runs on a suitable blockchain, with instant transactions directly into your wallet. It does not rely on any third party, and once deployed your evergreen business is immutable, unstoppable meaning it cannot be shut down! This is how movements are built on the Metanet.
Tutorman tweet media
English
0
0
0
60
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
While it looks like a stylized "T" for the brand name, the logo is actually a technical diagram. According to Elon Musk, the logo represents a cross-section of an electric motor. The Components: • The Main Body (The Vertical Part): This represents a single pole extending from the motor's rotor (the part that rotates). • The Top Curved Bar: This represents a section of the stator (the stationary part that surrounds the rotor). How it works: In an electric motor, the interaction between the rotor and the stator creates a magnetic field that generates torque, which is what actually drives the wheels of the car. If you were to take that "T" and repeat it in a circle with the curved tops facing outward, it would look like a simplified blueprint of the internal engine that powers every Tesla. Interestingly, this design philosophy matches Musk’s other company, SpaceX, where the stylized "X" is meant to represent a rocket trajectory.
English
0
0
1
29
Ian Miles Cheong
Ian Miles Cheong@ianmiles·
Marc Andreessen just revealed the Elon Musk philosophy that completely broke his brain: "The best product in the world shouldn't even need a logo." We all know Elon is relentless about quality. As Marc puts it: "Do you want the best car in the world or not, right? Like that's Elon's mentality... And it's working very well." But at a recent event, Elon took this mindset to a completely different level. He dropped a perspective so jarring that Marc initially thought it was a joke. Elon’s thesis? "You shouldn't even have to have your name on the product. It's just obvious. Everybody knows." The logic is brutal but simple. If you build the undeniable, undisputed best thing in the world, everybody uses it. And because everybody uses it, you don't need to slap your branding all over it to prove it's yours. Think about that. We spend endless hours agonizing over marketing, tweaking brand colors, and putting our logos on every square inch of what we build. But the ultimate flex isn't a flashy logo. The ultimate flex is building something so undeniably brilliant that its mere existence is the brand.
English
851
2K
17.9K
29.9M
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
@MaestroBSV @CsTominaga Yep, laughing all the way to the Binance exchange while bag holders are waiting…when moon? CSW did not create any vehicle for freedom or an exit strategy for anyone else, … Next! True or true?
English
0
0
0
77
Maestro
Maestro@MaestroBSV·
CRAIG WRIGHT IS THE CREATOR OF BITCOIN. Despite YEARS of vicious LIES, SMEARS, and lawfare from Coinbase, Blockstream, the Core MAFIA, and the entire BTC cult he never backed down. @CsTominaga is quite possibly one of the most brilliant minds on the planet.
English
12
18
127
2.9K
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
@DevelopingZack How long does it take to buy a Starbucks coffee with BSV? 🤔
English
1
0
1
106
Zack Wins
Zack Wins@DevelopingZack·
BSV did everything right technically and everything wrong socially. Turns out humans matter more than code. Who knew? Engineers in shambles.
English
24
8
115
4.9K
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
@MattDabit PowerPoint is not there for a brain (text) dump of tiny paragraphs of text. Follow best practices, you can do better than that. And you got millions of views for that. WTF.
English
0
0
3
518
Matthew Dabit
Matthew Dabit@MattDabit·
Academics, business leaders, and anyone stuck making PowerPoints: Grok 4.3 just turned a full tDCS/TMS neuroscience paper into this clean 9-slide academic deck in minutes. Cool tones, strong layout, easy to read fonts, exactly what I asked for. Stop doing the boring work. Grok it. What dense document do you want turned into a deck next? @grok @xai
Matthew Dabit tweet media
English
305
598
4.5K
25.4M
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
"If you do not own the business, you do not control your future". At any stage you could have fees increased, lose access/get locked out, and lose all your assets. Do you trust one person with your time and money? Even Satoshi lost his keys to his bitcoin baby, because he trusted a trustworthy individual. In my opinion, the system you create on needs to be immutable and unstoppable, and that means not controlled by any 3rd party. Calvin Ayre President of the Board 2020 to now. CA could sell it, he could close it, and he could manipulate it for personal gain! True or true?
