Sabitlenmiş Tweet
world
1.7K posts

world retweetledi

@shozkuruki Nigga thinks loving women of age and older than them is corny lmfao you cant be serious. Rot in hell lolipedo

English

Stay safe out there, first pic is a picture of my friend iv (follow him for pred catches, @pickleboy677) baiting a predator to join a server that grabs his email
Second pic is self explanatory (mary is an associate of a child predator & sex offender, dps.texas.gov/texas10mostwan…)


English

@CathRoser @Dogmaticist i mean u can be a probabilist and not hold to moral laxism, alongside this probabilism would only assume probable follow a probable opinion that a benign act is lawful (even if the opposite opinion is more probable)
i myself am a probabiliorist tho given immodest credences
English

@kadaiot @Dogmaticist It seems like an obvious philosophical sin to grant some proposition of the malice of an act to be more probable, and thus approximate to the truth, and simultaneously grant that it would be licit to do
English

🔗Medium article of Fr. Daniele Concina O.P. on the Fewness of the Elect
🔽

Child of ST Thomas@ChildOfStThomas
“Nearly all Catholics are going to hell” Anyone who is familiar at all with the teaching of the theologians knows that this is probably true. The way is narrow.
English
world retweetledi

“Excuse me sir mister—I heard a lot about Christianity and salvation, but I don’t really understand it. I was wondering if you could tell me more about that. I mean, how can I be saved?”
“Well, naturally, you would come to the Orthodox Church... Salvation isn’t something that can be simply explained in plain language—that would be far too Western. First, you must understand the metaphysical realities of the hypostatic participation and how they intersect with the noetic apprehension of uncreated energies, within the sacramental ontology of the ecclesial cosmos. You see, your problem isn’t that you’re a “sinner in need of Christ”, that’s merely the surface level Protestant reading. The real issue is that your mind, your intellect, has been epistemically fragmented by post-Enlightenment nominalism. It’s left you unable to properly contemplate the essence-energy distinction as articulated through the eternal liturgical consciousness of the Chur-”
“Wh-what’s a nominalism?”
“See, this is the problem. You’re asking for a definition as though words possess some neutral, self-evident meaning outside the total metaphysical framework that renders intelligibility possible. I could explain nominalism to you, but you would first need to account for the preconditions of predication, universals, identity over time, and the ontological status of language itself—and, frankly, you haven’t demonstrated that you’re approaching any of this in good faith.
You came in here asking to be “saved”, but now you’re demanding definitions like some kind of autonomous Cartesian subject sitting in judgement over two thousand years of patristic epistemology. This isn’t Sunday school. Read Lossky, read Florovsky, read Palamas, learn basic philosophy, and then perhaps come back when you’re prepared to have an adult conversation. Mods, remove him from the panel. He’s clearly trolli-”
“I just wanted to know how to become a Christia-”


English
world retweetledi
world retweetledi

@brycejofficial @kalammist bro im abt to go on a road trip what do you want
English
world retweetledi

@RealKaguraPost they're calling it the most israeli post of all time
English

@brycejofficial It is very clear that the sentence “Christ did not die for our sins” is repugnant to the Gospel & the teachings of our Russian fathers
English
world retweetledi

@ChrisRojas4081 @ThomasByrn35550 Whats going to be the argument for that?
English
world retweetledi

@exotic_YT133 Catch up, I was giving an Exegesis of a quote from De trinitate, not refuting the Filioque per se.
Follow this account for refutations coming soon!
English
world retweetledi





















