Igor

980 posts

Igor

Igor

@igorsyl

Building in AI/Crypto. Software Engineer and Physicist.

World Katılım Mayıs 2009
2.5K Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Igor
Igor@igorsyl·
Is there any chain that rewards validators in relation to their age?
English
0
0
2
117
Igor
Igor@igorsyl·
@adityaag Mediterranean weather coastal land.
English
0
0
0
74
Aditya Agarwal
Aditya Agarwal@adityaag·
A thought experiment I often run is whether stuff that billionaires have today be possible for the average person to have in 20-30 years? Is there a fundamental law that would prevent it?
Sam Altman@sama

I’m not big on identities, but I am extremely proud to be American. This is true every day, but especially today—I firmly believe this is the greatest country ever on Earth. The American miracle stands alone in world history. I believe in techno-capitalism. We should encourage people to make tons of money and then also find ways to widely distribute wealth and share the compounding magic of capitalism. One doesn’t work without the other; you cannot raise the floor and not also raise the ceiling for very long. The world should get richer every year through science and technology, but everyone has to be in the “up elevator”. I think the government usually does a worse job than markets, and so we need to encourage our culture of innovation and entrepreneurship. I also believe that education is critically important to keeping the American edge. I believed this when I was 20, when I was 30, and now I am 40 and still believe it. The Democratic party seemed reasonably aligned with it when I was 20, losing the plot when I was 30, and completely to have moved somewhere else at this point. So now I am politically homeless. But that’s fine; I care much, much more about being American than any political party. I’d rather hear from candidates about how they are going to make everyone have the stuff billionaires have instead of how they are going to eliminate billionaires. The American experiment has always been messy. I am hopeful for another great 250 years. Happy 4th!

English
4
1
5
4K
Vaibhav (VB) Srivastav
Vaibhav (VB) Srivastav@reach_vb·
Wow! OmniGen 2 is quite amazing - State of the Art in Image edits - Apache 2.0 licensed 🔥 Bonus: can also do in context generation, text to image, visual understanding and image edits Play with directly on the demo below and models on the hub 🤗
Vaibhav (VB) Srivastav tweet media
English
2
57
316
45.6K
Igor
Igor@igorsyl·
@PirateWires @SamoBurja Now that we have proof of personhood perhaps proof of parenthood comes next.
English
1
0
1
747
Igor retweetledi
Pirate Wires
Pirate Wires@PirateWires·
NEW TODAY: There’s no point of a multiplanetary future if there are no people left to populate it The U.S. fertility rate sits at an anemic 1.79, far below the required level to replace our population. The global rate is not much better. This means we’re watching civilization compound into oblivion through the powerful force of exponential decline. Even in countries with state-funded IVF programs, policy and technology have had little effect, because depopulation isn’t something you can fix with tax subsidies and robots. It stems from a fundamental devaluation of family life in post-industrial economies. Once, having children was how you joined the world. Today — with help from parenthood’s total absence from narratives that celebrate professional ambition, romantic conquest, and lone-wolf heroism — it’s framed as opting out of it. Freedom is childlessness. Kids are a burden. DINK life (Double Income, No Kids) is not only accepted but vaunted like an achievement. In a culture addicted to self-optimization, the case against children practically writes itself. Some people have deeply personal reasons not to have children. As for the rest of us, especially the self-proclaimed futurists who are resourced and capable? Wake up to the programming. Have kids now. Don’t wait for the perfect apartment with a nursery. Don’t wait until you can afford a night nurse, like I did, cutting into the window of opportunity to have another, and another. Don’t wait for your startup to exit, or to make partner, or to hit some phantom “ready” (readiness is just control, repackaged). Stop shitposting. Stop procrastinating. You need less money, space, and time than you think. Let it be messy. Let it be visible. Choose this fundamentally creative act, a reason for living that breaks you open and remakes you. The future of humanity — whether on Earth, Mars, or beyond — depends on it. (No pressure.) (Link to the full piece is threaded.) 👇
Pirate Wires tweet media
English
29
52
404
138.3K
Igor
Igor@igorsyl·
Now that we have proof of personhood perhaps proof of parenthood comes next.
Pirate Wires@PirateWires

NEW TODAY: There’s no point of a multiplanetary future if there are no people left to populate it The U.S. fertility rate sits at an anemic 1.79, far below the required level to replace our population. The global rate is not much better. This means we’re watching civilization compound into oblivion through the powerful force of exponential decline. Even in countries with state-funded IVF programs, policy and technology have had little effect, because depopulation isn’t something you can fix with tax subsidies and robots. It stems from a fundamental devaluation of family life in post-industrial economies. Once, having children was how you joined the world. Today — with help from parenthood’s total absence from narratives that celebrate professional ambition, romantic conquest, and lone-wolf heroism — it’s framed as opting out of it. Freedom is childlessness. Kids are a burden. DINK life (Double Income, No Kids) is not only accepted but vaunted like an achievement. In a culture addicted to self-optimization, the case against children practically writes itself. Some people have deeply personal reasons not to have children. As for the rest of us, especially the self-proclaimed futurists who are resourced and capable? Wake up to the programming. Have kids now. Don’t wait for the perfect apartment with a nursery. Don’t wait until you can afford a night nurse, like I did, cutting into the window of opportunity to have another, and another. Don’t wait for your startup to exit, or to make partner, or to hit some phantom “ready” (readiness is just control, repackaged). Stop shitposting. Stop procrastinating. You need less money, space, and time than you think. Let it be messy. Let it be visible. Choose this fundamentally creative act, a reason for living that breaks you open and remakes you. The future of humanity — whether on Earth, Mars, or beyond — depends on it. (No pressure.) (Link to the full piece is threaded.) 👇

