Kevin Mesiab

6.7K posts

Kevin Mesiab banner
Kevin Mesiab

Kevin Mesiab

@kmesiab

I practice the art of making something from nothing. https://t.co/bidnSGAbOF

Tacoma - Stadium District Katılım Mayıs 2008
31.5K Takip Edilen31.6K Takipçiler
Kevin Mesiab
Kevin Mesiab@kmesiab·
@coderabbitai has "auto-fix" in beta... GitHub Copilot is officially cooked. GH Copilot Web PR fixes are lack luster, often fail their own code reviews, spin off sub branches from feature branches instead of committing leading to unnecessary merge management. It's absolute mayhem.
English
1
0
2
64
Kevin Mesiab
Kevin Mesiab@kmesiab·
The Anthropocene Proteome: Heterogeneous Nucleation and Field-Determined Phase Transitions in Neurodegeneration @kevinmesiab/note/p-186876864?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=n02vc" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@kevinmesiab/n…
English
0
0
1
57
Kevin Mesiab
Kevin Mesiab@kmesiab·
Multi modal grounding problem? What problem? Introducing the Merovingian Array. Pure mathematical pattern recognition and motif/causal law discovery in novel environments open.substack.com/pub/kevinmesia…
English
0
0
1
184
Kevin Mesiab
Kevin Mesiab@kmesiab·
Why Isn't AI Improving My Dev Teams? You're doing it wrong.... Enterprises are pouring cash into GenAI tools for their dev teams and wondering where the hype went. The challenge with GenAI initiatives at enterprises isn’t a tooling problem it’s a staffing problem. Real gains come from the top 15-20% of your engineering staff. So how do you both leverage them, and scale them? This is how: linkedin.com/posts/kmesiab_…
English
0
0
0
105
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@EricRWeinstein·
If only we weren't hemmed in by Lovelock's theorem to a cosmological constant, and we were forced to consider other (40 year old) dynamic...and even more *geometric*...models of "Dark Energy", perhaps this would actually be exciting. Nah...who are we kidding. I'm sure with a few more decades, this will all be worked out. Let's get the people who haven't ever succeeded well into their 70s and 80s to peer review and gate keep this to absolute perfection. What does String Theory and Loop Quantum Gravity have to say? AdS/CFT? Let's get Dennis Overbye (81) to write it up! Remember: String Theory is 22nd Century Physics that just happened to fall into the 21st Century. LFG! ;-)
Eric Weinstein tweet media
English
63
35
593
55.8K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@EricRWeinstein·
Unfortunately, the field of theoretical physics is once again being threatened almost daily by new ideas. Keeping those new ideas out of theoretical physics when we have the 50YO "Standard Model of Particle Physics", the 25YO "Standard Model of Cosmology", and our over 110YO "General Relativity", has fallen to a tiny handful of aging gatekeepers and increasingly aggressive enforcer-psychopaths who know that true progress requires that patience be measured in millenia when we already have the one true theory in every case. What calamity would befall physics if those science enforcers faltered? One shudders even to contemplate. The "Grift", The "Arrogance", The "Charlatanism!", The "Bunk", The Change, The Repudiation of Dogma...my god. The progress could be unbearable. Imagine if we were wrong and the critics of the last 40+ years weren't crazy after all.... ;-) We might even have to apologize. Unthinkable! [Seriously: who are these morons? It's like Zombie Fauci-ism on steroids. Where do they come from? This is kinda just unbelievable. May be time to just roll over the science NPCs.]
Curiosity@CuriosityonX

NEWS🚨: James Webb confirms there's something seriously wrong with our understanding of the universe — and reveals unknown physics exists.

English
356
456
3.3K
337.4K
Kevin Mesiab
Kevin Mesiab@kmesiab·
@mattyp Hold on… don’t you work at Replit? My guy, never have I ever seen a pot call a kettle black so arrogantly as this. Your platform is just as brittle and flawed. Possibly the worst offender. Shall I list your zero days as well?
English
0
0
0
65
matt palmer
matt palmer@mattyp·
On March 20th, 2025, my colleague and I discovered a critical vulnerability in Lovable's implementation of Row Level Security (RLS) policies. Applications developed using its platform often lack secure RLS configurations, allowing unauthorized actors to access sensitive user data and inject malicious data. Lovable applications, being primarily client-driven, rely on external services for backend operations like authentication and data storage. This architecture shifts the security burden to the implementor of the application. However, misaligned RLS policies between the client-side logic and backend enforcement frequently result in vulnerabilities, where attackers can bypass frontend controls to directly access or modify data. Lovable later introduced a "security scanner," but it merely checks for the existence of any RLS policy, not its correctness or alignment with application logic. This provides a false sense of security, failing to detect the misconfigurations that expose data.
matt palmer tweet media
English
38
47
587
178.3K