John Sjölander

11.3K posts

John Sjölander banner
John Sjölander

John Sjölander

@jsjo

Privately a non-politically aligned critical thinker, on a quest for truths, in search of novelty. Devote heretic. Professionally I create and invest. Ⓥ

)°( BRC or Amsterdam, .nl Katılım Eylül 2007
621 Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
John Sjölander
John Sjölander@jsjo·
In life, learn the power of saying: Thank you.
English
2
0
4
0
Mikael Pawlo
Mikael Pawlo@mpawlo·
@OliverMolander Daniel Stenberg (left) would be the sole contender. Daniel Stenberg is the creator of Curl, a library for transferring data via URLs. Here with his gold medal that the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences (IVA) awarded him in 2025.
Mikael Pawlo tweet media
English
2
1
19
1.9K
Oliver Molander
Oliver Molander@OliverMolander·
Name one Nordic (or European for that matter) tech entrepreneur who has been more influential globally than this guy. I'll wait. 🇫🇮🐧
Oliver Molander tweet media
English
20
10
93
5.7K
John Sjölander
John Sjölander@jsjo·
@mpawlo Not really, but Moonshots, Uncapped, Dwarkesh podcast, Complex systems are all contenders for content (although they don’t run a weekly news roundup).
English
0
0
1
45
Mikael Pawlo
Mikael Pawlo@mpawlo·
Is there a pod out there like early All-in? I e tech not politics.
English
4
0
3
4.6K
Jim O’Neill
Jim O’Neill@regardthefrost·
I’m extremely honored to be nominated by President Trump to serve as Director of the National Science Foundation.   Heroic scientists have always challenged consensus to advance the frontiers of knowledge. Recently, many institutions have weakened academic freedom and lost the trust they once enjoyed. Yet across our country, a new golden age of discovery is dawning. Information is open source and debate is public.   The marketplace of ideas is not an efficient market. Finding and funding independent thinkers and builders has taught me to eliminate bottlenecks and favor rigorous science that replicates.  Private funders are developing frontier models and useful technology. Government should take bigger financial risks to pose and answer deeper questions.   NSF’s scientists and staff have built something worth strengthening. Working together, scientists, engineers, investors, research institutions, and businesses can support American genius, enhance national security, enrich our economy, and improve our quality of life.   Entropy is on the march and China is not waiting.
Jim O’Neill tweet media
English
196
293
2.5K
434.5K
John Sjölander
John Sjölander@jsjo·
@robkhenderson Same, but this was a strange test to take for someone with libertarian leanings. In several cases I couldn’t agree nor disagree fully. Clearly not designed for that part of the political spectrum.
English
0
0
3
129
John Sjölander
John Sjölander@jsjo·
Old news, my brain ran Doom already in the 90s. 🧠🤓
SciTech Era@SciTechera

This is insane. Scientists just taught living human brain cells to play DOOM. Cortical Labs in Australia grew about 800,000 neurons (human stem-cell derived plus mouse neurons) on a silicon chip and connected them to a computer using a high density microelectrode array. This system, called DishBrain, sends electrical signals representing the game environment and reads the neurons’ responses as control inputs. These cells don’t see graphics. They receive patterns of stimulation encoding movement and feedback, then reorganize their firing to improve performance. In earlier experiments, these neuron networks began learning tasks like Pong in about 5 minutes of gameplay. Because biological neurons adapt continuously and use extremely little energy, researchers are developing real bio-hybrid machines like the Cortical Labs CL1 biological computer, which runs living neural networks on silicon hardware. For perspective, the entire human brain operates on roughly ~20 watts of power. Modern AI systems require far more energy for comparable tasks. Researchers call this Synthetic Biological Intelligence. Future applications could include controlling robotic limbs, modeling neurological diseases, testing drugs, and building ultra-efficient computers that learn naturally instead of being trained from scratch. This isn’t consciousness or a “brain in a jar.” It’s proof that living tissue itself can function as computing hardware. Acceleration is everywhere.

English
0
0
2
125
Pablo A. Penietzsche
Pablo A. Penietzsche@PabloPeniche·
I will not monitor the situation. I will enjoy my weekend off in Tokyo. I will not monitor the situation. I will enjoy my weekend off in Tokyo. I will not monitor the situation. I will enjoy my weekend off in Tokyo. I will not monitor the situation. I will enjoy my weekend ...
English
12
3
280
9.9K
John Sjölander
John Sjölander@jsjo·
This is probably true. Glubb wrote about this in the 70’s in The Fate of Empires and Search for Survival. Look it up - fascinating reading. TL;DR as empires move from enrichment to upkeep they have to appease their outposts/allies and they over time they how to leverage the appeasement so that eventually the empire flow of riches are reversed and finally the empire can’t upkeep the costs to appease their vassals. So yeah… probably. But it’s a feature, not a bug in the empire model. However shitty is may seem. Conclusion; avoid being an empire. Instead be competent and extremely well armed (Israel, Singapore, The Illyrian’s, etc)
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

