Jack Lee

6.9K posts

Jack Lee banner
Jack Lee

Jack Lee

@JackLeePV

#bitcoin; fix the money, heal the world.

Global Katılım Aralık 2010
1.1K Takip Edilen3.1K Takipçiler
Jack Lee retweetledi
LifPay⚡
LifPay⚡@LifPay·
BITCOIN FW26 Featuring: Self Custody Core Proof-of-Work Minimalism Low Time Preference Luxury Timeless never goes out of style. #Bitcoin
LifPay⚡ tweet media
English
0
2
6
123
Jack Lee retweetledi
BTC Prague
BTC Prague@BTCPrague·
Bitcoin experts just warned of multiple factors that will bring Bitcoin to $1M faster than most people think. ⚡ Natalie Brunell, Tony Yazbeck, Rahim Taghizadegan, and Jack Lee join a panel at BTC Prague 2026 on Bitcoin, geopolitics, and surviving the Great Reset. They debate whether rogue states and Wall Street institutions taint Bitcoin, why self-custody is the only real ownership, and how neutral money reshapes the shift from a unipolar to a multipolar world. Watch the full panel. Link below. 👇 @natbrunell @V4BTC @scholarium_at @JackLeePV
English
4
12
50
13.1K
Cory 🦢 Real Bitcoin @ Swan.com
Probably no one knows more about the chances of success for OUSD than Christian, who co-founded Libra and @lightspark. Here's his initial take:
Christian Catalini@ccatalini

1/ Today, more than 140 companies, most of which compete fiercely with one another, agreed to back the same stablecoin. The vehicle is @openstandard, a new and deliberately independent company launching Open USD, or OUSD, and positioning it not as anyone’s product but as neutral infrastructure for payments, trading and the internet economy.

English
8
8
76
25.9K
Jack Lee retweetledi
Milk Road
Milk Road@milkroaddaily·
Lyn Alden: Bitcoin's 4-year cycle had its best run, and now AI is eating its lunch. "For a long time, Bitcoin was the fastest horse really that you could invest in." But the rise of AI companies gave investors a 10x alternative. Capital that used to chase $BTC is now chasing semiconductors. Bitcoin's unique edge - self-custody, borderless, unseizable - doesn't disappear. But from a pure price performance standpoint, "AI is kind of sucking a lot of the attention out of it." When AI goes sideways, Bitcoin may re-attract that capital. FT @LynAldenContact @GoldRepublic.
Milk Road@milkroaddaily

Mike Novogratz: No one cares about anything outside the AI food chain right now. "Crypto is in that... we tried to make the crypto agentic link. It's actually a real link. It's not a theoretical link..." "But no one cares about crypto right now." "Markets need energy." "And then you've got Saylor selling a little bit. I don't know why he did that, it was a strange move..." "It was a tiny amount - but if the guy with laser eyes is selling $BTC, that's not good either." FT @Scaramucci @Novogratz @AllThingsMkts @SkyBridge @SALTConference.

English
48
32
435
123.8K
Jack Lee
Jack Lee@JackLeePV·
@LogicalThesis Yes sell the crypto business but just keep Bitcoin as reserve.
English
1
0
0
16
Logical Thesis
Logical Thesis@LogicalThesis·
Why doesn't $GLXY sell their digital asset portfolio, divest the crypto biz, and focus solely on data center? Bet the stock would jump $15
English
12
1
37
9.5K
Jack Lee
Jack Lee@JackLeePV·
@milkroaddaily So, David, it’s time for Bonnie to get away from Blockchain, at least her X name…
English
0
0
0
11
Milk Road
Milk Road@milkroaddaily·
Lyn Alden on why $BTC is struggling right now: First, the broader crypto space is finally being seen for what it is... "A lot of it was fake decentralization... regulatory arbitrage" with "not a lot of there there." DeFi total locked value never took out its 2021 peak. Second, capital that once chased crypto as the fastest horse has now shifted toward AI... Chip stocks, hyperscalers, the SpaceX IPO. "Until that kind of cools off, Bitcoin could be somewhat pressured." FT @DavidLin_TV @LynAldenContact @EgoDeathCapital.
Milk Road@milkroaddaily

