kabd3

@PaulDMauro @FBIMiamiFL Keep on this @PaulDMauro

I've got to double-tap this one and post again. This is really bothering me. Why would this guy do this? With any crime, look to who benefits. This has to be fully fleshed out, esp. given his role. @FBIMiamiFL

I totally agree but will there actually be any accountability or consequences for those directing and involved?

@carrotcottagerr I had no idea this was happening thank you for sharing this information. Sending blessings to you for all your work to helping these bunnies.

Good morning! I wanted to show you the side profiles of a Mesocephalic (normal) faced bunny vs a brachycephalic (flat) face bunny. The contrast is very obvious. Both bunnies have the same number of teeth which is 28. The practice of selective breeding to achieve a certain “cuteness” means to breed the shortest possible faced bunnies together with the aim of getting an even shorter faced litter of kits. This is unnatural, and means that there is a lot less space for those 28 teeth, leading to a whole range of health complications like malocclusion (misaligned jaw) Breathing problems and eye problems, mostly due to those pesky teeth not having enough space and everything being to squashed. This is cruel, leaves so many vulnerable animals to a life of pain, and early death. When we see first hand the pain and cruelty that these bunnies experience, because some humans want them to be “cuter” it baffles me. This needs to stop. They are not objects for our viewing pleasure, they feel love, pain, loneliness and fear. We have dedicated our lives to give them a place where they will know love, regardless of their physical appearance. We need your support to grow our voice ,because we proudly speak for the voiceless. You are the bunnies marketing team. One voice at a time we become heard. ❤️

Lol I’ve seen this happen multiple times with my own cat and dog.

@sciencegirl Oh my really? That’s beautiful thank you for saving those sweet babies. The grey cat looks just like my cat! Thank you firefighters!

Firefighters in Jurupa Valley rescued four unconscious cats from an apartment fire on March 24, 2026, using oxygen masks and CPR, successfully reviving them at the scene.

@KinderBuenoUS Agree heading to the store soon but not sure they’ll “stay” in my purse ☺️

@kabd3 Why not both 🤭

Ever think something's "gone" and it's just somewhere in your purse? 👀 We've got you. Tell us one thing in your bag RN for a chance at a surprise.

@gothburz Omg much of what you said has been my own direct experience!

My company rolled out AI tools 11 months ago. Since then, every task I do takes longer. I am not allowed to say this out loud. Not because there is a policy. There is no policy. There is something worse than a policy. There is enthusiasm. There is a Slack channel called #ai-wins where people post screenshots of AI outputs with captions like "this just saved me an hour." There is a VP who opens every all-hands with "the companies that adopt fastest win." There is a Director who renamed his team from Operations to Intelligent Operations. There is a peer review question that now asks: "How have you leveraged AI tools to enhance your workflow this quarter?" If the answer is "I haven't, because I was faster before," that is a career decision. So I leverage. Emails. Before the tools, I wrote emails. This took the amount of time it takes to write an email. I did not measure it. Nobody measured it. The email got written and sent and it was fine. Now I write the email. Then I highlight the text and click "Enhance with AI." The AI rewrites my email. It replaces "Can we meet Thursday?" with "I'd love to explore the possibility of finding a mutually convenient time to align on this." I read the rewrite. I delete the rewrite. I send my original email. This takes 4 minutes instead of 2. The 2 extra minutes are the enhancement. I do this 11 times a day. That is 22 minutes I spend each day rejecting improvements to sentences that were already finished. In #ai-wins I posted a screenshot of the rewrite. I did not post the part where I deleted it. 23 people reacted with the rocket emoji. That is adoption. Meetings. We have an AI notetaker in every meeting now. It joins automatically. It records. It transcribes. It summarizes. After each meeting I receive a 3-paragraph summary of the meeting I just attended. I read the summary. This takes 3 minutes. I was in the meeting. I know what happened. I am reading a machine's account of something I experienced firsthand. Sometimes the account is wrong. Last Tuesday it attributed a comment about Q3 revenue to me. My manager made that comment. I spent 4 minutes correcting the transcript. Before the notetaker, I did not spend 7 minutes after each meeting correcting a robot's memory of something I personally witnessed. I attend 11 meetings a week. That is 77 minutes per week supervising a transcription nobody requested. I mentioned this once. My manager said "think about the people who weren't in the meeting." The people who weren't in the meeting do not read the summaries. I checked. The read receipts show single-digit opens. The summaries exist not because they are useful but because they are there. I read them for the same reason. Documents. I write a weekly status update. Before the tools, this took 10 minutes. I typed what happened. I sent it. My manager skimmed it. The system worked. Now I open the AI writing assistant. I give it my bullet points. It produces a draft. The draft says "Significant progress was achieved across multiple workstreams." I did not achieve significant progress across multiple workstreams. I updated a spreadsheet and sent 4 emails. I rewrite the draft to say what actually happened. Then I run my rewrite through the grammar tool. It suggests I change "done" to "completed" and "next week" to "in the forthcoming period." I click Ignore 9 times. Then I send the version I would have written in 10 minutes. The process now takes 30. I have been doing this every week for 11 months. I have added 20 minutes to a task that did not need 20 more minutes. I call this efficiency. I have been calling it efficiency for 11 months. That is what efficiency means now. It means the additional time you spend to arrive at the same outcome through a longer process. Nobody has questioned this definition. I have not offered it for review. I kept a log once. 2 weeks. Every task, timed. Before-AI and after-AI. The after number was larger in every case. Every single one. Not by a little. The range was 40 to 200 percent. I deleted the log. I deleted it because it was a document that said, in plain numbers, that the AI tools make me slower. And a document like that has no place in a company where AI adoption is a strategic priority. I could not send it to my manager. He championed the rollout. I could not post it in #ai-wins. I could not raise it in a meeting because the notetaker would transcribe it and the summary would read "[Name] expressed concerns about AI tool efficacy" and that summary would be the first one anyone actually reads. So I do what everyone does. I use the tools. I spend the extra time. I post in #ai-wins. I write "leveraged AI to streamline weekly reporting" in my review and my manager gives me a 4 out of 5 for innovation. I have innovated nothing. I have added steps to processes that were already finished. I have made simple things longer and labeled the difference with words that used to mean something. Every week in #ai-wins someone posts a screenshot. And 20 people react with the rocket emoji. And nobody posts the part where they deleted the output and did the task themselves. Nobody posts the revert. Nobody posts the before-and-after timer. Nobody will. Because "I was better at my job before the AI tools" is a sentence that cannot be said out loud in any company that has decided AI is the future. Every company has decided AI is the future. So we leverage. Quietly. Adding steps. Calling them optimization. Getting slightly less done, slightly more slowly, with slightly more steps, and reporting it as progress. My yearly review is next month. There is a new section this year. "AI Impact Assessment." It asks me to quantify the hours saved by AI tools per week. I will write a number. The number will be positive. It will not be true. But the AI writing assistant will help me phrase it convincingly. That is the one thing it does well.

