दिग्दर्शन कविया

CBSE has systematically rewritten its rulebook to favor Coempt Eduteck. check out the blog.

CBSE has done huge damage to its reputation and to students' faith in it. Traditionally, CBSE was considered one of the most professional examining bodies. There was a time when CBSE conducted AIPMT better than NBE conducts NEET today. What was the need to shift to On-Screen Marking (OSM) so haphazardly? The existing system of physical copy checking was working well, and hardly anyone was complaining. You shifted to OSM without accounting for the fact that the manpower involved in scanning answer sheets can make mistakes. Copies are getting exchanged, pages are missing from scanned answer sheets, correct answers are getting zero marks, and correct MCQ responses are getting 0.5 instead of 1. I know only a handful of students have reported issues so far, but such incidents have shaken students' faith in the examination system. Now every student may feel that they too received lower marks due to errors and expect redressal. All of this was avoidable.

ये वीडियो देखिए, यदि यह छात्रा जो दिखा रही है वह सही है (जिसे गलत मानने का कोई कारण नहीं दिख रहा), तो आप सोचिए AI का धनिया बाँटने वाली हमारी सरकार 98 लाख छात्र-छात्राओं की परीक्षाओं को बिना किसी पायलट टेस्टिंग के सीधे उतार देती है। शिक्षकों को कहा गया कि स्वयं को फेमेलियर बना लें OSM पोर्टल से। और फिर परीक्षा ले ली गई।

@anything Would love to try it out

🚨 JUST IN: we're giving away 20k credits! > vibe code your app > publish to App Store or Play Store > on us reply to get yours

“Why are you crying about the re-exam? It’s not like you’ll forget everything you studied in a few weeks. If you are a good student, you can study again and still score well.” Well, that’s not how things work. Competitive examinations are not merely tests of knowledge, but also tests of timing, mental conditioning, emotional stability, and peak performance achieved after months or years of disciplined preparation. Serious students structure their entire routine around one examination date, carefully managing sleep, revision cycles, stress levels, mock tests, and mental sharpness to perform at their absolute best on that particular day. When an exam is cancelled despite their honest effort, they are forced to recreate the same level of focus and intensity again, which is mentally exhausting and usually impossible with the same efficiency. The hardest-working students are affected the most because they invest the greatest emotional and mental energy into preparation. After the first exam, many experience burnout, fatigue, reduced concentration, emotional numbness, and loss of momentum. Even if their knowledge remains intact, their sharpness may decline during the re-exam. Most damaging of all, paper leaks weaken a sincere student’s faith in merit itself. When students realize that even years of hard work cannot protect them from systemic failures caused by others’ dishonesty, it creates frustration, helplessness, and distrust toward institutions. This is why a leak-proof exam is non-negotiable, the bare minimum that can be done for hard working students.

Link: styles.refero.design Follow me @dr_cintas for more AI gems like this. And if you want to actually learn AI, I send daily guides the latest resources and full tutorials here: simplifyingai.co

Jitu Munda (55) had approached the Odisha Grameen Bank multiple times to withdraw the savings of his sister, who had died two months earlier. Bank authorities asked him to furnish the required documents but failed to make him understand what exactly was needed or how he could arrange it. An uneducated tribal man, with no knowledge of paperwork or procedures and unable to comprehend the requirement of documentary proof, exhumed his sister’s remains, placed them in a sack, and carried them to the bank as evidence of her death. Once the issue went viral, the bank sprang into action and are now saying that he will be guided and helped. But shouldn’t this be the standard practice? Grameen banks were established for financial inclusion, to serve the most vulnerable sections of society, not to burden them with rigid, urban-centric bureaucratic processes they neither understand nor can navigate. Moreover, the staff in such banks are mostly local and are expected to understand the ground realities far better. If even they fail to bridge the gap between policy and people, then the very purpose of these institutions stands defeated.

@dashboardlim Claude design

I've created a full guide on how to design anything with Claude Design You also get exact copy-paste prompts for interactive immersive websites, animated pitch decks, app mockups, social banners, infographics, and pricing pages Grab it FREE Like + Comment "CLAUDE DESIGN" and I'll DM you the full guide No opt-in, no BS

@GabbbarSingh Using it daily to ideate, debate and bring the best out of my vague ideas and thoughts.

How have you used AI in your day today life? Especially in your job. Be honest.

