Bobby-Jo Tuita

@BornPeachy @LadyColinCampb @quickbeam71 I would say her husband’s affair and her numerous affairs are what cost her her marriage. Neither of them were happy I just wish she would have lived to find her happily ever after. She harboured many scars and deserved to be happy as does Charles.

@LadyColinCampb @quickbeam71 That manipulated interview by Martin Bashir cost Diana her marriage & set into motion the series of events that killed her. For Diana wouldn’t have been frolicking in the Med w/an Egyptian playboy were she still married. BBC & Martin Bashir have Diana’s blood on their hands.

To those of us who know the facts, Prince Harry's perversion of the truth for his and his wife's self-aggrandisement and gluttonous glorification continues in its customary unedifying style. Notwithstanding the indisputable fact that his late mother Diana, Princess of Wales relinquished her Royal Protection against the advice and express wishes of her ex-husband, mother-and father-in-law, and the "men in grey suits" including her brother-in-law Robert Fellowes, then Her late Majesty's Private Secretary - Diana claimed doing so would prevent them from "spying on" her (as I wrote in my posthumous biography The Real Diana) - Harry is now quoted in People magazine asserting that she was forced to give up the very protection she herself disallowed, and that that led to her death, just as how the removal of his state-funded security might lead to his, his wife's, and HIS children's. How I pity the Royal Family. It isn't easy having to live a life with treacherous, attention-seeking, self-pitying, money-grubbing relations lying left, right and centre, as I know from personal experience, but having to do so on a public stage adds a whole other dimension. There is clearly no depth which Harry will not plumb. No fact is sacrosanct, not even when violating it absolves Martin Bashir of the responsibility he played in driving Diana to taking the unfortunate decisions which led to her death. How Harry's perversion of the truth must rankle with William'. After all, Diana was his mother too. Not that Harry and Diana 2.0 acknowledge that fact, now that Oedipus has married the Lazarusian Jocasta and she deploys Rachel Zane's knowledge to "enrich" their lives in a multiplicity of ways. Truly disgusting.

@AinsworthKeith @bennyjohnson They remove that stuff asap so the groups responsible can’t use it in their propaganda. Visuals are very powerful.

@bennyjohnson Why was the first thing the cops did was tie up the ISIS flag?

🚨BREAKING: FBI says New Orleans attack that left 10 dead, dozens injured is being investigated as an act of terrorism

@AKharvester @truth_in_sv @DonYamada2 @The_Kyle_Mann @TheBabylonBee The fact that the OP called Penny a Hero shows that he doesntvthink he should be guilty lol

This dangerous verdict is only going to inspire copycat heroes

@truth_in_sv @DonYamada2 @The_Kyle_Mann @TheBabylonBee Well Penny wasn’t a vigilante he was literally a Hero. He wasn’t trying to harm Neely he was trying to protect others and the fact that only he was charged when THREE people restrained him says an awful lot.

@The_Kyle_Mann Let’s hope so. We need more heroes willing to risk everything for the safety of others.

@CNviolations What I find funny is the buying MSNBC memes. My son is like nah he wouldn’t… I remember before he bought Twitter and we all thought the same 😂😂😂

3. The purchase of decades.

💀 9 BRUTAL comebacks liberals won't like. 🧵THREAD🧵 1. Legendary.

@iAnonPatriot Good it makes it easier for sane people to avoid them 😂

Kamala Harris supporters have shaved their heads, made blue bracelets, and will be wearing mask… so they can easily identity each other. 👀

@FoxNews Good. There’s no place in society for racism and xenophobia. Isn’t that what the tolerant left have been screaming? Shes a revolting, hateful hypocrite.

Susan Sarandon says she's been blacklisted in Hollywood after anti-Jewish remarks trib.al/NgV2axu

@BLAIMGame Did she ask why her brother looked so old whilst he was dying? Did she ask if he had anorexia as he wasted away? Chemo is brutal it reckons you she has no excuse for her vile nasty behaviour. Criticising a woman’s looks IS malicious I don’t care how she tries to spin it

According to Google Munchousen Syndrome is the term for someone who does awful things and then plays the victim. Narinder on the Jeremy Vine show.

@Abhijee67231354 @annockh @narindertweets It’s just asking? Is she brain damaged? The whole world knows Kate has had cancer treatment and this moron asks a completely unnecessary vile question just to be nasty. She deserves to get a nasty response.

@annockh @narindertweets Its not about criticism its about just asking...