You don’t understand. I’ve watched a ton of congressional defense hearings. In EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. the Admirals and Generals say “we are only strong because of our allies.” At first I believed it. Then I started attending defense conferences overseas. I watched U.S. GOFOs get treated like royalty. Five-star hotels. Wined and dined. Told how great they are for “being such great allies.” The pattern became obvious. Europeans spend lavishly on ego-boosting, awards dinners, and fine wine… and in exchange, every GOFO goes home and tells Congress how indispensable our allies are. And our “allies” save a fortune on defense. Then a buddy got a job at European Command and confirmed everything—except it wasn’t just GOFOs. There are entire departments of people working in “intelligence” who are basically travel agents for generals and members of Congress. Then I started digging into the UN. Guess what? They hold a massive number of “security” conferences too—except most of theirs are in straight-up resort towns. Then I got inside a few think tanks. You want to see posh surroundings and excellent wine and food? Buddy up with them. I started posting about all this a few years ago and got MASSIVE pushback—which I knew meant I was on the right track. But I still wasn’t 100% sure. Most of it was grift, but maybe some parts were essential… until Midnight Hammer. Then Maduro. Now this. My European friends were totally blindsided by all of it. And guess what? We performed better without these great “allies.” Why? Going all the way back to Korea, one thing has remained true: Europeans don’t fully trust us—and they like having a little power over us. So they are absolute sticklers for Rules of Engagement. They wine and dine our JAGs. They hold endless conferences about “the rule of law” to reinforce the “importance of ROEs.” And ROEs are what kills our military. Nobody is suggesting soldiers should do anything immoral. Nobody is saying there shouldn’t be consequences for atrocities. What I am saying is that having a battalion of JAGs and a dozen allied nations—each with their own ROEs—breathing down every commander’s neck is why we lose wars. That includes Vietnam, where most “allies” refused to fight but every one of them put serious diplomatic pressure on DC to tighten ROEs. All of this “allies are our strength” dogma gets reinforced at these conferences, at war colleges, by European-influenced media, and through think tanks. The reason we’re suddenly so effective is because @PeteHegseth has cut all this out. Our allies are flying blind. They can’t throw up a million legal objections because they don’t know the details behind these missions any sooner than we do. Just look at Starmer’s body language. He’s clueless. And it’s not just our allies that no longer get to micromanage everything but media and UN diplomats and think tanks and bureaucrats and more. Now if we could just cut Congress off from this “allies are great” grift, we could probably start passing legislation too. P.S. I see no signs of Hegseth or DoW weakening our allies or alliances. They genuinely seem to want Europe to be stronger. They just aren’t asking permission anymore or giving allies veto power over everything like before.

English
0
0
0
96
John Sjölander
John Sjölander@jsjo·
I guess it’s time to move from the Netherlands. It was fun while it lasted.
Bitcoin News@BitcoinNewsCom

NEW: Dutch Parliament Member Michel Hoogeveen explains how the 36% unrealized capital gains tax, just passed by the House of Representatives, will work. Here is a more detailed example: Step 1. Starting position You own 500 shares. Value on Jan 1, 2028: €50,000 Value on Jan 1, 2029: €100,000 So the paper gain is: €100,000 − €50,000 = €50,000 unrealized profit You did not sell. But for tax purposes, that €50,000 is treated as income. Step 2. Apply exemption You are married, so you get a €3,600 exemption. €50,000 − €3,600 = €46,400 taxable amount Tax rate: 36% €46,400 × 36% = €16,704 tax bill That bill is due in May, even though you never sold anything. Step 3. Market falls before you pay Now suppose by May the shares drop in value. New total value: €60,000 So your portfolio is no longer worth €100,000. It’s worth €60,000. But the tax bill is still €16,704, because it was calculated based on the January 1 valuation. Step 4. You must sell shares to pay tax To raise €16,704, you sell part of your shares. After paying the tax, you’re left with: €60,000 − €16,704 = €43,296 Originally you had 500 shares. Now you have 360 shares left. You were forced to sell 140 shares. 140 ÷ 500 = 28% of your shares gone. Step 5. What happened economically? Before the correction: Paper gain was €50,000. After the correction: Portfolio is worth €60,000. Original cost basis was €50,000. Real gain is only €10,000. But you paid €16,704 in tax. So instead of being up €10,000, you are now: €43,296 − €50,000 = €6,704 below your original starting value. You turned a €10,000 real gain into a €6,704 net loss. And you lost 28% of your shares permanently.

English
0
0
3
135
John Sjölander
John Sjölander@jsjo·
@mgurri Maybe there is still hope for us Europeans who believe in Europe but have lost hope in the EU and the EU project? 🤞🏼🤞🏼
English
0
0
0
21
Sterling Cooley
Sterling Cooley@SterlingCooley·
I can't get over this... They can insert a catheter in your *groin* - push it through blood vessels to your neck - and implant a Vagus Nerve Stimulator I guess an alternative if you *don't* want Ultrasound I guess 🫣 vaguscure.com/blog/what-if-h…
English
2
0
27
1.3K
John Sjölander
John Sjölander@jsjo·
Natural next step: Once this new form of entertainment takes hold, some people will be better at ”directing”. These will make for more interesting experiences. Then these people’s production can be put up for others to experience in a YouTube/GitHub-esque manner.
English
0
0
0
20
John Sjölander
John Sjölander@jsjo·
I bet a team of < 100 people can make this new form of personally catered entertainment, and it will have triple-A games quality and big budget movie quality at the same time.
English
1
0
0
26
John Sjölander
John Sjölander@jsjo·
This is actually my prediction for the future of entertainment: Moving images and games will merge into a choose your own adventure style form of entertainment where you both interact with the show as well as direct the story, all rendered in real time with the help of AI.
fintechjunkie@fintechjunkie

Someone should create a company that allows fans to continue the storylines from canceled TV series with AI producing the episodes. No need for spinning the actors back up. Let AI do it. Let fans create, share and consume. This would be huge.

English
1
0
0
74
John Sjölander
John Sjölander@jsjo·
Attention platforms, apps and sites: If you limit access from my VPN provider you will be substituted. It’s just bad for everyone involved.
English
0
0
0
38
John Sjölander
John Sjölander@jsjo·
We Europeans don’t recognize your unelected illegitimate authority. So no thank you. Kindly, This European.
English
0
0
1
97