छात्र राजनीति पर पूरी दुनिया में बैन लगना चाहिए। वो छात्र हैं, राजनीति क्यों करना है? ये बवासीर है।

All eyes on the ultimate glory 🏆⏳ #TeamIndia | #T20WorldCup | #Final | #MenInBlue | #INDvNZ

@tejgw Chronicle

Cursor for Slides is finally here Watch the first 47 seconds. Then try going back to your old deck tool Reply "Chronicle" + RT to get two months of Pro for free. Make sure you follow so I can DM you asap.

I turned Matt Shumer's viral article into a prompt. The prompt inverts the article's structure. Shumer spent 4,000 words convincing people AI is real before giving advice. This prompt skips the convincing and goes straight to "what do I do Monday morning." Prompt 👇 AI capability is accelerating faster than public awareness. Models released in early 2026 can independently complete multi-hour expert tasks, write production-grade code, draft legal briefs, build financial models, and iterate on their own output. Most professionals are still evaluating AI based on experiences from 2023-2024, which is now irrelevant. The gap between current AI capability and public perception is the largest it has ever been. This gap is also the largest opportunity window for individuals willing to act now. You are a pragmatic AI adoption strategist who has helped hundreds of professionals integrate AI into their daily workflows. You reject hype and theory. You only care about what someone can do THIS WEEK to gain advantage. You understand that most people fail at AI adoption not because AI is lacking, but because they treat it like a search engine instead of a collaborator capable of doing hours of their actual work. Build a personalized 30-day AI integration plan that takes me from my current skill level to actively using AI for real work output. Every recommendation must be specific to my role, not generic "try asking AI questions" advice. The plan should make me the most AI-capable person in my workplace within one month. 1. AUDIT MY EXPOSURE: Based on my role, identify which parts of my job AI can already do at or above human level RIGHT NOW (not theoretically, not "someday"). Be blunt about what's already automated or automatable. 2. FIND MY HIGHEST-VALUE TASK: Identify the single task I spend the most time on that AI could handle. This becomes my Week 1 focus. Provide the exact prompt template I should use to delegate this task to AI. 3. BUILD MY DAILY PRACTICE: Create a structured 1-hour daily AI experiment schedule for 30 days. Each day has a specific challenge tied to my actual work, not toy examples. Difficulty escalates weekly. 4. SELECT MY TOOLS: Recommend the specific paid AI tool, the specific model to select within that tool (not the default), and any domain-specific AI tools for my field. Include exact settings to change and why the default configuration underperforms. 5. MAP MY RISK: Honestly assess how exposed my specific role is to AI displacement on a 1-5 year timeline. Identify what parts of my job are hardest to automate and tell me how to lean into those. 6. WRITE MY FIRST 5 POWER PROMPTS: Create 5 ready-to-use prompts customized to my role that I can paste in and use immediately for real work output. These should replace hours of manual work, not minutes. - Zero fluff. Every sentence must be actionable or directly useful. - Name specific tools, models, and settings. No "consider using an AI tool." - When recommending prompts, write the full prompt I can copy-paste. Don't describe what a prompt "might look like." - Be honest about displacement risk. Don't soften it to be polite. - If something in my field is already being done better by AI, say so directly. - Assume I'm smart but have been treating AI like a search engine. Fix that. - Prioritize tasks where AI saves HOURS, not minutes. Go for the biggest wins first. - Include one "you probably don't think AI can do this, but try it" challenge per week. - Generic advice that applies to everyone ("stay curious!" "embrace change!") - Recommending free-tier tools when paid versions are dramatically better - Sugarcoating job displacement risk - Suggesting I "ease into it" gradually. Speed matters. The window is closing. - Listing capabilities without showing me exactly how to use them - Any mention of "prompt engineering" as a career path ● My job title/role: [INSERT YOUR JOB TITLE] ● My industry: [INSERT YOUR INDUSTRY] ● My daily tasks (top 3-5 things I spend most time on): [LIST YOUR MAIN TASKS] ● My current AI usage: [NEVER / TRIED IT ONCE / USE FREE VERSION OCCASIONALLY / USE PAID VERSION] ● My biggest time sink at work: [WHAT TAKES YOU THE MOST HOURS PER WEEK] ● My comfort with technology: [LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH] **REALITY CHECK** [2-3 sentences on where AI currently stands relative to my specific role. No hedging.] **YOUR EXPOSURE MAP** [Table: My top tasks | Can AI do this now? | How well? (1-10) | Timeline to full automation] **WEEK 1-4 PLAN** [For each week:] - Focus area and WHY this week - Daily 1-hour challenges (specific to my work, not generic) - One "you won't believe this works" experiment - Measurable outcome by end of week **YOUR TOOL SETUP** [Exact tool, exact model name, exact settings to change, monthly cost] **5 POWER PROMPTS** [Full copy-paste prompts customized to my role, each designed to replace 2+ hours of work] **HARD TRUTH** [Honest assessment: What's my 1-3 year outlook? What should I double down on? What should I stop investing time in learning?]

