jordan fladell

Congressman Ro Khanna came to Israel to carry out a staged confrontation intended to demonize Jewish “settlers” and curry favor with the more extreme anti-Israel and anti-Semitic elements of the Democratic Party. The stunt backfired. israel365news.com/419677/ro-khan…

Funny is funny like @RoKhanna's fake news story.. next up he will be claiming @elonmusk prevented him from going on spacex or own a tesla. This man needs to go

I served on the House Foreign Affairs Committee for more than a decade. I know the difference between serious foreign policy and political stunts. The House is about to vote on an amendment that would end America's longstanding security assistance to Israel and would also undermine humanitarian, peace-building, and coexistence programs benefiting Israelis and Palestinians. Iran continues to threaten the United States and Israel, even as it attacks our allies throughout the region. Hamas remains committed to terror and to Israel's destruction. Peace will not come from empowering Iran and its terrorist proxies, making it more difficult for Israel to defend its citizens, or from abandoning a strategic partnership that has advanced American interests and regional stability for decades. This amendment is a blunt instrument. It would undermine Israel's security, weaken America's position in the Middle East, and move Israelis and Palestinians further from the future both peoples deserve: living side by side in peace, security, and dignity. This amendment ignores the realities of the Middle East, undermines American interests, and rewards the forces that have spent decades opposing peace, stability, and coexistence. A vote for this amendment is not a vote for peace. It is a vote to weaken a democratic ally, strengthen the hand of its enemies, and make a stable and secure future for Israelis and Palestinians harder to achieve.

@jimcramer This is on brand for New York Politics - as far left and woke as they can be

when done right and in conjuncture with local authorities it can be a boon to poorer areas. This is short sighted and somewhat rash

The enemy is already inside the gate!

Francesca Albanese, special United Nations rapporteur for the Palestinians who has a long history of making anti-Israel comments, ought to read a book after her claim that Jews have been treated only in exemplary fashion in Arab lands since the Inquisition ended in the 19th century. “Francesca Albanese can either read history books if she wished to—obviously she doesn’t—or she can meet people like my wife,” David Harris, executive vice chair of the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy, told JNS. Harris, who was CEO of the American Jewish Committee from 1990 to 2022, is married to Giulietta Boukhobza, whose family comes from present-day Libya. That country is Judenrein, he told JNS, using the German for “Jew-free.” “There is not a single Jew left in Libya. No trace. No plaque. No memorial. No monument. No museum. No school book reference. Nothing,” Harris said. “No citizenship. Any business venture required a majority Arab partner. No legal recourse. The list is a long one.” After Libya became independent in 1951, new rules made it almost impossible for Jews to remain, and later, after the Six-Day War in 1967, “mobs came to the homes of Jews, including my wife’s family, to burn down and kill the Jews—very, very similar in a way to Oct. 7,” Harris told JNS. At a June 19 gathering of current and former U.N. staffers, Albanese, whom the global body considers an independent “expert,” said that “Jews had been discriminated in Europe, not in West Asia, not in the Arab world, where they had been in fact welcomed once they were kicked out from Spain and other parts of Europe.” Albanese’s comments, which took place during a webinar hosted by the anti-Israel group U.N. Staff For Gaza, have not been reported previously. She made the remarks as she compared the Holocaust and what she said is a “genocide” that Israel is carrying out against the Palestinians. Making a comparison like that is antisemitic, according to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of Jew-hatred. Lyn Julius, a British journalist and co-founder of Harif, a U.K. charity that represents Jews from North Africa and the Middle East, told JNS that “there’s the great myth of peaceful coexistence of Jews in the Arab countries, which is a staple of Palestinian propaganda.” “It allows them to delegitimize Israel because obviously, if everything was wonderful between Jews and Arabs in the Arab world, you don’t need Israel,” she said. There is a well-documented concept in Arab lands of non-Muslims, including Jews, having dhimmi status, in which Islamic law grants protections to the non-Muslims, who subordinate themselves and pay a tax called jizya, according to Julius. Jews and others had religious and cultural autonomy but faced strict social and legal restrictions, including dress codes, and sometimes suffered harsh persecution and restriction in ghettos, the journalist said. Mike Wagenheim, Jewish News Syndicate

@Sol_Rashidi on Using AI to Enhance Your Thinking | Aprio Ascend youtu.be/mAbxFZQUUqY?si… via @YouTube - amazing episode!

