Kevin Wimer

3.5K posts

Kevin Wimer banner
Kevin Wimer

Kevin Wimer

@kevinace

Serial entrepreneur. Pilot. Ex-pro gamer. Angel Investor (330+). Father/husband. July 2024 stage 4 🫁 cancer diagnosis changed my life.

Dayton, OH, USA Katılım Mart 2009
277 Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
I used to sleep 8+ hours and still wake up feeling like I got hit by a truck. Afternoon crash by 2pm. Caffeine on IV drip. Mood tanked. Sound familiar? Then I built Drift Sleep Coach to stop guessing. v1.7 just dropped — and my mornings are completely different now. Here’s what changed everything 🧵
English
1
0
3
271
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
@Teslarati No issues in CT but had a model X loaner while getting some service on the truck and it slid out badly on slick roads on a left turn going fairly slow. Tried to wait to see if it would recover and wasn’t looking good so I took over
English
0
0
0
56
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
@cybrtrkguy Used mine for ~12 years on my Model S with no issues 🤷‍♂️
English
0
1
1
68
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
Situation monitoring starter pack
Kevin Wimer tweet media
English
0
0
0
10
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
Yo @nikitabier I uncheck these all the time and they keep defaulting back to checked (iOS). Trying to not monitor the situation sir. Plz fix 🙏
Kevin Wimer tweet media
English
0
0
0
12
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
I had a similar take. Ultimately the cost per mile is passed on to the consumer (once companies run out of $ / can’t absorb debt more). Seems like Tesla around $0.70/mi operational costs and on a path towards ~$0.20 per mile while Waymo is $40 and looking to get to $0.80 (which willl be tough given hardware costs). I’d imagine ride quality ends up similar for both but if consumers are choosing between a $10 ride or a lot more, the $10 provider wins. I’m having a hard time to steel man an argument in favor of Waymo here long term
English
0
0
3
1.2K
Josh Kale
Josh Kale@JoshKale·
Nobody understands how much of a disaster this Rivian <> Uber deal is Rivian lost $3.6 billion last year on 42k deliveries. That's $86,000 of value destruction PER VEHICLE that left their factory. Their solution? Partner with Uber to turn a $58K camping SUV into a robotaxi... to compete with Tesla's Cybercab... YIKES Every 12-18 months, this company finds a new partner to write a check: - Amazon: $1.3B equity + 100K van order - VW: $5.8B joint venture - US DOE: $6.6B loan - Uber: $1.25B robotaxi deal (today) The moment they announced the Uber deal, they admitted they're pushing back profitability AGAIN to fund an autonomy program that can't even handle stoplights. Tesla's Cybercab is purpose built at $25,000 with no steering wheel. The cost per mile math isn't even close. The Uber deal is to deploy 50,000 robotaxis by 2031. Slight problem: The car doesn't exist yet. The factory doesn't exist yet. The autonomy software doesn't exist. Manufacturing is HARD. good luck have fun
Josh Kale tweet mediaJosh Kale tweet media
Rivian@Rivian

A fleet of R2 Robotaxis is coming exclusively to @Uber. ⚡🌿 Today, we announced a partnership to help both companies accelerate their autonomous vehicle plans across 25 cities in the US, Canada and Europe by the end of 2031. rivn.co/uber

English
238
158
2.1K
381.2K
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
@KevinMark @eliano You lads require peeps to be on site at one of your offices or is remote possible? 🇺🇸 🤓 💻
English
2
0
0
710
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
@eliano Criteria ✅ Need to be on site somewhere? I’m in Ohio. Relocation required?
English
0
0
0
225
Eliano A Younes
Eliano A Younes@eliano·
if you love America, are high agency, and love building, come work at Palantir
English
163
57
1.8K
156K
phil beisel
phil beisel@pbeisel·
Tesla’s forthcoming AI5 uses a half-reticle design, which is crucial for yield. A reticle defines the imaging area of a lithography machine, fitting two chips per shot effectively doubles yield. This means the Tesla chip design team had to carefully manage die features, for instance dropping the older ISP (and classic GPU) to make room for more AI cores. By contrast, NVIDIA’s Blackwell fills nearly a full reticle, making it a single-reticle design. If Tesla hits its compute and efficiency targets with AI5 in this half-reticle format, it’s almost like cutting fab requirements in half. And this has a big impact on Terafab, especially if it carries forward for AI6, AI7, etc.
phil beisel tweet media
phil beisel@pbeisel

