Julius
247 posts

Julius retweetledi

@julius4406 @Telekom_zockt Gar nicht. Die Telekom tut alles dafür, dass es nicht kommt
Deutsch
Julius retweetledi

300 km/h, keine Hände am Steuer.
Ich präsentiere das Bordrestaurant der Deutschen Bahn.

Vanessa Lisa Oelmann@VLOelmann
130 km/h auf der Autobahn, keine Hände am Lenkrad und niemand kann mir deshalb was: Ich präsentiere den BMW Driving Assistant Pro.
Deutsch

@Kelburn1975 @EU_Commission I travel to work 2 hours every day in the Cologne area and im still alive. I guess we need more diversity. ;)
English

@visegrad24 How do these guys always get into these situations? I walk like everyday through my citys main station. And nothing ever happend.
English

Comedian Nikita Miller was nearly killed by a migrant who attacked him inside Bremen Central Station.
The migrant was released on the same night as the stabbing. According to Miller, the court stated that the migrant “no longer poses any danger.”
The charge was also reduced to bodily harm instead of attempted murder, which Miller said was because the court argued that the migrant stopped the assault before killing him.
However, Miller told the court that he only survived the random attack because he fought back, and that the migrant only stopped because the blade broke off.
During the attack, Miller suffered five serious stab wounds, including a 15cm wound to his head.
He later told the German news outlet Express that the suspect was granted German citizenship despite the attack.
The comedian has since moved to Norway, saying that if anything were to happen to his wife or family, he would not want to deal with the German criminal justice system again.
“I won’t survive it a second time,” he said.

English
Julius retweetledi

did a FAT16 file system write this tweet
fish@fishPointer
a file should be no more than like 5-20 MB. 100MB max. that's the right size for a file. anything bigger is just absurd
English
Julius retweetledi

Apple and Google are gradually expanding their use of hardware-based attestation. They're convincing a growing number of services to adopt it. Google's Play Integrity API and Apple's App Attest API are very similar. Apple brought it to the web via Privacy Pass, which Google intends on doing too.
Google's Play Integrity API requires hardware attestation for the strong integrity level and is gradually phasing in requiring it for the more commonly used device integrity level. Apple already has it as a requirement. Over the long term, this will increasingly lock out hardware and OS competition.
The purpose of these systems is disallowing people from using hardware and software not approved by Apple or Google. This is wrongly presented as being a security feature. Banks and government services are the main ones adopting it but Apple and Google are encouraging every service to use it.
Apple's Privacy Pass brought hardware attestation to the web to help with passing captchas on their own hardware. Many people saw that as harmless since few sites would be willing to lock out non-Apple-hardware users. Apple and Google are both likely to bring broader hardware attestation to the web.
Google's reCAPTCHA is planning an approach where they use Privacy Pass on Apple hardware, their own approach on Google Mobile Services Android devices and a QR code scanning system to require an iOS or Google certified Android device for Windows and other systems:
support.google.com/recaptcha/answ…
Banking and government services increasingly require using a mobile app where they can use attestation to force using an Apple or Google approved device and OS. Apple's privacy pass, Google's 'cancelled' Web Environment Integrity and now reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification are bringing this to the web.
Current media coverage for reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification misunderstands it and the impact of it. They're bringing a hardware attestation requirement to Windows, desktop Linux, OpenBSD, etc. by requiring a QR scan from a certified smartphone to pass reCAPTCHA in some cases. They could expand it more.
Control over reCAPTCHA puts Google in a position where they can require having either iOS or a certified Android device to use an enormous amount of the web. Google defines certification requirements for Android which includes forcing bundling Google Chrome, etc. It's enormously anti-competitive.
Google's Play Integrity API bans using GrapheneOS despite it being far more secure than anything they permit. It also bans using any other alternative. This isn't somehow specific to an AOSP-based OS. You can't avoid this by using a mobile OS based on FreeBSD instead. You'll just be more locked out.
Google's Play Integrity API permits devices with no security patches for 10 years. The device integrity level can be bypassed via spoofing but they can detect it quite well and block it once it starts being done at scale. The strong integrity level requires leaked keys from TEEs/SEs to bypass it.
It doesn't provide a useful security feature, but it does lock out competition very well. Services requiring Apple App Attest or Google Play Integrity are primarily helping to lock in Apple and Google having a duopoly for mobile devices. Play Integrity is more relevant due to AOSP being open source.
Governments are increasingly mandating using Apple's App Attest and Google's Play Integrity for not only their own services but also commercial services. The EU is leading the charge of making these requirements for digital payments, ID, age verification, etc. Many EU government apps require them.
Instead of governments stopping Apple and Google from engaging in egregiously anti-competitive behavior, they're directly participating in locking out competition via their own services. Requiring people to have an Apple device or Google-certified Android device is anti-competition, not security.
reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification will currently work with sandboxed Google Play on GrapheneOS but it clearly exists to provide a way for them to start using hardware attestation on systems without it. People without an iOS or Android device will be locked out when this is required even without that.
This isn't about security or any missing functionality. GrapheneOS can be verified via hardware attestation. Google bans using GrapheneOS for Play Integrity because we don't license Google Mobile Services and conform to anti-competitive rules already found to be illegal in South Korea and elsewhere.
Services shouldn't ban people from using arbitrary hardware and operating systems in the first place. Google's security excuse is clearly bogus when they permit devices with no patches for 10 years but not a much more secure OS. It's for enforcing their monopolies via GMS licensing, that's all.
English
Julius retweetledi

Arbeitsweg black mesa
Lewis Bergen ( == Rail == )@railLKB
OMG BERLIN. What is this and how do I do it? That looks so fun!
Deutsch
Julius retweetledi

THEY ARE GOING TO BAN VPNs
THEY ARE GOING TO BAN VPNs
THEY ARE GOING TO BAN VPNs
THEY ARE GOING TO BAN VPNs
THEY ARE GOING TO BAN VPNs
THEY ARE GOING TO BAN VPNs
THEY ARE GOING TO BAN VPNs
THEY ARE GOING TO BAN VPNs
THEY ARE GOING TO BAN VPNs
THEY ARE GOING TO BAN VPNs
European Parliamentary Research Service@EP_EPRS
Virtual private networks #VPN are increasingly used to bypass online age verification. Protecting children online is a priority, with new rules being implemented requiring a minimum age for access to some services Read👉 link.europa.eu/FGfr6C #DSA @EP_Justice @FZarzalejos
English
Julius retweetledi
Julius retweetledi

@shitpost_game years back, i spent 2 bitcoin (more than my current nw) to pay for my foster cat’s chemotherapy.
and id do it again, without hesitation
English




















