Zoé ⭐⭐⭐

Always remember us this way 🌹

Raise your hand if you would be perfectly OK with this outcome.

And then there’s Messi, who randomly decided to score a Panenka free kick😂

KOSOVO JE SRBIJA

estoy llorando con la adiccion de neymar al casino no podes estar tan ENFERMO

A 22-year-old unknown actor walked into a birthday party in 1982 and caught the eye of one of the most famous women on the planet and what happened next lasted over four decades, long past the romance and all the way to the very end of his life. His name was Val Kilmer. He was lanky, funny, and almost completely unknown. Cher was 36, a global superstar, and the host of the party her friend was throwing for her. A mutual friend had arranged the introduction, telling Cher that she thought either she or a friend of hers would like this young actor. They started laughing together immediately. They became friends first. They spent a week just talking before they kissed. When they finally did, Cher later said she thought her head would shoot right off her body. The romance that followed was intense, joyful, and full of private jokes only they understood. The 14-year age gap raised eyebrows in Hollywood. They did not care. They gave each other nicknames he was Sid, she was Ethel — so that they could call to each other in public without being overheard. They also called themselves Valus Maximus and Cherus Reprimandus, which tells you everything about how they operated. Cher later said he was like nobody she had ever known. Exasperating and hysterical. Thrilling and funny. A person who simply did not do what anyone else did. They parted in 1984. Val called it off. Years later, Cher told Howard Stern that Val Kilmer was the only ex of hers who had ever broken up with her. She said she was madly in love with him and he left. She never forgot it. But the friendship never left. Thirty years after their romance ended, Val Kilmer was fighting throat cancer. He had first noticed something wrong in 2014. By 2015 the full reality of it had arrived — the hospitalization, the tracheotomy, the chemotherapy, the permanent damage to the voice that had once commanded every room he walked into. He moved into Cher's guest house. One night, he woke up vomiting blood. He wrote later that it covered the bed like a scene from a film. He prayed. He called 911. Then he alerted his hostess. Cher stepped in and stepped up. She was there for every hard day that followed. He wrote about her in his 2020 memoir. He called her the funniest woman he ever met. He said that once Cher worked her way inside your head and heart, she never left. He said their spirits had stayed united even when their paths diverged. In his final years, when speaking required effort and every public appearance was an act of courage, he knew there was one person who would still pick up the phone no matter where she was or what she was doing. Val Kilmer died on April 1, 2025. He was 65 years old. The cause was pneumonia. His daughter, Mercedes, confirmed it to the press. Cher posted her tribute that same week. She called him brave. Funny. Brilliant. A great friend and a pain in the neck. She signed it with his nickname. Valus. Not Val. Not Mr. Kilmer. Valus. The name she had given him back in 1982 when they were young and electric and absolutely sure that the best thing in any room was each other. Some loves don't become marriages. Some loves become something more permanent than that — a person who shows up with no conditions attached, who sits beside you in the dark and doesn't flinch, who still uses your old nickname when everyone else has moved on. Val Kilmer and Cher gave that to each other for over forty years. Share this with someone who has loved someone that way.

saturn return marriages, saturn loves disciplined commitment

Listen to me. This is why you HAVE to make a lot of money Not for cars, bags, houses, etc though they’re cool too… it’s to guarantee the safety of your loved ones It’s not even for you, it’s for your girlfriend, wife, parents, children This is not a post about race, religion or immigration. There are evil people of all kinds in this world You’re doing a disservice to your family by not trying as hard as you can, working as hard as you can, until they’re in a better position in life We just traveled for 10 days with private driver and armed security all over Europe Too much? Waste of money? Maybe, but I’ll tell you what my wife will NEVER get harmed by a stranger while alone taking public transportation And what does that cost me, money? Easy trade. I’ll take that every time

The U.N. General Assembly has adopted a draft resolution that unequivocally condemns the trafficking of enslaved Africans and the transatlantic slave trade as the most inhumane and enduring injustice against humanity. 123 in favour 3 Against (USA, Israel, Argentina) 52 abstentions The resolution also seeks to recognize the profound and lasting impacts of the abhorrent regimes of slavery and colonialism and emphasizes that claims for reparations represent a concrete step towards remedying historical wrongs against Africans and people of African descent. #sabcnews

