John Ford

30.4K posts

John Ford banner
John Ford

John Ford

@john_ford77

Anglo-French Financier. Father, husband, and one-time particle physicist.

London, Pau, Newcastle Katılım Haziran 2010
667 Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Colin Wynter KC
Colin Wynter KC@QcWynter·
@Princess4life90 I shall be drafting an application, comprising all relevant information sent to me by end of this week, to be sent to the Attorney General for him to action. So far as I am aware there are 3 or 4 of these chaps who misuse the law in this way. Each must be stopped and this is how.
English
101
240
2.3K
85.5K
Colin Wynter KC
Colin Wynter KC@QcWynter·
Although vexatious status has no direct impact on criminal complaints, the fact that a chap has formally been declared vexatious will have an impact on police & CPS assessments of the chap's credibility& reliability. Vexatious status will thus effectively shut the chap down.
Colin Wynter KC@QcWynter

@drljultra @LegalGengar @JudiciaryUK Judiciary does not act. Individuals act and petition the AG who, if he does his job properly, will apply to the High Court for an order that the chap be declared a vexatious litigant. Will mean he must obtain court permission for any future civil claims. gov.uk/guidance/vexat…

English
16
121
1.1K
30.2K
Cllr Leo Montague
Cllr Leo Montague@LeoMontague91·
Rayner - accidentally avoided £40k in tax, repaid the money, had to resign. Tice - deliberately avoided £600k in tax, hasn’t repaid anything. 15x the money, infinitely more immoral. He’ll resign as an MP, right? He can just be a shadow MP going forward.
English
1.4K
872
4.2K
136.3K
John Ford
John Ford@john_ford77·
@ThomasWillett9 One and three are not fundamental human rights. You seem unable to understand that you wanting something to be a right doesn’t make it one.
English
0
0
0
9
The London Economic
The London Economic@LondonEconomic·
'If the standards applied to Angela Rayner last year meant she had to resign, then the same standards must apply to Richard Tice here.'
The London Economic tweet media
English
953
3.5K
10K
194.8K
Peter Bayer
Peter Bayer@peter_baye48767·
@john_ford77 @bea_johanssen @LeoMontague91 She she didn't know that trusteeship for a dependant counted as ownership for the purposes of stamp duty, she thought that when you sold a property you no longer owned it, which I would imagine is most people's understanding.
English
2
0
0
13
Colin Wynter KC
Colin Wynter KC@QcWynter·
@john_ford77 @drljultra @LegalGengar @JudiciaryUK I don't know but it is possible that he is a "man of straw", with no assets that can be seized and no regular income to which any court order can be attached. That would make him pretty much immune, other than in terms of his credit rating. "Vexatious" is the obvious route.
English
5
12
222
3.4K
Dr Ultra
Dr Ultra@drljultra·
So, Stephanie Hayden now owes: - £20,000 (@LegalGengar) - £35,000 (Daily Mail - interest accruing) - £15,000 (Family Education Trust) - £15,000 (ex-landlord) - £3500 (Adrian Yalland) Approaching £100,000. All cases funded by the taxpayer. When are @JudiciaryUK going to act?
English
59
637
3.2K
76.9K
JKAM Media
JKAM Media@JKAMMedia·
There’s still a fundamental distinction here. Angela Rayner was investigated over whether stamp duty was owed and ultimately paid what HMRC determined was due. In the case of Richard Tice, the allegation relates to legal tax planning under the current rules. If something is lawful under the tax code, it isn’t the same as failing to pay a tax that was actually owed. If people think the rules allow too much tax planning, that’s a debate about changing the system. But presenting legal arrangements as if they’re the same thing as unpaid tax is where the comparison starts to fall apart.
English
2
0
5
1.3K
Peter Bayer
Peter Bayer@peter_baye48767·
@bea_johanssen @LeoMontague91 Actually she didn't lie, at the time of the transaction she had sold her previous property and therefore would only be liable for single stamp duty, because she would spend more time elsewhere the flat was declared as a second home paying double council tax. 1/2
English
2
0
0
31
John Ford
John Ford@john_ford77·
I’ve been on finance for thirty years, this attempt at a semantic shift came in a few years ago and was absolutely pushed by the government. You can play along with it if you like, I’m not going to. The entire point is to let people like you feel smug about your own avoidance while screeching at others’ equivalent behaviour.
English
0
0
0
12
DaveYatesLDN
DaveYatesLDN@DaveYates86·
@john_ford77 @DanielJHannan @TiceRichard It’s not semantic games ISAs and pensions are constructed explicitly to save without paying tax. That is their purpose Tax avoidance is using legal schemes in a way not originally intended to reduce tax Those are different activities not semantics
English
1
0
0
15
Daniel Hannan
Daniel Hannan@DanielJHannan·
It’s hardly my job to defend @TiceRichard. But there is nothing wrong with legal tax avoidance. Legal tax avoidance is what you do when you buy an ISA. If you dislike the specific arrangements he had, change the rules. But don’t complain that he was following existing rules.
English
255
380
3K
410.5K
John Ford
John Ford@john_ford77·
@ali__samson That depends on the returns you make. How much tax have you avoided by using your tax-free allowance? Or is that somehow different?
English
0
0
0
8
ali
ali@ali__samson·
How much do I need to put in my ISA to avoid £600,000 in tax?
Daniel Hannan@DanielJHannan

