Sabitlenmiş Tweet
A$CEND!NG
5.5K posts

A$CEND!NG
@itsascendingfr
The Young Riser, The Fine Line Walker, The Cosmos Jumper THE MULTI CITY PRODIGAL SON MCK-》PRNC-》FTW-》DEN Watch Out For The Snakes, They Lead 2 Medusa.
In The Cosmos Katılım Temmuz 2016
179 Takip Edilen89 Takipçiler

@lady_valor_07 Yes because I only listen to one song anyways and that one is a rare play... Easy Dub.
English
A$CEND!NG retweetledi

2022: “Stop overreacting, they won’t overturn Roe.”
They did.
2023: “Stop overreacting, they won’t let women die rather than get an abortion.”
They did.
2024: “Stop overreacting, they won’t arrest women for miscarriages.”
They did.
2025: “Stop overreacting, they won’t turn women into incubators.”
They did.
2026: “Stop overreacting, they won’t attack mifepristone.”
They did, today.
Now: “Stop overreacting, they won’t go after birth control next.”
They will.
English
A$CEND!NG retweetledi

The internet constantly tells women that men are terrible listeners because the second a woman starts venting about her day, the man immediately interrupts to offer a logical solution. We are taught to view this as him being dismissive, emotionally unintelligent, or invalidating our feelings.
The strict, unpopular truth is that to a man, fixing the problem is his absolute highest, most desperate form of empathy.
Women vent to connect; we want our partner to just sit in the dark with us and validate the emotion. But men are hardwired to view the woman they love being in distress as an active threat. When he immediately offers a spreadsheet, a strategy, or a solution to your problem, he isn't trying to silence you. His brain has recognized that something in the world is hurting his partner, and his immediate, visceral instinct is to assassinate the thing causing you pain.
We constantly shame men for "not just listening," completely ignoring the fact that his attempt to fix your life is his most profound declaration of love.
k@alfkkifine
what opinion about men do you have that makes people feel like this???
English
A$CEND!NG retweetledi

The biggest lie society sells us is that women are the "emotional" gender and men are the "logical" ones. When you actually look at the dating market, the reality is the exact opposite.
Men are the true romantics. Women are the pragmatists.
A successful man, a CEO, a lawyer, a doctor will happily marry a woman who works as a cashier, a waitress, or is completely unemployed. He doesn't care about her status, her network, or her bank account. He marries her simply because she brings him peace, she is kind, and she makes him smile.
He loves her for who she is, not what she can do for him.
Now flip it. Ask a successful woman to marry a kind, loving, loyal man who works as a cashier.
The answer is almost always a hard "No."
Suddenly, "love" isn't enough. Suddenly, she needs "ambition." She needs "security." She needs a man on her level or higher.
A woman rarely falls in love with a man’s soul; she falls in love with his trajectory. She loves what he can provide, where he can take her, and the lifestyle he unlocks.
Men grow up thinking love is a fairy tale. They project their own capacity for unconditional love onto women. They think, "If I give her my heart, she will have my back."
They learn the hard way that female love is performance-based. The moment he loses the job, the moment the confidence wavers, or the moment he stops being "useful," the "romance" evaporates.
We call men "dogs" and "players," but men are the only ones willing to bet their entire lives on a partner who brings nothing to the table but her presence. Women love with a calculator in their hand. Men love with their eyes closed. And that is exactly why men are the ones who get destroyed they are trying to play a game of hearts with a gender that is playing a game of chess.
k@alfkkifine
what opinion about men do you have that makes people feel like this???
English
A$CEND!NG retweetledi

@RepThomasMassie @Adelgary @WhiteHouse @WhiteHouse totally disconnected from reality. Robin Williams called it.
English

🚜 Curious how American farmers are benefiting right now — or exactly how much each state has saved?
👀📲 ONLYFARMS.GOV

English

@AskPlayStation can't login to my account and I'm not receiving any emails
English
A$CEND!NG retweetledi
A$CEND!NG retweetledi
A$CEND!NG retweetledi
A$CEND!NG retweetledi

Let me make this ABUNDANTLY clear:
- If Clinton abused kids..
• Prison
- If Bill Gates abused kids..
• Prison
- If Musk abused kids..
• Prison
- If Trump abused kids…
• Prison
You either agree to all of those or none of this. If you pick in choose based on politics, then you stand with Pedos… not kids.
English
A$CEND!NG retweetledi

@FreakyGif_ Doing it and using part of the money to go to rehab and never do it again and have the rest of the monyon in savings
English
A$CEND!NG retweetledi

lead actor a little too full of himself otherwise great movie
MyTimeToShineHello@MyTimeToShineH
Give me your honest thoughts on Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings
English
A$CEND!NG retweetledi
A$CEND!NG retweetledi

Christmas is not Christmas without remembering the one moment in World War I when humanity briefly overpowered the war itself.
The 1914 Christmas Truce has become a kind of seasonal legend, heartwarming in its tenderness, heartbreaking in its impossibility, a reminder that even in the darkest chapters of history, people still reached for light. Along the frozen trenches of the Western Front, where mud, fear, and artillery defined daily life, something extraordinary happened: soldiers who had been shooting at each other hours earlier began singing the same carols into the night.
What followed feels almost impossible today. German and British troops slowly emerged from their trenches, hands raised, voices trembling with equal parts caution and hope. They met in the middle of No Man’s Land , the very ground meant to kill them, to exchange cigarettes, chocolate, buttons, and stories of home. Some kicked around a football. Others helped bury each other’s dead. For a few precious hours, the war paused not because commanders ordered it, but because ordinary men chose to see each other as human again.
But the beauty of that moment only deepens its tragedy. High‑ranking generals were furious when they learned what had happened. They ordered artillery strikes to break up any lingering peace and threatened court‑martial for anyone who attempted such a truce again. By Christmas 1915, the front was too bitter, too mechanized, too scarred for anything similar to happen. The brief miracle of 1914 remained a one‑time defiance, a fragile rebellion against the machinery of war.
And yet the story endures, retold every December not because it changed the course of the conflict, but because it revealed something essential about the people trapped inside it. The Christmas Truce is a reminder that even in a world built on orders, fear, and survival, individuals can still choose compassion. It is a story that refuses to fade, because it speaks to a longing that transcends time: the hope that peace, however fleeting, is always possible.
#archaeohistories

English
A$CEND!NG retweetledi
