Raoul Pal: Retail didn't abandon crypto. They lost their stake and went to a different casino (AI). They're in their 20s, can't afford a house, working 3 jobs, and looking for a way out. They'll be back the moment crypto outperforms. We need to stop painting their rationality as 'disloyalty.' FT @RaoulGMI @LgDoucet

English
48
17
452
155K
Dawn Song
Dawn Song@dawnsongtweets·
🚀I'm excited to share that I will be joining Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL) as Vice President of AI Research, together with many members of the Virtue AI team. I will help shape Meta's AI safety and AI security efforts, advancing the safety and security of frontier AI models and agentic AI systems that will serve billions of people and organizations around the world. Throughout my career, I have been driven by a simple belief: for AI to realize its full potential, it must be secure, trustworthy, and beneficial. That belief has guided my research for many years and ultimately led us to co-found Virtue AI in 2024. Our goal was to translate advances in trustworthy AI research into practical solutions and build the trust layer for AI systems and agents, enabling organizations to deploy AI with confidence. I am incredibly proud of what the Virtue AI team has accomplished. Together, we built technologies for AI security and agent security, partnered with leading enterprises and frontier AI labs, and contributed research, benchmarks, and open platforms that have helped advance the science and practice of trustworthy AI. Most importantly, we assembled an exceptional team united by a shared mission: making AI more secure, trustworthy, and beneficial. I am deeply grateful to our team, customers, collaborators, advisors, and investors for their trust and support throughout this journey. In particular, I would like to thank Lightspeed Venture Partners, Walden Catalyst Ventures, Prosperity7 Ventures, Factory, Osage University Partners, Lip-Bu Tan, and all of our supporters who helped us turn an ambitious vision into reality. Your trust, guidance, and partnership have been instrumental in shaping Virtue AI's journey. As AI systems become increasingly capable and autonomous, ensuring their security, trustworthiness, and alignment will be one of the defining challenges of our time. I am inspired by Alex, Nat, Prashant, and the broader MSL team’s vision of building AI and AI agents that benefit billions of people, and I look forward to helping make that vision a reality through advances in AI safety and security. The future of AI will not be defined solely by how intelligent our systems become, but by how secure, trustworthy, and beneficial we make them. I believe we have an extraordinary opportunity and responsibility to shape that future together and bring the benefits of AI to billions of people around the world. We're just getting started. If you're passionate about advancing frontier AI while building the foundations of AI safety, security, and trust, I'd love to hear from you. Come join us on this extraordinary journey to help shape the future of AI.
English
135
60
1.2K
251.5K
Samson Mow
Samson Mow@Excellion·
For everyone talking about $STRC, when you say “peg” I automatically think you have no idea what you’re talking about. Use the correct term: par.
English
17
55
997
57.3K
Jack Lee retweetledi
A.R.M
A.R.M@13arm13arm·
Dear Tesla Leadership, I am writing this with real respect for everything Tesla has done. You have changed the world with electric cars and pushed hard on self-driving technology. I have been a big supporter for years. I own a 2017 Tesla Model X in Sydney, Australia, and bought the Full Self-Driving package more than six years ago for over ten thousand dollars. I also bought a Model 3 in 2021 and replaced it last year with another one. I am also a TSLA shareholder. I still believe in the mission. That is why I need to say something important. For early buyers like me, especially on older Model X and S cars that have now ceased production in their RHD versions since 2020, the long wait for Full Self-Driving feels demeaning, devaluing, and humiliating. Back when we paid for FSD, it was sold as the feature that would let the car handle driving on its own. We accepted the delays because we trusted the plan. Many of us on 2017 cars got the free Hardware 3 upgrade later, and we were grateful. But in Australia right now, newer cars get the full FSD version 14 experience with all the latest improvements first. Older cars are still waiting or getting lighter versions that do not match up. After six or seven years on my Model X, it still does not feel like the complete capability we paid a big premium for. Switching to a Model 3 or Y feels like a downgrade from what the original X offered. This feels unfair. The flagship Model