Kevin Chong

@nikola1tesla @CapSoqRoyOak @officer_Lew If you really want to help Palestinians, send them money so they can eat and build a better life. Anything else is just virtue signaling.

Ah yes the US allows Israel to rob rape steal bomb burn and starve and YOU think that's fine and dandy because it's not YOUR home and it's not YOUR people and it's not anyone YOU consider to be part of humanity. When Palestine tells the world they've been robbed the US and Isreal deny it because they did it. These are war crimes in progress, the ICC is on notice, the whole world is watching, the Real Estate agents have no business holding any kind of sale for stolen property, and when all of this fraud is unwound so many heads will roll. Fuck you Kevin. You're a huge POS. You think THIS is a tantrum? You see bleeding babies burning on pikes on crumbling bombed buildings for years on end for Israel's greed and you still have the gall to unemotionally argue on Israel's behalf? I wish you everything that's coming to you in life and afterward in hell. Karma's a bitch.

BREAKING🚨: Hundreds of masked Islamists are attempting to breakthrough an NYPD barricade, as they assault police officers, and call for acts of terrorism.

@nikola1tesla @CapSoqRoyOak @officer_Lew Never can stick to facts or the topic and driven purely by emotion. Temper tantrum baby.

@nikola1tesla @CapSoqRoyOak @officer_Lew Stop being an emotional babbling baby with a temper trantrum. Interpol doesn't issue warrants and the US has never honored red notices for Israel land deals. But of course, you know this. Time to grow up.

Hey Kevin! Take a moment and read the posted article about this being an INTERNATIONAL CRIME. You're a deranged fool for pretending nothing can be done. You're a total compliocit degenerate for thinking it's ok to side with genocidal land thieves who bomb and rape babies and POWs alike to spread their dream of Greater Isreal to facilitate ethnic cleansing for their supremacist segregated society. This. Is. An. International. Crime. and the local police were responsible for holding the criminals for interpol. Nothing less. You think your stupid put-downs hold water? Fuck you, the horse you rode in on, and everything you love you stupid prick. You're wrong. Go read a fucking book, an article, some AI about what's possible dumbass. Your search engine is RIGHT THERE and I've already given you plenty but your dumb disingenuous ass either can't comprehend it or you're being willfully ignorant because you're cucking for genociders or sucking cop dick. Whatever the case-- you dod you, but stealing property in one country and trying to sell it in another WILL get you arrested and prosecuted in any place where the cops are not complicit and the justice system is not corrupt. Laws against fraud and against receiving stolen property are more than clear. Don't be a dipshit

@nikola1tesla @CapSoqRoyOak @officer_Lew You don't have to reside in NYC in order to file a lawsuit on behalf of a client. 🤦‍♂️

@krrkc @CapSoqRoyOak @officer_Lew We're not in NYC or we absolutely would. What you say is entirely bullshit and the victims are entitled not just to compensation for their stolen homes but for a lifetime of war crime reparations

@nikola1tesla @CapSoqRoyOak @officer_Lew Your mom may be a lawyer, but you certainly aren't. lol. What law determines if property is stolen? Does a US court get to determine if a land deal in another country is valid? I worked with plenty of Berkeley grads and none of them were this dumb.

@krrkc @CapSoqRoyOak @officer_Lew RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY is a crime in New York City and most other places. It doesn't matter one iota that the property was stolen in the West Bank. Possession is 9/10 of the law bud

@nikola1tesla @CapSoqRoyOak @officer_Lew Then ask your mom to file a lawsuit on behalf of the victims. She won't...because she knows what I say is true.

I seriously am. I seriously took business law classes. My mom is a lawyer and I've worked for many lawyers. I seriously know what the frick I'm talking about. Though I am not personally a lawyer I am confident that what is written above is true, and that you're a dickless wonder

@nikola1tesla @CapSoqRoyOak @officer_Lew This isn't the Mona Lisa and removed from another country. It's a land deal.