@erildox Amazing book read it many times the knowledge @bhorowitz drops is a must read imo

one of the best books Ive read so far on management, what is the right thing and how to do it, and above all how things change when you actually care about doing a great job. when I first started reading this book, it did not appeal to me that much but after the first chapters, it is an incredible work of art. I like it a lot and as someone who has seen not that good management firsthand, loved it. Incredible insight @bhorowitz

Call to action for American Jews. High time to create a new “conceptzia” (strategic doctrine). Unite. Strengthen Jewish identity. Connect w/ #Israel. Go on offense. Seek new allies. Be more sophisticated voters & donors. Don’t be played for suckers. Now. youtu.be/_pKriC_HjtI

I actually understand why Democrat leaders didn't take our stories seriously when the Times reported them in June but are taking them seriously now. It was by design. The line most shared from the piece was the claim that the Times “could not corroborate” my story despite talking to two of my friends. I gave them the contact information for five friends. They called the two who I clarified would not know about the abuse but would be able to affirm our relationship timeline, events, etc. They simply did not call the other three. I also gave them the names of all my former roommates who remembered him stalking our row house (which was about 5 houses down from his) and waiting for me to return. I gave them screenshots of messages between these roommates and I discussing it. I gave them the names of other men I dated who might have remembered him following us around the hill and showing up on my stoop after we walked home from dates to confront us. I gave them emails to my landlord urgently ending my lease and moving to an apartment across town and diary entries talking about it - all time marked. I told them that during pre-marital counseling I had spoken to my ex-fiance about the abuse because I had to explain to him why I reacted with such terror any time he lost his temper. They said oh NO we don't need to bother HIM (or my priest). Besides, I had written about it in my diary in detail, they reassured. As the weeks dragged on I stopped trying to give them evidence because the amount I had already given them seemed to overwhelm them and I thought it meant they clearly had more than enough to verify my every claim. My friends might not have known the details of the abuse, but they affirmed that yes, I had told them that he was abusive—long before he ran for Senate. Besides, they assured, my part in their reporting would be small. I thought my details would only serve to affirm Jenny and the other anonymous woman. Jenny and I - having never met or spoken - both shared with these reporters terrifyingly similar details of intimate partner violence, coercive control, and cycles of abuse/love bombing. The third unnamed woman in the story did as well. But tell me again how they “could not corroborate.”

Democrats fully vetted Graham Platner, happily signed off on his incredibly disturbing history to win a Senate seat, and are only pretending to be shocked now because they can no longer rationalize the hypocrisy.

This ⬇️

Does a country committing “genocide” typically provide cancer treatment to the alleged victims?

Israel built this 7-layered wall costing billions of dollars on its border with Gaza, turning it into the largest open prison in the world 👇 Sorry for the typo, Egypt built this on its border with Gaza.

Egypt loves Palestinians so much they build a fortress of border walls to keep all the Palestinians out of Egypt. So humane and caring 😂 Islamic virtue signalling off the charts

Egypt's border fence with Gaza is eight miles wide, six meters below ground, six meters high and topped with barbed wire - with 40,000 heavily-armed Egyptian troops guarding it. They have shot and killed Gazans who tried to get past it. But, sure, Egypt supports Palestine.

TOP SECRET 1942: The Nazis official written pact with the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem — “Yes to Arab independence… and YES to the DESTRUCTION of the Jewish National Home in Palestine.” This is not hearsay or interpretation. This is the actual English version of a top-secret letter from Nazi Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop, dated Berlin, April 28, 1942, sent on behalf of both Germany and Italy to Amin al-Husseini. “Germany is consequently ready to give all her support … for the destruction of the Jewish National Home in Palestine.” The letter frames it as part of the fight against their “common enemy” until “victory is achieved,” and orders it kept “absolutely secret” until Berlin decided otherwise. It was written while Rommel’s Afrika Korps was advancing toward Mandate Palestine where the Nazis planned to extend the Holocaust. History did not begin in 1948. The organized Nazi-Arab rejection of Jewish sovereignty and active collaboration in the Final Solution was already on paper in 1942. The archives don’t lie. Read it. Share it. Never let anyone bury it.

We have given Israel 174 billion dollars since 1948 (not adjusted for inflation I’m not good at that). Of that 124 BILLION was given as a credit to be used in America on American weapons. That money didn’t leave the country. It became contracts, payroll, and R&D at Lockheed, Boeing, Raytheon, General Dynamics, and hundreds of smaller suppliers. In effect, a large share of “aid to Israel” is a federal procurement program to fund American weapons production. Defense spending sustains somewhere between 15,000-30,000 American jobs a year depending on which model you use. And when the Pentagon then buys the same F-35s, interceptors, or munitions, the per-unit cost is lower because Israel’s orders helped spread the fixed costs and sustain the supply chain. So the aid functions as a subsidy to the US defense industrial base that lowers the price America pays for its own weapons. So the real aide number is actually closer to like 47 billion dollars on actual money that leaves this county since 1948. The total number of foreign aide, not adjusted for inflation since 1948 (a strong researched conservative estimate) is 1.6 trillion dollars. So 3%. That is why I don’t take the anti-Israel critics seriously when they start talking about our aid to Israel. They don’t honestly analyze the situation and the reason they don’t honestly analyze the situation because they need it to be the only problem that matters and so it’s much cashier to throw out a number then explain it. But that’s why I don’t take any of these liars seriously.

@CIOonline Same group of analysts who said EDI was dead in 1995 yet 2026 and EDI is still here… when you are paid for an opinion you give one that makes the headlines..

Agentic AI puts $234B in enterprise SaaS spending at risk, Gartner says spr.ly/6016BDNGna

What if this was said about other ethnic groups? A little more _______? Yet we are supposed to accept this as normal when it’s said about Jews? It’s not normal. It’s the normalization of antisemitic tropes.