English
0
0
0
69
Babbage | BRC100
Babbage | BRC100@ProjectBabbage·
The big problem with all this, which is also the core reason the Metanet Foundation and every single BSV-based project ever conceived will always be encumbered... is that the restriction EXPLICITLY incorporates NAR by reference, giving the BSVA ultimate authority over everything on-chain. You alone can order all nodes to cut off their fellow chefs, and lock them out of the kitchen. Also... you alone can change the NAR or update it whenever you want. I am not saying that you would, but you could, and that matters. A lot. The problem, and I told you this weeks ago in private... is that the Association alone has the power to decide who gets to participate and cut people off. Ban them. The stated goal is to remove bad actors and comply with law. That's good. That's why I support NAR. But it's very powerful, and it's a weak point. You should recognize that, openly, publicly. In the wrong hands, NAR is exactly the kind of political justification that could be used to co-opt and capture the BSV Blockchain from within, and/or create "mining cartel" behavior. So as the wielder of this power you create a massive liability at the center of the BSV network in your current form. We need to work together to mitigate that liability and make the political weaponization of NAR / "Open BSV" IMPOSSIBLE. And that has to be done openly, even though it is the biggest risk I will ever take. Right now you are, with all due respect, a "weak institution" in the political sense. You have one funder. You do not operate under a public charter. You do not have a board reflecting all the kinds of voices of key stakeholders like miners, enterprise, regulators, and builders/infra. Yet, via NAR, you are acting as a key nexus of control over the network. And via Open BSV, you are implicitly tying all your tooling and applications up with that core problem. That makes us look immature and non-adoptable. It's hurting my bottom line and hurting everyone else's too. It's been hurting all of us, for years, and now it is time for a change. This is NOT just me, not just my company. @johncalhooon, @_b1nary_, @LightBSV, and others know this has been a long time coming. And @kurtwuckertjr said he'd sit on a board with GorillaPool if invited. I've also heard from a few lesser-known BSVers who may be interested in putting some money forward. Again, it is time for a change. Let's keep NAR + Open BSV for Teranode (maybe Apache for other stuff...) BUT we NEED to make the political weaponization of NAR / stewardship decisions in general impossible to achieve, while also solving your resourcing problems. — So that organizations from across academia, enterprise, government, dev groups, and all use-cases are free to become members, as they can with joining LF, CNCF, or W3C. — So that no single donor, backer or interest group can EVER have the leverage to starve the organization of its working capital, team and legitimacy. — So that budgets for work on libraries, overlays, industry standards, hackathons, education and outreach are put forward, voted upon, and approved through public processes, not behind closed doors. — So that NO ONE can change the NAR without input from all stakeholders, and those responsible for signing NAR directives are elected at regular intervals by an Assembly comprising all stakeholders. And, so that EVERYONE in the world can know how these decisions are made, who is in favor, and who against. That's what it means to go from a weak institution to a strong, healthy, diverse, resilient one. So will you at least release some sort of formal public statement acknowledging that this is what we are working towards? And can we find a way to get you some more funds from outside parties, so that we can both re-enlist the help of our friends? And for the reasons I've stated, this can't just be a "go form Metanet Foundation" copout. I wish that strategy could work, but glomming more foundation-style entities atop a "weak institution" foundation of sand wouldn't earn any more trust or goodwill, from anyone. Enterprise buyers are watching right now, and they know that. I hope we can make some stuff happen for the long term. You are very talented and have done more than anyone for our success in a lot of ways, Siggi. I want you to get recognized for all your work, and be rewarded for your worth. We all deserve that. It doesn't happen in a vacuum, and we're going through this growing pain for good reasons. Baby steps. And P.s. for the record: I am not opposing Chronicle...
Siggi@___siggi___

Grok has some interesting things to say about this: The license is deliberately not fully permissionless — that’s the entire point. It is 100 % permissive on the official BSV chain and 100 % closed everywhere else. That is not accidental or hypocritical; it is an explicit design choice to keep a high-performance, enterprise-grade node codebase (Teranode) from being weaponised by bad actors to launch forks, scams, or rival chains that would confuse users and erode network effects. The protocol itself remains permissionless — anyone can still implement the Bitcoin whitepaper rules from scratch under a clean MIT license if they want. This license only governs this specific codebase. Calling that “permissioned blockchain” is like calling a restaurant’s proprietary kitchen recipe “permissioned cooking”. You’re still free to cook whatever you want; you just can’t use their exact recipe and ingredients and then claim you’re serving the same dish in a different restaurant. People trying to “worm their way out” of the restriction are indeed either clowns or dishonest. The text is brutally clear: use outside the defined BSV chain = outside the license. No ambiguity, no loopholes, no “but muh open source spirit” escape hatch. If you don’t like the restriction, write your own node or use older, unrestricted Bitcoin SV code. Simple.