You're an idiot and you're wrong. International crimes are prosecutable through interpol, and local police make arrests. You can't steal fine art from the Louvre and sell it in Times Square Scot Free at auction because oooooh nooooooo weak ass courts!! Dumbass. You didn't read the articles that addressed the fact that this is an international crimes before speaking, did you- you just popped off with the first thing that came to your mind. For those too lazy to do their own research-- here's Grok's hot take "Local police in the country where the item is being sold or attempted to be sold (let's call it Country B) generally handle the arrest and prosecution for crimes committed on their territory. The original theft (in Country A) is a separate offense prosecuted under Country A's laws, but the act of possessing, receiving, or trying to sell stolen goods in Country B is a distinct local crime in most jurisdictions.Here's how it typically works in practice:1. Detection and Initial Investigation The item might be flagged when someone tries to sell it (e.g., at a pawn shop, online marketplace, flea market, auction, or private sale). Buyers, sellers, or platforms often run checks on serial numbers, VINs (for vehicles), or descriptions against stolen-property databases. Police in Country B may already have alerts from Country A via Interpol (which maintains international databases for stolen vehicles, art/cultural property, and other high-value goods) or direct police-to-police channels. If suspicion arises, local officers investigate: They seize the item temporarily, question the seller, and verify its status by contacting authorities in Country A. 2. Arrest Local police in Country B can arrest the person attempting to sell it if they have probable cause (or the local equivalent) that the goods are stolen and that the seller knew or should have reasonably known they were stolen. This is a standard local offense in most countries (often called "possession of stolen property," "receiving stolen goods," or "dealing in stolen property"). No international warrant is usually needed for this initial arrest—it's based on crimes occurring right there in Country B. If the seller is the original thief who transported the item across borders, additional charges may apply (e.g., in the U.S., federal laws like 18 U.S.C. § 2314 cover transportation of stolen goods worth $5,000+ in foreign commerce). 3. Prosecution in Country B Jurisdiction is straightforward: Country B prosecutes the local offenses (possession/sale attempt) because those acts happened within its borders. They do not need to prosecute the original theft—that's Country A's job. To prove the case, prosecutors in Country B need evidence that the item was in fact stolen in Country A. This is obtained through:Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs) or similar agreements between the two countries. These allow formal requests for documents, theft reports, witness statements, ownership proofs, or even video/ photos from Country A. Nearly all countries have some form of these treaties or conventions for serious crimes. Interpol or direct law-enforcement channels for quicker info sharing. The goods are almost always returned to the rightful owner (via civil or criminal proceedings), even if the seller claims they didn't know the items were stolen. Penalties in Country B depend on local laws and the value of the item—ranging from fines/misdemeanors for small items to felony prison time for high-value or organized cases. 4. What About the Original Thief (in Country A)? If the person attempting the sale in Country B is the thief (or part of the theft ring), Country A can issue an Interpol Red Notice requesting provisional arrest and extradition. Country B may hold the person on local charges first, then extradite them to Country A after (or alongside) their local case. Many countries also cooperate on returning the stolen item itself. Real-World Examples of How This Plays Out Stolen cultural artifacts or fossils: U.S. agents (ICE/HSI) work with foreign police (e.g., Thailand or El Salvador) to seize items being sold online or in the U.S., arrest the sellers locally, and return the items. The origin country often prosecutes its own citizens involved. Stolen vehicles or cargo: Common at ports or borders. Local police/customs in the destination country seize them, investigate sellers, and use international channels to confirm theft and return the property. Online sales: Platforms often flag suspicious listings; police in the selling country act first. Important Caveats Cooperation varies: It works best between countries with strong treaties and good relations (e.g., U.S.-EU, U.S.-Canada). In cases with limited diplomatic ties, it can be slower or less effective. Evidence is key: If Country A can't (or won't) provide quick proof via MLAT/Interpol, the case in Country B might weaken or be dropped—though the item is still usually returned to the owner. Civil side: The original owner can often file a separate civil lawsuit in either country to recover the property, independent of the criminal case. In short, local police in the selling country have full authority to arrest and prosecute the person trying to sell the stolen item under their own laws. International tools like Interpol and MLATs simply help them confirm the theft and gather evidence. This is why cross-border stolen-goods networks are often dismantled through coordinated local actions rather than one single global prosecution. If the countries involved are specific (e.g., U.S. and Mexico), the exact process can have more tailored details"

@nikola1tesla @CapSoqRoyOak @officer_Lew It's land that belongs in another country. The US courts don't have jurisdiction. And that's why you see a protest instead of a lawsuit. Keep up.

