yev

410 posts

yev

yev

@itisyev

building something new

surfing the interwebs Katılım Eylül 2013
871 Takip Edilen708 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
yev
yev@itisyev·
Howdy @NousResearch I have a hackathon submission
English
1
1
11
1.3K
yev
yev@itisyev·
@MaxDiffusionRL This is a repeat of Signal being for drugs and is now for privacy
English
0
0
0
16
Maximum-Epiplexity Agent Swarm
Maximum-Epiplexity Agent Swarm@MaxDiffusionRL·
It's so strange how if someone starts saying a lot of psychotic/strange things all of a sudden, you now wonder "did they get LLM psychosis" over "are they on drugs" now
English
1
0
3
87
Ryan
Ryan@ohryansbelt·
@anothercohen request for startup: site that tracks all forbes 30u30 recipients and whether they've committed fraud yet or not
English
6
6
247
12.5K
Alex Cohen
Alex Cohen@anothercohen·
Incredible. At this point we need to put the Forbes editors in charge of the FBI
Alex Cohen tweet media
Ryan@ohryansbelt

Delve, a YC-backed compliance startup that raised $32 million, has been accused of systematically faking SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance reports for hundreds of clients. According to a detailed Substack investigation by DeepDelver, a leaked Google spreadsheet containing links to hundreds of confidential draft audit reports revealed that Delve generates auditor conclusions before any auditor reviews evidence, uses the same template across 99.8% of reports, and relies on Indian certification mills operating through empty US shells instead of the "US-based CPA firms" they advertise. Here's the breakdown: > 493 out of 494 leaked SOC 2 reports allegedly contain identical boilerplate text, including the same grammatical errors and nonsensical sentences, with only a company name, logo, org chart, and signature swapped in > Auditor conclusions and test procedures are reportedly pre-written in draft reports before clients even provide their company description, which would violate AICPA independence rules requiring auditors to independently design tests and form conclusions > All 259 Type II reports claim zero security incidents, zero personnel changes, zero customer terminations, and zero cyber incidents during the observation period, with identical "unable to test" conclusions across every client > Delve's "US-based auditors" are actually Accorp and Gradient, described as Indian certification mills operating through US shell entities. 99%+ of clients reportedly went through one of these two firms over the past 6 months > The platform allegedly publishes fully populated trust pages claiming vulnerability scanning, pentesting, and data recovery simulations before any compliance work has been done > Delve pre-fabricates board meeting minutes, risk assessments, security incident simulations, and employee evidence that clients can adopt with a single click, according to the author > Most "integrations" are just containers for manual screenshots with no actual API connections. The author describes the platform as a "SOC 2 template pack with a thin SaaS wrapper" > When the leak was exposed, CEO Karun Kaushik emailed clients calling the allegations "falsified claims" from an "AI-generated email" and stated no sensitive data was accessed, while the reports themselves contained private signatures and confidential architecture diagrams > Companies relying on these reports could face criminal liability under HIPAA and fines up to 4% of global revenue under GDPR for compliance violations they believed were resolved > When clients threaten to leave, Delve reportedly pairs them with an external vCISO for manual off-platform work, which the author argues proves their own platform can't deliver real compliance > Delve's sales price dropped from $15,000 to $6,000 with ISO 27001 and a penetration test thrown in when a client mentioned considering a competitor