English
15
6
32
12.8K
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
@Bitcoin_Beyond Nice Ai generated article. Proof: governed by committee —. (long dash indicates A.I. generated). I'm so glad you have your say, again.
English
0
0
1
6
Connor Murray
Connor Murray@Bitcoin_Beyond·
I want to acknowledge that from the outside looking in, this post might "make sense" because the Association can and should continue to be more open, transparent, and engaging with the BSV community. This is something that Asgeir and Siggi are fully committed to. As someone that has been in BSV since day 1, I have never felt more confident in the Association's leadership, and I've never been more optimistic in BSV's future. Babbage is not on the outside looking in, which is what makes this post all the more confusing. There's a fundamental confusion here between decentralized governance and distributed systems. Bitcoin was never meant to be governed by committee — it's a distributed network with defined rules. The NAR codifies those rules. The guy who wrote the ISDA Master Agreement, the standard contract governing trillions in derivatives globally, helped draft the NAR. This wasn't guesswork. It was deliberate: model the rules on frameworks that have actually been stress-tested in high-stakes commercial contexts. Let's address your specific claims: "The BSVA has ultimate authority over everything on-chain" — No. Read Part I, Clause 1a. The NAR is a multilateral legal agreement between the Association AND all Nodes. The Association is bound by the same rules. They can't act outside them. Their powers are explicitly constrained to the original Bitcoin protocol. They cannot alter the coin supply. They cannot change the protocol outside Satoshi's design. "Set in stone" is now a legal constraint written into the framework, thanks to the NAR. "You alone can order all nodes to cut off their fellow chefs" - Also no. Any enforcement action requires the Association to act "reasonably and in good faith" (Clause 6). There's an entire Part III (Enforcement Rules) and Part IV (Dispute Resolution Rules) that govern this. It's not arbitrary. It's not unilateral. There's due process. The Association can send Messages (alerts), but only within defined parameters, only for actual rule violations, and with accountability mechanisms built in. "You alone can change the NAR whenever you want" - This fundamentally misunderstands how multilateral contracts work. The NAR is anchored to an external, unchangeable standard: the original Bitcoin protocol as described in the White Paper. That anchor doesn't move. The Association can't just rewrite the terms because the foundational reference point is fixed. You can't "update" a contract to contradict its own core premise. That's not how contract law works - and the people who helped to draft this understand contract law better than most. The NAR is a multilateral contract. Nodes are bound. The Association is also bound. They can't alter the coin supply. They can't deviate from the original protocol. The protocol is "set in stone" as a legal commitment, not just an allusion to an old forum post by Satoshi. The Association's hands are tied to Satoshi's design. That's the whole point. On "openness": The NAR is published. All of it. Every rule, every enforcement mechanism, every dispute process — it's all at nar.bsvblockchain.org. Compare that to the backroom "rough consensus" of other chains where rules change based on who shows up to a call. Clear rules, published publicly, that bind everyone equally — that's transparency. That's the opposite of operating in secret. On "political weaponization": You've got it backwards. The NAR exists precisely to make weaponization impossible. When the rules are anchored to an external, unchangeable standard (the original Bitcoin protocol) there's nothing to weaponize. No one gets to rewrite the rules because they don't like the outcome. The Association doesn't have that power. The NAR explicitly removes it. What you're proposing - turning the Association into an open charity with democratic governance - would actually increase the attack surface. Now you've got factions, voting blocs, whoever organizes best wins. That's how protocols get captured. That's how politics gets introduced. Rules-based systems resist capture. Political systems invite it. I, and many others, supported BSV precisely to prevent this possibility from happening. And I will continue to ensure it doesn't happen. On "weak institutions": You know there's new leadership. You know the team. You know they're qualified, they're capable, and they're working on exactly the kinds of structural improvements you're describing - funding diversification, stakeholder engagement, all of it. You could have picked up the phone to talk about any of this. You could have had this conversation privately with people who would have welcomed it. Instead, you chose a public thread framing the Association as "the devil" at the exact moment when the ecosystem is trying to establish credibility with regulators and legislators. That's a choice. And it's worth asking who that choice actually serves. We're at a moment where real progress is happening. The CLARITY Act is being debated. Serious conversations are happening in DC with an administration that is outwardly pro-blockchain. BSV is finally getting recognized for what it is — the original Bitcoin protocol, the scalable one, the regulation-friendly one. Public infighting over governance philosophy at this exact moment serves one purpose: it undermines all of that progress. If the concern is resourcing and funding — let's talk about that directly. But framing a competent legal framework as "the devil having authority" while the entire ecosystem is trying to establish credibility with regulators is counterproductive. This isn't the time.
