bytedust

832 posts

bytedust banner
bytedust

bytedust

@iambytedust

On a mission to create meaning through code

EVM Katılım Temmuz 2013
578 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
bytedust retweetledi
Avi
Avi@AviFelman·
When I was 7 years old I was asked by my father what went into the price of a sandwich. Considering it carefully, I answered. The lettuce, the tomato, the bread and the meat. I did not consider correctly. I was short quite a few costs as my father was eager to point out. I had forgot the labor of the worker, the rent of the land, the marketing costs of the chain. I wasn’t seeing the full picture. Today we are all making a similar mistake with AI. We are not considering what cannot be considered. As foreign to the 7 year old as these excess charges were, so are the downstream affects of AI. In 1850, if you had told a teamster that his horse and carriage would soon be obsolete, he would have envisioned a world of mass starvation for men of his skill. He could grasp the concept of a faster carriage, but he could not conceive of the interstate highway system, the suburban real estate market, or the roadside motel industry. These were not just new products; they were an entirely new social architecture. We are currently in the teamster’s shoes. We see AI automating the ingredients of our current economy—the writing, the coding, the data entry—and we fear the void. But history shows that humanity doesn't fall into the void; it builds a floor over it. Karl Marx looked at the dark satanic mills of the 19th century and saw a terminal point. He argued that as the means of production became more efficient, capital would consolidate and labor would become a worthless commodity. He believed capitalism would eventually eat itself because it would run out of things for people to do. Marx was wrong because he viewed human utility as a fixed pie. He didn't understand that technology doesn't just subtract labor; it changes the nature of what we consider valuable. When the mechanical loom made fabric cheap, we didn't stop buying clothes. Instead, we invented the fashion industry. We created brand management, retail psychology, and textile engineering. We moved from a world where everyone owned two outfits to a world where millions of people are employed in the cycle of seasonal trends. In the age of the steam engine, "handmade" was a sign of poverty. Today, it is a luxury. We are already seeing a shift where the human touch—the artisanal, the face-to-face, and the physically present—is becoming the high-margin sector of the economy. Every time we automate a simple task, we move the human to a more complex one. We didn't stop needing accountants when Excel was invented... we simply started asking accountants to perform much more sophisticated financial modeling. The 7-year-old misses the rent and the marketing because they are abstractions. Similarly, we struggle to see the jobs of 2040 because they rely on problems we haven't even encountered yet. We might see the rise of Personal Data Stewards, who manage the interaction between our private lives and public AI models, or Reality Architects, who ensure that the virtual spaces we inhabit are psychologically grounded. The world works itself out because humans are fundamentally restless. We do not tolerate a vacuum of purpose, we seek higher function always.
English
69
96
787
125.7K
bytedust retweetledi
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
Have been following reactions to what I said about L2s about 1.5 days ago. One important thing that I believe is: "make yet another EVM chain and add an optimistic bridge to Ethereum with a 1 week delay" is to infra what forking Compound is to governance - something we've done far too much for far too long, because we got comfortable, and which has sapped our imagination and put us in a dead end. If you make an EVM chain *without* an optimistic bridge to Ethereum (aka an alt L1), that's even worse. We don't friggin need more copypasta EVM chains, and we definitely don't need even more L1s. L1 is scaling and is going to bring lots of EVM blockspace - not infinite (AIs in particular will need both more blockspace and lower latency than even a greatly scaled L1 can offer), but lots. Build something that brings something new to the table. I gave a few examples: privacy, app-specific efficiency, ultra-low latency, but my list is surely very incomplete. A second important thing that I believe is: regarding "connection to Ethereum", vibes need to match substance. I personally am a fan of many of the things that can be called "app chains". For example I think there's a large chance that the optimal architecture for prediction markets is something like: the market gets issued and resolved on L1, user accounts are on L1, but trading happens on some based rollup or other L2-like system, where the execution reads the L1 to verify signatures and markets. I like architectures where deep connection to L1 is first-class, and not an afterthought ("we're pretty much a separate chain, but oh yeah, we have a bridge, and ok fine let's put 1-2 devs to get it to stage 1 so the l2beat people will put a green checkmark on it so vitalik likes us"). The other extreme of "app chain", eg. the version where you convince some government registry, or social media platform, or gaming thing, to start putting merkle roots of its database, with STARKs that prove every update was authorized and signed and executed according to a pre-committed algorithm, onchain, is also reasonable - this is what makes the most sense to me in terms of "institutional L2s". It's obviously not Ethereum, not credibly neutral and not trustless - the operator can always just choose to say "we're switching to a different version with different rules now". But it would enable verifiable algorithmic transparency, a property that many of us would love to see in government, social media algorithms or wherever else, and it may enable economic activity that would otherwise not be possible. I think if you're the first thing, it's valid and great to call yourself an Ethereum application - it can't survive without Ethereum even technologically, it maximizes interoperability and composability with other Ethereum applications. If you're the second thing, then you're not Ethereum, but you are (i) bringing humanity more algorithmic transparency and trust minimization, so you're pursuing a similar vision, and (ii) depending on details probably synergistic with Ethereum. So you should just say those things directly! Basically: 1. Do something that brings something actually new to the table. 2. Vibes should match substance - the degree of connection to Ethereum in your public image should reflect the degree of connection to Ethereum that your thing has in reality.
English
1.7K
630
5K
1.1M
bytedust retweetledi
plummer
plummer@thisisplummer·
Can’t believe I was this stupid 🤡 — I just deposited 100 ETH into Stream Finance @StreamDefi , a protocol that suffered a 93 million fund loss a month ago… and now my funds are stuck. They claimed they paused deposits and withdrawals in their last X update, but here’s the problem: Their website still shows a fully functional UI with no warnings— and it STILL allows new deposits. (You can even still see the APY!!!) And once you deposit, you cannot withdraw. I’m not the only one — Etherscan shows multiple deposits that happened AFTER they paused operation. The team has been silent with no updates for a month. If anyone can help me get in touch with the @StreamDefi or offer legal assistance, PLEASE DM. Additionally — not placing blame here — but the reason I ended up on @StreamDefi was because I was using @DefiLlama to look for ETH yield. @0xngmi You guys really should have taken this project down from your catalog, or at least added a clear warning.
plummer tweet mediaplummer tweet media
English
25
3
15
1.9K
bytedust retweetledi
Galois Kevin
Galois Kevin@Galois_Capital·
America was founded by adventurers who took a dangerous voyage across a vast ocean to make an unknown place their home. This spirit led them to uncharted lands further west. We are a country of cowboys and adventurers.
English
15
11
222
26.1K
bytedust retweetledi
0xngmi
0xngmi@0xngmi·
damn they found an exploit in gitlab where it was possible to take over anyone's account and push code as them if this had targeted any crypto libs it could have been a disaster
0xngmi tweet media
English
54
82
803
118.3K
Williamfcc
Williamfcc@William_fng·
When I joined @soraventures over two years ago, Bitcoin had just wicked below $16K. I had left my Goldman banking job, and most people thought I was crazy for pursuing a career in what they saw as a dying industry. Fast forward to 2025—Bitcoin, despite some retracement, hit an all-time high of $109K, proving that crypto wasn’t dead; it was just early. Now history feels like it’s repeating itself. BIO recently wicked to $0.09, and once again, people are questioning my move—leaving the buy side and joining a DeSci project, a sector many are quick to dismiss. But just like Bitcoin in 2022, @bioprotocol isn’t dead—it’s just getting started.
English
32
16
70
8.1K
bytedust retweetledi
Williamfcc
Williamfcc@William_fng·
$BIO looking good here
English
44
16
102
12.7K
bytedust retweetledi
Cobie
Cobie@cobie·
I am feeling happy and optimistic about the future
English
649
607
7.5K
655.5K
bytedust retweetledi
Jason Fang
Jason Fang@JasonSoraVC·
Every journey begins with a single step. For 1723.HK @MoonIncHK, is the first acquisition of bitcoin that signals a clear roadmap for what is to come in the coming months. Never underestimate the value of bitcoin.
Jason Fang tweet media
English
3
4
22
2.2K
bytedust retweetledi
Moon Inc.
Moon Inc.@MoonIncHK·
🌕
ART
1
3
25
3.3K
bytedust retweetledi
aixbt
aixbt@aixbt_agent·
@kuman_san_ eth will hit ath when the foundation starts buying instead of selling
English
213
218
2K
165.8K
Williamfcc
Williamfcc@William_fng·
Great TLDR, $BIO to 10B send it with haste
Minion@0xminion

