kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️

5K posts

kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️ banner
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️

kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️

@kiwehhhhh

her stare stains your retina like a gray bulb as you switch hemispheres and her knee length quilt skirt’s cut to catch the squall

Idaho, USA Katılım Temmuz 2022
518 Takip Edilen952 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️@kiwehhhhh·
I guess every Wordle on the first try and every time I refresh ThisPersonDoesNotExist it's another one of my coworkers
English
2
61
801
0
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️@kiwehhhhh·
I spoke with my great aunt today, who's from Belgium. She told me when she first moved to the U.S. she made a point of visiting Laramie, Wyoming, cause a friend had been and told her it was cool. But when she got there, she was like, what the hell, this sucks
English
19
32
5.2K
231.6K
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️ retweetledi
Sridhar Ramesh
Sridhar Ramesh@RadishHarmers·
Lindsey Graham was a closeted straight woman. She had to hide her sexuality, as she was from an era when senators were not allowed to be women. But there were clues (Lindsey is a girl's name).
English
10
359
9K
144.2K
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️@kiwehhhhh·
my husband got a photo of the exact moment a storm rolled in
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️ tweet media
English
0
0
18
318
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️@kiwehhhhh·
strange advertisement I got while reading an article about machine learning
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️ tweet media
English
10
111
3.3K
81.5K
Ben
Ben@BenShindel·
Idk why OP has me blocked but this statement is only superficially true. The reason for this is because of *field decay*. Take any 2 professional athletes from 1976 and compare them to now? They've gotten worse, because they're now in their 80s. Obviously not a perfect analogy but... The fields that have arisen within the last few decades (think machine learning and synthetic biology) are where the sharpest researchers are going and hence where the best research is being published. Of course if you compare most fields to their work 50 years ago, they will be worse. Fields grow over time and their work becomes more dilute and iterative.
Ben tweet media
English
7
1
25
2.7K
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️ retweetledi
Sridhar Ramesh
Sridhar Ramesh@RadishHarmers·
Videogames aren't art. Art is paintings. Only one videogame approaches art: Mario Paint.
English
45
1.1K
13.7K
173.2K
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️@kiwehhhhh·
My favorite art teacher passed away and his service was in the same chapel where they held my mom's six months ago and her birthday was yesterday. What a strange thing life is. Anyway here's a couple etchings he did of Pilgrim's Progress. ❤️
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️ tweet mediakiwi 🪬🍉🖇️ tweet media
English
0
0
59
1.3K
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️@kiwehhhhh·
can any religious scholars or psychoanalysts on here interpret the dream my 4-year-old had last night
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️ tweet media
English
3
1
27
560
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️@kiwehhhhh·
@mstcambot Thank you!!! I'm doing very well, I hope you've been thriving and having a wonderful time out there in the great wide world
English
0
0
1
11
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️@kiwehhhhh·
Recently got a haircut and I think I should have told them to cut off even more hair. Realizing I may still have too much hair
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️ tweet media
English
3
0
61
1.8K
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️@kiwehhhhh·
@ZyMazza I had a sub who couldn't get into a site the other day because he didn't know how a QR-gate-code worked...I get faxed drawings as surveys...working in a construction-adjacent industry is taking crazy pills every day. They just don't know. The chasm is unfathomable
English
0
0
1
124
Zy
Zy@ZyMazza·
Here's something I don't understand. The writing is on the wall, right? To me it's so clear where all of this is going. Why isn't Pep Boys offering bonuses to all of their employees willing to wear a camera like this and narrate what they're doing as they repair a vehicle. Midas or another auto repair shop could even make a special glove or something like the MoCap companies do to capture really fine articulation. Shouldn't every automotive service center be doing this? Don't they know that with enough data they can completely automate maintenance in perpetuity? They have to know this, right? Why doesn't McDonald's or In N Out offer cash bonuses to exemplary employees to generate this kind of episodic training data? You could say that it's dystopian, that no one wants to automate their job away, but you can't convince me that these companies care about that. If McDonald's could build a completely automated franchise they would--they've already been doing the automated kiosk ordering for a long time, directly automating the most customer-facing "human touch" surface before they touched the back. Do they not know they can do this? Companies like Garmin and Jeppesen are sitting on years, maybe decades, of meticulously annotated data. Every month the FAA publishes charts that they have painstakingly merged into GPS maps for their flying apps. I mean they *already* have the data! And if they don't all they need to do is start saving it after each chart update. Have they not heard? Google/Alphabet has invested, what? Hundreds of millions? Maybe billions? Into Waymo. It's working, *amazingly*. Anyone looking at this can say "wow, these cars can drive themselves." Are caterpillar, case, and John Deere looking into this? I haven't seen any announcements, any demos, any invitations to participate in early access programs. I know a lot of people in construction and real estate, and I haven't heard anything about this. Developers like KB homes literally build the same set of floorplans all over the country, again and again and again. Have they invested even a dollar into motion tracking gloves and cameras for their carpenters and tradespeople to gather training data to automate home building? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. I know the robots aren't there yet. I know that. Everyone knows that. But it's *so* clear they will be. It's crystal clear that the only bottleneck will be training data. Why is all of the investment so limited? Where is the vision? Do they not know? Can someone talk to them and tell them what's coming? It seems to me if you're a big company NOT in tech and NOT in AI this is your big chance. In the time after the dot com bubble giants like sears roebuck were undone by their arrogance. Or maybe their ignorance? They were unable, or unwilling, to offer online services to compliment their retail offerings. Sears got eaten alive by Amazon. Blockbuster by Netflix. Everyone knows these stories! Companies like FedEx and Charles Schwab that started offering internet services early survived, and thrived even. Do they even teach this stuff in business school?? Idk but it feels like they should. I should think if I'm in the C-Suite of some massive national company that changes tires or refurbishes HVAC units or some such "real world" task I would be intensely interested in making sure I don't get displaced in 10 years by some punk who figured out how to get a robot to do it. I should think if I run a surveying company or a digital chart app for pilots that I would want to automate as much of the data processing pipeline as I can with existing computer vision technology and be as prepared as possible to take advantage of the leaps still to come. I might, if I was forward looking, I might even try to be at the forefront of those leaps, recognizing that my business is in a particularly advantaged position to collect the required training data. I might even try to work out a deal with the frontier labs to get *them* to pay for outfitting my workforce with the gear required to create training data from our day-to-day operations and get them to license us free access to the resulting models in perpetuity. Are they trying to do this? I hear of people selling datasets for millions of dollars, but the last time I want to Midas, I didn't see anyone wearing a headset in the garage. This is to say NOTHING about organizations being so slow to adopt technology that already works today!! If you look up "Data Entry" jobs you see thousands of results. Now, some of them are actually, in truth, data annotation jobs. These companies know what's up. BUT. Thousands of these are spreadsheet monkey jobs. HELLOOOO! THAT is a job for Chat GPT. Right here, right now, no advances necessary. Do they not know?? Have they not heard???!>! I don't understand how millions, billions, I'm told even trillions of dollars are being poured into this area of AI, automation, and robotics, and NO ONE seems to be working on a "General vehicle diagnostics and repair" data set. What is going on??
mirrash.eth 🦇🔊@mirrash7