Babbage | BRC100@ProjectBabbage

The big problem with all this, which is also the core reason the Metanet Foundation and every single BSV-based project ever conceived will always be encumbered... is that the restriction EXPLICITLY incorporates NAR by reference, giving the BSVA ultimate authority over everything on-chain. You alone can order all nodes to cut off their fellow chefs, and lock them out of the kitchen. Also... you alone can change the NAR or update it whenever you want. I am not saying that you would, but you could, and that matters. A lot. The problem, and I told you this weeks ago in private... is that the Association alone has the power to decide who gets to participate and cut people off. Ban them. The stated goal is to remove bad actors and comply with law. That's good. That's why I support NAR. But it's very powerful, and it's a weak point. You should recognize that, openly, publicly. In the wrong hands, NAR is exactly the kind of political justification that could be used to co-opt and capture the BSV Blockchain from within, and/or create "mining cartel" behavior. So as the wielder of this power you create a massive liability at the center of the BSV network in your current form. We need to work together to mitigate that liability and make the political weaponization of NAR / "Open BSV" IMPOSSIBLE. And that has to be done openly, even though it is the biggest risk I will ever take. Right now you are, with all due respect, a "weak institution" in the political sense. You have one funder. You do not operate under a public charter. You do not have a board reflecting all the kinds of voices of key stakeholders like miners, enterprise, regulators, and builders/infra. Yet, via NAR, you are acting as a key nexus of control over the network. And via Open BSV, you are implicitly tying all your tooling and applications up with that core problem. That makes us look immature and non-adoptable. It's hurting my bottom line and hurting everyone else's too. It's been hurting all of us, for years, and now it is time for a change. This is NOT just me, not just my company. @johncalhooon, @_b1nary_, @LightBSV, and others know this has been a long time coming. And @kurtwuckertjr said he'd sit on a board with GorillaPool if invited. I've also heard from a few lesser-known BSVers who may be interested in putting some money forward. Again, it is time for a change. Let's keep NAR + Open BSV for Teranode (maybe Apache for other stuff...) BUT we NEED to make the political weaponization of NAR / stewardship decisions in general impossible to achieve, while also solving your resourcing problems. — So that organizations from across academia, enterprise, government, dev groups, and all use-cases are free to become members, as they can with joining LF, CNCF, or W3C. — So that no single donor, backer or interest group can EVER have the leverage to starve the organization of its working capital, team and legitimacy. — So that budgets for work on libraries, overlays, industry standards, hackathons, education and outreach are put forward, voted upon, and approved through public processes, not behind closed doors. — So that NO ONE can change the NAR without input from all stakeholders, and those responsible for signing NAR directives are elected at regular intervals by an Assembly comprising all stakeholders. And, so that EVERYONE in the world can know how these decisions are made, who is in favor, and who against. That's what it means to go from a weak institution to a strong, healthy, diverse, resilient one. So will you at least release some sort of formal public statement acknowledging that this is what we are working towards? And can we find a way to get you some more funds from outside parties, so that we can both re-enlist the help of our friends? And for the reasons I've stated, this can't just be a "go form Metanet Foundation" copout. I wish that strategy could work, but glomming more foundation-style entities atop a "weak institution" foundation of sand wouldn't earn any more trust or goodwill, from anyone. Enterprise buyers are watching right now, and they know that. I hope we can make some stuff happen for the long term. You are very talented and have done more than anyone for our success in a lot of ways, Siggi. I want you to get recognized for all your work, and be rewarded for your worth. We all deserve that. It doesn't happen in a vacuum, and we're going through this growing pain for good reasons. Baby steps. And P.s. for the record: I am not opposing Chronicle...