Ajde da se ne lažemo, ne smetaju vam helanke koje ulaze gde ulaze, ako uopšte i ulaze, ne smetaju vam tetovaže, ne smeta vam goli trudnički stomak ili krop top - smeta vam što žena ne traži dozvolu da bude takva. Smeta vam što ne možete da je kontrolišete pogledom, komentarom, pravilima koja ste sami izmislili da biste se osećali sigurnije. Jer čim ona izađe iz tog kalupa, odjednom više ne važe vaša pravila i to vas izjeda. Lakše je reći “vulgarno je” nego priznati “meni je neprijatno jer ja to nikad ne bih smela”. I onda ide ono klasično moralisanje, kao brinete za “ukus” i “dostojanstvo”, a zapravo vas bode tuđa sloboda - jer vas tera da se zapitate gde ste vi sebe sputali. U koje okvire vas je trauma patrijarhata zatvorila. Svaki put kad komentarišete ženu koja nosi šta hoće, koja pokazuje telo bez srama, koja čak i trudna ne želi da se sakrije kao da treba da nestane, vi samo pokazujete koliko ste navikli da žena bude manja, tiša, pokrivenija, lakša za varenje. I da nacrtam konkretno jer tu stalno mešate stvari, scrunch helanke nisu seksualizacija same po sebi - to je kroj, konstrukcija materijala koji prati telo, podiže i oblikuje, isto kao grudnjak što podiže grudi ili farmerke koje stežu struk. Funkcija je oblik i udobnost u pokretu, posebno za trening, ne poziv na bilo šta. Seksualizacija nastaje u trenutku kada vi to posmatrate kao signal upućen nekome, kao poruku, kao ponudu. A nije. To što vidite oblik tela nije isto što i to da je nešto ponuđeno. To je isto telo koje postoji i u trenerci, samo ga tada ignorišete jer ne iskače iz forme na koju ste navikli. Znači problem nije u helankama nego u načinu na koji str naučeni da čitate žensko telo - čim je naglašeno, odmah ga svodite na seksualni objekat. E to je bolesno, ne helanke! To je vaša interpretacija, ne njena namera. I ne, nije ovo o odeći. Ovo je o tome da vi ne podnosite ženu koja je okej sama sa sobom. Koja ne traži potvrdu. Koja neće da se uklopi da bi bila prihvaćena. To vas provocira, ne helanke. Žena ne živi više u 18.veku i odevanje se promenilo. Do skoro je bilo skandalozno da žena nosi pantalone, zar ne? I što je najjače, što više pokušavate da je spustite, ona je glasnija. Što više govorite “previše je”, ona je još više svoja. Jer ovo više nije vreme gde žena ćuti da bi bila voljena - ovo je vreme gde bira sebe pa makar vam to bilo najneprijatnije ogledalo koje ste ikad videli. Problem je u vama tamničarima. Onima koji bi da vraćaju na stari sistem po cenu svega. E pa, ne može. Niti će ikada ponovo moći.

she CHEWED him up like men just aren't smart i'm crying😭

Jadna zena... Treba dovesti zakon da svaka radnja ima obezbedjenje. Na poziciji prodavaca su uglavnom zene i mnoge se susrecu sa lopovima koje same moraju da obuzdaju. Ovo ne sme vise da se desava.

Absolute bombshell. A Middle East expert exposes a massive coordinated media campaign spreading fake news to deliberately drag Saudi Arabia and the UAE into the US war on Iran. The Gulf states are refusing to take the bait.

I hope her and her daughter will heal together from this. Good job mama

Every time NATO bombs a country, the conversation immediately becomes about how terrible that country's leader was. Milošević. Saddam. Gaddafi. Assad. The monster is always pre-positioned. Always ready. So you never have to discuss the 78 days of missiles falling on Belgrade. On bridges. On hospitals. On water treatment plants. On the Chinese embassy. On a television station. Sixteen journalists killed at their desks. Called "collateral damage" from 15,000 feet. "Failed communist state." Yugoslavia had a higher standard of living than most of Eastern Europe. Free movement. Free healthcare. Free education. Western trade relationships. Its own independent foreign policy that defied Moscow. Not exactly the profile of a failed state. "Made up of different cultures." So is Switzerland. So is Belgium. So is the United States, spectacularly so. Diversity didn't kill Yugoslavia. Western interference, IMF structural adjustment gutting its economy through the 1980s did. And a very deliberate Western strategy of recognizing breakaway republics before any political settlement existed. Germany recognized Croatia in December 1991. Unilaterally. Against the advice of the UN Secretary General. That recognition was gasoline. And since we're doing the full history: Operation Storm, 1995. Croatia ethnically cleansed over 200,000 Serbs from Krajina in days. The largest single ethnic cleansing in Europe since World War II. U.S. operational support. General Wesley Clark helped plan it. You didn't hear much about it because it was the right kind of ethnic cleansing, conducted by the right kind of people. NATO didn't bomb Serbia to stop Milosevic. They had cozy relationships with far worse leaders that same decade, in Saudi Arabia, in Egypt, in Indonesia, where the bodies were still warm. They bombed Serbia because a European country was resisting the architecture of the post-Cold War order, and that required an example. Same logic as Vietnam. Different accent. My point was never about whether Yugoslavia was a paradise. It was about power and the ability to respond to power. Yugoslavia had none. It absorbed 78 days and surrendered. Iran absorbed 48 hours and made Trump publicly beg China for help. That's the only comparison I was making. You can despise Milošević and still recognize that NATO had no UN mandate, no legal authority, and no right to bomb a European capital while calling it "humanitarianism." Those two things are not in conflict.

NOW - Dame Sarah Mullally is officially "enthroned" as the Archbishop of Canterbury, head of the Church of England, becoming the first woman to take the role in 1,400 years.

People keep making fake photos of a guy to portray him as a depressed person, even though they know what he went through in life. That’s really disturbing.

The only way stopping men from raping is killing them.

Reshape the region? Are they fucking for real? Go and fight israel and leave others the fuck alone. They keep on destroying other countries with fake excuse of them having the US bases on the places where only regular people live. This has gone way too far

Ljudi su idioti neviđeni. Pored toga što ovo radiš svom djetetu, ti to još snimiš i ponosno objaviš

я оказывается знаю чешский язык