eloise

@theAuntieAngie you're easily confused, understandably.

I’m confused. When @w_terrence puts on a wig and mocks Maxine Waters or Jasmine Crockett, conservatives laugh. But when @druski puts on a wig to mock Erica Kirk, now it’s offensive? Be consistent. Either it’s all comedy or it isn’t.

@TheQuartering "i think it's an important discussion for grown ups" hahahahaha well gosh if it's for grown ups, I'll certainly tune in!

Joe Kent & Cenk Uygur on the same team and you people are calling him a patriot. Lol

@JustinArnett22 @SB4Freedom @realsashastone @PolitiBunny lolllllll Christ only had thousands gather to hear him encourage them, the crowd, to forgive their enemies totes not comparable but yeah you're making such an excellent point about the lack of pyrotechnics 😂

@SB4Freedom @realsashastone @PolitiBunny Christ didn't have fireworks going off while he danced around on a stage. It's kind of a gross comparison. I feel like her actions were the opposite of Christ like. Christ didn't go in front of audiences and up on stages to announce his forgiveness.

I'll never understand how Erika Kirk became a target. I'll never understand how so many people went along with it.

@viewsceo I just see 2 exogenous hormone-laden males.

Clavicular’s girlfriend Violet has just been arrested alongside him 😬

@LessCheerful @TwittaUser22 @LiLa__lee18 no shit, poindexter.

@TwittaUser22 @LiLa__lee18 ... It isn't milk, though. Technically it's juice. Milk can only come from mammals.

Your air fryer is a convection oven and you were duped into buying another appliance. Goodnight 😘

@BlackFlagPoetOG @johncardillo to look cool for other males on the internet. that simple, that low iq.

My question is why? As a former manhunter, I grapple with the thought of taking a life, any life. To just pull up and KILL a living creature for no reason, and then to just leave it there is truly the mark of an evil, psychotic person. All life is precious, this is senseless. I hope that fucker asshole gets a bad case of flesh eating bacteria from the glades.

Out of season using an illegal method to kill the gator. This is criminal abuse of wildlife. Prosecute this groyper moron and the idiots with him.

@WatcherontheWeb what's he gonna do without access to all the drugs and products he uses? revert back to his original form?

I was concerned this might blow over and he might not get hard time Then I saw he fucked with the Fish Cops domain.... Yep... that "boy" won't be seen again until at least 2030

@TxRuntzOg @0hour1 "bruh you're grammar" lmao nice try kiddo

@0hour1 Bruh you’re grammar is so bad plz stay in school kid and laughing at your own post is just sad af

That fat fuck will be had by diabetes in a few years look at him. Lmao 🤣

@shirley_kohl @Chris__X__ very cute that you think you can plan for every potential disaster that could impact your ability to pay property taxes. adorable honestly 🩷

@Chris__X__ The elderly need to make required changes as they age. If/when they need to downsize they should. I won’t refuse to make required changes when it’s my turn—as my body breaks down and inflation makes my budget tighter. It’s not ok for anyone to be entitled. Young or old.

Tell me I’m wrong, but no senior should lose their home over property taxes after paying it off for 30 years.

@JoshuaLisec @pearlythingz that should tell you something.

@pearlythingz Catholics, Orthodox, and Latter-day Saints in my mentions have been “with it”

This week the Christians have made it clear that they worship women and not God

@michaeljknowles @TrevorSheatz @benshapiro you called his wife a whore, you disingenuous prick.

I suspect you didn’t intend to disrespect your wife, and so you might have been surprised that some people, myself included, criticized you for speaking in a way that is unbecoming of a husband. I think you made a mistake. But your points here are not sound. 1. I never said you used that word. I said that’s what you called her (while contrasting her sin with your own virtue). “Promiscuous” is an adjective, the nearest nouns for which are “whore” and “slut.” 2. They are all pejorative terms that refer to people who engage in sexual immorality. They all carry negative connotations because they refer to shameful acts. If the nouns are more evocative than the adjective, that owes more to their Saxon (rather than Latinate) origins than to their meaning. It’s the same reason “pulchritudinous” is less evocative than “hot.” The words all mean the same thing, and we should not refer to our wives in such a way—certainly not to millions of strangers. 3. My phrasing was not in the present tense but rather the past. (See: “called” versus “calls” or “is calling.”) But even my description of your wording does not imply the present tense. By way of analogy, “she was promiscuous” : “he called her a whore” :: “Jeter was a Bronx Bomber” : “he called him a Yankee.” (Derek Jeter does not currently play for the Yankees, and the final comment does not suggest that anyone thinks he does.) As I said, I don’t think you meant to disrespect your wife. You might have the best of intentions. None of that is my point. You made a controversial post, which included both admirable comments about grace and inappropriate language that in my estimation is unbecoming of a husband and not to be recommended to others—hence my public commentary on your own public statement.

