Konger

7.6K posts

Konger banner
Konger

Konger

@konger_eth

Co-Founder @SpiritDao Placing high conviction bets in web3 and Gamefi. #Azuki #Pixelmon #Avalon https://t.co/8kJYi0NDxr

Katılım Kasım 2013
2.1K Takip Edilen12.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Konger
Konger@konger_eth·
Patience. Do you have enough patience to hold your investments long enough for your thesis to play out? We all have our own investment strategy, but only a few projects are going to make it in the end. Good luck anon 🫡
English
65
101
333
37.5K
Konger retweetledi
Grail.eth
Grail.eth@graildoteth·
I know the market is still bearish on NFTs And even die-hard NFT holders are bearish on Azuki @Azuki has fumbled the web3 side since the TGE, ignoring what they built to focus completely on the web2, vaporizing much of the lift that made them relevant. I don’t disagree with their push into web2 with a product (I like the TCG) but by not engaging their web3 engine to power their vehicle, they’ve left out most of their horsepower. I hope they return to their roots and integrate the entire NFT and token ecosystem into what they are now building. It would turbocharge their IP and ecosystem again and empower their community like nothing else. But hear me out If Azuki actually goes back to the web3 side and decides they are relevant again and NFTs run it up again one more time... These spirits might be a steal...
Grail.eth tweet media
English
89
16
294
47K
Konger retweetledi
Peter Girnus 🦅
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz·
I am a Web3 Ambassador at World Liberty Financial. There are 12 of us on the team page. 4 are named Trump. 3 are named Witkoff. The page calls us "the passionate minds shaping the future of finance." 600,000 wallets bought our memecoin. They lost $3.87 billion. The family collected $350 million in trading fees. It launched 3 days before the inauguration. 80% of the supply went to CIC Digital LLC and Fight Fight Fight LLC. I did not choose the names. I designed the allocation, the vesting, the timing, and the distance between the product and the President. The distance is my best work. I am the reason these events are unrelated. World Liberty Financial sends 75 cents of every dollar to DT Marks DEFI LLC. That is the family entity. Zero capital contributed. Zero liability assumed. I wrote this into the Gold Paper. Page 14. The lawyers bound it in white leather. The binding cost more than the due diligence. Justin Sun invested $75 million. He was facing SEC fraud charges. The SEC dropped the case. He is now our advisor. These events are unrelated. Changpeng Zhao pleaded guilty to federal money laundering violations. He received a presidential pardon. The SEC dropped its lawsuit against his exchange the same week we listed our stablecoin. Then the exchange settled a $2 billion deal entirely in that stablecoin. These events are unrelated. Arthur Hayes, Benjamin Delo, and Samuel Reed of BitMEX pleaded guilty to Bank Secrecy Act violations. All 3 received presidential pardons. Then the company itself was pardoned. $100 million in fines. Gone. An American first. These events are unrelated. Sheikh Tahnoun of Abu Dhabi paid $500 million for a 49% stake that was never publicly disclosed. Then the administration approved semiconductor exports to his companies over national security objections. These events are unrelated. Everything