vanshaj

@alpic_ai 's chatgpt advent calendar was a great reason for me to finally make my NYC subways MCP server more robust. if you've ever wanted to ask chatgpt "when's the next northbound 6 train," now you can! server url: mta-gtfs-alpic-a880c663.alpic.live try it out: mta-gtfs-alpic-a880c663.alpic.live/try

@maschnetwork @dsp_ (disclaimer: i work at stytch) we provide APIs for folks to build out authorization servers and we support CIMD already :) stytch.com/connected-apps we've also built a microsite to explain CIMD for both clients and servers: client.dev

@dsp_ Great to see the progress here. I'm curious if you already got signals from authorization server vendors to support this capability in the near future?

Dynamic Client Registration is broken and hard to use: Today MCP core maintainers accepted a proposal that the next version of MCP will make use of Client ID Metadata. This will make the use of DCR no longer necessary. github.com/modelcontextpr…

Hosted a wonderful event last night with @itsArthurAI, @CloudflareDev, and @stytchauth for #SFTechWeek on AI Agents 🌉 🚀 We had an amazing turnout and great conversations. Shoutout to Ian, Nori, @imvs19, and @csparks1919 for showing their cool agentic demos and sharing their expert insights on "how to ship agents that don't break" ⚡

@monadoid @janwilmake @p0 hey, i'm an engineer at stytch. this is a cryptic error, but i'm fairly confident it isn't caused by the issuer. i did see this github issue from exa -- is it possible you might've not selected oauth as the auth mode, or might have an api key in the url? github.com/exa-labs/exa-m…

@janwilmake @p0 I'm seeing "Connector is not safe" when I'm trying to set up cubby as a connector. Did you run into that error? Not a very helpful error lol. I'm thinking I might need to use my own oauth provider instead of stytch, bc the `issuer` value comes from a diff subdomain w/ stytch

big news: OpenAI just released the docs for their FULL MCP offering. They call it "APPS" You can just use them by naming them, no "installation" needed. Let's get Parallel in there! People may be able to use it by simply saying "Research top 50 companies to target. Do this in Parallel" HYPED 🔥

@cbugwadia32 LOL but on a serious note, 162 being a prereq for 168 doesn't really make sense

if you enrolled in 168 without having 162 please drop thanks

@cbugwadia32 thanks for coming out :)) pleasure to have you

respect greatness. proud of u always @imvs19 (today's 61A lecturer :'))

@cbugwadia32 important clarification here that the "they" is not the department, but rather the college/university. the department voted on this ages ago, the college just seems to have better things to do. and then there's the evcp, who has yet to respond to the queries about budgeting.

non-CS/EECS people saying we complain too much don't understand the bullshit we have to put up with on a consistent basis. they can't even come to a consensus on removing the worst class in the department as a requirement, when that was supposed to be done April 8th.

it is April 11th, enrollment starts in about a week, and there are zero CS classes listed in the enrollment center.

@cbugwadia32 so much misinformation in this tweet that it got me to respond

if there's anything that this semester has taught me, it's that there needs to be a study done on what makes the dating game so easy for mediocre brown men

@notkavi i think examtool having no dependency on ok is one of the things that made it work. the more i've worked with ok, the more i've realized that its biggest downfall is its poor scalability (and i have yet to find the bandwidth to make it scale better).

@imvs19 But yeah he's 100% right. Honestly the whole platform was a mistake, I think the idea was fine but we could have done it via a service other than ok

taking a computer security course where a good example of why you shouldn't roll your own crypto is a custom exam platform that was created and used by the course i was a TA for in summer 2020. fond memories! that was the only semester we used that platform.

@rampure_suraj after my first guess i figured it was gonna be something bizarre so here we are Wordle 229 2/6* ⬛🟩⬛🟨⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Tough scene: Wordle 229 5/6 🟩⬛🟩🟩⬛ 🟩⬛🟩🟩⬛ 🟩⬛🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

@AMKSomani next level spite

@FakePaperclips i feel like i've been learning new words for the last few days that i didn't know existed

@imvs19 This one was so hard. Hardest by far. I really started thinking there was a bug (I did it at ~2am before anyone else had done it)

annoyingly it was just an inopportune steering wheel lock

love getting to walmart, realizing i don't have a mask, and then spending 8 minutes trying to figure out why my car key wouldn't turn :D

@FakePaperclips @notkavi it's like trying to get on a highway. the trend is the on-ramp, you just have to find the closest trend :)

@imvs19 @notkavi lol is wordle what finally makes you tweet regularly??

Wordle 209 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

i would use this more often but idk how it works