Jarad Johnson

10.2K posts

Jarad Johnson banner
Jarad Johnson

Jarad Johnson

@jdjohnson

Trying to be better. Building @mostly_serious (https://t.co/Ikj59v8exR).

Springfield, Missouri Katılım Nisan 2007
685 Takip Edilen3.2K Takipçiler
Jarad Johnson retweetledi
Thijs
Thijs@cdngdev·
i gave 5.6 sol access to my camera roll and had it extract pictures of every piece of clothing i own from my photos then, told it to find new outfits for me and render them on me with gpt-image! its kinda cool to see your entire wardrobe in a collection like this
Sam Altman@sama

i'd love to see interesting things people have built with 5.6 sol. i will send the person who made the coolest thing a special gift from the openai archives.

English
324
534
14.5K
2.7M
Jarad Johnson
Jarad Johnson@jdjohnson·
@Dimillian @PhilippSpiess The new reports are very good. A lot of my company status automations got so much better with this latest update. 🙏🏼
English
0
0
1
58
Thomas Ricouard
Thomas Ricouard@Dimillian·
If you update to the latest ChatGPT iOS app version, we have a very cool new feature from @PhilippSpiess. Codex visualisation now also works on iOS; you can ask for all kinds of graphs and custom content to be built on the fly!
English
37
14
525
57.9K
Jarad Johnson
Jarad Johnson@jdjohnson·
@dsiroker Give that thing access to Sol to execute its ideas and save yourself some tokens.
English
0
0
0
36
Dan Siroker
Dan Siroker@dsiroker·
I am Fable pilled
Dan Siroker tweet media
English
4
0
15
2.6K
Jarad Johnson retweetledi
Riley Goodside
Riley Goodside@goodside·
ChatGPT 5.6 Sol Pro solves an empty crossword puzzle (made by Claude Fable 5 Max) with the first 150 Pokemon without any individual numbered clues:
Riley Goodside tweet mediaRiley Goodside tweet media
English
35
43
986
147.9K
Jarad Johnson
Jarad Johnson@jdjohnson·
@TheZvi Fable oversees strategy, design, judgement, distillation, and quality. Sol for everything else.
English
0
0
0
46
Jarad Johnson
Jarad Johnson@jdjohnson·
@NorthstarBrain I would argue this is burning goodwill faster than tokens. Everyone I know is raging at Anthropic. Counterpoint: I have two 20x accounts.
English
0
0
0
30
Alex Northstar
Alex Northstar@NorthstarBrain·
It’s not even funny. The goofy powerful strategy Anthropic is using: Scarcity. They keep screaming at you that the absolute best AI model in the world is gone in 1 week. Then in another week. Then in another week. Imagine if YOU kept telling your clients this, that your services are gone in 1 week. That they gotta maximise their usage. I honestly would love to see the revenue Anthropic is squeezing right now from their users. With this desperation. But it works. And I’m taking notes. Top marketing masterclass.
Alex Northstar tweet media
English
4
0
5
618
Jarad Johnson
Jarad Johnson@jdjohnson·
This was really surprising for me. People always said to use lower reasoning but ime Extra High was the only one that didn’t make serious mistakes. 5.6 Sol on Medium doesn’t make mistakes on most tasks. And High almost never does on more difficult tasks. Actually struggling to find use cases for Extra High and Ultra.
English
0
0
4
67
Jarad Johnson retweetledi
ArtButMakeItSports
ArtButMakeItSports@ArtButSports·
Lamentation (flipped, detail), by Gerard David, 1515-23, 📸 by Roberto Schmidt
ArtButMakeItSports tweet media
English
269
16.8K
216.2K
4.7M
Jarad Johnson retweetledi
Gergely Orosz
Gergely Orosz@GergelyOrosz·
What is "loop engineering" to you, anyway? Been looking into this, and also experimenting myself... and I'm not (yet?) buying that it's a new paradigm. But I might just be missing something. Can you share "loops" you regularly use?
English
213
24
738
164.7K
Jarad Johnson retweetledi
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
Updates for Codex and ChatGPT Work users. No nerfing, only good stuff! - We have landed inference optimizations and are passing down savings to all the subscriptions for GPT-5.6 Sol. That should result in around 10% more usage on its own. - We noticed that by changing the context size limit in the product to 372k for GPT-5.6 Sol, up from 272k for GPT-5.5, it resulted in more usage being charged than intended. We have reverted to 272k and will work to roll back out to 372k in the days to come. You should notice that usage drains significantly less after this change. - To understand where the extra usage was coming from, we ran some experiments where reasoning efforts were changed (referred to as juice values under the hood) and have reverted this. - There is slightly more usage of multi-agent than intended in high and xhigh reasoning effort, we are fixing this going forward. Also fixing a small other thing we noticed with auto-review where we can be more efficient. And we continue to have the 5h limit temporarily not apply. Enjoy the rest of the weekend!
Fix@FixlationAI