English
1
0
3
458
Igor
Igor@igorsyl·
@pgpsam If this is the result of a free market then why restrict it?
English
1
0
1
82
Sam Forman
Sam Forman@pgpsam·
@igorsyl The argument against making that customizable is that it would create a race to the bottom
English
1
0
1
110
TAOisTheKey
TAOisTheKey@TaoIsTheKey·
I have a BANGER of an idea for a subnet but I need good devs/engineers to make it happen. I just can’t seem to find the right people to team up with. I spoke to Yuma. They like the idea. But they said I need to refine it with a dev and come back to them. Who knows a good dev in the Bittensor ecosystem that might have interest in a new subnet?
English
8
1
29
7.1K
Igor retweetledi
clem 🤗
clem 🤗@ClementDelangue·
If AI stays closed-source, proprietary and monopolistic like it is now, it will destroy lots of jobs and just make the richest companies richer and more powerful! If we open it up thanks to open science and open-source, foster competition and decentralization of value and control, it will create many more jobs and economic value than it destroys. Let’s go!
English
165
189
1.5K
153.9K
Igor retweetledi
Sami Kassab
Sami Kassab@Old_Samster·
New piece that covers why we believe subnet tokens on Bittensor are undervalued We also cover how the 'sum of subnet tokens' metric is being misused and share some insight on other macro indicators TLDR: stop using FDV - its not the right metric to value subnets
Sami Kassab tweet media
English
23
40
259
36.4K
JJ
JJ@JosephJacks_·
I think the vast majority of people who think they understand how blockchains can best scale … have absolutely no idea what they are talking about. Bitcoin doesn’t do the hash computations on-chain, Bittensor doesn’t do its incentive computations on-chain either — this is literally the key reason it scales arbitrarily.
English
8
3
49
2K
Jon Durbin
Jon Durbin@jon_durbin·
Sure, we have some work to do to decentralize chutes more, but this is silly. We don't use a single AWS service, and none of our miners use AWS to provide compute. We aren't a training subnet, but we run arbitrary compute so training could in fact run on chutes. Nearly 100% of our usage is API based, not UI, but we do have an incredible UI thanks to @bonoliverdev We aren't strictly an agent platform either, so why would we need encrypted stateful memory? In fact, chutes is entirely stateless intentionally to best support it's use case (accomodate miner dereg, scale, performance, cost, etc). Our agent platform runs in isolated containers per iteration with a memory subsystem which is encrypted in flight and at rest, but that's a product built on top of chutes, not chutes core. Criticism is fine but at least try to get a few points correct 😅
Normie@EarlyNormie

Neither $TAO nor $KAS are structurally and Architectural equipped for decentralized AI at scale. TAO’s limitations go far beyond Substrate. It lacks encrypted memory, persistent agent state, sovereign storage, private identity, and any form of on-chain model training. It still relies heavily on AWS and has no native memory for agents or AI. Switching to Kaspa doesn’t solve this. Kaspa is optimized for speed, not depth. It has no compute layer, no agent runtime, no encrypted memory, no privacy, and no ability to host verifiable or sovereign AI. Even smart contracts are still a dream outsourced to third-party teams trying to duct-tape something onto L2s. Kaspa is fast and wide like the Amazon River sure. But what’s flowing through it? You can’t run an AI economy on a payments pipe. That’s like suggesting Visa should host OpenAI just because it’s fast. Most people in TAO see subnets doing “something” and get excited by slick frontends. But under the hood, it’s mostly old OpenAI or other pre-trained models wrapped in a UI. No models are being trained. No decentralized AI is being created. It’s just inference hitting centralized APIs. Take Chutes, for example. Marketed as decentralized compute, but it lacks training, encrypted memory, agent persistence, and any sovereign infra. It’s deployment theater just spinning up models on AWS with some UI sugar on top. They all just farming and enjoying emissions with beautiful User interfaces. No one asks the hard questions. In crypto, loud marketing often wins over real architecture. There’s only one protocol I’ve seen that can actually solve this at the base layer: $QUIL. I’m not here to shill. Don’t invest if you’re unsure. But if you understand architecture, read the whitepaper or wait for 2.1 and see what it enables. This isn’t hype. It’s a pointer for those who can tell the difference between frontend noise and substrate gravity. Do your homework. You don’t need to be a protocol expert or rocket scientist , but it’s your capital. Don’t follow the loudest voice follow the logic. Many don’t understand what they are talking about and can easily mislead people who decide to be sheeps eg. 👇🏼

English
11
13
141
7.8K
Igor
Igor@igorsyl·
@JosephJacks_ @omron_ai omron uses zk (software) for verification. There is opportunity to create a subnet to incentivize TEE (hardware) GPU inference.
English
0
0
1
67
Igor
Igor@igorsyl·
@DistStateAndMe Perhaps subnet owner should be renamed to subnet leader.
English
0
0
0
27
Artchick 🔥👠
Artchick 🔥👠@digitalartchick·
Why is everyone so excited? Bitcoin is only $0.11M
English
17
8
133
6.8K
Igor
Igor@igorsyl·
@markjeffrey This is awesome! Makes me post more!
English
0
0
2
72
Mark Jeffrey
Mark Jeffrey@markjeffrey·
Hey now! Cookie.fun adds Bittensor KOL rankings. Who dat lower left? :)
Mark Jeffrey tweet media
English
23
3
99
5.5K