John Smith
5.1K posts


MODAL ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT (PLANTINGA)
Idea: If God's existence is possible, then because God is a necessary being, God exists in all possible worlds.
Definitions:
□ = necessarily
◇ = possibly
Premises:
It is possible that a maximally great being exists.
◊G
A maximally great being exists necessarily if it exists.
G -> □G
If something possibly exists necessarily, then it necessarily exists.
◊□G -> □G
Conclusion: □G
Therefore: G
English

@30MinMinistries Hiding my post demonstrates your dishonesty. Peter 3:15 is relevant as you refuse to do what your bible says you ought be prepared for. Another useless theist. Can you demonstrate your god exists?
English

@ident_smithjohn For the 4th time.
I don’t answer/waste my time with anonymous X accounts 🤷♂️ don’t take it personally champ
English

@MasterMaliq That's called begging the question; a logical fallacy.
English

The strongest argument? That something exists rather than nothing. Existence itself points to a Creator.
Yẹmí—Ìdàmú Ànọ́bí.@KR3Wmatic
What is the strongest argument that God exists?
English

Imagine believing the universe came into existence out of nothing by nothing with no cause or purpose giving us a habitable planet. The universe fine-tuning itself for life to be even be possible. Magically having food that humans can eat and survive, an atmosphere that humans can survive in.
There is no bigger fairytale in existence than atheism, and I will take that to the grave.
English

@Tsar_Martyr All theist accounts on here cannot demonstrate their gods exist.
English

I'm going to post this one again, since it has been so popular. It's also very true. To look around this complex world, to think with our complex minds, and really think there is no evidence for God in His creation and in us is truly absurd. it is being willfully blind. 👇👇👇👇
Sandra H.@StandswithGod
Anyone who claims there is "zero evidence for God", is unbelievably willfully blind.
English

@30MinMinistries Which means you cannot demonstrate your god exists.
English

@ident_smithjohn No, I don’t waste my time with anonymous X accounts 🤷♂️ sry champ
English

@AleMartnezR1 @MartinTweats @CatholicCo200 @darwintojesus @PhilosopherJoeC @worldviewdesign @Lion_IRC That does not demonstrate 1. You merely reassereted the claim. Demonstrate 1.
English

Justifying Premise 1: "Every possibility entails a choice."
The Core Idea: Possibilities cannot actualize themselves. If a universe could exist in a million different ways (or not exist at all), it is contingent.
The Defense: To go from a mere "maybe" to reality requires a mechanism of selection. If there are multiple open options, a specific reality can only emerge if one option is actively selected over the others
English

@AleMartnezR1 @MartinTweats @CatholicCo200 @darwintojesus @PhilosopherJoeC @worldviewdesign @Lion_IRC Begging the question. Demonstrate 1.
English

@30MinMinistries So, you can't demonstrate your god exists because anonymous accounts are stronger than your demonstration and your god?
English

@ident_smithjohn I don’t answer too the anonymous x accounts
God bless ✝️💜
English







