@jess_ann_pin @MichaelAArouet Trump is considered a far right neo Nazi fascist, and he basically runs the same platform Obama did. Leftist have become far more extreme overall, and more women being leftists mean they are extreme.
English
K4tarn
180 posts
This is a misrepresentation.
The data only shows that more young women identify as liberal than in the past.
That does not mean that individual liberal women are becoming more liberal or even that women have changed their views.
The reason more young women identify as liberal is because conservatives have been seriously threatening women’s rights.
The open threats to women’s rights are why more young women, who have the most to lose from abortion bans for example, identify as liberal.
This should not be hard to figure out.
English
That's an interesting chart. Young men have stayed similarly conservative for over 25 years, while young women have drifted much further left.
Why such a divergence? What has changed for young women that hasn't changed for young men?
English
@andtwofortea @CaravanWD @abs0luteknower You have 12k posts in 4 months. You don't work. You may have a "job", but that only proves that you are being propped up.
English
@CaravanWD @abs0luteknower I’ve worked with high level AI. It’s cheaper to have a person do it than to have the person check the AI output.
English
> "So, your view is that there's a shortage of men for high status women because men are generally lower status."
> "Exactly, yes."
> "You're not trying to change this, I assume."
> "Absolutely not, no. It's a good thing."
> "Then who cares?"
> "To be honest, the main purpose of this article is to reduce the status of men."
Brad Wilcox@BradWilcoxIFS
The Left's theory of America's marriage divide: it's all class, esp. ways that less-educated men, as @mattyglesias puts it, lack "the sort of financial and emotional stability that make them attractive long-term partners."
English
@Goatitano @selfmaxxer Notice how Tim ruins his own experiment by replying to people collaborating and attempting to influence others?
English
@be_Zanazar @NathanFrancisIQ @Suchan_Arc Your inability to recognize this as a parallel and not collaboration is proof of your idiocy. The candy bar is living you dumb fuck.
English
@k4tarn @NathanFrancisIQ @Suchan_Arc Yes no collaboration, so no promising the kids a candy bar. So what is it? Is half of all children dying an argument or not? Can't have your cake and eat it too my guy.
English
Imagine there's a button that says "EVERYONE THAT PRESSES THIS BUTTON LIVES", and you just...don't push it.
You press the other one, thinking that "hey, if me and other idiots press that one...we all live!" That's democracy. A bunch of idiots choosing death for no reason.
Altair Zero@ZeroAltair1
English
@ChibiReviews But those blue guys under the crusher are overwhelmingly people you want in society. Letting them die is a huge loss to you.
While the first blue voters are illogical, once a certain amount of blue voters are forecasted, voting blue becomes the logical choice for your own sake.
English
The whole blue and red button drama is basically this summarized
If everyone clicked red, nobody would die. Those that click blue have suicidal empathy
English
@__K8r @NapoleonBonabot Children are not as retarded as you make them out to be. Ask a classroom of children if they would rather pick red and get a candy bar or blue and get nothing unless half the class picks blue. Every kid is picking red.
English
because a lot of people are thinking about babies and children that cannot make well thought out decisions. and to innocent children blue does sound better. so save the children. if you're in a room of a thousand well-educated analytically thinking people yeah you should probably press red but there's so much variance in the world and most people at the bottom rung society are taught this religion of being good and not selfish
English
>Red: guaranteed survival
>Blue: survival only if enough people press blue
Am I losing my mind? Why do so many people see blue as the favorable option?
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@NathanFrancisIQ @Suchan_Arc Correct. Blue has won AFTER COLLABORATION every single time. The rules specifically state no collaboration. Every blue voter failed the experiment.
English
@NathanFrancisIQ @Suchan_Arc The original scenario is, "pick red and live, pick blue and die unless 50% also pick blue". There is no need to reframe it. Don't use kids as an argument either. Tell a class of kids that they can get a candy bar for red, or they get nothing unless 50% pick blue. All pick red.
English
@Suchan_Arc I notice red voters always have to completely change the scenario because the original scenario is so obviously blue to anyone who can think even a little bit.
English
A bunch of irrationals are blaming red for this one. They are making up the idea that because someone picks red they are killing everyone who picks blue. Red is not Blue's keeper. Nobody is responsible for your choices. Picking blue is the most morally taxing pick.
𝔏𝔲𝔪𝔦𝔫𝔢𝔯𝔳𝔞@LumLotus
New point that doesn't make sense from Blue. I still don't understand how it's "Red's fault" for Blue's irrational actions.
English
@OliApplin @RandomPe0n @Otome_chan311 The point is the original requires >50% blue period. Abstaining in the original would still require 51 blue. Further, no one knows what the vote is at. If there is a flaw in the original, it's that it was posted on X for people to discuss and look at others before answering.
English
@k4tarn @RandomPe0n @Otome_chan311 It totally matters. If 78 people voted red, there is only 22 votes left for blue, they already can't make it to 50%, they will all die. If 52 people voted red, blue can only get to 48% max, they are again already condemned.
English
Reds accept responsibility for their own actions and outcomes. Blues blame others for the outcomes of their decisions.
Altair Zero@ZeroAltair1
English
@RandomPe0n @Otome_chan311 @OliApplin Your scenario is disingenuous. There is no adding people and the vote occurs at the same time. If the total population is 100, it doesn't matter if 5, 37, 52, or 78 people vote red, blue still needs at least 51 to survive.