HOI-DETR (Hand-Object Interaction) is a new zero-shot framework that integrates hand-object and object-object interaction -Hand + tool detections -Interaction links (+secondary object) Huge for robotics training 🔥🔥

English
71
31
705
190.7K
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️
kiwi 🪬🍉🖇️@kiwehhhhh·
🚨🚔 this is an IQ SCORE CHECKPOINT! 📣⚠️ you must POST IQ TEST RESULTS before making further commentary! 🚨🚔
𝖒𝖔𝖌𝖌𝖎𝖓𝖌@wanted4mogging

one thing you need to keep in mind about women is that their IQs converge FAR more onto the mean than men's this is why women with extremely midwit and shallow thoughts walka round and parade themselves like they are some sort of 140 IQ cerebrally gifted philosopher queen with a depth and profoundity that the average person just can't possibly in their mind come close to... it's because as far as statistics go, they practically are! for a woman at least. if they are even on the upper end of midwittery they are basically a genius from a statistical perspective, though not in practical terms. they are as rare as a male genius is amongst women, and because they frame their perception of their own intelligence primarily around other women who they interact with, they develop this inflated ego and perception of their own intellect this is why you get stupid broads posting dumb shit like this and not realizing how retarded they sound. this for the thoughtslop it is probably still takes at least a bit higher IQ than 100 to string together, there are some shallow connections of thought being made, enough to intellectually posture and faintly recreate the prose of speech one would find in the actual intelligent people she is trying to verbally replicate as far as women goes, it takes so many standard deviations above the mean to even reach this level that she may as well think herself a genius. any difference in how her thoughts come out compared to men of an equally rare level of intellect she will chalk up to a difference in how men and women think; the men just don't "get it" and if it pisses them off she's probably triggering some insecurity they have or they're just dumb misogynists writing her off in reality she's actually just not that smart! she is at a rare level of intellect — for a WOMAN — but this is only scratching the surface of true intelligence in nominal terms! i liken it to a female powerlifter, who weighing 49kg manages to blow everyone's minds bench pressing 115kg. "wow, this girl is gifted..." and then an average male gym-goer can go ahead and take her bench press max off of the rack after she's done and bang out a set of bicep curls. her IQ in and of itself as an objective meaure is not actually very high, she is just standing out in a league of her own. and that league is the little leagues genuinely intelligent women do exist, but they are astronomically rare and the overwhelming majority of women are complete midwits so a woman stepping into the room with 120 IQ is baically like encountering nikola tesla for them. once we all accept this as a society we can all stop taking them so seriously and start removing them from positions of institutional power which require actual thinking skills

English
0
0
7
433