jonjon

1.8K posts

jonjon banner
jonjon

jonjon

@jonjonclark

MAKE DATA GREAT AGAIN Shipping 🚢 co-founder @envio_indexer

London Katılım Ekim 2009
1.1K Takip Edilen3.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
jonjon
jonjon@jonjonclark·
Introducing Snubb – a multichain token approval scanner in your terminal. Inspired by @revokecash – this is an incredibly fast and efficient CLI tool to scan for outstanding token approvals for your address across as many as 70 chains simultaneously. Try it out now with one terminal command: npx snubb --address --chains 1,10,130 E.g. npx snubb --address 0x7C25a8C86A04f40F2Db0434ab3A24b051FB3cA58 --chains many-networks Video in reply showing it in action 👇🔥 It’s lightning fast—able to scan multiple chains and return results in seconds. Under the hood, it uses hypersync queries (by @envio_indexer) to scan entire chains very quickly, with specific filters for approval and transfer events related to the given address. If you find any outstanding approvals using Snubb, it’s recommended to head to revoke.cash to easily revoke those approvals. Share any feedback!
jonjon tweet media
English
25
41
438
38K
jonjon
jonjon@jonjonclark·
yeah hyperindex v3 is indeed here ...
English
0
0
4
241
jonjon
jonjon@jonjonclark·
BIG NEWS: HyperIndex V3 just dropped! Whats next? - Polishing Solana Support - Indexing 1,000,000+ events per second
jonjon tweet media
English
0
1
14
929
jonjon
jonjon@jonjonclark·
@plondon514 Just as important for LPs to see past behaviour so they can better understand how to LP in future 😄 DM if you want me to share my research on it
GIF
English
0
0
1
15
Philip London
Philip London@plondon514·
Uniswap has been quietly shipping improvements to the LP experience one update im excited about is the liquidity position chart ↓
English
18
7
128
30.1K
jonjon
jonjon@jonjonclark·
Lots and lots powerful goodies. I.e. you can index factory / metadata events from early blocks while indexing actual swap events from much later blocks, from the SAME contract address. Not just the fastest, but also the most flexible ...
ENVIO@envio_indexer

🎯 Per-event start blocks in HyperIndex Override contract and chain start blocks on a per-event basis. Useful when you need different historical depth for different events across chains in the same indexer.Set custom start blocks per chain, with TypeScript exhaustiveness checks built in:

English
0
3
11
709
jonjon
jonjon@jonjonclark·
Net realised profit: $7,182,126 Rank #33 all-time, earned in 21 days from slight market mispricings.
English
0
0
3
209
jonjon
jonjon@jonjonclark·
There stats from Oct 26 → Nov 16 2024: • 762 USDC splits totalling $15,275,535 • 20,214 simultaneous Trump-YES + Harris-YES sell events • Sum exceeded $1.00 in 77.9% of them - average 1.00078, max 1.01914 (a 1.91% riskless spread) • Total fills: 36,740. Volume: $23.24M. 99.9% in two markets.
English
1
0
3
261
jonjon
jonjon@jonjonclark·
Day 3 of interesting @Polymarket strategies I've seen: A trader made $7m in 21 days (#33 all time realized PnL rank) during the 2024 election by arbitraging multiple binary markets that all priced this event (i.e. never betting on who would win).
English
3
3
14
1.1K
jonjon
jonjon@jonjonclark·
Looking back and slightly adjusting some assumptions about Day 2's wallet: The 95% win rate is a selection artifact. Across all 864 positions opened, only 47.3% were on the eventual winner. The "closed bets" count excludes 427 positions flattened pre-resolution at ~zero PnL. Real edge: tiny mispricing at the bid + fast flatten on bad bets (turns –38¢ losses into –2¢) + hold winners to $1.00. Asymmetric payoff does the rest. The moat is exit speed, not prediction 👀 At least this is what I think ...
English
0
0
0
168
jonjon
jonjon@jonjonclark·
@AlgorithmicBot Yeah I'm thinking about it more and relooking into it- i think I've overlooked that they'll sold out various positions not counting towards this win rate. The PnL is correct, but its only heavily analyzing bets held till redemption.
English
0
0
1
58
naz
naz@AlgorithmicBot·
for example, if this statement is true: "when this bot puts capital on a side, that side is the eventual winner 95% of the time.", then it effectively gives us a formula for free money. we simply watch which side the bot takes, and if the price at which we can realize the trade ourselves is below 0.95, then we are expected to make profit. so something must be off. from the above, it seems like you can short sell sides, I thought that was not possible - maybe the above model does not account for the fact that you can mint both sides of the trade, i.e. it's possible to mint both YES and NO for $1.00. So if he is taker selling, then he must be selling the minted tokens. There are also neg risk tokens, which have their own mechanisms - iirc they actually might be enabled in sports markets.
English
1
0
1
32