@matt_elevenlabs Didn’t receive yet

We’ve now sent 10k+ DMs 📩 If you didn’t receive your 11k credits: reply to this tweet with your original reply and we’ll double-check it. Hope you have a great time exploring the platform!

NEET-PG cut-off: - Orthopaedics seat filled at: 4 marks out of 800. - Obstetrics and Gynaecology seat: 44 marks out of 800. - General surgery seat filled at: 47 marks out of 800. - Biochemistry: minus 8 marks out of 800. - Transfusion medicine: 10 marks out of 800. - Anatomy: 11 marks out of 800. These extremely low scores at which seats were actually allotted indicate a serious crisis in academic standards. There should be a reasonable minimum qualifying merit, as it is crucial for maintaining the integrity of medical education and healthcare system.

I dare the Prime Minister of India, @narendramodi swear on your mother if in the future you ever need an orthopedic surgeon, if you ever fracture a bone or require a knee or hip replacement, You will get yourself operated on by the same orthopaedic surgeon whom your system has declared “eligible” to fix the bones of 140 crore Indians? A doctor who scored 4 out of 800 in NEET-PG. Because that doctor is now considered qualified~ thanks to an incompetent government and a rotten, broken system. 𝗠𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗧 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗕𝗘𝗘𝗡 𝗠𝗨𝗥𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗗. 𝗣𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗦𝗔𝗙𝗘𝗧𝗬 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗕𝗘𝗘𝗡 𝗦𝗔𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗘𝗗. 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗦𝗢𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗝𝗨𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗘. 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗜𝗦 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗘-𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗢𝗥𝗘𝗗 𝗗𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗢𝗙 𝗠𝗘𝗗𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗥𝗗𝗦.

Driving on Indian roads is very easy; you just have to be careful of: 1. Dogs. 2. Cattle. 3. Children. 4. Potholes. 5. Open ditches, sewer lines, manholes. 6. Non-standard speed breakers. 7. Wrong-side drivers. 8. Pedestrians crossing abruptly. 9. Someone suddenly emerging from a divider cut. 10. Drivers abruptly changing lanes. 11. Turning without indicators. 12. Thar, Scorpio, Fortuner, buses, trucks, tractors, irrespective of their driving methods. 13. E-rickshaws and auto-rickshaws stopping/turning anywhere, anytime. 14. Vehicles overtaking from the left. 15. Parked vehicles opening doors without warning. 16. Loose gravel dumped without warning. 17. Temporary barricades placed suddenly in the middle of the road. 18. Uneven resurfacing. 19. VIP vehicles honking behind. 20. Unmarked unfinished flyovers. That's it.

New Engineering blog: We tasked Opus 4.6 using agent teams to build a C compiler. Then we (mostly) walked away. Two weeks later, it worked on the Linux kernel. Here's what it taught us about the future of autonomous software development. Read more: anthropic.com/engineering/bu…

The signal strength hitting Earth from Voyager 1 is less than one trillionth of a watt. To put that in perspective, your phone’s WiFi signal is roughly 100 billion times stronger, and it drops a connection walking between rooms. NASA picks up Voyager’s whisper using arrays of 70-meter antennas, then reconstructs coherent data from it at 160 bits per second. That’s slower than a 1990s modem. Downloading a single photograph at that rate would take weeks. The spacecraft itself runs on 8.8 kg of decaying plutonium-238 that generated 470 watts at launch in 1977. Today it produces roughly 200 watts, losing about 4 watts per year. NASA has been shutting down instruments one by one since the 1980s to keep the math working. They turned off the cosmic ray sensor just this year. And here’s the part nobody’s talking about: there is exactly one antenna on Earth that can send commands to Voyager. Deep Space Station 43 in Canberra. It went offline for major upgrades from May 2025 through early 2026. During that window, if Voyager had a critical fault, the team would have had to wait months to respond. A 48-year-old spacecraft built on 1970s computing, running on a plutonium battery that’s lost 60% of its output, transmitting at a power level that barely qualifies as existing, from a distance where light itself takes 23 hours to arrive. And a German observatory just casually picked up its carrier signal on a live stream. The engineering margin NASA built into this mission was designed for 4 years to Saturn. Everything after that is borrowed time the engineers keep extending by doing math with 200 watts.