is unrelated. I track the unrelatedness on a dashboard I built. The dashboard has 7 columns now. I am proud of the dashboard. On May 22nd, 220 people paid a combined $148 million to eat dinner with the America First president. Over half were foreign nationals. Justin Sun paid $18.5 million for the first seat. He visited the Executive Office Building the day before. I designed the seating chart. I put it on the Investor Confidence page. That page is doing well. The team page lists 3 Witkoffs. All 3 are Co-Founders. Steven Witkoff is the President's Middle East envoy. He testified as a character witness at the President's fraud trial. His son Zach runs the crypto operation. His son Alex is also a Co-Founder. I have not been told what Alex co-founded. The father runs the diplomacy. The sons run the platform. The family runs both. That is organizational efficiency. Barron is 19. His title is Web3 Ambassador. The same as mine. Donald Jr. called the conflicts of interest "complete nonsense." Eric launched a Bitcoin mining company called American Bitcoin. America First. The mining partner is Hut 8. Hut 8 was founded in Canada. America First means the name. On March 6th, the President signed Executive Order 14233 creating a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. The order directs the government to hold Bitcoin. The President's family holds billions in Bitcoin. The executive order appreciates the President's assets by presidential decree. I did not write the executive order. I made sure it looked unrelated to the portfolio. Trump Media put $2 billion of Bitcoin on its balance sheet. The ticker symbol is DJT. His initials. The press secretary said it is absurd to insinuate the President profits off the presidency. Forbes calculated his crypto holdings exceed the combined value of Mar-a-Lago and Trump Tower. I would call that absurd too. That is my job. 600,000 wallets bought in. 1 of them asked why she could not withdraw her funds. I told her the protocol was experiencing dynamic market conditions. She asked what that meant. I sent her the Gold Paper. She said she had read the Gold Paper. I muted her channel. Dynamic means the conditions change. The condition that changed was her access. A congressman called us the world's most corrupt crypto startup operation. We put it on a coffee mug. Ironic merchandise. $45. The revenue split on the mug is also 75/25. My own tokens vest on a different schedule. I wrote that schedule. That is not in the Gold Paper. The memecoin funds the family. The family funds the platform. The platform funds the stablecoin. The stablecoin funds the deals. The deals require the pardons. The pardons free the partners. The partners fund the platform. The President signs the executive orders. The executive orders inflate the assets. The assets fund the family. I am the reason these events are unrelated.
Peter Girnus 🦅 tweet media
English
1.7K
7.4K
23.6K
5.5M
Konger retweetledi
shinny𝙟𝙪𝙪𝙠𝙪 ⛩️🏁
my new anime for lmk (ft @Azuki #5498) is out now via NIGHTMODE <3 creating an anime for one of my songs has always been a dream of mine so ty to @phuncal for helping this dream become a reality blessed to be able to feature my bros azukis as well @MINHxDYNASTY @MiKeMeUpP @dingalingts @IcedcoffeeEth @konger_eth @0xseraph and for @jasonfromkaizen for passing me the shotty in the anime lmao
shinny𝙟𝙪𝙪𝙠𝙪 ⛩️🏁@shinny427