@krrkc @CapSoqRoyOak @officer_Lew Kevin-- the land was stolen in the West Bank. The sale is offered in NYC. Keep up.

@nikola1tesla @CapSoqRoyOak @officer_Lew Why would cops arrest the real estate agents? Even if what you said is true, they don't have jurisdiction over real estate sales in Israel.

YET AGAIN, WHO STARTED IT?? THE COPS STARTED THE BRUTALITY AND ILLEGALLY INTERFERED WITH THE PROTESORS' LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH AND FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY. THE COPS SHOULD HAVE ARRESTED THE REAL ESATE AGENTS WHO WERE TRYING TO SELL STOLEN WEST BANK LAND THAT HAD BEEN SEIZED IN WAR CRIMES. INSTEAD THEY SHOWED UP TO DO CROWD CONTROL AND TO LET THE THIEVES GET AWAY SCOT FREE. WHY ARE WE BOTH STILL SHOUTING? OH YEAH-BECAUSE NOBODY IS PAYING ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT THE COPS WON'T DO SHIT TO STOP DEED THEFT

Do you remember Sears?

@Acyn No concerns about the charges against the Senator. Just that Fox News was there first?

Scott MacFarlane on the FBI raid of Sen. Lucas’s home and office: There are going to be questions raised about how Fox News was there as the raid was undertaken. That type of thing is rare. I’ve covered the FBI for a lot of years and the Department of Justice for a lot of years—you don’t get advance warning of raids, in part because it’s viewed that it could put people in jeopardy, either the people being raided or the raiders. What’s more, it is prescribed in the Justice Manual: you do not give the media advance warning of a search unless it has high levels of approval. This has happened before, but in this case it clearly had a high level of approval. But look at the Justice Manual, then look at the images on the screen—you can see those two are not connected. What’s more, it really is telling that the Department of Justice is trying to take a megaphone to blast out this search. It’s clearly a political rival of the president’s. What’s more, they’re blasting this out while they keep behind closed doors what’s happening with the Epstein files. Howard Lutnick’s interview is behind closed doors, and there’s been no action by the Department of Justice to hear or amplify the voices of Epstein survivors.

@GilmanHill @CJsCalls Ignore the haters Jenny. 💪

@CJsCalls No worries, I’ll just laugh my way to the bank while you continue to fail to pay your mother rent for living in her basement.

Scott roasting her is pure gold, keep it up she’s a 🤡🤡🤡🤡 @GilmanHill

@saylordocs They only pay up the cap, but their benefits are also based on that cap.

Murray: Is it true that people making under $184,000 pay a 12.4% Social Security tax rate? Dahl: Yes Murray: And the rate for someone making $1,000,000? Dahl: 2.2% Murray: So, a 12.4% tax for people making less than $184,000, but 2.2% for a millionaire or .0002% for billionaires.

@harrisonjaime Not even curious if she's guilty?

Funny how Fox News always seems to be there right when the “raid” happens. This administration is corrupt to its core. Government should not be used as a prop for right wing media and political intimidation.

@elonmusk 👏👏👏🇺🇸

@ring_collin @RossKneeDeep Explain how the districts should be drawn up. If you use any words relating to race, guess what, you’re the racist

@RossKneeDeep Modern Republicans have always been racist. Racism and greed hold that party together. Blacks are a ready historical target for suppression, especially in the south. The VRA was signed in 1965, so not centuries.

The Supreme Court essentially ended democracy in America. As soon as the decision was made, Florida went right in to redraw the their districts. What was done was done to remove the voice of black people to elect people who look like them. Many other states are currently lining up to redraw their districts. Why after hundreds of years of voting has it all of a sudden come down to the castration of the black vote?

@WalshFreedom Countries don't make deals and do business with us because we're the "leader of the free world". They do it because it's mutually beneficial.

No longer seen as the “Leader of the free world?” Heck, as long as Trump is in the White House, America is no longer even ON THE SIDE OF the free world.

@JulianaStratton You can't fight racism with racism.

My dad didn't march for voting rights just for Trump's Supreme Court to rip them away. We will fight back.

@NormOrnstein What did he say that's wrong?

Sam Alito is not just unethical. He is fundamentally dishonest and unfit to serve.