John Mappin

Dearest Candace, @RealCandaceO We thought that you and other friends of Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11 might appreciate this at this time. That auspicious and star crossed night on 11th December 2018 when you Candace, and Charlie first arrived in London to launch Turning Point to this nation, we launched @TPointUK and changed all our lives' trajectories including that of @TPUSA When George arrived, I recall uttering the now memorable words, "I don't believe you have met Lord Farmer's son Candace" And the rest, as we now know to say, is Future. ❤️ One has made a few introductions in ones time, but the introduction of Turning Point to the United Kingdom that night, the introduction of Charlie's and your philosophy and way of thinking and, most joyfully, our introduction of you to your loving Husband George, ranks up there for sure. God had his eye and hand on this Kingdom that night for sure. How we will fill the awful vacuum of friendship in our lives that Charlie has left, I don't know. What I do know, is that Charlie and you, with the help of many other friends of freedom, have created a political and spiritual Legacy, a juggernaut, that is beyond compare in this world. Our family will do whatever we can to help protect his legacy and to ensure that it stays true to those highest possible purposes as Charlie intended. We know, as you do, what they were. And I am sure that God in his grace will ensure that those purposes continue to shine as brightly as Charlie shone that night in London and on so many other occasions. And that providence will continue to be part of His, of your and of our story. You are all in our Prayers. I would ask all watching this and appreciating this special moment to pray for Erika and Charlie's children. @MrsErikaKirk @JDVance All our love John and Irina Mappin @ImMappin ---- @Nigel_Farage @michaelgove @Freddygray31 @MrHarryCole @CharlesHMoore @piersmorgan @ImMappin @rustyrockets @TRobinsonNewEra @TuckerCarlson @RupertLowe10 @liamtuffs1 @LeilaniDowding @realannapaulina @JamesMelville @Nero @RealCandaceO @RWMaloneMD @lopatonok @kadmitriev @liamtuffs1 @PatrickChristys @MartinDaubney @RWMaloneMD @MELANIATRUMP @LeilaniDowding @toryboypierce @1MikeFairclough @beverleyturner @elonmusk @GBNEWS @SecKennedy @WhiteHouse @Iromg @ViKu1111 @itsmarlamaples @RepMTG @IAMTOMMACDONALD @GenFlynn @tylerbowyer @KingBobIIV @Scavino47 @realDonaldTrump

Attended my first Restore meeting tonight, it was fantastic, lot’s of speakers lots of ideas put forward. Everybody given the opportunity to speak, far more democratic than the first Reform meeting I attended. Excited for our future, this is only the beginning. Branch Lead Ted Jenkins, young lad granted, but he has a great future of that I’m sure. 👏🏻