X and S that many early adopters chose are no longer made the same way. New cars come with better hardware built in and get the newest features first. Early buyers who helped fund the early days are left watching from the side while our discontinued vehicles lag behind. The FSD transfer option has ended. It adds to the sense that we are now seen as legacy owners. It feels demeaning because early supporters took the biggest risk. We put real money behind the vision when it was new. Now it can seem like our loyalty is not valued the same as new customers who get the latest from day one. It feels devaluing because the extra money we paid has not given the full benefit we expected. These cars lose value on the used market when buyers know the FSD experience is limited or delayed on older hardware. It feels humiliating after years of waiting and hearing updates that mostly benefit newer cars. We watch the big progress celebrated while our older vehicles stay behind. Many of us feel overlooked despite being there from the start and sticking with Tesla through multiple purchases and as shareholders. I am not asking for the impossible. I just ask for fairness: Give clear and fair upgrade paths for those of us who bought FSD early, with prices that recognize we already paid once. Offer good ways to move the full value of our FSD to a new Tesla purchase. Keep pushing improvements for older cars in Australia and be straight about timelines. Think about some goodwill for the people who have waited the longest. Tesla has achieved so much. Treating early customers right would show real loyalty back to the people who believed first. I still want Tesla to succeed, including by making good on what brought us in years ago. Thank you for reading this. I hope you will consider it. Sincerely, Adam M. A Concerned Early Adopter and TSLA Shareholder Owner of a 2017 Tesla Model X (and multiple Model 3s) Sydney, Australia @TeslaAUNZ @Tesla @Tesla_AI @elonmusk @robyndenholm @kimbal @KathleeWT @jgebbia @tomzhu_nz @IraEhrenpreis
English
75
59
480
46.1K
Jack Lee retweetledi
Matt Cole
Matt Cole@ColeMacro·
Following up on yesterday's post with some additional context and data that may help explain what we saw on Friday. A few people asked why I believe the selloff was driven primarily by a leverage liquidation event. No issuer has perfect visibility into every investor's financing arrangements, so no one can know with certainty exactly what happened across every account. That said, three things stand out. First, we knew leveraged strategies had developed around Digital Credit securities. We had seen examples of trades that involved meaningful leverage and had publicly discussed the risks associated with some of those approaches. Second, we received anecdotal reports from market participants indicating that liquidations were occurring during the selloff. Third, the trading data itself is consistent with what is often observed during forced selling events. The STRC chart shows volume remained relatively modest through much of the decline, then exploded as the security moved from roughly $89 toward its intraday low of $82.50. After the low was established, volume quickly subsided and the price recovered materially into the close. That pattern is often associated with a liquidation cascade. Forced selling drives volume sharply higher, prices overshoot fundamentals, and then buyers step in once the selling pressure has been exhausted. The SATA chart also shows a price decline, but a very different volume profile. Volume remained much more consistent throughout the session (and the entire week) and did not exhibit the same relative spike around the lows that was observed in STRC. That distinction is important. To me, the data suggests that the primary stress event occurred in STRC, while weakness elsewhere in Digital Credit was more likely a spillover effect from the broader selloff than a similar wave of liquidations occurring across every security. This is not a statement that one credit is stronger than another. In my view, both STRC and SATA remain strong credits, and neither issuer experienced a sudden deterioration in credit quality during Friday's trading session. Digital Credit is a new asset class. As it grows, there will be periods where market structure, liquidity, leverage, and investor behavior create volatility that has little to do with underlying credit fundamentals. Understanding those dynamics is part of the maturation process. Friday was the most significant stress test Digital Credit has faced so far. The market absorbed it, buyers emerged, and both securities recovered substantially from their lows. That is a constructive outcome and an important data point for the future of the asset class.
Matt Cole tweet media
Matt Cole@ColeMacro

