farz

8K posts

farz banner
farz

farz

@iamhtml

Bangkok, Thailand Katılım Haziran 2008
2.1K Takip Edilen496 Takipçiler
Aaron Paul
Aaron Paul@_aaronpaul25·
@theholyengineer @madebycol Yeah - but I'm not gonna tell anybody what it is cause she wants it to be stealth. I'll respect that because of our previous relationship.
English
2
0
10
915
Noah Ryan
Noah Ryan@NoahRyanCo·
This app rated us 50/100 because we are “untested” when we have a section full of COAs on our site. This product is garbage at best. Bordering predatory. Nobody benefits from this except the developers. Type of stuff that should get you blacklisted
Noah Ryan tweet media
Farmer Ash@strong_sistas

Our corn- & soy-free, drug-free, mobile pasture-raised eggs from small regenerative farms score a 38/100 on @oasishealthapp, while Costco’s industrial “pasture-raised” corn- & soy-fed eggs rank at the top. I believe we provide some of the highest quality eggs you can find, and have spent years developing a custom corn-, & soy-free low-PUFA feed to intentionally lower PUFA levels in our eggs. And many of our customers tell us they can finally tolerate eggs again after switching to ours. These kinds of simplified food “ratings” have real consequences for small farms and small businesses. We’ve already had customers cancel subscriptions because of this “score”. If apps are going to publicly rate food quality, they need to include real agricultural context (feed composition, farming practices, ingredient sourcing, and actual on-farm experience) not just broad nutritional assumptions slightly disconnected from how food is actually produced.