Very kind words John. Thank you - a pleasure as always to come to Camalot 😊

THE TEST OF A LEGACY In Charlie’s Absence, Who Held the Line? IF MAGAZINE. There are moments when a man’s life ceases to be a matter of biography and becomes, instead, a question. Not what he said, nor even what he did, but what remains when he is gone. The Iran war crisis provided precisely such a moment. It was, in every meaningful sense, the first true test of Charlie Kirk’s legacy and, more pointedly, of those who claimed to stand closest to him. For it is one thing to speak of restraint in private, and quite another to uphold it when the machinery of escalation is already in motion. By the time of his death, Charlie had made his position unmistakably clear. He had warned that a war with Iran would be a catastrophic mistake, and urged those within the system to prevent such a course. That was not rhetoric. It was instruction. And with his absence, the question became unavoidable: would that instruction be honoured, or quietly discarded? What followed was not silence. It was a form of answer. A Chorus, Not of Noise, but of Clarity A number of voices, some expected, others less so, stepped forward and, in doing so, revealed something of the man himself. For friendships, in politics as in life, are rarely tested in comfort. They are tested in moments of consequence. Tucker Carlson @TuckerCarlson spoke with a clarity that bordered on defiance. He rejected outright the notion that escalation with Iran was either necessary or aligned with the will of the electorate, insisting that those within government retained both the authority—and the duty—to refuse it. Candace Owens @RealCandaceO followed with a sustained and principled opposition, arguing that such a war was incompatible with the very identity of the movement itself. Her position was not merely strategic, but philosophical: a movement grounded in national interest could not coherently justify foreign entanglement. Milo @nero Mike Cernovich @Cernovich, Alex Jones @RealAlexJones, Megyn Kelly @megynkelly reinforced the argument from different platforms, widening its reach and sharpening its political implications. Marjorie Taylor Greene @mtgreenee broke from the gravitational pull of loyalty to state plainly that such a war was “not what we voted for,” pairing sentiment with the more tangible prospect of congressional constraint. Many grass roots MAGA loyalists expressed the same conclusion in more forceful terms, framing the issue as a direct betrayal of “America First” and rejecting the return to regime-change wars. Within government, Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie sought to impose constitutional discipline through War Powers mechanisms. Joe Kent, @joekent16jan19 in perhaps the most tangible act of dissent, resigned rather than lend his name to a policy he believed unjustified. Beyond these American figures, the response was not confined within national borders. International voices like Piers Morgan @piersmorgan and others emerged not merely as participants, but as amplifiers of the same common sense sane essential truths across a wider international stage. People who could not in good conscience live to see a civilisation wiped from the face of the earth. As long-standing supporters of Trump and the movement, their intervention carried the authority of continuity rather than departure. Through sustained public commentary and media platforms, they highlighted civilian consequences, economic destabilisation, and the widening divergence between principle and policy. They articulated, clearly and repeatedly, that one could oppose the Iranian regime while rejecting the destruction of its people; that to stand against war was not to abandon the movement, but to defend its core. Each of these people’s role was not peripheral. It was catalytic to a peaceful outcome. An Absence of a Different Kind, Yet if this moment revealed the strength of certain friendships, it also revealed something else. An absence. For while individuals stepped forward, often at personal or political cost, the institutional voice most closely associated with Charlie Kirk was, by contrast, notably restrained. The organisation he founded, nurtured, and helped to build, Turning Point USA was not at the forefront of this defining moment. Its messaging, at a time when Charlie’s final position might reasonably have been expected to find its clearest institutional expression, was conspicuously muted. This is not to suggest opposition. But absence, in such moments, carries its own meaning. For institutions are not merely judged by what they say. But by what they do not say when it matters most. Across different platforms, constituencies, and geographies, a single underlying truth emerged: the trajectory toward war was neither inevitable nor justified, and could not withstand sustained scrutiny. And in that scrutiny, something shifted. For facts and truth, clearly stated, repeatedly articulated, and widely distributed, have a peculiar power. They do not merely challenge narratives; they dissolve them. They make it harder to sustain illusion, harder to claim consensus, harder to proceed without question. What had been presented as settled began to appear contingent. What had been framed as necessary became debatable. Momentum slowed. And it is in moments such as these, that slowing is everything. The Test For if a legacy means anything, it must be capable of surviving the individual. It must pass, altered perhaps, but recognisably intact, into the hands of others. The Iran war crisis was and is not merely a geopolitical flashpoint. It was a test. A test not only of ideas, but of loyalty, of conviction, and of courage under pressure. And one might, if inclined to a more expansive view, imagine that Charlie himself, freed from the immediacy of events, is observing this moment from beyond it. That from some higher vantage, beyond politics but not beyond consequence, he saw how those closest to him would respond. And what would he have seen? That when the war drums were at their loudest, when the pressure to conform was at its greatest, his true friends did not retreat into silence. They spoke. They resisted. Charlie's true friends held the line. And in doing so, they did something more than preserve a position. They helped to create space, however narrow, for peace to prevail where conflict had seemed inevitable. For politics, like all human systems, depends not only on power, but on permission. And Charlies true friends did not give permission. And when enough voices withdraw that permission, even the most determined course can falter. Thus the absence of Charlie Kirk did not mark the end of restraint. It marked its proving. And in that proving, something larger became visible: That while one man may, for a time, hold the line alone, A true legacy ensures that, when he is gone, Others will hold his standard high. Thank you. @TheCeliaWalden @realannapaulina @KingBobIIV @BretWeinstein @realmflynnJR @CarriePrejean1 @GaryCardone @ShaykhSulaiman @AubreyLaitsch

Montgomery Tom’s @MontgomeryToms is a bright new light in British politics. It was our pleasure to support him from the outset and to learn what has happened in his journey over the last few months. What a rise. He is a tremendous asset to @RestoreBritain_ and for @RupertLowe10

@girl17_diamond @GaryCardone No no distortion here.