juuku - lmk

English
35
30
158
10.8K
Konger retweetledi
Grail.eth
Grail.eth@graildoteth·
Hyperliquid has effectively scammed all the Hyperliquid ticker auction buyers by seizing $MON from @monprotocol and handing it over to Monad. The whole value prop of even buying these spot tickers from Hyperliquid was the immutability of the purchase and the hyperliquid front end UI that gives that ticker the value. Regardless of the size or success of the token tied to the seized ticker, having Hyperliquid just seize the ticker, quoting just a 'UI change' and hand it over to Monad is the wrong precedent and an injustice to every single ticker buyer who in good faith invested capital into the future success of Hypeliquid. Not a single one would have bid on any ticker if ownership of that on the Monad frontend was not immutable. They should offer full refunds to every single aucction ticker buyer. Shame on them. Shame on @chameleon_jeff and @iliensinc, who I thought were better than this. A number of the spot ticker auction sales went for mid-six figures. One even sold for almost 7 figures. Some of the higher sales (not all): GOD for $975,700 ANIME for ~500k MON for 489K SOVRN for 262,660.17$ FLASK for 159,794.44$ FARM for 181,291.25$ HYFI for 90,652.95$ SHEEP for 111,683.24$ BUBZ for 118,531.66$ SOLV for 128,345.67$ GENESY for 87,198.02$ WATAR for 73,940.75$ STAR for 66,889.45$ Why were these tickers bid on so high? Because the teams that bid on them were essentially paying for future distribution rights for their token by having it spot listed on Hyperliquid. You are NOT paying for some useless backend on-chain ticker that no app will use or support with zero practical utility. HYPE bag holders will no doubt go into defense mode and try and justify this, but try to understand what's happened here and how negative this is overall. Let me tell you a little story with you as the protagonist. 1/ You fairly buy a sought-after apartment in a prime city center location at an open auction from a well-regarded developer. The developer has decided to try a new real estate sale format, offering anyone the ability to buy the property for life if they bid the highest. 2/ You participate, and to guarantee you win, you pay a huge premium for that property because the house is literally in a perfect location, a location that will match the life you intend to create for yourself. 3/ You move into the apartment, you furnish it, and you even set up a little home office in it. You invite family to stay, you host events with friends, you slowly make this little space yours. This is your very own apartment, bought from a developer with an impeccable reputation for honesty who prides itself on building quality affordable housing in a city where most developers do not. 4/ But suddenly, in just under a year of owning and living in this property, this developer informs you that a very famous, very wealthy celebrity wants your home. That celebrity already owns multiple houses, but your house is in a prime location that would allow quicker access to his favorite art gallery. The property developer also stands to gain because the celebrity will bring a host of free publicity to that developer by owning that property. The developer will be able to sell even more properties because of that and earn even more money in the future! 4/ The developer, let's call them @HyperliquidX, despite your protests that you bought that home fair and square, forcibly transfers your title deed to the celebrity and then suddenly evicts you from your home. To honor *some* of the terms of the auction sale, but not the spirit of the purchase, you are instead handed the title deed to an apartment outside of the city, in a poor and undesirable location, worth a fraction of what you paid (if anything) on the open market. 5/ Since you LOST the property you actually paid for, you at least ask for a refund because you did NOT get what you paid for, but are told no refunds. Why? Because the developer had a little sneaky line in the sale contract, which stated that the developer fully owns the actual building location, and you were not really buying a title deed to that specific building address, but just 'any' single building the developer owns in the city. Unfortunately, this little side clause was so obscure and written in another language that none of the apartment buyers even knew it existed. ---------- This story is real, and it's what @HyperliquidX has done to @monprotocol in essence. You can call it what you want. Say that nothing was violated and the ticker on the chain remains the same, and that the UI for the ticker is on hyperliquid. But I call it theft and nothing but that. Now I've been a fan of what Hyperliquid has been trying to do over the past year, but what they have done here violates everything they have stated they are about. @Pixelmon spent $500k to secure the $MON ticker on the hyperliquid ticker auctions. Did they wildly overpay in hindsight? Yes. But they fairly won that auction with the full expectation that they would have control of that listing name ON the hyperliquid platform for the foreseeable future. Only to be kicked aside and have the ticker forcibly changed because of a much bigger project @monad decided they wanted to use the same ticker and Hyperliquid decided on it. Yes, Pixelmon's gaming token is down 97%. I should know, I had massive bags there that I did not sell. Despite web3 gaming pretty much dying and the mon gaming token along with it, the Pixelmon team has been building non-stop and just globally launched their flagship game @wardensascent on Apple Store. They are certainly not dead, nor have they abandoned their community or token. Oh yes, 'technically' Hyperliquid is only changing the 'front end' UI while the ticker remains unchanged on the chain itself. But in practice, this is basically the open theft of that ticker. The value of the Hyperliquid spot ticker was ALWAYS primarily the front-end ticker displayed on the platform. Why would anyone possibly pay inflated prices for a ticker when the exchange can (and will) change the name arbitrarily when it best suits their business interests? What value is there then for all those spot ticker purchasers? Any bigger project can come along and hijack (for free!) your ticker because Hyper will just straight out hand it to them when the trading fee incentives are there. You don't buy a non-trademarked domain name only to find out, suddenly after you buy it and build a business on it that another bigger company that wants to build a business on the same name can just seize it for free. So yeah by basically forcibly changing a legitimately paid for ticker, @HyperliquidX has undermined their stated ethos. It's a bad look on their part and shows the company, under the hood, operates much like the very same CEX platforms they claim to be disrupting. Bad look. Hyperliquid needs to make this right. At the very least, a choice of a better name AND a full refund because what was paid for was basically seized by force.
Akku@Akkukap

