Rohit Bhat

2.5K posts

Rohit Bhat banner
Rohit Bhat

Rohit Bhat

@imteng

Investor @ Airavat Capital. Interested in investing, science, tech, SFF, board games and RPG.

Katılım Ocak 2010
232 Takip Edilen914 Takipçiler
Thejaswi Udupa
Thejaswi Udupa@udupendra·
A nice moment from the Mumbai Quiz Festival, this time last month. Points to anyone who recognises my t-shirt.
Thejaswi Udupa tweet media
English
1
0
8
1K
Sidu Ponnappa
Sidu Ponnappa@ponnappa·
parenting is one such never discuss parenting online parents are easily offended and unforgiving enemies
English
6
0
20
1.3K
Sidu Ponnappa
Sidu Ponnappa@ponnappa·
it kind of blows my mind that i no longer run a single anon account on any platform the privacy is too easily pierced these days
English
3
0
30
2.8K
Rohit Bhat
Rohit Bhat@imteng·
@_swanand @_svs_ RAFO! Lots of good ideas, but way too long, too much inner monologue and very YA tilt in the writing, I felt. Book 4 was ok. Book 5 was a let down for me.
English
0
0
1
20
Swanand
Swanand@_swanand·
@imteng @_svs_ Is the story not going anywhere good? I honestly thought there wasn't much left for 2 more books, but Sanderson is prolific, so who knows
English
1
0
0
25
Rohit Bhat
Rohit Bhat@imteng·
@_swanand @_svs_ Lucky man. You didn’t have to see what it turned into. After book 2, I waited for the full arc before I did a full read through. 15 years! Anyway, I’m grateful for him finishing WoT and for Way of kings.
English
1
0
0
29
Swanand
Swanand@_swanand·
@imteng @_svs_ I gave up on Stormlight by Oathbringer. It's just sitting there in my shelf, eating dust
Swanand tweet media
English
1
0
1
36
Rohit Bhat
Rohit Bhat@imteng·
@udupendra No 13 for me - wasn’t in the US then. But I have rented from Videowala in Indiranagar back in the day.
English
0
0
0
57
Rohit Bhat
Rohit Bhat@imteng·
@ponnappa @helloanand Mostly Budokan, of course. The pièce de résistance was getting galaxies to spin and flames to burn. I think we had better computers by then, though.
English
0
1
2
299
Sidu Ponnappa
Sidu Ponnappa@ponnappa·
Haha I got a 386sx discarded from a family friend's workplace in '95. Monochrome monitor. 1mb ram, 40mb hdd. Said I wanted to code (which I did) but I actually wanted to play games (obviously). Implemented two different graphics textbooks along the way without understanding a damn thing, but... so pretty. Iirc ray tracing a few pixels took hours. Mandelbrot set took 6-8s per pixel on a 640x480. Good times.
English
2
0
4
655
Anand Jain
Anand Jain@helloanand·
Convinced my mom in 1994 to buy a 386 computer with a 387 math coprocessor so that I could do floating point instructions. That would effectively make it a 486. That helped me do some animations in 3DStudio. The rendering would take 6-7 hours for a 10 second clip.
Sidu Ponnappa@ponnappa

This actually worked for me in 2003. I did a banger of a college project on top of it. As was (and is) normal for VTU CS, I was one of maybe 5 people out of 110 in my batch who did not plagiarize to do the project. When I went to my principal for permission to bring my desktop to college to demo the project (yeah, that was a thing smh), my Principal accused me of plagiarizing my project. lololol.

English
1
0
6
2.7K
Sanjeev Vaidyanathan
Sanjeev Vaidyanathan@sanhelmet·
After no progress at all for 2 years after the below tweet, I have found a way to listen to podcasts, in a surprisingly frequent way, and without a loss to other useful/fun activities.
Sanjeev Vaidyanathan@sanhelmet

Question: I have a difficult time going through podcasts/audio (much prefer transcripts). Yet, I constantly come across interesting ones that I would like to listen to. If this sounds like you and but you have found a way to regularly listen to podcasts, please tell me how!

English
2
0
7
2.1K
Sanjeev Vaidyanathan
Sanjeev Vaidyanathan@sanhelmet·
Important rejoinder to the original thread, especially for parents/coaches: x.com/aakashg0/statu…
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

Everyone is missing what this study actually says to parents. The graph shows two paths to the same destination. The yellow line (early specialization) gets there faster in the early years. The blue line (multi-disciplinary) gets there slower but breaks through to world-class. The key insight: individuals who perform best at a young age are usually not the same people who later reach the world-class level. This came from 34,839 top performers across four domains: Nobel laureates, Olympic medalists, elite chess players, and renowned classical composers. The researchers found three consistent patterns. First, the best kids and the best adults are mostly different people. Second, future world-class performers showed gradual development and weren’t among the best in their age group. Third, they didn’t specialize early but engaged in multiple disciplines. The research team proposes three mechanisms that explain why breadth beats depth. The search-and-match hypothesis suggests that exposure to multiple disciplines increases the likelihood of eventually finding the best personal fit. The enhanced-learning-capital hypothesis proposes that learning in diverse areas strengthens overall learning capacity, making it easier to continue improving later at the highest level within a chosen field. The limited-risks hypothesis argues that engaging in multiple disciplines reduces the chance of setbacks such as burnout, unhealthy work-rest imbalances, loss of motivation, or physical injury. That third one matters enormously. Specialized athletes are 2.25 times more likely to get overuse injuries than multi-sport athletes. The American Academy of Pediatrics, AOSSM, and American Medical Society for Sports Medicine all recommend against early specialization before age 15 for most sports. The lead researcher, Arne Güllich from RPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, puts it bluntly: “Don’t specialize in just one discipline too early. Encourage young people by providing opportunities to pursue different areas of interest, and support development in two or three disciplines.” The two or three disciplines don’t need to be related. Language and mathematics. Philosophy and geography. The researchers cite Einstein pursuing physics and violin. The connection between domains seems to build cognitive infrastructure that pure depth cannot replicate. Here’s what makes this uncomfortable for parents. The early specialization path produces visible results faster. Your kid looks better at age 10. They make the travel team. They win the tournament. The graphs cross and diverge later, around peak performance age, when the multi-disciplinary kids start pulling ahead. The entire youth talent ecosystem runs on selecting early performers and accelerating them. Travel leagues, elite academies, showcase tournaments. Every incentive pushes toward specialization. But the research shows this system is optimizing for the wrong metric. It produces great 14-year-olds, not great 24-year-olds. The practical takeaway: let your kid play three sports until at least middle school. Let them quit the piano and try drums. Let them be mediocre at several things instead of great at one thing. The data says this approach produces both more elite performers and fewer burnout casualties. The hardest part is watching other kids pass yours on the yellow line while trusting the blue line catches up.

English
2
0
0
149
Rohit Bhat
Rohit Bhat@imteng·
@gamedabado Unfortunately, I don't invest in RPG. Only occasionally play them.
English
0
0
0
6
Rohit Bhat
Rohit Bhat@imteng·
This one is certainly close to the heart. Congrats to Lokvir, @amrishrau and the Pine Labs team. And, of course, to @sjs_day1. Unwavering belief and foresight. A great week at @peakxvpartners
English
2
0
7
828
Rohit Bhat
Rohit Bhat@imteng·
@ku1deep Unbelievable gameplay and music. Both 1 and 3 are on my work music playlist.
English
0
0
1
24