@JohnMappin @GaryCardone John, you are a liar! You distort Charlie Kirk’s words and take them out of context to push your own anti-Israel narrative and agenda. God in heaven sees everything you’re doing. Everything you do in your deception will FAIL.

This is what Charlie Kirk had noticed and why he had turned against Israel's policy @GaryCardone

@JohnMappin @RupertLowe10 @RestoreBritain_ You deserve a medal. Well done for refusing. Can you even believe they asked you to put them up in your beautiful hotel 🤣 what a joke! There's the rest of us slogging our guts out to pay for boat men to look at that view, eat 3 meals and sexual harass our women and girls 👊

@JohnMappin @RupertLowe10 @RestoreBritain_ 🎯 I for one cheered when it was released you'd told them to shuv it where the sun don't shine! You're a legend ❤️🇬🇧

What a lovely surprise. I was just enjoying my afternoon coffee in the Cornish sunshine when Jane approached me to say hello. So nice. She likes Rupert Lowe @RupertLowe10 and @RestoreBritain_

Art of the deal? Trump’s claims: Mar 3: "We won the war." Mar 7: "We defeated Iran." Mar 9: "We must attack Iran." Mar 9: "The war is ending very beautifully." Mar 10: "practically nothing left to target." Mar 11: “You never like to say early you won. We won.” Mar 12: "We did win, but we not completely yet." Mar 13: "We won the war." Mar 14: "Please help us." Mar 15: "If you don't help us, I will remember it." Mar 16: "Actually, we don't need any help at all." Mar 16: "I was just testing who's listening." Mar 16: "If NATO doesn't help, they will suffer." Mar 17: "We neither need nor want NATO's help." Mar 18: "Allies must cooperate in reopening Hormuz." Mar 19: "US allies need to get a grip." Mar 20: "NATO are cowards." Mar 21: "Hormuz, we don't use it, no need to open it." Mar 22: "This is the last time. I will give Iran 48 hours." Mar 22: "Iran is Dead" Mar 23: "We had very good talk with Iran." Mar 24: "We’re making progress." Mar 25: “They gave us a present today." Mar 26: "Make a deal." Mar 27: "We don’t have to be there for NATO." Mar 29: "Talks are progressing." Mar 30: "Open Hormuz immediately or consequences." Mar 31: "Deal very close, Iran will do the right thing." Apr 1: "We’ll see what happens very soon." Apr 2: "Deal likely, strikes if not." Apr 3: "Something big is going to happen." Apr 4: "Iran must comply immediately." Apr 5: "Open the fuckin' Strait, you crazy bastards." Apr 6 : "A whole civilization will die." Apr 7: "Total and complete victory." Apr 8: "Objectives were met." No regime change. The strait of Hormuz remains closed. Israel is getting destroyed. Iran won?

I can’t believe I find myself agreeing with every word of this from… @megynkelly

Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson are brave journalists. They were willing to admit they were wrong and changed course when the evidence suggested that they should. Independent thinkers. Very few people have the guts to do this. They just stay in their tribe.

Modern Israel are certainly a long way removed from the Balfour Declaration. I wonder what Lord Balfour would feel about it. This clause of that declaration is quite clear - and Israel could well be considered to be in breach of that declaration. “it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,” @RealCandaceO

Full divorce must be pursued. End all ties, diplomatic, financial and military.

“A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇱 BREAKING: Tucker calls for a complete end to all U.S. military and economic aid to Israel: "Not one more dollar. Not one more fighter jet or bomb or missile defense system or ammunition of any kind. Because Israel is aggressively acting against our interest." He's careful to say this isn't about treating Israel as an enemy. It's about treating them like every other country: an ally with restrictions, reservations, and red lines. He wants a "healthy conventional relationship where Israel can pay its own bills and fund its own military." This is the most significant statement any major right-wing media figure has made about the U.S.-Israel relationship in decades. Source: @TCNetwork

Rather sane.

There is no justification for killing a child. If you stood up for the world's children during COVID, then surely this disturbs you. It's not 5D chess or some elaborate plan. Murdering children is evil. We should protect children of all nations, faiths, and backgrounds.

Iran drops another one.

Wow ! @RealCandaceO

🚨BREAKING🚨 Tyler Robinson was ALREADY in custody when the infamous Discord confession happened. Per UTAH Police records Just one more red flag! The America people deserve the truth. They assassinated Charlie Kirk on national television! That was very traumatic for a lot of people to see, and we deserve the answers!