Jess Vandy

2K posts

Jess Vandy banner
Jess Vandy

Jess Vandy

@jess_vandy

Sustainability, social impact for the visitor economy | Based in Aotearoa NZ

Te Matau-a-Māui Katılım Ağustos 2010
764 Takip Edilen406 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jess Vandy
Jess Vandy@jess_vandy·
I suspect the demise of this end of the alphabet is getting closer. Im not paying for this dumpster fire and will be checking in less regularly. I’m over at Bluesky 🩵💙
Napier City, New Zealand 🇳🇿 English
0
0
3
298
Jess Vandy
Jess Vandy@jess_vandy·
@toddmstephenson Dude, give it a rest. This is wildly misguided in the context of global events. This is where you’re investing your time and energy?!?
English
0
0
3
39
Todd Stephenson MP
Todd Stephenson MP@toddmstephenson·
Almost every week I receive emails from New Zealanders asking why some government agencies are still using te reo ahead of English. The English-first policy is not one of ACT’s coalition commitments, but I decided to look into it. In fact, the Government’s main public-facing webpage, govt.nz, still uses ‘Te Kāwanatanga o Aotearoa’ ahead of ‘New Zealand Government’. This is the Public Service Commission’s official branding for the Government. The Public Service Commission sets guidelines for branding across government, so it’s no wonder many agencies are lagging.
Todd Stephenson MP tweet media
English
218
59
431
46.9K
Jess Vandy
Jess Vandy@jess_vandy·
@JoelMacManus Brilliant article. As someone who has worked in events for 20 years, this is something many of us have been asking. It has muddied the Major Events Fund which up until recently had a rigorous and robust process for funding. Now, it’s anyone’s guess as to who gets funding
English
0
0
5
217
Jess Vandy retweetledi
Mayor Wayne Brown
Mayor Wayne Brown@MayorWayneBrown·
It's called the silly season, not the stupid season. Merry Christmas
English
78
116
965
104.8K
Jess Vandy
Jess Vandy@jess_vandy·
Imagine thinking this is a win. All this does is delay the inevitable. Global pressure won’t ease; lenders, insurers, multinationals, investors are still requiring scope 1-3 data aligned to GHG Protocol, irrespective of NZ laws. The dumbest take.
ACT New Zealand@actparty

𝗔𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗠𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝘄𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝗻 𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀 ACT Leader David Seymour is welcoming moves to roll back mandatory climate reporting requirements for most companies, and says ACT will campaign to go further. "We were right then, and we’re right now. ACT alone opposed this regime from day one. We voted alone against the law in 2021. We oppose every attempt to force ideological accounting rules onto businesses who just want to get on with serving their customers and rewarding their workers," says Mr Seymour. “People are rightly concerned about high costs. Kiwis cannot afford Climate Related Disclosures that add cost without getting environmental results. Businesses already want to emit less, to avoid Emissions Trading Scheme costs. The paperwork was just virtue signalling. It’s another thing we’re fixing because the cost of living matters to New Zealanders. "Labour wanted to turn every business into a climate activist. The result was higher compliance costs, fear of being ‘debanked’, and pressure on companies to play politics instead of growing wealth, hiring workers, and serving customers. "Today’s announcement will save time and money for many businesses. That's good news for customers too. New Zealand doesn’t need another spreadsheet, we need capital flowing to the best ideas, not the best climate disclosures. “This is yet another move reflecting ACT’s principled leadership. In recent times we’ve seen the Government reverse Earthquake Legislation and Zero Carbon Act targets. In these cases ACT voted alone against the entire Parliament, only to be proven right years later. In the case of the Oil and Gas Ban, only ACT and National opposed the ban, now there is a majority to reverse it. "We wholeheartedly support this Government action, but we believe it could go further. Large entities like banks are still subject to this regime. That means lending decisions are influenced by climate checklists and not simply risk and return. ACT will be campaigning to get rid of this rubbish for all entities, including banks and insurers."