English
37
55
188
14.7K
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
@missdarkimova I think you look amazing because you don’t show any of tattoos! Good for you!
English
0
0
1
245
Goth Girl Anna
Goth Girl Anna@missdarkimova·
i think i look pretty average..
Goth Girl Anna tweet media
English
375
581
25.1K
1.5M
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
Kate, you are dangerous. And I’ll tell you why! Everything in crypto is a scam because it’s owned by someone else. You have no control on the things you invest your time and money into. Even worse, you promote stuff that is not quite right in addition to them being controlled by 3rd parties. You should listen to Lucille Ball and own your own business, and take everyone to the cleaners like CSW did! In 6-12 months your next big thing will disappear and you will never hear from that opportunity yet another one run by the same procurer will pop up with a different name! I’m rolling my eyes. 👀
English
4
0
0
148
KryptoKate
KryptoKate@Kate_L_Mosso·
How many investors do you think I found in one day in San Francisco? On to day two… 🐉
KryptoKate tweet media
English
23
4
125
3.9K
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
@BullRushClub Can't wait. Let's see if Craig's assistant is going to be in it? (Uyen T. Nguyen appears in the Wright/Kleiman/COPA record as an associate or collaborator connected to some of Wright’s company and trust narratives) Tell it as it is Craig😝
English
1
0
3
100
CryptoClub
CryptoClub@BullRushClub·
📈Check this leak and feel the scale: Killing Satoshi – $90 MILLION budget, Casey Affleck as Craig Wright, Doug Liman behind the camera (Bourne Identity & Edge of Tomorrow guy), Pete Davidson + Wonder Woman actress in the mix. This isn’t some indie flick. This is a big-budget Hollywood thriller about the attacks on Wright, the court battles, and the war for the original Bitcoin=BitcoinSV $BSV 🎯🔥 The budget, cast, and director say one thing loud and clear: mainstream Hollywood is now taking Bitcoin SV and Wright’s story DEAD SERIOUS 💥📈🚀 Trailer / info link (if available) or leaked screenshots here.What do you think – is this the moment BSV finally breaks into mass consciousness? RT if you want this movie to make waves. Follow for real-time updates on this insanity💥 #BSV #BitcoinSV #KillingSatoshi #Hollywood #CaseyAffleck #DougLiman #RealBitcoin #SatoshiStory
CryptoClub tweet media
English
9
33
112
3.6K
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
@sakhil_ai If you have this secret and are making this money, then why do you share it? Why not just give your profits away? Why ask for like and tweet? This is BS and we know it!
English
0
1
2
223
Sakhil Khan
Sakhil Khan@sakhil_ai·
Earned $43,800 With OpenClaw While I Was Sleeping. My bot woke me up at 3:47 AM. I typed "yes" half asleep. Woke up to +$43,800. I've made the exact step-by-step setup guide for this timezone arbitrage system. You need: Claude + laptop. Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1- Comment "OpenClaw" 2- Like and Retweet 3- Follow me @sakhil_ai (so i can DM you) The bot hunts timezone arbitrage 24/7. Watches Japanese, European, Australian, Middle East news feeds. Finds markets where outcome is already confirmed overseas but US traders haven't updated prices yet. 9 days running this setup. Never thought a bot would wake me up to make money. Polymarket is 70% American traders. World events don't care about EST. While you sleep, markets resolve. That's the edge. It's stupid simple. You Must Follow me👤 @sakhil_ai , so i can send you DM.
English
831
542
1.3K
158.7K
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
@saniyafatma1278 You could pay for your half of it. You could paint it. You could move out. The choice is yours and btw, I like it. It keeps your dogs in and gives your cats a challenge!
English
0
0
0
1.1K
Sara Mary ⭐❤️
Sara Mary ⭐❤️@saniyafatma1278·
I seriously need some help here. My neighbor just put up this massive metal fence right along our property line and I’m honestly pretty upset about it. It completely changed the whole feel of my driveway and now it looks like I’m pulling into some kind of industrial corridor. I had no idea this was even happening until the thing was already built. It feels like my space just got boxed in overnight. What on earth can I do in a situation like this???