English
72
40
983
253.4K
Anthony Gustin
Anthony Gustin@dranthonygustin·
Kettle and Fire: 1/100 because it has bone broth, cinnamon, celery Oreos: 28/100
Anthony Gustin tweet mediaAnthony Gustin tweet media
English
139
64
2.9K
669.6K
Cormac
Cormac@cormachayden_·
Recently we shared two inaccurate data listings with inflated heavy metal results for LMNT and Premier Protein. We have since deleted these posts to stop the spread of inaccurate information and fixed the listings in our app. All of our efforts are committed to adding layers of verification for lab data, reviewing every product listing on Oasis and building out our team of scientists and engineers. The corrected figures: LMNT Citrus Salt lead detected at 0.0773 µg/serving (15% of the strictest reference level), and Premier Protein Chocolate lead detected at 0.380 µg/serving (76% of that level). I want to thank our community for flagging this issue so we could correct it. Your feedback highlighted key flaws in our process which we are acting on now. We will be back with updates on the changes implemented. In the meantime, thank you for holding us accountable
Cormac tweet mediaCormac tweet media
English
95
4
113
115.2K
Hugh Geiger
Hugh Geiger@geigster·
@dranthonygustin @oasishealthapp @eatlineage IMO it's vibe coded bullshit that they've mass scraped from another source and processed in a weekend with an LLM. They have no actual idea of what's in their database. It's negligence + fraud/misrepresentation.
English
2
1
21
773
Anthony Gustin
Anthony Gustin@dranthonygustin·
More ridiculousness from @oasishealthapp on our @eatlineage products... 1. Chocolate bar is scored as 63/100. But there's zero reason for why? Everything in the app says it is green? 2. Mixed berry bar is scored at 60/100, but why? Let's see... 3. Organic almond butter. There is NO almond butter in this bar. None. 4. Linoleic acid at 57 milligrams. There are 4g of fat in the bar, meaning we have 1.4% linoleic acid. Is that bad? Of course not, grass-fed tallow and butter have 3% linoleic acid. It is is a normally occurring fat and 1% is astronomically low. You basically have to eat zero fat to have 0%. Yet, our tallow and many others rank 90-100/100 yet have more % in linoleic acid. 5. Palmitic acid and caproic acid, two healthy fatty acids, measured in micrograms! Same thing applies here. Further, there are plenty of data showing benefit of these fatty acids, but we don't claim this on our product page because they are in micrograms here and that would be retarded. Absolutely no reason for this to be a negative score. 6. Our chocolate protein powder has two listings, one 90/100, and the other 35/100 (!!!) again for no reason here other than it is "untested." 7. We have two listings for creatine, one is 90/100 and another 20/100. Same product. No justification. 8. Again, our meat sticks are rated as 67-70/100 because they are "untested." By whom? Them? Us? Fun fact: we do test and list our findings on our website. Clean product. See for yourself. This is the amount of absurdity with just one of my businesses. I am not sure how anyone can take this brand seriously at this point, and the amount of harm experienced for much smaller brands can be devastating. In the interest of trying to push for more clarity and being helpful, here are some suggestions for them on improving their app: 1. Having zero transparency around what makes the score is hurting your reputation, massively. When products are otherwise fully "green" when you click in, but rated 63/100, for literally zero documented reason, is massively harmful to brands. Most people probably won't click in. They'll just see the score and not buy. Not only that, there's no consistency. "Untested" for some of our products apparently justify a 35/100, while others are only mercifully spared at 63/100. Have better and clearer standards on what actually makes up a score instead of what seems to be a mix of AI bots and subjectivity. 2. Multiple listings per product with one being at 90 and one 20 with no rational is insane and goes to show the "rigor" that is being applied with their AI agents. Clean up multiple listings. Easily doable. 3. The false "untested" moniker issue has come up with plenty of other brands. We literally have the test results on the product page. There is no detailing on what untested means in this case, yet they dock people for providing testing results on the product page itself. Maybe gate the score and allow the brand to have a dashboard they can point to, and if they refuse to upload testing data, then you can have some consistent scoring or a tag for untested. 4. Phantom ingredient inclusions are unconscionable. Getting docked for having ingredients in our product that aren't there is absurd. I don't even know a suggestion here other than massively better QC on the vibe coded slop. 5. Dock on score for literally no reason. Some products don't have the "untested" tag, nor are there any red highlights when you open the product. There is zero rationale. Have some sort of score contribution system where you understand the score? Ex. you click the score and you can see exactly why it is what it is. Can have a neutral starting point for every product until you have data. Ex. every product starts at 75 baseline and gets docked if negative, but additional points up to 100 if 3rd party tested. 6. No limits actually explained in areas that get you docked. E.g. the linoleic acid, when you click in, doesn't say when or why it achieves a negative score. Is it total amount? On what? Per serving? Per 100g? Is it % basis? Have an objective way to apply negative score and apply it to EVERY product that has that (ex. tallows would be more negative than our bars, but none of them have this). Honestly the best way forward would be to back off the Bali hustler "isn't it sweet how much money I'm making off this app!" vibe, put the app on pause until you fix these issues, and if not, the likelihood of a litany of lawsuits increases dramatically by the day. cc @cormachayden_
