james ryan

60 posts

james ryan

james ryan

@kingjames_93

Katılım Aralık 2013
419 Takip Edilen26 Takipçiler
james ryan
james ryan@kingjames_93·
@odysseus0z Haven’t tried this, but I have higher hopes in @thsottiaux that this will not make be a part of my weekly routine lol x.com/meta_alchemist…
Meta Alchemist@meta_alchemist

Codex's app has been super slow for me lately. at first, I thought the problem was Codex itself. It wasn’t. After cleaning things up properly, Codex felt roughly 10X faster. 0 slowness. Before this, I had 8GB of logs built up, and it slowed things down like crazy. Here’s the 15-point cleanup system, which worked perfectly for me. It won't delete anything. Copy paste these 15 bullet points when your Codex starts to slow down: > it will inspect things first > back up & archive important files > and make your Codex blazing fast again. 15 ITEMS TO KEEP CODEX FAST 1. Check what is actually taking space. Inspect sessions, archived sessions, worktrees, archived worktrees, logs, config, and the local state database. 2. Back up the important files first. Back up config, global state, session index, state database, memories, skills, plugins, and automations before changing anything. 3. Check if Codex is open. If Codex is running, only inspect. Apply cleanup after closing it so the local database is not being touched from two places. 4. Find the giant active chats. Look for the biggest active session files. These are often old conversations that are still treated as active history. 5. Archive old non-pinned chats. Move chats older than 7-10 days into archived sessions, unless they are pinned or clearly still current. 6. Keep only recent work active. Your sidebar/history should not be carrying weeks or months old execution threads. 7. Use handoff docs instead of massive chats. If an old thread matters, turn it into a handoff doc, archive the thread, and resume in a fresh chat from the doc. 8. Normalize weird paths. On Windows, clean up path mismatches like normal C:\... paths vs extended \\?\C:\... paths. 9. Prune dead config projects. Remove project paths from config that no longer exist or point to temporary folders. 10. Move stale worktrees. Don’t keep old Codex worktrees in the hot worktrees folder. Archive them instead of deleting them. 11. Rotate large logs. Move oversized old logs into an archive folder so Codex can recreate fresh ones. 12. Check heavy background processes. Look at Node/dev-server processes. Don’t auto-kill them, but close the ones you don’t need. 13. Verify the cleanup. Afterward, confirm config still parses, the database opens, active session size dropped, archived sessions increased, and no bad paths remain. 14. Turn this into a weekly script. The cleanup should not be a dramatic one-time rescue mission. Make it repeatable. 15. Make it boring. Weekly maintenance should back up first, archive old sessions, normalize paths, prune config, move stale worktrees, rotate logs, and give you a report. The biggest lesson for me: giant chats should not become permanent memory. Chats are for execution. Handoff docs are for memory. Archives are for history. Fresh threads are for speed. P.S. Before doing all this, make comprehensive handoff documents for each active chat, too, with prompts prepared for each to reactivate them after. This will start new chats from the exact places you left off, but at blazing-fast speed. Like this, things simply work perfectly. I even told my Codex to automate these weekly, and it has set it up for every Sunday. Save this for when you will need it, as Codex app does get heavy as you use it more, especially if you are using many terminals and long sessions a lot.