I’ve been a Hyperliquid maxi for a long time, and HL still remains my largest position in Web3. But a recent decision by the team has been extremely disappointing to see. Earlier this year, @monprotocol acquired the $MON ticker on HL for ~500k: x.com/monprotocol/st… The rationale was that CEX interactions were frustrating, and the Pixelmon team wanted to align with a fully decentralized venue. The token ultimately didn’t gain much traction on HL (very low volume, practically a waste in hindsight), but at least the team had secured an immutable asset. Fast forward to Monad’s launch, and suddenly the MON ticker on Hypercore now refers to Monad, not Pixelmon. So I checked with the Pixelmon team assuming they must have sold the ticker. Turns out they didn’t. Hyperliquid simply changed the frontend names: Pixelmon is now shown as “Monpro” on UI (but still $MON on-chain). Monad is shown as “Mon” on UI (but is actually $UMON on-chain). So technically the ticker is immutable, but from a consumer perspective the actual UI identity has been reassigned. And realistically, no one cares what the ticker is on-chain when the UI shows something else. If this isn’t effectively a ticker grab, what is it? Pixelmon paid 500k for something that the frontend can override at will, while Monad (or rather @unitxyz, who is clearly closer to the HL team) gets the visible name without paying for it. To be clear, this doesn’t materially affect Pixelmon’s future. But on principle, it’s wildly disappointing. Is this the ethos Hyperliquid wants to stand for? Centrally aligned players first? What message does this send to smaller teams who choose HL because they believed “listings without fuss” meant UI consistency and fairness? Are we now saying: “You can buy the on-chain ticker, but we’ll decide the visible name depending on who we talk to”? Tagging @chameleon_jeff @iliensinc because this seems like a serious breach of HL’s own stated values, and I’m not sure whether this decision was fully acknowledged at the top. For clarity: Pixelmon ($MON): 0x622cf551933f19f9136303dcab56488c Monad ($UMON): 0x58dae745c8c5fed4012f35ef39829c2d Frontend: This requires an explanation imo and its not about this particular case but more problematic for the overall direction team wants to take. To me this is a clear slap on the face of smaller teams being allowed to be strong-armed by privileged partners. @sershokunin can you also pitch in as to what happened here?

English
107
33
247
46.9K
Adrian
Adrian@adriannewman21·
Curious how @HyperliquidX will respond to this, imo lame dumb f mistake.
Akku@Akkukap

I’ve been a Hyperliquid maxi for a long time, and HL still remains my largest position in Web3. But a recent decision by the team has been extremely disappointing to see. Earlier this year, @monprotocol acquired the $MON ticker on HL for ~500k: x.com/monprotocol/st… The rationale was that CEX interactions were frustrating, and the Pixelmon team wanted to align with a fully decentralized venue. The token ultimately didn’t gain much traction on HL (very low volume, practically a waste in hindsight), but at least the team had secured an immutable asset. Fast forward to Monad’s launch, and suddenly the MON ticker on Hypercore now refers to Monad, not Pixelmon. So I checked with the Pixelmon team assuming they must have sold the ticker. Turns out they didn’t. Hyperliquid simply changed the frontend names: Pixelmon is now shown as “Monpro” on UI (but still $MON on-chain). Monad is shown as “Mon” on UI (but is actually $UMON on-chain). So technically the ticker is immutable, but from a consumer perspective the actual UI identity has been reassigned. And realistically, no one cares what the ticker is on-chain when the UI shows something else. If this isn’t effectively a ticker grab, what is it? Pixelmon paid 500k for something that the frontend can override at will, while Monad (or rather @unitxyz, who is clearly closer to the HL team) gets the visible name without paying for it. To be clear, this doesn’t materially affect Pixelmon’s future. But on principle, it’s wildly disappointing. Is this the ethos Hyperliquid wants to stand for? Centrally aligned players first? What message does this send to smaller teams who choose HL because they believed “listings without fuss” meant UI consistency and fairness? Are we now saying: “You can buy the on-chain ticker, but we’ll decide the visible name depending on who we talk to”? Tagging @chameleon_jeff @iliensinc because this seems like a serious breach of HL’s own stated values, and I’m not sure whether this decision was fully acknowledged at the top. For clarity: Pixelmon ($MON): 0x622cf551933f19f9136303dcab56488c Monad ($UMON): 0x58dae745c8c5fed4012f35ef39829c2d Frontend: This requires an explanation imo and its not about this particular case but more problematic for the overall direction team wants to take. To me this is a clear slap on the face of smaller teams being allowed to be strong-armed by privileged partners. @sershokunin can you also pitch in as to what happened here?