Today was the most difficult day in the history of Digital Credit. $STRC traded as low as $82.50 before recovering sharply. $SATA traded from par down to the low 90s before also rebounding. It was a difficult day for many investors. What happened today was a leverage liquidation event, not a deterioration in underlying credit quality. There is an old saying in income markets that the road to hell is paved with carry. When investors discover an asset that offers attractive yields, relatively low volatility, and strong underlying credit characteristics, many eventually decide that owning it is not enough. They borrow against it. They lever it. They attempt to enhance the carry. That works until it doesn't. When markets move against leveraged holders, forced selling can create a cascade. Prices fall, margin calls increase, more selling occurs, and the cycle feeds on itself. The selling becomes disconnected from fundamentals and becomes driven by balance sheet constraints. We have seen this many times before in traditional finance. Some of the largest hedge fund failures in history involved highly leveraged positions in U.S. Treasuries. Not because Treasuries suddenly became poor credits, but because investors became overextended while trying to earn additional yield on assets that appeared safe and stable. That is the dynamic that played out today in Digital Credit. Importantly, the creditworthiness of the issuers remains strong. At @Strive, our dividend reserves remain intact. Our company is not under stress. We remain well positioned to meet our obligations and continue executing our strategy. The underlying credit profile remains substantially unchanged from where it was before today's volatility. One of the lessons markets teach repeatedly is that leverage flushes are not necessarily evidence of weak collateral. In many cases, they occur precisely because the underlying collateral is viewed as stable enough to encourage excessive leverage in the first place. In that sense, today's events were difficult for some investors, but they were also instructive. Digital Credit is still in its infancy. It is better for the market to experience and learn from these dynamics now, while the market remains relatively small, than years from now when the market is many times larger. Investors, issuers, and market participants all benefit from understanding the risks associated with leverage and liquidity before the asset class reaches full scale. No one knows with certainty whether today's lows will ultimately prove to be the bottom. What is clear is that there was substantial demand at those prices. Both $STRC and $SATA experienced significant buying interest off their intraday lows, resulting in sharp recoveries. That price action reflects meaningful demand entering the market at lower levels and is an encouraging sign for the health of the asset class. A liquidation event and a credit event are not the same thing. The price action today did not change my conviction in the long-term opportunity for Digital Credit. If anything, it reinforced my belief that we are building an entirely new category of financial instrument that will experience many of the same growing pains that other large fixed income markets experienced before reaching maturity. The volatility was uncomfortable for many participants. The lesson will prove valuable. Stay calm. Focus on fundamentals. Markets have a way of working through excesses, and when they do, stronger foundations are often left behind.

