Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Heres the Operating Philosophy i use to 10x my Codex Workflow.
Maximising Codex to its limits.
• 1 | Give your AGENTS.md a prime directive.
-Not a bunch of rules. A doctrine that becomes Codex guiding philosophy.
-Mine : “Ship the smallest correct change, that increases product power without weakening truth, trust, security or maintainability.”
• 2 | Ban "implement X." Make it fill an outcome contract first.
Before any task, Codex must answer these 5 questions:
-what behavior am I replacing?
-what's the outcome?
-who owns the source of truth?
-what old path gets deleted or redirected?
-what evidence will prove it?
Use workers to help expose gaps before proceeding:
This one habit kills most wrong layer issues.
• 3 | Always have Plan reviewers, review the plan, before proceeding.
This agents objective is read and check for three things:
-wrong owner
-missing cutover,
-weak evidence.
It has to come back "aligned" before a single line gets written.
Catching a gap early can prevent days of debugging. Make this part of your doctrine.
• 4 | The rule: anti-accretion
This is the biggest one. As your code base grows in complexity, the importance of ensuring old paths are either deleted, redirected or demoted is vital.
Failure to understand this principle causes cutover debt.
Two competing systems causes confusion for Codex.
Then you wonder why your changes, aren’t being changed.
• 6 | Demand evidence you can see : Acceptance evidence.
We all know codex loves a green test, but this only proves the code runs, not that the product changed relative to your plan.
Use this :
“What did the user see / receive / do before the change vs after?” With proof.
Hope this helps.
English
