Kev

Quoted from: Rev. Fr. Francis Spirago, "The Catholic Catechism Explained" (more here:archive.org/details/the-ca…):

@Pontifex Magnifica Humanitas: On Safeguarding the Human Person in the Time of Artificial Intelligence summary in 4k

Artificial intelligences do not undergo experiences, do not possess a body, do not feel joy or pain, do not mature through relationships, and do not know from within what love, work, friendship or responsibility mean. Nor do they have a moral conscience, since they do not judge good and evil, grasp the ultimate meaning of situations, or bear responsibility for consequences. They may imitate or even simulate, but they do not understand what they produce, for they lack the affective, relational, and spiritual perspective through which human beings grow in wisdom. #MagnificaHumanitas

@catholicsede @opnjmj Also, Bellarmine explicitly denied that any of the officeholders of the Papacy could be the anti-Christ, and that the anti-Christ cannot be Roman. quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A20740.… As Pope Leo XIII stated, heretics are not Catholic. You sir, are not Catholic.

@catholicsede @opnjmj You should also show the part where St. Robert Bellarmine (Book IV Chapter IV) says it’s impossible for a pope to be manifestly a heretic instead of quote-mining the Dimonds, lol. Both Suarez and Bellarmine taught that it is impossible for a Pope to manifest heresy.

Sedevacantism has been condemned by the Church since the 14th century. The ‘Fraticello’ sect claimed Popes had lost the papacy due to heresy, and that they alone preserved the ‘true’ traditional faith. St James of the Marches was the inquisitor fighting against them:

@exRhenum @lovelivesatire @opnjmj Dissident schismatic sedevacantist blocks me on X for defending lumen gentium #16. All sedes go to hell.

@exRhenum @lovelivesatire @opnjmj Theres no document from Vatican 2 that says Jews and Muslims can be saved [in] their false religions. Can you cite me a specific example with a direct reference/link/screenshot?

I am no longer a sedevacantist. For the last month, I have been praying the rosary with the petition that Our Mother would save me from heresy, schism and error. I beg everyone to do the same.

@exRhenum @lovelivesatire @opnjmj Also, you seem poorly informed on this matter. Serious theologians do not ask whether Muslims [worship the same God],” they ask “in what sense do they [i.e., Muslims and Jews] worship the same God, and in what sense do they fail to know Him?” Do you reject Pre-V2 teaching?

@kev__313 @lovelivesatire @opnjmj Lumen Gentium 16, as well as the teaching of one of your antipopes. Do you fully submit to this?

@exRhenum @lovelivesatire @opnjmj I should note that if you want to arrive at a ‘contradiction’ here, you need to demonstrate that there exists a proposition and its negation at the same time, in the same respect, in the same formal aspect (P & ~P). Otherwise you’re not really establishing any inconsistency.

@exRhenum @lovelivesatire @opnjmj There’s no contradiction here. Moreover, long before Vatican II, St. Robert Bellarmine stated that the “Jews themselves and the Turks, although they are impious, yet worship the one God.” Pope St. Gregory VII says: “we believe and confess one God, although in different ways.”

@exRhenum @lovelivesatire @opnjmj The Catechism of St. Pius X says: “Muslims admit and worship “one true God.” The 1907 Catholic Encyclopedia says Muslims “adore Him” while not recognizing Christ. I can keep going and I’ll even screenshot and send the exact references if you wish.

@exRhenum @SOSmoot83121722 @opnjmj Well these are just sentences. You’d need to demonstrate in a step-by-step procedurally formalized natural deduction system (applying various rules of inferences) to demonstrate the consequence as following from the premises. You’re clearly a schismatic and an obstinate heretic.

@kev__313 @SOSmoot83121722 @opnjmj No, you're not Catholic, because you believe notorious idolators are true Popes.

@TheOnlyMicoysis @Catholic_Bob @ValentinaForUSA Zionist’s, Jews, and Israel-supporters cannot obtain salvation (see Galatians 5:19-21; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10; 1 Corinthians 10:6-9). I’m not telling you you’re going to hell; Sacred Scripture is.

@kev__313 @Catholic_Bob @ValentinaForUSA Dont tell me im going to hell ur not Jesus u dont say where i go whats wrong with u acting like ur Jesus? I have not once said anything like this to u shame on u Mr. All Righteous

The Pope has time to: -Drive a Ferrari -Visit a mosque in Africa BUT He’s too busy to go to Nigeria where Christians are being murdered by muslims. WORSE POPE EVER.

@KekkerJoe @Captain__Ex @___TheGOOdWitch Yeah? “…the Word was with God, and the Word was God (John 1:1)”… “…My Lord, and my God (John 20:28)”… Isaias 9:6 is also talking about Christ [as Lord]. You’re clearly a biblically illiterate baboon who has no idea what he’s talking about.

@Captain__Ex @___TheGOOdWitch He never claimed to be God other than that "I am" moment

@___TheGOOdWitch @soter_a @MyWenisGenius14 It doesn’t matter if you asked him to. Most consent theories are false anyways. When you say “I didn’t ask,” what theory of consent are you working with? I cast skepticism on ‘tacit consent’, though I grant express consent. It doesn’t matter if you didn’t ask him to, though.

@soter_a @MyWenisGenius14 I didn’t ask him to😅

@___TheGOOdWitch @MyWenisGenius14 Also, your bio exposed your philosophical illiteracy; you’d be conflating ‘proof’ (a formalized step-by-step natural deduction feature of argumentation) with knowledge, which confuses formal methodology to arrive at such-and-such conclusion with epistemology, lol.

@___TheGOOdWitch @MyWenisGenius14 Hmmmm, no argument was made, though. You just have a string of sentences together. Can you defend the claim made in the caption of the picture by making a premise-conclusion argument in a formalized natural deduction system with a set of rules of inferences?