
Ja Mc
29 posts






Worldcup Folio⚽️🏆


This time we should protect market integrity! Endless times we can see how UMA rocks manipulate market outcomes (farming UMA tokens rewards and simultaneously trading on polymarket). Two big problems with this market: 1.) Vague rules and inconsistent polymarket clarification. By rules we have: Only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count toward this market's resolution. By polymarket team clarification: Footage that was not broadcast live, even if filmed during the relevant events and released during market timeframe, will not qualify toward resolution. They subverted their own rules. There is a BIG difference in meaning: (broadcast) OR (streamed live) != (broadcast live) or (streamed live) Polymarket's clarification is trying to manipulate the semantics - we need urgent attention to this. 2.) A lot of evidence of live translation, or at least of broadcast. We have a lot of evidence of live translation of time-frame that clarify to market resolution on YES side. And we also have overwhelming amount that clarifies that video fragment is broadcasting and should resolve to YES. WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO? "If you believe you've witnessed potentially manipulative or prohibited trading activity on Polymarket, we want to hear from you." Send letter with complaint here - Integrity@polymarket.com


@JexTrade @PolymarketTrade @PolymarketDevs @Polymarket The illusion of a decentralized oracle. A $1M+ short position on @Polymarket triggers a review on @UMAprotocol. When challenged with technical evidence, official mods openly admit the vote is rigged: "God will win because he’s a whale with all the votes... when you lose 99-1






Iranian report: The U.S. offered temporary OFAC waivers on Iran's oil sanctions during talks. Tehran wants full permanent removal. Washington's offer only holds until a deal is finalized.





The release everyone was waiting for is now live. Ghost fills dropped from a peak of 30% to 0.17% with the rollout, and will continue trending toward 0% throughout the day. We know this issue was hurting everyone's experience and we're truly sorry for that but it should now be night and day. This was a significant core protocol change and we're incredibly proud of the whole team for executing it. We'll keep improving our systems, step by step, until we're the best exchange in the world.

This time we should protect market integrity! Endless times we can see how UMA rocks manipulate market outcomes (farming UMA tokens rewards and simultaneously trading on polymarket). Two big problems with this market: 1.) Vague rules and inconsistent polymarket clarification. By rules we have: Only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count toward this market's resolution. By polymarket team clarification: Footage that was not broadcast live, even if filmed during the relevant events and released during market timeframe, will not qualify toward resolution. They subverted their own rules. There is a BIG difference in meaning: (broadcast) OR (streamed live) != (broadcast live) or (streamed live) Polymarket's clarification is trying to manipulate the semantics - we need urgent attention to this. 2.) A lot of evidence of live translation, or at least of broadcast. We have a lot of evidence of live translation of time-frame that clarify to market resolution on YES side. And we also have overwhelming amount that clarifies that video fragment is broadcasting and should resolve to YES. WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO? "If you believe you've witnessed potentially manipulative or prohibited trading activity on Polymarket, we want to hear from you." Send letter with complaint here - Integrity@polymarket.com

Typical of the corrupt voting system of the UMA on Polymarket. Do away with them and let an AI be the sole judge @shayne_coplan





spotted a simple inefficiency in the World Cup market. 13% sitting there for free if you add up the top 14 favorites: France, Spain, England, Argentina, Brazil, Portugal, Germany, Netherlands and 6 more: they cover only 88% of total probability buy 100k shares in each → spend $88k total → collect 100k$ when any of them wins $12k profit, that's 12% return before July 20 the other 20+ teams split just 12% between them. mathematically possible, but realistically not happening DYOR, i will give it a try! market: polymarket.com/event/2026-fif…