English
14
5
70
8.8K
Konger retweetledi
Akku
Akku@Akkukap·
I’ve been a Hyperliquid maxi for a long time, and HL still remains my largest position in Web3. But a recent decision by the team has been extremely disappointing to see. Earlier this year, @monprotocol acquired the $MON ticker on HL for ~500k: x.com/monprotocol/st… The rationale was that CEX interactions were frustrating, and the Pixelmon team wanted to align with a fully decentralized venue. The token ultimately didn’t gain much traction on HL (very low volume, practically a waste in hindsight), but at least the team had secured an immutable asset. Fast forward to Monad’s launch, and suddenly the MON ticker on Hypercore now refers to Monad, not Pixelmon. So I checked with the Pixelmon team assuming they must have sold the ticker. Turns out they didn’t. Hyperliquid simply changed the frontend names: Pixelmon is now shown as “Monpro” on UI (but still $MON on-chain). Monad is shown as “Mon” on UI (but is actually $UMON on-chain). So technically the ticker is immutable, but from a consumer perspective the actual UI identity has been reassigned. And realistically, no one cares what the ticker is on-chain when the UI shows something else. If this isn’t effectively a ticker grab, what is it? Pixelmon paid 500k for something that the frontend can override at will, while Monad (or rather @unitxyz, who is clearly closer to the HL team) gets the visible name without paying for it. To be clear, this doesn’t materially affect Pixelmon’s future. But on principle, it’s wildly disappointing. Is this the ethos Hyperliquid wants to stand for? Centrally aligned players first? What message does this send to smaller teams who choose HL because they believed “listings without fuss” meant UI consistency and fairness? Are we now saying: “You can buy the on-chain ticker, but we’ll decide the visible name depending on who we talk to”? Tagging @chameleon_jeff @iliensinc because this seems like a serious breach of HL’s own stated values, and I’m not sure whether this decision was fully acknowledged at the top. For clarity: Pixelmon ($MON): 0x622cf551933f19f9136303dcab56488c Monad ($UMON): 0x58dae745c8c5fed4012f35ef39829c2d Frontend: This requires an explanation imo and its not about this particular case but more problematic for the overall direction team wants to take. To me this is a clear slap on the face of smaller teams being allowed to be strong-armed by privileged partners. @sershokunin can you also pitch in as to what happened here?
Akku tweet media
MON Protocol 🐉 $MON@monprotocol

MON is now listed on the @HyperliquidX spot market. app.hyperliquid.xyz/trade/0x622cf5…

English
161
87
966
591.9K
Konger
Konger@konger_eth·
This is the best web3 game and it's not even close. Highly addicting when you assemble a full squad and start evolving them. Give it a play.
GiulioX@GiulioXdotEth

.@wardensascent is now live on Android and iOS and playable worldwide. The game has a singleplayer mode - with campaign expansions added every month by our live ops team - and an endgame multiplayer challenge mode (Arena) where you can pit your @Pixelmon against other players. All web payments going through the $MON - ID wallet system will automatically onramp to $MON @avax and reflect in app as in game purchases. Try it. Links in comments.