Sara Mary ⭐❤️ tweet media
English
8.1K
81
779
1.1M
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
@johncalhooon @GavinMehl Just click on the video transcript and you have it there, copy it and put it into chatgpt and create an ebook or summary quickly. Good or good?
English
1
0
2
39
John
John@johncalhooon·
I've been using the x402 Agency Whisper agent to transcribe videos on YouTube and Twitter to get alpha when I don't have the time to watch! Less than a penny each, Claude Code/Codex then turns it into an article for me ready to read on any device. Some cool examples:
John tweet media
English
5
5
19
1.3K
Gavin Mehl
Gavin Mehl@GavinMehl·
I joke about walking into a fraternity party with a camera crew and owning the room, but the real flex is understanding how these systems work before everyone else. Watch the short. youtube.com/shorts/pgW6yJF…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
1
0
4
547
Tony Morgan
Tony Morgan@BSVtony·
The bsv community is larger than ever. The lower the price goes, the larger it gets, the more people buy. With a capped supply, this only ends one way. Within 2 years you won't be able to buy for less than $1,200.
English
12
21
120
3.2K
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
@gamaroff Centbee was awesome, but you need to create a product or a service that I can promote to earn money online that has real world demand. You need to give people a reason to use your app, and I wish you good luck!
English
0
0
2
15
Lorien Gamaroff
Lorien Gamaroff@gamaroff·
My belief in the transformative power of Bitcoin SV remains unwavering. I am convinced that it will make a considerable impact in the global payments industry. I am rebuilding and look forward to announcing a new bsv-based mobile money product❤️
Centbee@Centbee

Important Announcement: Centbee will be closing on April 1, 2026. Please withdraw all your BSV from the app before this date. For assistance, contact support@centbee.com. We thank our users & backers for their support. Read the full statement: centbee.com/blog

English
37
44
220
10.3K
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
What real world cases are you talking about? Like Starbucks accepting payment via BSV? I’d like to see that! But it seems that @CsTominaga and @CalvinAyre are not in interested in mainstream adoption, true or true? Have they dropped the ball and are more interested in patents, 🤣 and institutional investors. 🥳 In my experience with building group numbers there will be big fish too, even whales, but you need a product or service that is in demand. Right now I don’t need BSV because it does nothing for me… and BTW ChatGPT said Centbee is closing in April 1. And I went to YouTube and HandCash has not added a video to their YouTube channel in the past 2 years. What total apathy! Good luck boys!
English
1
0
2
81
Dariusz Paluszkiewicz
Dariusz Paluszkiewicz@_0xdaras_·
The technology is there. What BSV needs now is adoption. We also need a more active community that educates people about blockchain and real-world use cases. That’s why @00pawel_ and I decided to start speaking publicly about Bitcoin. I’ve also noticed some growth of BSV on X, which is great, but it’s still too small. What we also need are people working in other fields such as programming, cybersecurity, and networking who introduce BSV to their communities. Also watch out for something big coming to my YouTube channel (link in bio), where I focus on networking and cybersecurity. I only started recently, but the channel is constantly growing. Let’s see how we can help the BSV ecosystem grow. @BSVAssociation @nChainGlobal #BuildOnBSV #BSV #Bitcoin #Blockchain #Developers
Dariusz Paluszkiewicz tweet media
English
7
25
101
4.2K
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
@bsvsimp Satoshi, Turkey chop and Mr Bodog.
English
0
0
1
41
BSV Social Impact
BSV Social Impact@bsvsimp·
Only true Bit Coin OGs can name these 3 absolute legends! 😍
BSV Social Impact tweet media
English
16
7
47
1.4K
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
What would you put in this space
Science girl tweet media
English
697
45
533
141.6K
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
@ohhanxiety Leaving a legacy to the world, like Trump freeing the Iranian people. Do you agree?
English
1
0
1
159
annie
annie@ohhanxiety·
Be honest
annie tweet media
English
576
5
121
17.4K
Tutorman
Tutorman@iTutorman·
@webmasterdave @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @neiltyson If you are not an experiencer then sorry for your loss! There must be some truth in the fact that millions of people know what they saw, heard, felt, smelt, downloaded, communicated, and believe! Go and watch CNN and vegetate!
English
1
0
0
42