It’s hardly my job to defend @TiceRichard. But there is nothing wrong with legal tax avoidance. Legal tax avoidance is what you do when you buy an ISA. If you dislike the specific arrangements he had, change the rules. But don’t complain that he was following existing rules.

English
26
61
1.6K
98.2K
John Ford
John Ford@john_ford77·
No, there’s a push to change the meaning to this but It’s always been the case before that avoidance included pensions, ISAs, buying in duty-free and so on. I’m not inclined to play along with these semantic games to try to paint completely legal tax decisions as somehow immoral in order to shame those who use them. It’s generally done by people happy to use their tax free allowance too, the one that higher earners don’t get.
English
1
0
0
15
DaveYatesLDN
DaveYatesLDN@DaveYates86·
It’s a common misconception ISAs and pensions are constructed solely for the purpose of reducing tax Tax avoidance legally reducing tax using schemes in a way not originally intended Rich people and newspapers love conflating the 2 because it makes it seem like tax avoidance is perfectly normal and ‘just like everyone else’ it’s really not
English
1
0
0
53
John Ford
John Ford@john_ford77·
@CharlesTerf @LegalGengar I assume Fat Tony won’t pay; any thoughts on how he seems able to keep launching litigation despite not settling his costs?
English
1
0
3
343
Charles Terf 🦖💜🤍💚🏴‍☠️
Hayden v Heath @LegalGengar was the expected train crash for Hayden. Hayden’s submissions on adjourning the quantum of costs as well as the principle of costs completely failed. Matthew has secured a costs order in his favour with a payment on account of £20k within 28 days. 😂😂
English
57
171
1.5K
58K
DaveYatesLDN
DaveYatesLDN@DaveYates86·
ISAs are t considered tax avoidance They’re a specific tool created by the government to encourage saving Tax avoidance isn’t all created equal either. Even if you think ISAs count clearly they’re different to creating a shell company in a tax haven and a complex intercompany loan structure
English
14
8
141
6.4K
John Ford
John Ford@john_ford77·
@DanielJHannan I wonder how many of those complaining take advantage of their personal tax-free allowance.
English
0
0
0
84
Daniel Hannan
Daniel Hannan@DanielJHannan·
As the responses here show, people tend to see as proper only those forms of legal tax avoidance that they personally employ. I wrote about the phenomenon a while ago. capx.co/in-praise-of-t…
English
9
7
72
14.3K
Paul Lewis
Paul Lewis@paullewismoney·
Surely you understand the two things are completely different. Opening an ISA is what Parliament intended. Wriggling through loopholes using offshore trusts is not.
Daniel Hannan@DanielJHannan

It’s hardly my job to defend @TiceRichard. But there is nothing wrong with legal tax avoidance. Legal tax avoidance is what you do when you buy an ISA. If you dislike the specific arrangements he had, change the rules. But don’t complain that he was following existing rules.

English
327
453
2K
76.1K
John Ford
John Ford@john_ford77·
@VictoriaZeev @elonmusk We should not judge the 1% of them who are not dangerous perverts by the actions of the 99% who are…
English
2
0
31
438
Victoria Zeev
Victoria Zeev@VictoriaZeev·
@elonmusk One person’s crime doesn’t prove an entire online community is unsafe, posts like this deliberately conflate the individual with the group.
English
137
3
43
17.6K
Catherine Blaiklock
Catherine Blaiklock@blaiklockBP·
Someone on 99k is better off than someone on 110k How can that be right ?
English
29
22
511
23K