James V

4.8K posts

James V banner
James V

James V

@james_mtc

CTO, CAIO, and VC/PE Board Advisor. Former head of AI @NASA CAS and tech wonk for @WhiteHouse, DOD, and DOJ. Tweets are my own.

He/Him Katılım Mart 2018
4.5K Takip Edilen25.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
James V
James V@james_mtc·
James Carville is wrong. "Move to the center" is backwards. Mamdani has the right idea. And I have the data to prove it. For your consideration: thecenterisalie.org
English
1
0
6
640
James V retweetledi
David Sirota
David Sirota@davidsirota·
When you see Neera Tanden depict herself as an expert on "electability," please remember that Tanden was one of the architects of the Hillary Clinton 2008 campaign that explicitly insisted that Barack Obama could not win a general election.
David Sirota tweet media
English
43
601
3K
62.5K
James V
James V@james_mtc·
If you can’t trust someone to legislate in the interests of the average citizen, but instead have to wonder if EVERY leg vote is being biased towards foreign and wealthy influence… yeah the resume doesn’t matter. Taking Super PAC money, particularly PACs with explicit foreign influence, should be immediately disqualifying because it creates a conflict of interest.
English
0
1
5
265
Neera Tanden🌻
Neera Tanden🌻@neeratanden·
Note the absence of any statement about Haley’s service to the country or President Obama. I get the opposition to AIPAC. I just wonder if the people of Michigan see this as the only thing that matters in this race, given how many are struggling to make ends meet.
Ben Rhodes@brhodes

Note the absence of any effort to defend AIPAC's spend or the tens of millions in special interest money of all sorts backing Stevens. Because it's indefensible and terrible for the Democratic Party.

English
364
83
574
271.8K
James V
James V@james_mtc·
The Tea Party swept 2010. 63 House Seats, 6 governorships, 5 full leg and gov combos, 700 state seats, and 20 addl state legislatures. That influenced redistricting and entrenched gerrymandering for the last 1.5 decades. Then by 2014 the Tea Party had effectively established strong state ops and drove 9 Senate flips and changed the entire party narrative and internal control structure. That changed how 2016 primaries were run and what the messaging was. That got us Trump. And at the end of Obama and early Trump I, we had a SCOTUS changeover from Senate/McConnel duplicitousness. And that SCOTUS gutted the VRA and affirmed gerrymandering, entrenching the Tea Party’s original REDMAP goals.
English
1
0
0
30
Politics & Poll Tracker 📡
Politics & Poll Tracker 📡@PollTracker2024·
#WisconsinGovernor Politico: One Wisconsin Democratic state lawmaker, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said this regarding Francesca Hong: “It’s scary to think that this is the person who is leading the primary … There’s a lot of us that think if she’s the nominee, we lose that seat, even in what’s supposed to be a very big Dem year. And we will lose the Assembly, too.”
Politics & Poll Tracker 📡 tweet media
Politics & Poll Tracker 📡@PollTracker2024

Politico: Scandal sends Wisconsin Democrats into freakout mode over governor’s race The Democratic establishment is alarmed that a top candidate’s collapse and the surge from a democratic socialist could cost them the governorship. politico.com/news/2026/07/1…

