Aaron Hall

@Freqazoid26 @ZebBoykin @RangeDayBro The muzzle flash in the window is a substantial piece of evidence that points exactly at my suspected location. Another substantial piece of evidence pointing in that direction is CK physical reaction. Then, your audio analysis. Then observable behavior and strategic location.

The location you have selected is too close for the audio separation. The second picture, if I could explain why his work looks like that and not converge on the Losee, it's because he is measuring a common reflection. If you look at all the alleged "thumps" in the reflection model they pretty much point to the same surface reflectors (Soronsen, and the top right corner). I'll show this in the video that I do (hopefully this weekend) in the TDoA testing

@Freqazoid26 @ZebBoykin @RangeDayBro Do you guys see the convergence of evidence for the shooter's location that I do? No store, just physical evidence and strategic logical location(up against a wall and surrounded by a small team for concealment). Please see these pics.

@Freqazoid26 @ZebBoykin @RangeDayBro Thank you for acknowledging my post. It seems the location I'm suspecting is within margin of error. Could the sound of the gun reflecting off the wall cause more room for error? The light flash reflecting from the window looks like a muzzle flash without a doubt to me.

@Freqazoid26 @ZebBoykin @RangeDayBro @RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @realjesseonfire @triggersmarthq @HighImpactFlix Please see the OP. The audio forensics were done by @Freqazoid26. @RangeDayBro can you do some small caliber ballistics test on projectiles following curved surfaces, such as the interior of a skull?

@Freqazoid26 @ZebBoykin @RangeDayBro *no story* meaning I'm not trying to making up an unrealistic story. Just an observation, no appeal to your emotions. I sincerely just want the truth as to how it happened... I believe the why is well covered by @RealCandaceO

@IttlBuff @TPUSA

@TPUSA We will find out the truth, Charlie. Rest In Peace.

Turning Point USA condemns in the strongest terms the TikTok audio trend that uses or references the assassination of our founder, Charlie Kirk, for entertainment. Charlie Kirk was the victim of a real act of political violence. Turning that into viral content is grotesque and dehumanizing. There is nothing harmless, funny, or acceptable about it. It reflects a culture that trivializes violence and reduces real human loss to a punchline. This has no place on TikTok. Or anywhere. This audio needs to be removed.

@Freqazoid26 @RangeDayBro This should be relatively easy to replicate. Hopefully @RangeDayBro sees this a gives it a test.

100% - Mr Bro was bang on The bigger issue is mechanism consistency. A simple way to think about it is a high-pressure water jet cutting steel. The force is directional. There isn’t an obvious mechanism that redirects that jet back into the body, up through the neck, and then out the front. It should be broadly linear unless there is evidence showing otherwise. And if the claimed jet has enough energy to penetrate bone, then any proposed redirection through bone needs explaining, not assuming. That’s the gap for me: mechanism first, story second.

This whole section is certainty theatre. Exact joules. Exact vectors. Exact epicentre. Exact body motion values. But where were those independently measured? *********************** ***They weren’t. *** *********************** They’re outputs of assumptions layered onto compressed video frames. Change the assumptions: angle, timing, scale, posture, perspective, frame interpretation... and the outputs change with them. That means these aren’t fixed facts. They’re model-dependent estimates dressed up as measurements. A far simpler explanation for the visible “gas escape” is that a projectile impact caused a visible reaction. Fancy graphics and decimal places don’t rescue uncertain inputs. If the assumptions move, the conclusions move and that doesn’t validate the theory, it devastatingly exposes its fragility.

@Freqazoid26 @RangeDayBro Please excuse my very poor drawing made on my phone, but this is a very rough idea of the path I believe the projectile took through his skull. The projectile entered upper back right, followed the interior curvature and exited the jugular foramen.

@Freqazoid26 @RangeDayBro Absolutely agree. I'd like to point out that a skull is capable of redirecting a projectile and internal pressure. Especially when an experienced shooter knows what caliber and weapons can provide the perfect amount of energy to peirce a skull but not completely go through.

@Freqazoid26 I am looking forward to you refining these measurements of the z axis/angle of trajectory.

I measure the audio on this camera and the difference in the L/R is represented as up/down (z axis). This shows the audio came from ABOVE at a steep angle. What building is at a steep angle and within 50m... Hmmmm....

