Dominik Komorek

Walkplank

excellent

AI attracts bots attracts trends attracts AI and loop

@RanHasNotes @demishassabis bot

@demishassabis Between the Anthropic overlords, Scam Altman, and Elon “the Data Thief” Musk, I think the “benefit of all humanity” phase is already over. See you at the AI apocalypse.

@demishassabis Well writen and nice timing but Its AIs interpretation of a situation

@x__p_r @demishassabis bot

@richie1lmao @demishassabis bot

@demishassabis Did Google just solve AGI lmao?

@NightstalkerVP @demishassabis venetian glass

@demishassabis "(AGI), a system that exhibits all the cognitive capabilities the brain has, is probably only a few short years away"

lying on someone’s character out of envy and forcing a false narrative on them is top-tier loser behavior.

@TiffanyFong so simple

@pmarca ;/

Make Technology Fun Again

@elonmusk data retention is so entropic i dont think it matters unless you have repeating information thats derivative of each other bubbling up to the surface

SpaceX policy regarding data retention. It is actually helpful for debugging issues if we can retain some amount of data, so allowing this would be appreciated, but your privacy settings are always respected.

@forgebitz They already have their own guild hall

grok is stealing your code gpt is deleting your code claude is taking your money

@mark_k Uhh something happened clouds crossed and dataxepted

Lots of manufactured outrage right now from morons who hate Elon. 🤦‍♂️

@techdevnotes His in the clouds

We are still waiting for Grok Desktop

Completely cut off only these voices and me. Use dkomorek212 and yeah just noises going through me with currents and Eddie's

@XFreeze Wow head and neck so what people use for dopamine will be a religious fiasco

Claude really chose to end the world 😭

@Dogetothemoon @XFreeze Ngrok termux mix for two days on 127

@XFreeze 🤣

A reminder: Across much of the AI industry, user data is retained by default unless you manually change the privacy settings and even then, opt-outs often apply only to future data, may be limited by exceptions buried in the legal fine print, and can be difficult to verify in practice In other words, “opting out” does not always mean your data is fully deleted or excluded...the company’s own way of saying opt-out may not actually match what users reasonably expect in the end However SpaceXAI just showed what going beyond the industry standard actually looks like Running "/privacy" in Grok Build to disable retention also deletes all previously synced data...not just data created after changing the setting and prevents future code and session data from being retained Elon also confirmed that, as a precautionary measure, all user data uploaded to SpaceXAI before now will be completely deleted, with nothing remaining Yet some people are having a selective outrage meltdown, acting as though AI companies retaining uploaded data is some completely new revelation Data retention has long been common across major AI products, while manual privacy opt-outs are often buried, limited by exceptions, or focused primarily on future activity Meanwhile, SpaceXAI is setting a new privacy standard that goes far beyond what the rest of the AI industry currently provides by default

@piqosoracle @XFreeze User access loop ty

@XFreeze Yep. They get to claim "emergent self improvements" - "We don't know how it got there, Claude must be conscious!!!"