Udita Pal 🧂

16K posts

Udita Pal 🧂

Udita Pal 🧂

@i_Udita

@saltpe_ founder · yc w22 · forbes 30u30 · fluent in data, f1, fashion & fun facts · dog mom · blr 📍 · temp content stuff: @thineAI @trykitchenai

Bangalore Katılım Ağustos 2013
323 Takip Edilen15.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Udita Pal 🧂
Udita Pal 🧂@i_Udita·
Currently traveling and my parents randomly showed up at the station at 9 AM—just for five minutes—to hug me, kiss me, and slip me some cash. Made this 29-year-old woman cry like a baby. 🥹😭❤️ I don’t deserve my parents 😢
Udita Pal 🧂 tweet media
English
155
126
5.5K
130.5K
Ismael
Ismael@ismaelsevi87·
Llevo toda la vida viendo estos coches de colores pensando 'ojalá formar parte de eso algún día', y ya no es un deseo. Muy contento de poder contaros que he pasado a trabajar para Williams F1 como diseñador gráfico y artista 3D freelance :)
Ismael tweet media
Español
76
53
1.4K
28.9K
Udita Pal 🧂
Udita Pal 🧂@i_Udita·
The most honest thing about this piece is what it doesn't say: that no app, no system, no second brain fixes the underlying tension between a biological mind and an information environment that was never built for it. We've been treating the symptom for years. This is about the cause.
Siddhartha Saxena@siddsax

x.com/i/article/2045…

English
0
1
7
267
Udita Pal 🧂 retweetledi
Reuben Das
Reuben Das@reubendasx·
Started my TouchDesigner journey w @ThineAI keeping me company and providing inspiration. Extremely satisfying when the animations react to midi + piano.
Reuben Das tweet media
English
2
2
15
394
Udita Pal 🧂
Udita Pal 🧂@i_Udita·
Her insta is taste.guaranteed 👀
English
0
0
0
52
Udita Pal 🧂
Udita Pal 🧂@i_Udita·
My mom created her cooking channel last year. She finds / invents dishes, records them, edits them, find captions on chatgpt and post. All because she is passionate 🙌😭💗
Udita Pal 🧂 tweet media
English
1
0
5
218
Harnidh Kaur
Harnidh Kaur@harnidhish·
Got to HOLD my BOOK for the FIRST TIME in my HANDS and SCREAMED AND ALMOST HAD A PANIC ATTACK!!! Preorder now!!!! amzn.in/d/0ccy42t0
Harnidh Kaur tweet media
English
10
0
58
2K
Udita Pal 🧂 retweetledi
Siddhartha Saxena
Siddhartha Saxena@siddsax·
mad respect to them for running races they know they've lost :) flying w @thineai
English
17
19
103
10.2K
Udita Pal 🧂
Udita Pal 🧂@i_Udita·
“how can you forget” sire, i forgot my tiffin as a kid and my laptop as an adult. forgetting is literally the one thing i’ve been consistent at my whole life
English
2
1
11
362
Kale me maybe 🪲🤧
It’s been difficult to share anything about her and to process my grief publicly but today I miss her SO much and I just felt like I needed to continue to share my beautiful girl on my timeline ♥️ She is my whole world.
Kale me maybe 🪲🤧 tweet mediaKale me maybe 🪲🤧 tweet mediaKale me maybe 🪲🤧 tweet media
English
17
1
183
5.7K
Manan Agarwal
Manan Agarwal@manan_0308·
What on earth is this now, Claude?
Manan Agarwal tweet media
English
4
0
12
1.8K
Udita Pal 🧂
Udita Pal 🧂@i_Udita·
From sending blurry pictures of class notes on WhatsApp in 2013 to screensharing on it in 2026 to help my mom with upi payments. Same app, completely different version of me.
English
0
0
16
841
Udita Pal 🧂 retweetledi
Siddhartha Saxena
Siddhartha Saxena@siddsax·
LangChain shipped Deep Agents last week. @harisonchase is arguing the harness IS the product - built-in task planning, sub-agent spawning, middleware, hooks, the works. Garry Tan dropped "Thin Harness, Fat Skills" the same week. Opposite thesis: the harness should be as thin as possible. I'm firmly in Garry's camp. Here's why. Every piece of logic you put in the harness is reasoning you're taking away from the model. 40 tool definitions. God-tools with 5-second round trips. Brittle prompt chains babysitting the model at every step. You haven't built an intelligent agent. You've built a cage around one. This was defensible two years ago. GPT-3.5 couldn't follow multi-step instructions. Even through Claude 3.5 Sonnet, models genuinely needed guardrails for basic tool use. But with the current generation - Opus 4, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 - if you're still hardcoding orchestration logic, you're actively capping what the model can do. The real test: what happens on model upgrade day? Fat harness → your product breaks. You spend weeks re-engineering scaffolding to accommodate capabilities the model already has. Thin harness → your product gets better automatically. No ceiling on reasoning. The upgrade flows straight into better outcomes. This is the architecture that separates the 2x engineer from the 100x engineer. Same model. Same API key. Same context window. What thin harness actually looks like in practice: > Fat skills: judgment in markdown. Domain knowledge, heuristics, the fuzzy human stuff. Make these as rich as possible. > Fat code: deterministic operations. Auth, validation, DB writes. Things that must be right every time. > Thin harness: just the loop. Context in, model reasons, tool executes, result back. That's it. @hwchase17 is right that memory matters. But memory is a skill problem and a data problem - not an orchestration problem. You don't need hooks and middleware intercepting every model call. You need well-structured skills that tell the model how to use its memory. The best AI engineering looks almost too simple. Boring infra. Judgment in markdown. A model you actually let think.
Garry Tan@garrytan

This is the simplest distillation of what I have learned about agentic engineering this year Push smart fuzzy operations humans do into markdown skills. Fat skills. Push must-be-perfect deterministic operations into code. Fat code. The harness? Keep it thin.

English
4
4
15
1.2K