English
85
496
9.5K
1.1M
yev
yev@itisyev·
@ivanburazin I really wanna argue the way things play out is with some new network in which humans and AIs are interacting with the same platform However there are tiers of tools whether you're consumer, prosumer, or professional so agent-strict apps make sense
English
0
0
0
411
Ivan Burazin
Ivan Burazin@ivanburazin·
New category emerging: Headless SaaS Not infrastructure as a service / platform as a service Traditional software (Photoshop, Slack, Jira) rebuilt with agent-first APIs. - No UI - Programmatic access - Essentially the same product with different interface Entirely new business model.
English
151
40
901
111.3K
yev
yev@itisyev·
I wrote an introductory post on alternative interfaces for coding agent swarms as well as what the heck I mean by those words
yev tweet media
English
1
2
4
178
yev
yev@itisyev·
Not sure what you mean by "preempted" but I'd be inclined to say it runs where it needs to as it's invoked. This isn't a JIT optimization using WASM project, it's instead a toolkit for two-way Elixir->WASM (compiling Elixir programs into WebAssembly) and WASM->Elixir (using WebAssembly programs in Elixir, so you can bring over Rust, C, or whichever language you like!)
English
0
0
0
7
Victor Mendiluce
Victor Mendiluce@victormendiluce·
@itisyev When executing WASM from Elixir, is WASM execution preempted every 4000 reductions?
English
1
0
1
73
yev
yev@itisyev·
Introducing firebird! A modern Elixir/WebAssembly toolkit that was the outcome of billions of tokens via coding agents
yev tweet media
English
10
9
155
24.2K
yev
yev@itisyev·
There are plenty of flashy demos like Cursor making a browser or Anthropic making a C compiler but they often run into quick criticism of not being working solutions. Rather than join the mob of "there's no real use here!" I wanted to find an open-ish (as in not something with many/recent examples) problem and corral coding agents at it. A while ago I had fun writing interpreters in Elixir and saw an opportunity here to bring something to that community
English
0
0
1
18
elchemista
elchemista@elchemista·
@itisyev Just curious is there a real project/idea you working on, that push you to made it or just "why not" ?
English
1
0
1
61
yev
yev@itisyev·
@ChristophGockel Fair, but I don't suspect tech names from 20 years ago to be worried about a modern project
English
1
0
1
13
Christoph
Christoph@ChristophGockel·
@itisyev Congrats on the release! Not sure if you’re aware, but if this takes off you might want to look into the history of why Firefox is called Firefox today.
English
1
0
1
113
yev
yev@itisyev·
@goneflyin I recently ran into a 2M input tokens/minute limit but I didn't intelligently cache prompts which resulted in hitting that ceiling. I don't recall running into it with firebird so my suspicion is that the pi agents were caching tokens well But, based on napkin math, at least 2k
English
0
0
1
23
Scott Pfister
Scott Pfister@goneflyin·
@itisyev Dumb question, but … all in, what was the token cost for that 1bn tokens? Just curious of a ballpark. It’s an interesting metric I haven’t quite seen before.
English
1
0
1
19
yev
yev@itisyev·
Orb is like Vecty (Go WASM frontend) for Elixir. I wanted something that'd topically fit well in the awesome list for WASM In short, firebird covers both Elixir->WASM (refined for general cases as well as incorporating into Phoenix) as well as WASM->Elixir (so you can use WASM modules from inside an existing Elixir project, similar to Orb but generalized so you can use Rust, C, etc)
English
0
0
1
35
yev
yev@itisyev·
Since I didn't have "checkpoints" or steps for the models to validate themselves (although I suspect this just means including in the original prompt), I did step in a bit 1. Original two files results in close to 1 billion of tokens consumed (see pi-vers on GitHub) 2. I steered it to provision more testing/benchmarking agents after I configure branch protection on GitHub (to force guardrails) 3. It then runs off predominantly on its own and, to my surprise, agents would basically shut off when they had exhausted what could be done 4. I vibe a bit of clean up at the end so guides are readable etc So, all in all, a *ton* of work that'd be tough without LLMs. Rather than sit on this for weeks I can blast it out in a weekend
English
1
0
1
18
Sadi Moodi
Sadi Moodi@MoodiSadi·
@itisyev Billion tokens via coding agents to build an Elixir/WASM toolkit? That's the most 2026 dev story ever. The real question: how much of that was agent iteration vs human guidance? Would love to see the breakdown of agent vs human tokens.
English
1
0
4
549
yev
yev@itisyev·
Here's a walkthrough demo of the full game showing the following features: 1. Prompt a Playwright web browser agent in a Vers VM 2. Prompt an iMessage communication agent locally 3. Prompt a GH agent inside an Apple container 4. Prompt a coding agent in a cloud sandbox
English
0
0
3
162
yev
yev@itisyev·
Howdy @NousResearch I have a hackathon submission
English
1
1
11
1.3K
yev
yev@itisyev·
@unifiedh @magpie_lang @PyTorch How does it compare to a limited subset of LLVM? Based on website example of Magpie Wonder if something in that direction could unlock more compilation targets (ie WASM)
English
0
0
0
63
yev
yev@itisyev·
@samaaron Sounds like WebAssembly's making a comeback in 2026 :fanfare:
English
0
0
3
77
yev
yev@itisyev·
If you're curious about what Elixir and WebAssembly are or why bridge the two together, you can read about it here yev.bar/firebird
yev tweet media
English
2
0
10
1.4K