JK

An amateur asks “what should I buy?” A pro ask “how much should I risk?” Learn to size like Peter Brandt 🎥👇

@visegrad24 There’s no shortage of war clips

We just crossed half a million followers on Instagram. Our largest account is here on X, but we are growing swiftly on all platforms.

Boulder, CO. Have a great weekend

@Average_Sam_101 Absolutely not. The chart got me in. Clear breakout at $11. My reason for staying longer than the target (which is not standard practice and is not advised) is conviction, based on my interpretation of the fundamentals and path of growth.

@jonbking So it's not based on the chart or fundamentals or market environment...it's just a gut feeling

Navitas $NVTS is +20% today (again). My gf is the one who put this stock on my radar, and now we are having a toxic battle of who closes/realizes highest return. This one is different for me guys

@Average_Sam_101 Unoffended - thanks good question. I follow my rules 95% of the time. There are exceptions based on conviction or fear. One or two a year I tend to hold past target for better or worse. I still trail my stop though

@jonbking Hope this doesn't come off as rude but you mention how much the stock has been going up. Doesn't it become irrelevant, since I am guessing you took profits at the target already?

Are financials next? Which tickers are you looking at in the sector? Chart patterns are not predictions. They are a way to define risk, timing, and asymmetry. MORE: tinyurl.com/5dy8wmdc

The top holdings on $IXG >Berkshire Hathaway $BRK.B >JP Morgan $JPM >Visa $V > Mastercard $MA > Bank of America $BAC

Financials - iShares Global Financials ETF $IXG provides exposure to global financial stocks - banks, insurers, investment firms, payment networks, and other financial services companies. 219 holdings, 0.41% expense ratio, $533 million AUM, P/E ratio of 14.86x via @BlackRock

@DillyDallyGally This one is good enough for me 👍

@jonbking also...

One of the most powerful chart setups: The Inverted Head & Shoulders Continuation pattern. Exhibit A: $ARM Arm Holdings plc This inverse H&S continuation pattern has reached its measured target. Members were alerted ahead of its $183 breakout in April. Here how it works. 👇

I took it

Here's one breaking out right now. >Would you buy this chart?

@R89Capital He’s right. Maybe autistic but it’s true. These conversations happen behind closed doors between 3 people who are apathetic. He just doesn’t know not to say it out loud

He's actually such a piece of shit it's almost unreal lol

@BEKIND369 @TechCharts The chart I posted above is a new ticker, not ARM. Arm met target +

@jonbking @TechCharts ARM?

@SteveDa19026883 @DariusDale42 We make market calls

@DariusDale42 OK max confused, I thought it was time to be defensive/short now

POLL: Dr. Mo's been max long Tech $XLK since early April. Time to sell?

@MarkYusko 😂

Math Is Hard

@JoeMurp09609535 Clean. I like it

@jonbking what do you think

$NVTS feeding families

@JoeMurp09609535 100% true - best thing about these communities are the members. Thank you 🤛

@jonbking happy to say I alerted the factor members to this one

@ResGeoPol lost me at "it's not hype --" where it became clear I was reading the work of a robot.

Gallium is quietly turning into one of the biggest headaches for the whole AI boom. This obscure metal is critical for the high-end GaN and GaAs chips that power the fastest GPUs, data center gear, and next-gen comms stuff AI actually depends on. And supply-wise? It’s a nightmare. We’re talking global production somewhere around 300-600 tonnes a year max. China controls basically 98-99% of it. It’s almost entirely a byproduct from aluminum and zinc smelting — you can’t just spin up new mines when demand explodes. The West produces almost nothing domestically. We’re dumping hundreds of billions into AI infrastructure, yet the entire thing rests on this crazy concentrated chokepoint. Beijing already slapped export bans on the US late last year. When the next big wave of training clusters kicks in, this could get ugly fast. It’s not hype — it’s straight physics and geopolitics. Same story we saw with germanium, and now it’s gallium’s turn. Everyone loves talking about “onshoring” tech manufacturing. Maybe we should start onshoring the messy, unsexy minerals that make the tech possible in the first place. Anyone actually building serious non-China gallium capacity out there? Because from what I see, it’s damn near nobody. #CriticalMinerals #Gallium #AI #Geopolitics