Terafab may be the most essential vertical integration Tesla has ever undertaken— and it is truly non-optional. It will take years to build and will test even Elon’s speedrunning abilities to the limit, but that won’t stop him from trying. The breakthrough likely lies in overhauling the overall facility’s cleanroom model. By moving wafers in sealed pods with localized micro-environments, the fab no longer needs a monolithic ultra-clean space. Elon’s line about “eating cheeseburgers and smoking cigars” on the fab floor isn’t silly, it’s the practical reality of a radically simpler, cheaper, faster approach that could finally change the economics of chipmaking. This is all forced by the brutal “pinch” in chip supply. Tesla must produce on the order of 100–200 billion AI chips per year just to saturate its roadmap. That volume powers: FSD cars & Robotaxis (tens of millions of vehicles needing AI5 inference for near-perfect autonomy), Physical Optimus (scaling from thousands today to millions per year, each requiring AI5/AI6-level compute), Digital Optimus (the new xAI-Tesla software agents for digital/office automation, running massive inference clusters), Space-based data centers (AI7/Dojo3 orbital compute for GW-scale training and inference beyond Earth limits). AI5 delivers the ~10× leap for vehicles and early robots; AI6 shifts focus to Optimus + terrestrial DCs; AI7 goes orbital. No external foundry (TSMC, Samsung, etc.) can deliver that scale or timeline— hence the Terafab launch. Without it, the entire robotics + autonomy future hits a brick wall. Terafab isn’t optional; it’s the only way forward.

English
59
185
2.2K
341.7K
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
Cybertruck stopped charging on Sunday. Got in to the service center on Monday. Loaner model X until Wednesday when they resolved it. A+ service experience with @Tesla @tesla_na @cybertruck
Kevin Wimer tweet mediaKevin Wimer tweet media
English
1
1
3
67
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
@MCCCANM Oh my god I thought I was a lil retarded for remembering it that way myself. Whew! 😅
English
0
0
2
294
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
@nikitabier When I added in-app payments for the first time it was multiple days. Non-payment related changes typically go in review within 6-10 hours then approved an hour or so later.
English
0
0
2
381
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabier·
iOS developers: How long is App Review taking for everyone these days? It is now taking longer to get our app approved than it is to build the actual features.
English
2.5K
542
11.8K
50.5M
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
@dmbkparker I’m a light aircraft pilot. I’d imagine some skills transfer and I could pull it off!
English
0
0
1
15
Dan
Dan@dmbkparker·
Do you think if I put you in a helicopter you could successfully takeoff and land? No instruction. You can watch as many YouTube videos as you want before we go.
English
3.3K
46
1.7K
318.5K
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
@cybrtrkguy Dayton Ohio service center told me they’ve started to see a slight influx also
English
0
1
2
112
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
@cybrtrkguy I have a loaner X while my CT PCS gets replaced. X has it. CT does not 🤷‍♂️
Kevin Wimer tweet media
English
0
1
1
191
C is for CyberTruck
C is for CyberTruck@CyberTruckApoc·
@kevinace @LamarMK Did you get the alert outside of service mode? That did not happen when mine failed. I could only see it in service mode, and I only suspected due to 24/48A limit.
English
1
0
0
28
Lamar MK
Lamar MK@LamarMK·
Cybertruck PCS failures are happening back to back. It happened to my first truck VIN 2K, and recently happened to my new Cybertruck VIN 12K. I didn't say anything publicly at first because I didn't want to put Tesla in a bad light. But now I'm seeing someone post about a PCS failure almost daily, so I think it's best to say something about the issue. To my knowledge, this is only happening to older trucks. Newer trucks should not need to worry about this. Tesla has a new PCS revision ending in T2-G. If yours fails, double check with your service team that you're getting the latest version. I hope this new revision finally resolves the problem. The fun part? I got to drive a Cyberbeast while mine was being fixed, and that truck's performance is unmatched. It's incredibly fast. My suggestion to Tesla: fix any truck that develops a PCS issue, whether in or out of warranty. At some point, the older PCS versions will fail. Also, when your truck slows charging to 24A after a PCS failure is detected, it will only last a couple of days before completely failing. Schedule service as soon as you notice it, and Tesla will get you back up and running quickly. @elonmusk @wmorrill3 @cybertruck @Tesla @tesla_na
Lamar MK tweet media
English
52
18
239
34.1K
Kevin Wimer
Kevin Wimer@kevinace·
@cybrtrkguy Happened today also. Foundation Beast 31k VIN 🤷‍♂️
Kevin Wimer tweet media
English
0
0
5
352