English
0
0
0
25
Jess Vandy
Jess Vandy@jess_vandy·
@mjdutt Amazing the social posture that so many have adopted in the wake of CKs passing. Charlie was a product of culture where confidence outweighs coherence. It is embarrassing seeing these men try and defend the moral absolution that Kirk stood for
English
0
0
6
136
Mohan J Dutta
Mohan J Dutta@mjdutt·
It is amazing how many of these CEO types make unhinged defamatory claims. Is it the cognitive incapacity or the hubris? I hate to think what the state of the organizations they run would be, given this level of emotive response and inability to be rational.
Mohan J Dutta tweet mediaMohan J Dutta tweet media
English
4
10
67
2.6K
Nicola Toki
Nicola Toki@naturevision·
When is the evidence-based decision making going to be happening, again?
English
21
24
194
3.8K
Jess Vandy
Jess Vandy@jess_vandy·
Dog whistling for the sake of it? These MPs are not required to be there. The inquiry clearly states that this won’t affect their ability to gather information
Jess Vandy tweet media
Winston Peters@winstonpeters

Jacinda Ardern, Chris Hipkins, Grant Roberston, and Ayesha Verrall have all colluded and decided to decline to give evidence at the COVID-19 Royal Commission public hearings. The ‘Podium of Truth’ has become the ‘Podium of Evasion’. These former ministers do not want to sit in a public hearing and answer the hard questions that every New Zealander deserves to know. If ever there was a definition for “a different kind of ‘abuse of’ power” this is it. New Zealand First demanded a second inquiry to ensure there was public accountability for the decisions made during the pandemic. These former Labour ministers are undermining the entire action and purpose of the inquiry to avoid public scrutiny. The Royal Commission has stated today that “the COVID-19 pandemic was a significant event that affected every New Zealander…we remain of the view that the public being able to see former ministers questioned about those decisions at a public hearing of a Royal Commission of Inquiry would significantly enhance public confidence in our process.” Those former Labour Ministers have shown they care nothing about public confidence, and worse, are treating the entire public with distain and contempt. The Royal Commission has stated that the refusal of former ministers, in this case, to attend the public hearing is a refusal to answer questions in a public hearing. Those former ministers were at the heart of decisions that affected hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders. Cost livelihoods, careers, businesses, connection with families, and had a disastrous effect on the economy and future of our country – yet they refuse to be held to account. The public deserve an answer about why they are refusing to be held publicly to account.

English
0
0
0
39
Jess Vandy
Jess Vandy@jess_vandy·
The current ‘growth growth growth’ agenda for tourism is concerning. The goal to double our 2019 visitors by 2035 should be ringing alarm bells. I’m not opposed to charging int’l visitors to access key sites but how will this $ be used? It must be invested into tourism infra
Helen Clark@HelenClarkNZ

What next! Toll booths on road to Mt Cook & at entrance to Tongariro Crossing for international tourists who already pay a lot to get to & travel in NZ & also pay a visitor levy already? More commercial exploitation of conservation land? Desperate stuff: rnz.co.nz/news/political…

English
0
0
1
87
Jess Vandy
Jess Vandy@jess_vandy·
@NewYorker Didn’t turn on her at all. She was an incredibly courageous leader through one of the most challenging times in our history. Still one of our most popular PMs in history.
English
1
2
33
304
The New Yorker
The New Yorker@NewYorker·
Outside New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern is regarded as a liberal paragon among world leaders. Why did her own country turn on her? nyer.cm/tsy4Det
English
149
23
147
67.4K
Jess Vandy
Jess Vandy@jess_vandy·
Imagine being more outraged by use of the C-word rather than the impact this decision has for women - some who will no longer meet the new threshold for their historical claims.
Nicola Willis@NicolaWillisMP

@FleurFitzsimons Disappointing to see you platforming the C-Word to describe women in leadership. I thought better of you.

English
0
1
5
75
Outlet Camp Wānaka
Outlet Camp Wānaka@CampWanaka·
We’ve a clear and simple answer to Stephen’s review saying: “Politics and camping grounds should not be mixed. I’ll leave it at that for you to work out” Everything is political. We will continue to fly the flag and Toitū Te Tiriti!
Outlet Camp Wānaka tweet mediaOutlet Camp Wānaka tweet mediaOutlet Camp Wānaka tweet mediaOutlet Camp Wānaka tweet media
English
1
0
5
51