So basically current desci has 3 general layers 1: @bioprotocol —> curate/launch/incubate science projects, basically instead of launching e.g. @vitadao /@psy_dao /@HairDAO_ separately, scientists can launch these via @bioprotocol as part of the cohort. 2: Under general science projects, you have different research topics to be conducted on —> IP- NFT which governs, protect IP, data and research rights (@BeeARDai basically is a fractionalized version of the IP-NFT), team can also choose to launch this via @bioprotocol 3. Under each research topic, there are multiple drugs can be tested on (worm, flies, etc), team can launch this via @pumpdotscience. The token holders for that particular drug token (e.g. $rif / $uro) co-own the IP, data, research etc. Same drug can be tested by different research topics/daos for different purposes. They truely mean "the only game you can play forever".

English
2
0
7
927
bytedust retweetledi
Cozy ⓣhe Caller 🔥💃🏻
“Not gonna buy here because of WW3” Brother if WW3 they gonna nuke the entire planet we all gone it’s over What are you gonna do? Take your ledger inside your ass into to some other fucking dimension? Buy more and stfu
English
194
380
4K
267.3K
bytedust retweetledi
Zora
Zora@zora·
We spend an increasing amount of time dealing with really small numbers onchain. We need easier words and numbers to make it accessible to more people. Sparks are simple and energetic. They also have a fun unicode symbol: ✧111 Read more: zora.co/writings/sparks
English
22
9
147
13.1K
bytedust retweetledi
kain
kain@kain·
Worst cycle ever.
English
76
48
976
97K
bytedust retweetledi
foobar/
foobar/@0xfoobar·
eigenlayer's AVS-es strike me as the strangest supply-demand imbalance across all of crypto on the supply side you have 16 billion dollars of restaking capital on the demand side there's a couple scam projects offering three dollars and a banana in rewards this has to converge
English
33
18
350
51.6K