@Freqazoid26 @matt82704417 @MadMax84281 @jonaaronbray Your BR07m line terminates exactly with where I suspect the shooter; based purely on physical evidence, observed behavior, and logical tactical location. Your math has pointed you to the exact horizontal trajectory, now you just need to refine the vertical angle of trajectory.

They do. I already have 4 lines of invariable convergence. That in analytics is the strongest form of forensic evidence you can get. My work stand on it's own and I haven't seen anyone break the model yet. And, they have tried, believe me. And, so have I actively. If the shockwave is located via the blue lines it points to a trajectory. Red = very strong, orange = weaker, yellow = weakest and green non existent then how could a shot have been taken from the Losee? If it did, the ones closest to the trajectory would be the 2 yellow ones at the tip of the apex as they are highest and closest. They aren't I'm afraid bud. This is then constrained by the directional cues of the shot pointing the same way but behind it's respective "crack" as it should do but, it's converging on the same trajectory. How? And the "thump" everyone is fussing over actually shows to have come from the opposite direction from the shot in every mic. It can't be a thump in that instance I don't think, It's a reflection. I can demonstrate that because there is a ~70-90m gap between everyone's stated crack to thump "crack and thump". That doesn't fit between the hall of flags and the mic. That means, the only option is it came from the mirrored angle shown by the directional cue presented in the TDoA. Which points to the Sorensen Centre as a reflection source if location 2 is selected in the test. I didn't just select location 2. I used the reflections to select it, unbiased. I have demonstrated that in full on my channel, Trigersmart (shoutout Matt) and Crowd-source the Truth (shoutout Jason!) (thankyou gentlemen), multiple times. If the reflections fit then it gets restricted further and I perform the TDoA on all the relevant elements within the audio. I then map those and I have a posited trajectory, a directional cue for both the thump and the shot. (Every main instance in the audio disregarding the reflections. This is why the reflections constrain this test) I also have the waveforms and can detail the difference in location of the "squeak" that Bray relies on for his gel block prediction. If it was a gel block, that squeak would present equally across recordings as it would be fixed in space and time. It doesn't. It actually moves from recording to recording which shows the angular intersection with the mic, and the way the wavefront that traverses behind the projectile. The only way to make that shift is if it's moving. And moving really fast. There is a 21ms ramp up in audio of the shot before the audio of the shot arrives. An explosive doesn't provide a 21ms warning before it goes off. That was proved with Bray own video I after I inspected the audio. The only question is, how do you get 7 mics to all line up with a trajectory? Consider I am measuring at a subsample basis (0.021ms). Even if I'm out by 3ms (equal to 1.05m) It would still point the same way, a wavefront is huge. Give it all a wiggle and it'll still point the same way within 5m error at the end. If it was wrong it would be wildly wrong. The restrictions wouldn't have been able to stick. They line up regardless. There is no escaping the inevitability. And, no amount of complexity shielding is going to save anyone from the audio and the depth in which I have gone. I don't say that lightly, but I mean it respectfully. The oxygen has already been sucked out the room, it's just these idea's haven't realised they are suffocating. Now, in 20 years like 9/11, jfk must I go on... It's fine. I don't mind I'm not interested in a following or building a personality. It doesn't worry me. I'm just a nerd that has a physical job that likes dorking out. That's all haha. If there was 2 events. And explosion and a shot.. Then every mic would record the same timing on it as the speed of sound is fixed and the gap between instances would remain. Why only one 7m to Charlies back right has the gap he refers to? It's because the pressure wave from the projectile is pushing on the diaphragm as it passes over head. You can see it in the waveform in the left mic which should, under normal circumstances, be placed on the top edge of the phone in portrait. If it wasn't that, then the mic 15m to Charlies left would register the same ordering and you would have the same on the mics at the rails in front of charlie. All over. It's not. Because it must be moving. Once you line all these layers up it becomes evident that the only space left for an answer is the location I have selected via reflection constraints. I just need to know how these guys propose to break the laws of physics to account for their story. I'm not even being stand offish, or rude I hope. It's just science. Is it fact or fiction, true or false. Accuracy is my only goal here. These are 2 of the 5 essays broken down by gemini, but not by me. I was just as shocked as Dustin with how that came out, I don't know Dustin, met him like a day a go. All I'm saying is wait til the essays are complete and you'll soon see it as a whole and it'll make sense. gemini.google.com/share/9d69b1ce… Here are the essays, feel free to read them. Everyone is free to disagree, it doesn't matter because the audio is saying what it says, regardless of feelings. That is a picture of the project folder in full. You guys have up to stage 2 I believe, I finished 5 the other day so, I'm not just confident, I have got it backed up WITH evidence. drive.google.com/drive/folders/… I don't have to fix everyone else. I don't want to debate either and I'm done with arguing with these guys about it. Please, I'd rather not be pulled into threads with these people I'm sorry, but I have tried all I have experienced is hostility from them. It's a "believe me or you're the enemy" and it's an exhausting scenario to be pulled in to. All I want to do is help and I'll complete my part and the world is free to do what they want I suppose. It isn't going to change the results of the test and the honesty I have poured into it for like, 500-600 hours I heard. It's as honest as I can be and as accurate as I can make it. I still haven't broken it and seriously, I am very hard on myself about it. I'm serious about the accuracy and will fix anything I messed up. It's just a constraint model, that's all. It's not new in terms of investigation. I hope it helps explain my position guys, I really do. I'm not here to debate about it.