@god_pranay @TimelessTrvlr It’s the manure used on farmland. Lots of big flying bugs too.

@TimelessTrvlr Why does Lancaster stink sometimes of year ?

Lancaster, Pennsylvania proves you can have farmland, fresh bread at dawn, a walkable downtown, and housing that doesn’t require Manhattan money.....all in the same place.

@Bro_Code_x A bunch of neat ideas. I wish someone could make that couch frame for me 🥺.

Simple home tips that actually work

@nypost So heartbreaking when will we all have enough of this senseless violence and purge these criminals from your community?

83-year-old veteran randomly shoved onto NYC subway tracks dies from injuries, illegal migrant charged with murder trib.al/jSRje4o

@Athena1944 @1pcornwell Same - I also had to stop watching

@1pcornwell Very annoying character in the new series. We just couldn’t watch.

Jamie Lee Curtis Has Always Been a Boss. She’s Just Proving It Now - Newsweek newsweek.com/entertainment/…

@elonmusk @grok Like a few other people have noticed she looks very young. This isn’t appropriate @elonmusk and I’m somewhat of a fan of yours.

Grok Imagine gets better every week. Download the latest @Grok app!

@crumbl 🌷🌷🌷welcome spring and @crumbl

springing into a new week with a GIVEAWAY! 🌼🌿 i'm picking 3 people to send a mini 3-pack to! to enter: 🌷follow us 🌷like this tweet 🌷 leave a flower emoji down below!

@Sharn3960 They might be cute for a little punch-like animal

I have an extra set of arms. What do you think I should do with them? 🤔

Thousands of residents in Ohio and parts of Pennsylvania reported hearing a loud boom, which NASA confirmed was caused by a meteor entering Earth’s atmosphere. Dashcam footage shows a bright fireball streaking across the sky during the morning commute.

@jaynitx Some people don’t remember specific details but have actual accomplishments - I think it’s more a function of their ability to interview well.

Elon Musk reveals the single question he uses to spot liars in interviews: "When I interview somebody, I really just ask them to tell me the story of their career, what are some of the tougher problems they dealt with, how they dealt with those, and how they made decisions at key transition points. Usually that's enough to get a very good gut feel about someone." Elon explains what he's looking for: "What I'm really looking for is evidence of exceptional ability. Did they face really difficult problems and overcome them?" Then he shares how to tell if someone is lying about their accomplishments: "You want to make sure that if there was some significant accomplishment, were they really responsible, or was somebody else more responsible? The person who actually had to struggle with the problem, they really understand it. They don't forget. You can ask them very detailed questions about it and they will know the answer. The person who was not truly responsible for that accomplishment will not know the details." On whether college degrees matter: "There's no need to have a college degree at all. Or even high school. If somebody graduated from a great university, that may be an indication they'll be capable of great things, but it's not necessarily the case. Look at Bill Gates, Larry Ellison, Steve Jobs. These guys didn't graduate from college. But if you had a chance to hire them, of course that would be a good idea." He concludes: "I'm just looking for evidence of exceptional ability. If there's a track record of exceptional achievement, it's likely that will continue into the future."

It’s been one week since Usay and Kusay chucked their poorly made bombs into the streets of New York City, and what has Big Media learned: Not much, other than it ruined the nice little trip they had planned. And the parents? Not much, other than they’re “immigrants” from “Afghanistan/Turkey” who may, or may not “own a convenience store” and live in a “2.6 million dollar” McMansion in Pennsylvania. How did two immigrants from Afghanistan/Turkey manage to get all that paperwork for liquor licenses, gas pumps, business loans, and mortgages figured out, and how many convenience store owners are chilling in three million dollars homes, what did Usay, and Kusay do for a living, did they attend a local “church”, how about known associates, what do the parents think about all this, have they lawyered up, and if so, who did they hire, and who is paying? Meh, Big Media isn’t into the details. They have lobster to investigate.

@1pcornwell I’m watching it now!

The eagle has landed! 👠🔎🎥

@ABC7NY I loved watching Ernie growing up and more recently hearing his positively Ernie. So sad to hear of his passing.

Ernie Anastos, iconic New York anchor who spent 11 years at WABC-TV, dies at 82 abc7ny.com/post/ernie-ana…