OpenAI has reduced GPT-5.6 Sol's thinking budgets in an effort to make the model more efficient They essentially bumped everyone's reasoning down by 1... so if you were running Sol Extra High, you now have to set it to Max to get the same effort So we basically don't have Max reasoning anymore, how do you feel about these changes? 🤔

English
1.1K
605
9.9K
2.1M
Jarad Johnson
Jarad Johnson@jdjohnson·
Not all enterprises are billed the same by OpenAI. Some have more baked into their subscription that have allowed them to push off managing usage-based billing. This changes on renewals, but patterns have been established and it makes the transition feel more painful. I’m also seeing more people hit the limits when given access to Codex (will be the same for Work). So much so that three of my clients won’t open up Codex to the full team. This may be due to more conservative credit allocations, which is a mix of the first issue and not understanding the ROI on agentic work over one-off chats. But the costs can be quite absurd. The challenge is that we’re turning everyone into managers. People have to know how to manage the tools somewhat like we manage people. What to delegate, to which models, in which type of workflow, and how to measure performance across various setups. When I read that most people don’t hit their limits I wonder if it’s because they’re too intimidated to really dive in.
English
1
0
0
21
Simon Smith
Simon Smith@_simonsmith·
@jdjohnson @albfresco @ChatGPTapp It shouldn’t be a big transition because under credit-based enterprise billing you already consume credits for things like Pro models. We’re used to usage-based billing. And most users don’t even hit their monthly credit allocation now.
English
1
0
0
42
albs—
albs—@albfresco·
something I think no one talked about? the @ChatGPTapp router is back and better than ever in chat mode. instant for my simple questions. extended thinking when I ask for lookups and research seems to perfectly handle my casual chats with no model or reasoning setting
albs— tweet media
English
1
0
3
284
Jarad Johnson retweetledi
maria
maria@maria_rcks·
I solved the model picker problem, no need to thank me Tibo
English
434
386
11.7K
1.7M
Jarad Johnson
Jarad Johnson@jdjohnson·
@TheZvi Reduced cost Fable 5.1 or Claude 5 will surely be here by the 19th.
English
0
0
2
279
Jarad Johnson
Jarad Johnson@jdjohnson·
@_simonsmith @albfresco @ChatGPTapp I’ve struggled to answer this question for our entperise clients. Like you say, not an issue for most, but a problem for power users who blow through Codex usage. As they also move from ChatGPT to Work, I anticipate token problems. Interested to read how this unfolds for you.
English
1
0
0
45
Simon Smith
Simon Smith@_simonsmith·
@jdjohnson @albfresco @ChatGPTapp Yes, I believe Work uses credits the way Codex did before. As for determining, we don’t at this point. We encourage experimentation and monitor usage and intervene only if needed. Most users aren’t big token burners. Only a small percentage of power users, typically.
English
1
0
1
41
Simon Smith
Simon Smith@_simonsmith·
@albfresco @ChatGPTapp I also like that there are now different defaults for “chat” versus “work.” I can keep Instant for chat and Sol for work.
English
1
0
5
173
Jarad Johnson retweetledi
Claude
Claude@claudeai·
We're extending Claude Fable 5 access on all paid plans, as well as keeping Claude Code’s weekly rate limits 50% higher, through July 19.
English
6.7K
7.3K
73.7K
26.1M
Jarad Johnson
Jarad Johnson@jdjohnson·
@rezoundous Knowing Anthropic’s terrible communications strategy, they’ll pull it out, piss everyone off, then bring it back after burning a ton of goodwill.
English
0
0
0
55
Tyler
Tyler@rezoundous·
what are the chances Fable stays on Claude sub after July 12?
English
130
3
326
53.8K
Jarad Johnson
Jarad Johnson@jdjohnson·
@GregKamradt Will the agent have good judgement about the features it needs to create on demand without direction of guardrails? Or will it benefit from the time tested approaches built out in enterprise CRMs? Fable and Sol have likely crossed that judgement threshold.
English
0
0
1
39
Greg Kamradt
Greg Kamradt@GregKamradt·
@jdjohnson What is the gap between where you are now and a no brainer decision? (A decision to buy/build?)
English
1
0
1
123