If Mr. Robinson took a shot from the alleged location the audio would expand from that location. By the time it reached the hall of flags it would be about 300m-400m wide (approximately 980ft -1300ft ish). There is a near zero percent chance that the hall of flags would NOT reflect that energy back to the mics at the required time for the distance between mic and the hall. This is down to geometry. It does not exist in the audio. There is NO such reflection. Therefore it's EXTREMELY unlikely that the audio source originated at the Losee Centre. This is because a 400m wide wavefront has an absolute 0% chance of hiding anywhere in that amphitheatre. Period. That is not open for interpretation I'm afraid. Cheers big ears x

@ZebBoykinHQ these are 3 members of the team I suspect, with the shooter up against the wall and disguised as a woman. In this picture they are securing their position over an hour before the event.

@RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @IanCarrollShow @RangeDayBro @Black_Scout @Audio__Freq I hope you guys look in to this. There is substantial evidence for my analysis and allegation. Here are a few major supporting evidences

@nypost Sounds good and all, but... if you subsidize something, you'll get more of it.

Melania Trump lobbies Congress for more resources, including grants, for foster kids: 'A moral imperative' trib.al/U2FTJBz

@PressSec @PressSec are you even reading the comments? Oh and just so everyone is aware, the no tax tips/social security/overtime is temporary! They expire 2028!!! This is infuriating! We shouldn't even have income tax! Trump is fucking America over, and is the fraud!

"Many of the taxpayers said they had received their largest refund in years, money that is going toward paying down credit card debt, catching up on bills, padding savings accounts or covering the cost of a vacation." nytimes.com/2026/04/04/bus…

@MollyDavis543 @elonmusk This!!!

@elonmusk The "Uniparty" is jewish to its core.

The uniparty in action

@IanCarrollShow I'm skeptical that it's Haley, because of two observations. Haley seems to always use "going to", where Erika always uses "gonna". Haley pronounces "can" with a drawn-out "a"(sounds like cayn). Erika pronounces "can" with a short "a".

Woke up to the world ending over this tweet- so here’s some clarification. Read it- did not say it was Erika or confirmed or anything. I actually explicitly said that would be hard to believe. Most of the ‘debunks’ actually are not sharing convincing or any evidence at all. Candace has said she debunked it- and I trust her rigor. But I want to debunk it for myself now too. Digging into the files to try to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that it’s Hailey Robson today and I’ll update when I have that proof.

@LoMo_Loren @IanCarrollShow The file doesn't have a date, so we can't assume an exact age Erika could have been. How are you ruling out the possibility of her being 18?

Erika would have been a high school student in Arizona at the time of this recording. This is Haley Robson, who was a high school student in Florida at the time of this recording, and know recruiter for Epstein. They sound extremely similar. Get a fucking grip. One day you people will have to answer for this psychotic shit.

@stacksNoWO @IanCarrollShow Haley seems to always use "going to" and Erika uses "gonna". Also Haley pronounces "can" with a drawn-out "a", sounds like "cayn" Erika pronounces "can" with short "a" sound. The person on the call sounds more like Erika based on those two observations.

@IanCarrollShow It's Haley Robson (listen to her in the video). Haley Robson was on of Epstein's teen victims who later became involved in recruiting other girls to his Palm Beach mansion.