Anthony Gustin tweet mediaAnthony Gustin tweet mediaAnthony Gustin tweet mediaAnthony Gustin tweet media
English
20
12
310
42.4K
James Murphy
James Murphy@jamestmurphy_·
@oasishealthapp has now deleted the posts and issued two redactions, saying “we’ll do better next time” I had conversations with them over a year ago, assuming best intent when they started with this BS. It’s only gotten worse since then. This protein post got 3.5MM views before deletion. The same day the founder and head of growth are pumping their fists posting record revenue and app download numbers. The next day the correction comes. The correction gets a few thousand views. Dozens of people saying “wft, I threw that brand in the trash” You don’t get an out, again. You don’t get to defame brands for years now, collect millions of dollars in revenue, and say “my bad” when no one hears it. Receipts. Photos in order: - Protein defamation post. 3.5MM views (twitter alone). - Founder posting “record day.” - Correction post. 7K views. These guys like dramatic statistics. Oasis has a 500x fold ratio in false allegations to honest reporting. (3.5M views vs 7K) Thats 10,000x higher than the safety level set by any reasonable person for honest and credible work. For every one person that sees the redaction, 500 people are throwing the product in the trash and telling their friends about it too. Oasis, you better start spending every dollar of that defamation-made money on promoting these redaction posts.
James Murphy tweet mediaJames Murphy tweet mediaJames Murphy tweet mediaJames Murphy tweet media
English
16
23
180
24.9K
BLAIRE WHITE
BLAIRE WHITE@BlaireWhite·
Holy shit why is this man on Fox News wearing a literal CIA mask
BLAIRE WHITE tweet media
English
1.7K
5.3K
54.8K
21.1M
Phantom Stays
Phantom Stays@PhantomStays·
my boy met this shawty yesterday playing padel & today she moved into the spare room in our villa Only in bali
Phantom Stays tweet media
English
42
7
1.3K
206.8K
farz
farz@iamhtml·
@r_marked Yup. I use CMD X to cut cause backspace is too far
English
0
0
0
23
YOKEY DOT PARTY
YOKEY DOT PARTY@yokeyparty·
@oasishealthapp lol sorry but this is total bullshit. i downloaded your app, looked up premier protein on it and you are citing @ConsumerReports for the source of your testing. CR says .38mcg of lead. Why are you saying exactly 41x that number? @premierprotein y'all see this?
YOKEY DOT PARTY tweet media
English
3
2
51
27.4K
farz
farz@iamhtml·
@jonwu_ Nah. People that start off with digital are easily disheartened from the craft because everything they shoot looks awful. Being trigger happy does not make one happy. Film will drill basic concepts into you and you get to hold your results. It’s an amazing feeling.
English
1
0
2
712
Jon Wu
Jon Wu@jonwu_·
idk who needs to hear this but stop trying to get into film just buy a fujifilm camera it's cute to tote around a vintage nikon. it's not cute to spend $2 or $3 a shot when you're just getting into photography get a fujifilm. it doesn't matter which one, if you like it you can upgrade later x100 x-t5 x-t50 target $1,000 for camera + lens. sounds like a lot but that's only 300 shots on a film camera. 10 rolls. add a few film simulation recipes. start with "Reggie's Portra" (google it). follow the steps. punch it into the camera. set it to auto and just blast away. you'll see immediately that it's vastly superior to the iPhone camera fujis are especially good for people photos, the color rendering on skin is magical your wife will especially appreciate this purchase. this is an approved hobby good luck
Jon Wu tweet mediaJon Wu tweet mediaJon Wu tweet mediaJon Wu tweet media
English
60
88
3K
363.4K
Jack Mitchell
Jack Mitchell@jack_mitchell01·
@blakeandersonw Bro there’s just no way two 14 year olds built a better vibe code tool than Anthropic No hate sick to see ambitious young men but still
English
3
0
8
337
farz
farz@iamhtml·
@AndrewPrifer Electron ? Can we set flags in chromium in electron ?
English
0
0
0
328
Andrew Prifer
Andrew Prifer@AndrewPrifer·
Dear frontend devs and UI designers. I bring you Liquid DOM, a complete and faithful implementation of Liquid Glass on the Web. - Shape morphing - All properties animatable - Dynamic refraction and reflection - Adaptive tint - Adaptive specular highlight - Dispersion - Full html integration - Super fast layout engine that works across Canvas and html - Pointer event handling - Framework and renderer-agnostic low level API - High level React API - Ootb @threejs and r3f integration And lots more. Read on for implementation details and demos.
English
230
507
7.9K
1.2M
Martin
Martin@martinrue·
I’m just casually living inside Blade Runner. So cool. 🇹🇭
English
68
842
2.1K
1.2M
farz
farz@iamhtml·
@stannostudio @avipat_ People have forgotten all about the product and value it brings and just out here chasing distribution and clout
English
0
0
1
97
Stanley
Stanley@stannostudio·
@iamhtml @avipat_ Fully support them building a competitive product, just not copying our name & brand
English
1
0
3
389
farz
farz@iamhtml·
@jock_ferguson Also looks like the 35m post was boosted. Since other videos clearly look shadow banned. Would like to see more real examples.
farz tweet media
English
0
0
0
18
Jock Ferguson
Jock Ferguson@jock_ferguson·
Today, we officially level the playing field. The most viral companies in the world are gaming the algorithm differently to everyone else. Fastlane allows anyone to become the next Medvi. This is the next generation of marketing.
English
83
65
849
376.3K
farz
farz@iamhtml·
@jock_ferguson You can only have 3 TikTok accounts per phone. Would love to know more about how this is tackled
English
0
0
0
17