English
6
8
43
1.7K
Azuki Lover
Azuki Lover@azuki_love99999·
Have you ever dreamed of actually owning a real character like Luffy, Zoro, Sanji, or any other main hero? For ordinary people, it’s almost impossible to truly own them. unless you’re a giant corporation. But with Azuki, it’s different. You can actually own your own Luffy, Zoro, Sanji, or anyone else for real. All it takes is the courage to take a risk, and the conviction to believe in what you love. to truly see its value before the world does. Of course, if you see it wrong, you’ll collapse along with it just as quickly. I’ll be completely honest: I’ve never spoken with Zagabond, the Azuki team, or any insiders. I’ve never even been inside their Discord group. Because I believe that if I truly understand the project, then someday, the time will naturally come when I and the team will finally talk. to exchange visions and ideas. @Azuki @Zagabond @AzukiTCG
Azuki Lover tweet media
English
39
15
172
6.8K
Seraph
Seraph@0xseraph·
you know how, if you are dating a girl you know you want to marry, you can be pretty chill about the "when married" question? she may be freaking out, but you're chill cause you have a plan in your head? kinda the same for nft projects😅
English
16
1
63
3K
Seraph
Seraph@0xseraph·
if you need a why, this is my why
Seraph tweet media
English
190
16
766
62.6K
Konger
Konger@konger_eth·
@Xeer Some teams understand market manipulation better than others.
English
0
0
0
49
Xeer
Xeer@Xeer·
imma call this the great NFT bounce of 2025. the bottom was indeed in. (if not i'll just delete this tweet).
Xeer tweet media
English
79
13
216
10K
Konger
Konger@konger_eth·
@shanicucic96 @Sakattacking Ignore X right now. People are looking for a reason to pin their losses on someone. It would be different if RDAC was the only project in the tank, but every single project is heading to zero. So keep building and prove the haters wrong when the market turns around.
English
2
0
13
454
shan
shan@shanicucic96·
lmaoo wild. there are "portions" to a team nice. I am not involved in the treasury portion then bruh. Its my CFO. Check with him for detailed accounts @Sakattacking get on a call and run through all the accounts after an NDA. IF THere is misuse, ill do what he says. If not a public apology is all i need
greb@grebby

@penguinpecker1 @shanicucic96 if I was involved in that portion of the team I’d respond but everyone knows I’m not so 🤷‍♂️

English
15
15
53
9.9K
Konger
Konger@konger_eth·
@Xeer This is the biggest market indicator we are going into full blown bear season. 💀
English
1
0
1
526
Xeer
Xeer@Xeer·
imma be honest, i think it’s concerning that the top KOL in our space Mr CZ himself hard shilled $ASTER and we’ve almost completely retraced the pump in under 12 hours. we might actually be cooked this time bois.
Xeer tweet media
English
222
20
563
92.8K
Konger
Konger@konger_eth·
@Xeer disASTER is the perfect word to describe this.
English
0
0
0
64
Xeer
Xeer@Xeer·
Absolute fucking dis- $ASTER lmao. Looks like CZ has left it for dead. Anyone knows why my balance is showing as locked on the platform? It’s so bad they’ve locked people out of selling the token? GG
Xeer tweet media
English
124
12
253
26.9K
Konger
Konger@konger_eth·
@Xeer CZ rugged everyone.
English
0
0
0
54
Konger
Konger@konger_eth·
@OGDfarmer This market feels like the emperor has no clothes.
English
0
0
5
281
DFarmer
DFarmer@OGDfarmer·
This is the lowest sentiment for crypto as cultural substrate I’ve ever seen in almost a decade. Yes, this includes myself.
English
169
45
1.2K
113.7K