English
0
0
1
52
George
George@odysseus0z·
Love the product velocity of Codex and all the features just added, but I feel the app heats up my max spec MacBook Pro quite often nowadays. I used Codex to debug and it found itself burning 250% CPU, while only one thread is running. Something doesn't feel right.
George tweet media
English
3
1
9
1.5K
goodalexander
goodalexander@goodalexander·
Best prompt style with GPT 5.5 codex. "The performance is not ideal, or at all optimized. The backtest isn't vectorized properly. You're not efficiently multi threading. You are better than this. Do not disturb me until you've MASSIVELY improved the output here"
English
16
4
294
24K
james ryan
james ryan@kingjames_93·
@KingBootoshi Seriously, I find myself working even more because it’s so much fun. Just exploring optimizations and features I never had the time to do before
English
1
0
5
315
BOOTOSHI 👑
BOOTOSHI 👑@KingBootoshi·
anybody who seriously uses AI at this point deeply understands this shit is not replacing humans in anything because we are all working 10x more since we are 10x more productive everyone is just going to operate at a new layer that was never seen before and it's MARVELOUS
English
107
47
801
39.2K
james ryan
james ryan@kingjames_93·
@badlogicgames Is it concern of leaks of your actual ID? I’m inherently KYC’d through my payment method with a cc so I don’t see how far further a stretch this is
English
0
0
0
180
james ryan
james ryan@kingjames_93·
@adonis_singh What’re you primarily using it for? I’m trying to like low, but xhigh is just such a better debugger/optimizer for my use cases
English
0
0
1
760
james ryan
james ryan@kingjames_93·
@citrini Torn because I hate Sam but i depend on codex for my livelihood at this point
English
0
0
0
593
Citrini
Citrini@citrini·
The OpenAI/Elon lawsuit will produce some of the worst takes this platform has ever seen.
English
33
25
853
61.5K
eric provencher
eric provencher@pvncher·
GPT 5.5 says the WEIRDEST shit "I’ll keep babysitting it rather than leave a little perf gremlin running unattended."
English
47
7
699
45.1K
goodalexander
goodalexander@goodalexander·
@pvncher it started laughing hysterically at the numerology of a word... then kept explaining to me why it was funny. genuinely p weird sht lol -- honestly good user experience, keeps me guessing
English
2
0
5
2.2K
Taelin
Taelin@VictorTaelin·
one shot. it learned how the HVM works, it learned my coding style, and it re-implemented it in a whole new language, using an entirely new evaluation algorithm, tailored for a specific experiment and... it works. it fucking works this is nothing short of incredible
English
7
4
250
9.3K
Taelin
Taelin@VictorTaelin·
So I just asked GPT 5.5 to create a minimal clone of HVM4 in TypeScript with just the features I needed to run a specific version of SupGen, and it one shot a functioning runtime (link below). There are no words to describe this, it is just... beautiful. We're living the future.
English
34
32
995
46.9K
james ryan
james ryan@kingjames_93·
@fentasyl Codex + surf cli into pro might be able to get this semi-automated
English
0
0
0
13
Lisan al Gaib
Lisan al Gaib@scaling01·
Nothing changed for me. To be very clear: I still want Anthropic to win. They are taking the safer and more principled approach and I trust them a lot more. But I'm not going to sit here and pretend GPT-5.5 or any other OpenAI model sucks because of that. Since GPT-5.2-xhigh I have been saying that OpenAI has smarter models, and this trend has continued. My only complain was the reasoning-efficiency, but they fixed that. I have also made predictions about OpenAI pulling ahead way before all of this happened. Saying their models are better or enjoying Sam's recent drunk comments or post doesn't mean I agree or forgive them for all their past reckless actions. But I do appreciate Sam coming forward. It shows good will. Of course I'm not blind to why Sam might be doing all of this. The recent personal attacks on Sam's home, the upcoming Elon vs OpenAI trial and growing anti-AI sentiment are very good reasons to up your PR game and reflect on your actions. I would do the same. So I'm not discounting the possibility that he's doing this to save his own skin, but I also don't want to discount the possibility of this being a genuine attempt to fix things.
English
56
12
518
46.6K
james ryan
james ryan@kingjames_93·
@sdmat123 What reasoning level do you find yourself running? I’m seeing opinions all over the place
English
1
0
0
75
sdmat
sdmat@sdmat123·
Thoughts on GPT 5.5 after a couple of days of use: - A big step up in fundamental capabilities and a step down in post-training polish, a little like going from working with an experienced colleague to a prodigy a couple of years into their career - Mixed feelings on 5.5 pro, the speed is amazing and results are good but it lacks the rigor and hyper-autistic attention to detail that made 5.4 pro exceptional for hard tasks - At a base level 5.5 is a great model to work with, better personality and style than 5.4 together with superior common sense and general understanding. Big model smell. - Performance ceiling is sky-high but you need to put in significant work to approach it due to the limited post-training - This often manifests as a counterintuitive split where the model will explain the perfect approach for X when asked but won't proactively think it through when X comes up in the course of a task - Otherwise complex instruction following and metacognition are dramatically better - It's worth revisiting prompt engineering concepts that advanced post-training rendered irrelevant and making explicit process and allocation of effort for hard tasks - Self-supervision also works well, e.g. managing well-scoped subagents Fully expect 5.6 in a month or two to round out the post-training and deliver autopilot on hard tasks. Overall: fantastic!
English
16
18
389
36.5K
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
Here’s my view on GPT-5.5, which I have been testing for a couple of weeks. It conducted not-bad social science research on its own, developed a novel RPG & more. There is still jaggedness but GPT-5.5 Pro is (for today) the best model for hard problems. open.substack.com/pub/oneusefult…
English
39
66
650
56.6K
james ryan
james ryan@kingjames_93·
@fentasyl dude you need to start getting early access. turned into one of my favorite accounts for GPT models
English
0
0
0
35
Acer
Acer@AcerFur·
GPT-image-2 reasons during image generation. Now you know why I made IRGB ;)
English
6
2
118
5.5K
ben hylak
ben hylak@benhylak·
you need to start seeing all software as malleable. i hit a broken settings toggle in the @anthropic console. i dumped the js bundle, had claude reverse engineer it, and was able to manually send the network request. it worked.
ben hylak tweet media
English
8
3
132
10.8K
james ryan
james ryan@kingjames_93·
@SeverusChud Nolan could put Odysseus in a dress and makeup and he’d break the box office record. Some people are immune to boycotts
English
0
0
1
813
Severus
Severus@SeverusChud·
>Be Christopher Nolan >Builds one of the most prestigious film careers in history >Decides to raceswap Helen of Troy and Athena with random black women >Promotes his Ancient Greece epic... with a basketballer >The Odyssey flops in cinema >Will blame White people for not showing up to a film he marketed for black people What a complete, self-inflicted, pointless fall off.
Severus tweet media
English
491
661
17.3K
596.2K