Multiple times, @michaeljknowles said I called my wife a whore in my post (as did @benshapiro), even though I wrote "My wife was formerly promiscuous." To my surprise, upon checking the original video, the top comments are now overwhelmingly condemning their response to our story of God's redemption (screenshot below). Michael is now doubling-down on it on X by saying that me writing that she was formerly promiscuous is the same as calling her a whore (pic attached). Here's the three primary issues with them saying I called my wife a whore, and why Michael's argument is wrong. 1. It isn't true. I never used the word "whore," so he shouldn't be telling people I called my wife this. 2. We instinctively know that "she was formerly promiscuous" carries with it much more grace than "she's a whore," because "promiscuous" is an adjective describing her past, whereas "whore" is a degrading noun, a slur used to speak harshly of women. They're similar words, but different in meaning and intent. They are not the same. 3. Crucially, they spoke in the present tense: "He called her a whore" (implying this is a present-tense sin issue, something she still is). I spoke in the past tense: "My wife was formerly promiscuous." This tense difference matters immensely, especially when people greatly struggle to separate one's life before Christ from their life after Christ. The world can't fathom that such change can happen. But the Bible is clear: "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (1 Cor. 5:17). Or consider Galatians 2:20: "I have been crucified with Christ, and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me." That old Ashley is dead. It's because of these truths that my wife and I choose to boldly, confidently, and without giving loads of explicit details, share the sins that stained us before Christ with others (for I am indeed a great sinner and struggle in many ways, too). Our story isn't shared frequently, but at times and when fitting, so that other believers can be encouraged, other sinners can be given hope of redemption and forgiveness, and the lost can hear the good news of the gospel: that though all are headed for Hell for their sins (1 Cor. 6:9-10), anyone who repents and places their trust in the resurrected Christ will be saved (John 3:16, 18). Regardless of how much you've sinned, you can't out-sin the mercy of God. You can be washed clean, your shame and guilt removed, and you can have a brand-new identity in Jesus Christ (Titus 3:5-6). And we’re living proof of this! I have no ill will against Michael, Ben, @andrewklavan, or anyone else for their remarks and mocking, nor do I demand an apology. I forgive them. My greatest desire for them and anyone who's following this story, as well as God's, is for them to "be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth" (1 Tim. 2:4).

@mgrfleece @MattCouture5 lol words have meaning, sorry to burst your bubble.

@MattCouture5 “Assassinated” he was a podcaster he wasn’t that important

The nascar video was funny. It was harmless humor and that’s why most white people didn’t care This is too far though. Beyond the blatant racism, you’re mocking a widow who had her husband assassinated in front of the world. Imagine a white person dressing up as a “black liberal women” to mock them and posting it on the internet…

@MattCouture5 he looks inbred.

@nosoup4knowles appealing to the lowest common denominator is typically financially enriching, as Candida has shown.

670k likes on this slop

@DefiantOutlawX only a matter of time. his dysgenic features tell the tale. he'll stroke out by 45.

Druski is a fat POS who has a higher chance of a cardiac event than ever being funny.

Sorry I’m not dumb enough to support a grown man dressing like a woman for a skit 🤷🏾‍♂️

@HoopsCrave @graciehannah99 fake quotes are lame

Erika Kirk responds to Druski: “But if I did blackface as part of a skit, I’d be cancelled and called a racist.”

@ThatClaireKyleG @HoopsCrave @AintyouKiersten black fragility

@HoopsCrave @AintyouKiersten I need white people to understand there’s a double standard for a reason. Black people doing this kind of skit is humorous because it DOESNT hurt white people in real life. But if they did blackface, it’s extremely harmful toward black people.

@VigilantFox lol she wouldn't know what it's like to be in Elon's orbit outside of a few bootycalls she's far more familiar with the orbit of Elon's lawyers.

Elon Musk’s “baby mama” Ashley St. Clair laughs awkwardly as she recalls how “interesting” and “intoxicating” he once felt to her younger self. TIM MILLER: “He’s tweeting all night. He’s very manic. He has 13 children… What is it like to be in his orbit?” ST. CLAIR: “When I first met him, I thought he was very interesting. Especially, I was 23, 24 at the time. And guys my age are not talking about philosophy or Schopenhauer or the Greeks.” MILLER: “He’s talking about Schopenhauer?!” ST. CLAIR: “Yes, to a degree.” “So finding someone who could speak about something, and at the time, you think this individual is a part of something so much bigger than themselves, and they’re ‘fighting the good fight.’” “That’s very intoxicating to a young girl who does not have a fully developed prefrontal cortex at the time.” [laughs awkwardly] “So I think there’s been a difference in my view since I’ve developed that.” [laughs again]

God married a whore. In Hosea 1:2, God instructs a prophet to marry a prostitute as a living parable of His own relationship with Israel. I’ll admit my first instinct seeing this post was to recoil. Then I did my quiet time. In Hosea, Gomer is not background detail. She is the crux of the whole story. Hosea takes her back after she leaves him. He buys her back out of slavery as God tells him to. Because that is what God does. Rahab was a prostitute in Jericho. She is in the lineage of Christ. Matthew 1 puts her there without apology or asterisk. The woman who washed Jesus’ feet with her tears in Luke 7 was a known public sinner, likely a prostitute. The Pharisee hosting the dinner was disgusted that Jesus let her touch him. Jesus told the Pharisee that the person forgiven most loves most. He did not say she was tolerated. He said she understood grace better than the religious man throwing the dinner party. The pattern is clear, this is not one story. This is every generation being confronted with the same scandalous imagery and recoiling the same way. Because the scandal does not stop in the Old Testament. Paul tells husbands in Ephesians 5 to love their wives the way Christ loves the Church. And who is the Church? She is the bride of Christ. She is not a worthy or befitting bride. She is a people steeped in idolatry, rebellion, and spiritual adultery, bought back at the cost of His life. In the Old Testament, God tells Hosea to marry Gomer. In the New Testament, Christ marries us. The parable is the same only that the stage is larger. This post or this man’s union is not more scandalous than the gospel. The gospel tells us that a sinless God dies in the place of a guilty people who neither deserved it nor asked for it is the whole gospel. The scandal is not incidental to the story. It is the story. None of us gets to be comfortable. All of us recoiling at this testimony are doing exactly what the Pharisees did. They saw sinners near Jesus and called it contamination. Jesus said that was the entire point. So if this makes you uncomfortable, that discomfort is not a problem with the post. It is a problem with your gospel.