English
86
69
490
473.5K
The Story
The Story@TheStoryFNC·
WAR ON SUCCESS EXCLUSIVE: NYC DSA Co-Chair @unionGustavo says there’s no such thing as constitutional right “to double digit returns” on investment…
English
270
124
639
451.5K
James V
James V@james_mtc·
@sfrr024 @PollTracker2024 Huh? The tea party swept primaries and then dominated the generals…. 2010 decimated the Dems and the old guard GOP. And actually for well known candidates, the period between the primary and the election changes very little about the voters minds. thecenterisalie.org/s/window/
English
2
0
1
109
trashpandasfrrr
trashpandasfrrr@sfrr024·
@james_mtc @PollTracker2024 It’s a primary. Popularity in that doesn’t always equal popularity in the general. We saw this for republicans during the tea party
English
1
0
3
90
James V
James V@james_mtc·
@SteveKerins @_rotimia @ajlamesa incorrect. thecenterisalie.org Moderates are not a real voting block. It is nomenclature derived from self-labeling… not voting behavior. Outsiders and anti-establishment candidates are more attractive to voters than policy “moderates.”
English
0
0
2
59
Steve Kerins
Steve Kerins@SteveKerins·
I might have been on board with that before all the horrible candidates he successfully backed e.g. in the New York primary. The party can't function nationally if we're driving away everyone who isn't an urban leftist. Moderates could have won general elections in those seats. Moderates can't win elsewhere in the country if DSA politicians are the standard-bearers.
English
9
0
16
1.6K
Rotimi Adeoye
Rotimi Adeoye@_rotimia·
I think Democrats need to stop taking the loudest most unstable characters online and using them to develop how they understand certain factions of the Democratic Party. Zohran is correct here.
Rotimi Adeoye tweet media
English
34
116
1K
75.8K
James V retweetledi
Alan MacLeod
Alan MacLeod@AlanRMacLeod·
Corporate media think we are really stupid. I cannot stress this enough.
Alan MacLeod tweet media
English
335
6.8K
36.6K
369.3K
James V retweetledi
David Weigel
David Weigel@daveweigel·
El-Sayed campaign, which has been focusing on “electability” since McMorrow’s collapse, sending around memo contrasting its polls and fundraising w Stevens. “Which of these looks like the strongest general election campaign to you?”
David Weigel tweet mediaDavid Weigel tweet media
English
48
123
862
94.2K
James V
James V@james_mtc·
@esjesjesj 7-12 if a hole is something missing from a “t-shirt” 10-15 if we’re going topologically.
English
0
0
6
5.2K
Nate Blouin
Nate Blouin@NateForUtah·
I do not blame folks who feel this way anymore. When you look at two candidates funded by special interests that will not functionally change a broken system while candidates who actually speak to something different being possible continue to be defeated, people give up. They see a ping pong match between Democrats and Republicans without any lasting progress. Rights are used as bargaining chips and it's hard not to think there's truth to the feeling held by many that things like abortion are just seen as fundraising tools.
David Weigel@daveweigel

Emerging take on Abdul Twitter (though not from Abdul himself) is that if Stevens beats him, progressives could stay home and let Rogers win. Abdul's put this much more diplomatically - that there are a lot of guys named Abdul in Michigan who didn't vote D in 2024 but would probably vote for the non-AIPAC candidate who happens to be a Muslim guy. x.com/bhaviklathia/s…

English
7
4
63
2.1K
James V
James V@james_mtc·
@neeratanden She gets elected and makes moves from the left to the center and loses independents and your theory is that she should move further center? Wut.
English
0
0
4
286
James V
James V@james_mtc·
Ugh I’m sorry, @shannonrwatts. I don’t know how I’m suddenly in a thread with people defending Gallego to the hilt. 🫠 I think it’s my default response to any NYPost article to be incredulous, particularly quoting Rep Luna as a source, even if it’s not about her alien Nephilim theories. But if there are more complaints, if witnesses come forward, I do think there should be an expanded investigation into his inappropriate behavior. Creeps gonna creep.
English
0
0
0
102
Shannon Watts
Shannon Watts@shannonrwatts·
@BL33DZGR33N @james_mtc LOL do you think they get together in their states or in DC? And who do you think writes the rules? Men or women?
English
2
0
0
316
James V
James V@james_mtc·
You won’t find me saying that the Hill doesn’t have a long history of sexism and abuse. It’s a disaster. But “Gallego’s relationships deserve more scrutiny because of the power dynamic” is different from “this was an abuse of power.” The first can be true without proving the second. That distinction matters.
English
1
1
1
200
James V
James V@james_mtc·
According to the article They weren’t subordinates. They worked for different congressional reps from Texas. There was no supervisory connection, no professional dependency, and as far as we know no favors exchanged, no abuse of power, and no coercion. This was consensual. If those facts change, we can reconsider. As the facts stand it was improper, perhaps politically unwise, but not unethical. If a CEO dated a much younger person at a different company, but in the same industry, it might be frowned upon like all large age gaps are. But it’s not unethical or a violation of any workplace standard I’ve ever encountered.
English
2
1
7
281
Shannon Watts
Shannon Watts@shannonrwatts·
@james_mtc “Man has sex with subordinate colleagues.” Shake your head at me all you want, but this would be a fireable offense in a company. Consensual or not, there is a power imbalance and it’s unethical behavior for a member of Congress.
English
6
0
4
541