JC

3.2K posts

JC banner
JC

JC

@jpinto37

Male, Married, Conservative, Army, anti-woke, pro-weapons, worked for a living! -NO D/Ms - IFBAP

Houston, TX Katılım Ekim 2022
4.6K Takip Edilen4.3K Takipçiler
Angry Staffer
Angry Staffer@Angry_Staffer·
Just to recap: Russia is currently helping Iranian forces try to kill US troops. In response, Trump is… lifting sanctions on Russia and threatening to pull out of NATO, which are the #1 and #2 items on Putin’s wishlist
English
202
3.4K
10.8K
105.2K
JC
JC@jpinto37·
@Wilkmaster Methods of communication have changed dramatically since WW11.
English
0
0
0
4
HotChilli🌶️
HotChilli🌶️@hotchilliSA·
@RTD8690 @MurieAnita1 @Angry_Staffer @dollymad1812 That has nothing to do with what I said. Trump eased sanctions on Iran who America is currently at war with, and also eased sanctions on Russia, who is helping Iran and also at war with Ukraine who America is helping. Please try and make sense of that.
English
2
0
0
51
Signal Breaker ⚔️ Cult of 888
@marklevinshow The US wants a ceasefire so they can re-arm because they are running low. Iran doesn't want that because they have plenty of missiles. They want PEACE. And END to the war. US and Israel are desperate like Ukraine. Same BS ceasefire playbook.
English
2
0
1
92
Mark R. Levin
Mark R. Levin@marklevinshow·
Of course, the Iranian regime wants a ceasefire.  Every losing regime and army would like a ceasefire.  But a ceasefire is not unconditional surrender.  It's not a surrender at all.  Just saying.
English
1.3K
2.6K
8.5K
150.6K
JC
JC@jpinto37·
@Jimrob_north @bonchieredstate PS US won’t leave NATO but some of the individual countries have to spend less on socialism or the future will be bleaker.
English
1
0
0
17
Jim North
Jim North@Jimrob_north·
@jpinto37 @bonchieredstate 65% represents total US defence spending in relation to other countries total defence spending. It does not represent the total the US spends on NATO, which was the claim in the original post.
English
2
0
0
33
JC
JC@jpinto37·
@Jimrob_north @bonchieredstate You missed my point. If US went to the aid of NATO - our entire military establishment would be available. That % is much more than our individual contribution to NATO.
English
1
0
0
15
JC
JC@jpinto37·
@doobry @robert_lyman IMHO NATO couldn’t defeat Ukraine either without France going nuclear.
English
1
0
0
13
Doobry
Doobry@doobry·
@jpinto37 @robert_lyman They can't even beat Ukraine. I'm not worried about Russia unless they are allowed to win this war.
English
1
0
0
11
Robert Lyman 🇺🇦
Robert Lyman 🇺🇦@robert_lyman·
This is throwing the baby outwith the bath water Andrew. We mustn’t do anything like this until and unless we have all the requisite capabilities to replace those we are asking the US to remove. Its is also tantamount to a rejection of the core principle of NATO, and expecting an immature, multi-polar Europe do what NATO currently does. We may not agree with US strategy, but it’s theirs nevertheless.
Andrew Fox@Mr_Andrew_Fox

The correct answer is to follow France, Spain and Italy’s example in regard to use of airspace, and issue notice on Lakenheath, Mildenhall, etc. It is time to take the Americans at their word. We cannot entrust any part of our defences to the USA.

English
14
6
57
6K
JC
JC@jpinto37·
What irritated me about NATO was some of the members closing their airspace and not allowing the use of their bases. Those actions were spineless.
English
0
0
0
9
JC
JC@jpinto37·
You are kidding right? UK doesn’t have a forceful military any more. Germany would be the leader.
Mark@Exp_Sec_Prof

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1… If Trump leaves NATO the UK will have to step up to the plate as other EU countries will be looking at the UK to protect them.

English
0
0
0
7
Jim North
Jim North@Jimrob_north·
@bonchieredstate They don't. The 65% figure is based on total defence spending of all of the countries in NATO, not money that is spent on the defence of NATO. Of the NATO shared defence budget, the US contributes 15-16%.
English
2
0
11
688
JC
JC@jpinto37·
@doobry @robert_lyman Russia would be a lot less concerned about a NATO without the US.
English
1
0
0
9
Doobry
Doobry@doobry·
@robert_lyman NATO would still survive without the US. it might even thrive, especially when Ukraine joins.
English
1
0
0
20
JC retweetledi
Mossin Nagant
Mossin Nagant@MossinNagant·
@zerohedge The primary reason Washington underwrites European security is to guarantee unhindered global power projection. If they start restricting base access for out-of-area operations, the US is just subsidizing a wealthy continent's welfare state.
English
0
2
19
836
JC retweetledi
Saint Media
Saint Media@SaintMedia10·
This is a high-stakes moment for the alliance. While Rubio has traditionally been seen by European diplomats as a "stabilizing" force in the administration, his adoption of this skeptical tone suggests that the internal U.S. consensus on NATO is fracturing. If the U.S. cannot use its European "hubs" for non-NATO missions (like the current Iran operations), the administration clearly views the multibillion-dollar investment in European security as no longer serving American national interests
English
2
2
33
1.2K
JC retweetledi
MAGA Voice
MAGA Voice@MAGAVoice·
HOLY SH*T 🚨 Secretary of State Marco Rubio just went Nuclear on NATO: Marco: “If NATO is just about US defending Europe if they are attacked but they DENY us basing rights when we need them thats not a good arrangement” IT’S TIME TO LEAVE NATO
English
133
590
4.2K
45.2K
@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸@Chicago1Ray·
Who do you think folks in Kentucky should vote for in (KY-04) the former Navy Seal Ed Gallrein who's endorsed by Trump... or Thomas Massie
@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸 tweet media@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
3.5K
462
1.6K
139.5K
JC
JC@jpinto37·
@WhiteHouse Don’t abandon our Arib allies. They stood with US.
English
0
0
0
9
JC
JC@jpinto37·
If you are a lawyer, I’m the Pope. You live in your mother’s basement. Bye
JustAComicBookFan@JustACBMFan

@Average00037367 @lennonfan4 @jpinto37 @hemantmehta Who reported that? You are just talking out of your ass. He attacked them and started a war as a distraction. He lied to your fucking face. Saying he would not start any new wars or put boots on the ground in the Middle East. You fell for it. Again.

English
0
0
0
23