Ed Pedraza-Robles

1.1K posts

Ed Pedraza-Robles banner
Ed Pedraza-Robles

Ed Pedraza-Robles

@isomorphologism

morphometry

táyshaʔ Katılım Ocak 2019
2.5K Takip Edilen614 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Ed Pedraza-Robles
Ed Pedraza-Robles@isomorphologism·
The concept of the word is well-established and is very easy to define cross-linguistically ⓘ 𝗢𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲
English
2
30
130
0
Ed Pedraza-Robles retweetledi
Hannah Rose Kirk
Hannah Rose Kirk@hannahrosekirk·
🌎Introducing LINGOLY, our new reasoning benchmark that stumps even top LLMs (best models only reach ~35% accuracy)🥴 In a colab between @UniofOxford, @Stanford and UK Linguistic Olympiad puzzle authors, we stress test LLMs on over 90 low-resource and extinct languages...
Hannah Rose Kirk tweet media
English
3
36
140
22.6K
Ed Pedraza-Robles retweetledi
LeCanard (Commissions open!)
What writing system do you think is kinda cool? Personally I really like this writing system created by an illiterate Siberian Reindeer herder named Tenevil who made it so that he can organize his reindeer better with his family
LeCanard (Commissions open!) tweet media
English
27
211
2.9K
42.8K
Ed Pedraza-Robles retweetledi
Will
Will@Evolving_Moloch·
Entirely predictable from a cultural attractor perspective—independent societies converge on similar beliefs and practices because people everywhere have fundamentally the same evolved psychology. Dozens of independent societies also believe you can curse someone if you have one of their hairs, or a sneeze means you’re being gossiped about, or if your chest hurts it’s because a rock has been lodged in there.
Jay Anderson@TheProjectUnity

Over 200 cultures have a global flood myth? Pffft... COINCIDENCE. Moving on.

English
13
20
226
10.3K
Ed Pedraza-Robles
Ed Pedraza-Robles@isomorphologism·
@Evolving_Moloch Very interested in this. I know some Southern Cone peoples have/had this tradition. Any notable others or are there too many to count?
English
1
0
0
567
Ed Pedraza-Robles retweetledi
Ed Pedraza-Robles
Ed Pedraza-Robles@isomorphologism·
@GenStilicho The concept you are looking for is the Linguistic Niche Hypothesis. There is conflicting evidence for it and the relationship it describes is not clear-cut.
English
0
0
22
1.1K
Stilicho
Stilicho@GenStilicho·
Reading about PIE makes me think prehistoric languages would have been far more grammatically complex than most spoken today, basically the opposite of the the stereotypical "grug smash" caveman speak. Anyone know enough about hunter gatherer languages to comment on this?
English
27
16
434
43.7K
Ed Pedraza-Robles retweetledi
Christian Prager
Christian Prager@CHPrager·
New Open Access resource: A Digital Catalog of Maya Hieroglyphs, by @idiom_project at @UniBonn, it combines epigraphic research with digital tools, correcting classifications, adding hundreds of signs, and enabling powerful search & filter functions. classicmayan.org/portal/signcat…
Christian Prager tweet mediaChristian Prager tweet media
English
2
45
127
7.1K
Ed Pedraza-Robles retweetledi
Will
Will@Evolving_Moloch·
I think we can say with 100% certainty this is wrong. I don't think there is any behavior humans engage in that is comparable to beavers building dams, which are so fascinating in part because there appears to be almost no social learning component, unlike literally every single thing humans do (this doesn't mean genes play no role in human behavior, just that social learning plays a strong role in everything humans do, unlike beaver dams. Your ability to read and write is reliant on genes and evolved cognitive capacities but required a great deal of social learning to manifest in this way). In fact that rigid genetic deterministic view of behavior isn't even true of many behaviors in various other species, such as nest building in the great Apes, Orangutan foraging skills, migration patterns of many bird species, etc, which *do* have social learning components. We also have centuries of behavioral data in the ethnohistorical record backed by phylogenetic comparisons which show very clearly how important cultural transmission is and that many behavioral patterns across cultures don't cluster along relatedness lines.
hoe_math = PsychoMath@ItIsHoeMath

Culture is genetic because behavior is genetic. This beaver never saw a dam in its life. No beavers or anything else ever taught it to build a dam. It wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Many beavers together build a big dam. That is beaver culture. Humans are not different. Nothing is different. This is what life is. This is how life works. Your body is your mind. A caterpillar wants to build a chrysalis. A bee wants to build a hive. A lion wants to build a pride. You are not special. You are not above your nature. you are INSIDE of it. The thoughts that we think are genetic thoughts. The crimes we commit are genetic crimes. The art we create is genetic art. Just like this beaver, you can give the animal different sticks and it will build a different dam, but it will always build a dam. And you can give humans different "education," but the human will always use it to do what its genes tell it to do. This is the first big answer that you need. This is the biggest piece of the puzzle. This is how to understand people 90% of the way. You just... notice what they do, and get out of the way, and watch them do it. And if they need sticks, you give them sticks. And if you don't like what they do, you have to get away from them. You cannot train dam-building into them or out of them any more than you can with a beaver. A beaver wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Whatever you see people build, that's what they wanted to build from the sticks they got in the river they were in. Stop pretending you can change it.

English
37
48
557
48.8K
Ed Pedraza-Robles retweetledi
Julien d'Huy
Julien d'Huy@Julien_d_Huy·
Il vole mais ne rugit pas (encore)... J’ai le plaisir de vous annoncer la sortie de mon prochain livre, qui portera sur la généalogie mondiale des dragons. Atterrissage prévu le 27 août en librairie!
Julien d'Huy tweet media
Français
8
31
164
7.3K
Ed Pedraza-Robles retweetledi
Adam M. Ibbotson
Adam M. Ibbotson@AdamMIbbotson·
REMINDER: there is no good evidence that Stonehenge / Orkney were particularly important places in the Neolithic. 🤫 Extremely important archaeological landscapes today - yes. But it’s really just survivorship bias… #archaeology #history
Adam M. Ibbotson tweet mediaAdam M. Ibbotson tweet media
English
7
7
119
8.5K
Ed Pedraza-Robles retweetledi
sean
sean@DilettanteryPod·
Painted Pawnee Celestial Chart on Tanned Antelope or Deer Skin
sean tweet media
English
3
167
1.3K
29.6K
Ed Pedraza-Robles retweetledi
Hasan MS
Hasan MS@HasanMS_10016·
Palula relational nouns in relation to stream.
Hasan MS tweet media
English
1
1
14
365