English
@Otome_chan311 @OliApplin Yes, exactly!
My alt scenario is just rhetoric to show that the original’s red is deadly to blue because it forces the option of not standing with blue to stand in direct opposition to it.
English
@OliApplin @Otome_chan311 No you dumb fuck. The question is everyone period. There is no, "if more vote red more have to vote blue". If 100 people are in the experiment, blue always needs 51 votes. If people abstain and blue doesn't get 51 votes, blue still dies.
English
@Otome_chan311 No, reds usually fail to understand that their own actions have consequences on others. I can't count the number of people I've interacted with that didn't understand that pressing red increases the chances of blues of dying.
English
@BartSimpson9021 @bumbadum14 Male sexuality IS policed. That's the past 25 years of "don't approach us ever" resulting in the "why does no one approach me" stage we're in now. Women, in the same time frame, have been told to slut it out and that they're being tricked and abused if they marry before 30.
English
@bumbadum14 How exactly is a woman supposed to know if a guy is a "manwhore"? Anyway, this is why, if you want an actual "trad" society (female chastity, low divorce, high marriage rate, high fertility rate, etc.), you're going to have to start policing male sexuality once again.
English
It’s 100% true that men know whether they want to date/marry a girl very early.
It’s also 100% true that a man will keep a non-prospect girl in the fuck zone if she puts out too early.
Most of this is entirely dependent on the selection bias of the woman. If you choose a manwhore then you’re going to be used by a manwhore.
keeno ✧@ayekeeno
Call Her Daddy host Alex Cooper advises women to stop worrying about giving the wrong impression on first dates and to F*CK their date to avoid wasting time 💀🤔 “a man won’t just ghost you because you f*cked him on the first date, a man already knows”
English
@KAD_ProductionZ I don't think this confuses anything. Saiyan saga vegeta (PL 18000) had no trouble against kaioken Goku (PL 16000). Vegeta had no trouble with a Goku equal to 89% of his power. Say Goku and Vegeta are about a 9 now. That means Beerus should still dominate them.
English
and then RoF happened, and then Super right after, where everything, became confusing lmao
English
the funniest thing about this is that this is the definition of both sides
Godku's power was that high and powerful pushing Beerus to use nearly his 70%
OR
The G.o.D. and angels were weak af back then lmao
Its funny how the BoG movie has the most direct descriptive scale of every character, and Toriyama giving his rough estimates of it.
Robie 🌼@FigureRobie
Battle of Gods movie God Goku is still technically stronger than everyone in DBS
English
@RAZMASTER279845 @RipYa3NewOnes @nurulmasih @darksoulsscum @Superguy551 @AsdByte It's actually VERY realistic. Abused women often try to get back with and forgive their abusers. Children don't change this statistic, especially since the second most frequent abuser of children is the biological mother, right after the new step-dad/boyfriend that beats them.
English
@RipYa3NewOnes @nurulmasih @darksoulsscum @Superguy551 @AsdByte Dude no offense, but if your defense for bad writing is "it's fiction, it doesn't have to be realistic" then there's no point in us arguing. Debbie getting back together with Nolan isn't *just* unrealistic, but it goes against everything her character stands for
English
@aa03690 @SLupine6818 Great, now evaluate the total rates of violent crime. Oh? Suddenly those countries are much worse? European countries especially have an increasingly large amount of assault, rape, and murder? Gee, I thought the gun was the problem.
English
@SLupine6818 The only stupid argument here is suggesting that the only country that allows guns also has the highest murder rate with said guns purely by coincidence. No other developed country in the world has the problems we have. Stop being a fucking idiot
English
On the massive scale they do
Some people are gonna perish but gun laws do not stop the criminal from obtaining a gun
This argument is stupid
Gay Frog 🏳️⚧️@DemonessChara
English
English
@MartinMurm80177 @RTSG_Main Too long, didnt read. Price is not value.
English
@flyanew @Halcyon00523995 @Leaflit Then give an alternate position. But you didn't. And you won't. Because you don't care about edge cases, you just want to use them as a bludgeon to support all abortion.
English
@Halcyon00523995 @Leaflit thats why the actual answer is "maybe, but" or "neither, but" which is the answer i gave multiple times but was not enough, hence the repeating of the demand. i mean it worked. it did what leaflit wanted it to. it got her out of any substantive discussion. very andrew wilson.
English
Would you like to know more?!
FULL MUSIC VIDEO OUT NOW
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
English
"if i could make money off of you this would be worth my time, but it isnt so its boring."
yes you are a grifter. you can not debate. you are not andrew wilson no matter how tied up in semantics you get. no matter how many clipped chimped slop pieces you consume on youtube.
Leaflit 🍃 Angel's Sword@Leaflit
@flyanew Discussing with you is like trying to discuss ethics with a fish. If you were a vtuber at least I could debate you on stream and have a good time at it but this is just boring. Absolute waste of time.
English
@Leaflit its so easy to just be like "abortion is bad" when you handwave all of the nuance, like rape and incest and complications that risk the life of the mother and the fact that if you ban them people will seek them in other ways. same logic applies to drug safe areas/SCSs.
English