English
83
110
850
151.5K
Jack Lee retweetledi
Samson Mow
Samson Mow@Excellion·
$STRC is a brilliant instrument. It’s effectively what I tried to do with Bitcoin Bonds: strip out the volatility from Bitcoin and share the upside with investors. There is a massive market for a product like this somewhere in the ballpark of $200 trillion. There’s nothing structurally wrong with the design of STRC (or SATA, MARS, etc.) unless you think Bitcoin won’t appreciate in the long term, which I’m sure none of us do. Can STRC trade for under $100? Yes, of course it can. It moves freely according to market forces (this drop was caused by some leveraged plays). Do some people panic when it’s below par? Probably. That’s the behavior of short-term capital. However, when STRC is trading below par, that’s an opportunity for long-term capital to arb it. It’s the same case as when stablecoins like USDt (note STRC is not a stablecoin) are trading below their peg. It presents an opportunity for people to come in and earn money by buying it at an effective discount and redeeming for $1. It happens all the time. STRC pays the same dividend whether you bought it for $90 or $100. Long-term capital will absorb any below-par STRC like a dry sponge. Keep in mind that STRC is not even a year old. It’s still a baby, albeit one that’s growing at an incredible pace. It seems fashionable to dunk on it these days, but it’s far too soon to say it doesn’t work. Remember, the goal is to strip out the volatility from Bitcoin to package it into an instrument for investors who aren’t necessarily seeking out Bitcoin. This isn’t a year-long project. It’s a decades-long initiative that requires a massive balance sheet to shock-absorb. And that’s exactly what @Strategy has.
English
36
242
2.3K
134.1K
Jack Lee
Jack Lee@JackLeePV·
People may forget and think STRC is another Equity of Strategy. Yes it is, a preferred one. 😂😂
English
0
0
0
49
Jack Lee retweetledi
Scott Ellam
Scott Ellam@btconlyscott·
I was fortunate to join @adam3us and @saylor for dinners last week. I started my career in executive recruitment for one reason: there's no better way to learn from the world's most influential leaders, every day. That's truer now than ever - and it's the whole ethos behind @XCEofficial. Connect human capital to the digital capital! $XCE | AQSE: XCE | OTCQB: XCELF
Scott Ellam tweet mediaScott Ellam tweet media
English
19
13
101
14.8K
Jack Lee
Jack Lee@JackLeePV·
When these prevail, #Bitcoin then become global Digital Reserve, Strategy-like can lead to be become dominated global “Central Bank” while $STRC and in-kind will be the leading Reserved Currencies (replace Dollar). This will be the ONLY way possibly leading to “Bitcoin Standard”, which I believe is what Michael @saylor aiming for. Then the rest of products issued on top of, digital money, digital yields,…etc. become the new global financial investment instruments. I don’t think everyday just calling Bitcoin non-custodial assets works and not in practical bringing Bitcoin into the real world. The ultimate goal is the SAME, but the approach is very different. @parkeralewis fyi.
Michael Saylor@saylor

x.com/i/article/2066…

English
0
0
1
115
Jack Lee retweetledi
Tim Draper
Tim Draper@TimDraper·
I love Elon Musk.. Almost as much as I love Satoshi Nakamoto. #spacex #bitcoin
English
80
108
1.5K
44.8K
Jack Lee retweetledi
LifPay⚡
LifPay⚡@LifPay·
🦡 + 🐧 = ✨ What happens when Honey Badger meets Penguins at @BTCPrague ? Pure magic! Today’s energy was wild. Missed out? We’re just warming up! 🔥 📍 Find us right next to the Info Desk. Grab yours before they're gone! 👇 #Bitcoin #BTCPrague2026
LifPay⚡ tweet mediaLifPay⚡ tweet mediaLifPay⚡ tweet media
English
1
2
10
331
Jack Lee
Jack Lee@JackLeePV·
Yes “MSTR gives tradfi leveraged exposure to this pristine commodity. But Bitcoin already is superior money because it’s the ultimate bearer asset.” $MSTR (+$STRC) is the bridge. Bridging the tradition financial world’s assets into #Bitcoin. It has to go in the way to make more wealth owners aware of the merits of Bitcoin. Otherwise the sound money world won’t be arrived.
Emmett Long@EmmettLong8

Bitcoin is far more than just “money.” It’s a scarce digital commodity — the hardest, most verifiable asset ever created. 21 million fixed supply. No printing, no dilution by governments or banks. Better than digital gold: portable, divisible, instantly verifiable by anyone. It’s a true bearer asset. Hold the keys = true ownership. No counterparty risk. Send value across borders without permission. Unseizable without physical access. Revolutionary in an age of surveillance and censorship. Fiat is a claim on institutions. Bitcoin is property first — unconfiscatable, borderless, censorship-resistant. You don’t need to spend it for it to have value. Its power is scarcity + sovereignty + liquidity. MSTR gives tradfi leveraged exposure to this pristine commodity. But Bitcoin already is superior money because it’s the ultimate bearer asset. HODLers are accumulating the hardest asset in history. The world is catching up. You’re out of your depth Parker, just because you have a large following doesn’t mean my opinion is wrong. You should stop before you ruin your reputation any further.

English
0
0
0
118