Are you suggesting I owe an apology to sexual and racial abuse? I don't owe anyone an apology. I didn’t break any laws..unlike the abuse I received..do you see the truth of what actually happened?

@fopminui Washing machine

@TribesBritannia I cry every time I watch it and I have watched it at least twice a year since it first came out. Heartbreaking scene your heart breaks for her and it’s so relatable.

@TheFakeDuchess I only watch Taz and River and they’re more of royal commentators to me who aren’t scared to tell it like it is regarding the terrible two. I love them both. Completely different styles but both honest and full of integrity.

@benonwine I’m not a Briton I’m Australian but I once wrote an essay on Olaudah Equiano. Amazing man.

Can you? 👇

@TheWantonWench I don’t believe he has it would have been leaked to the media by now. Also IF he did file in the UK and the kids are in America good luck. He would have to have the children with him in the UK when he filed. Why do you think she won’t let the kids go to the UK lol

𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐅𝐫𝐞𝐞: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐱 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐇𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐲 Rumours are rife that Prince Harry has taken a decisive step: filing for divorce from Meghan. The question on everyone’s lips, though, is where he’s done it. If he’s filed in the UK, it could potentially set a legal precedent around the custody of the couple’s two children. Given British jurisdiction’s potential role, the path to securing their future may not align with Meghan’s plans, and instead, could place them squarely within the traditions of the Royal Family. The custody implications could be profound. Should the British courts have a say, it would open up avenues for the monarchy to reassert its influence over Harry’s children — a consideration given the historic British law on the guardianship of royal heirs. This law could prove advantageous for Harry if he wants to ensure the children maintain strong ties to the UK and the royal legacy they’ve been born into. Beyond legalities, however, the rift between Harry and Meghan might expose Meghan’s public image to scrutiny from an angle she may not have anticipated. Harry is armed with knowledge that could counter any narrative Meghan spins in the memoir, she allegedly penning. He knows, as the British say, “where the bodies are buried.” If he were to publicly challenge the version of events she has cultivated, it could complicate her carefully managed image — and potentially cast doubt on her credibility. If Harry were to return to the royal fold, it’s likely his role would echo that of another wayward royal, Prince Andrew. Seen, but not heard. Present but sidelined. The Royal Family, ever strategic, might just see value in such an arrangement — a quiet reclamation of one of their own that simultaneously disrupts Meghan’s media campaign. The subtle reabsorption of Harry would be a shrewd way to keep family matters from further public spectacle, shielding the monarchy’s image without fanfare. Titles, of course, are more than mere formalities. Harry could voluntarily place his dukedom into abeyance, effectively removing Meghan’s right to use the Duchess of Sussex moniker, one she has wielded with financial acumen. Should their divorce be formalised, Meghan’s “Princess Henry of Wales” style — technically derived through marriage — could be withdrawn as well. Although it’s unlikely the King would ever grant Harry another dukedom, the division would mean that Meghan’s association with royalty would no longer hold the weight it once did, relegating her permanently outside the sphere of Windsor. While much of this remains speculative, the legal and royal mechanisms are all in place. If Harry pursues this course, he could see his children’s ties to the UK strengthened, his titles strategically managed, and his own position within the royal fold restored, albeit quietly. This would mark the end of the Sussex chapter and the beginning of a new, redefined role for Harry — one that, even if understated, reinforces his place in the monarchy and keeps Meghan on the outside.

@FFS_WhatNow Women aren’t even supposed to be intimate after birth. What a selfish man baby. He has two good hands that can service himself she is not his sex slave. Thanks for giving us hope that this attitude isn’t all men.

She's been busy you selfish, self-absorbed pr*ck, and probably didn't expect to be dealing with an attention seeking adult baby and an 8 week old simultaneously.

@AnneUndone1 You can’t even be intimate for 6 weeks while you’re healing go rub one out you selfish narcissistic SOB.

@fopminui Grandparents are amazing but their OTT love for their grandkids is heavy on the spoiling and light on the discipline as that’s not their job. Teaching kids responsibility and consistency at a young age is essential. Trust me bringing in chores later is much much harder lol

@TheWantonWench That’s just a puff piece with a click bait headline.

Well wasn’t that a resounding slap for Duchess Difficult 🤭🤣🤣 people.com/meghan-markle-…

@ramzpaul Until you guys start deporting foreign born criminals convicted of a serious crime like we do there will never be a change.

If you object to this, you could go to jail in England.