Mike McCoy

4K posts

Mike McCoy banner
Mike McCoy

Mike McCoy

@kurdinoff

Author, Entrepreneur, Traveler and occasional athlete Follow me on Amazon and Medium: https://t.co/SHoErMLipU https://t.co/JaGUny8Axs

Cerritos, Ca. Katılım Ağustos 2007
615 Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
Stephen L. Miller
Stephen L. Miller@redsteeze·
Not a single major Democratic Party member has called on Swalwell to resign from Congress.
Stephen L. Miller tweet media
English
89
432
2.4K
44.3K
Mike McCoy
Mike McCoy@kurdinoff·
@realgarycollins You’re voting to circumvent federal laws. The creation of a criminal state.
English
0
0
0
21
Gary M. Collins
Gary M. Collins@realgarycollins·
BREAKING: The Maryland House is preparing to hold a late afternoon session to suspend the rules to pass a bill to end all cooperation with federal law enforcement on immigration. Opponents are dubbing this a bill that’s quietly being pushed through to make MD. a sanctuary state.
English
245
409
1.2K
585K
Mike McCoy
Mike McCoy@kurdinoff·
@JonathanTurley Let’s do another…who’s next? There are hundreds of eligible candidates.
English
0
0
0
10
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley@JonathanTurley·
...According to the host of "Inside California Politics," the Swalwell staffers declared that "Any decision of staff members to remain in their roles in the interim should not be viewed as support for Eric Swalwell...We, more than he, understand that we have obligations to the people we lead and to the constituents of California’s 14th Congressional District."
English
64
141
1.5K
87.5K
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley@JonathanTurley·
Truman said, if you want a friend in Washington, get a dog. This week, however, Eric Swalwell would be hard pressed to find a willing canine outside of a taxidermist. Fox40 just released a statement from "senior staff" in his offices that is crushing...
English
104
529
5.3K
386.9K
Mike Netter
Mike Netter@nettermike·
A Minnesota judge named Sarah West has reportedly tossed a $7.2 million Medicaid fraud conviction even after a unanimous jury verdict found the defendant guilty. Should she be fired?
Mike Netter tweet media
English
42
77
178
1.9K
Myrna 𝕏
Myrna 𝕏@GigaBeers·
If they held a gun to your head, who would you vote for?
Myrna 𝕏 tweet media
English
1.5K
110
357
45.7K
Mike McCoy
Mike McCoy@kurdinoff·
@FFT1776 @CL4WS_OUT @SecMullinDHS There is no law unless the rule of law is enforced. When a crime is known yet there are no consequences for illegal acts, law becomes mere words on paper.
English
1
1
11
59
Sherri Unfiltered™
🚨 UH-OH ILHAN! Ilhan Omar committed straight-up immigration fraud against the United States. Lying on those forms is an immediate denaturalization offense. Benny just dropped it: Stephen Miller has the records. @SecMullinDHS start the process NOW and get her fraudulent ass out of Congress and out of America! No one is above the law … especially not this Somalia import who’s been playing us for years. Pack your bags, Ilhan. America First means no more frauds in our government.
English
130
971
2.4K
16.8K
NanLee Marie Carissimi
NanLee Marie Carissimi@NanLee1124·
🚨🔥Eric Swalwell’s “PATTERN of MANIPULATION” is being exposed by @CheyenneHuntCA…“The number of credible women who have come forward since I posted my video is pretty shocking.” Arrest this scumbag!
English
26
272
424
4.3K
Joel Gilbert
Joel Gilbert@JoelSGilbert·
Has Eric Swalwell been paying off SEXUAL ASSAULT victims? Read below. This would explain why he is DEAD BROKE! He still has $ 100K in student loans and $ 100K credit card debit, cashed out his pension, and charged over $300,000 child care to his campaign! dailycaller.com/2026/04/06/eri…
English
65
386
998
13.2K
US Homeland Security News
US Homeland Security News@defense_civil25·
Aliens are real and human contact has taken place, according to Tim Burchett.
English
22
29
174
24.1K
NWRain-Judi
NWRain-Judi@RYboating·
This Word In The 14th Amendment Bans Birthright Citizenship, And It’s Not ‘Jurisdiction’ So with this argument, you must actually 'reside' in the US legally. If 'reside' means where you live, pay taxes, where you vote, serve on a jury etc.- Doesn't that also mean, where you are a legal citizen of the US, in order to give birth to a US citizen? 🤔 Justice Jackson suggests that if she steals a wallet in Japan, it gives her some sort of allegiance to Japan. 🙄 I'm pretty sure Japan wouldn't grant you citizenship over that argument. 😉 From the article: This week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara, the most consequential immigration case in decades. The case was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of a Honduran national challenging President Trump’s executive order denying citizenship to children born to illegal immigrants and tourists with temporary visas. The question posed was whether the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause guarantees automatic citizenship to every child born on American soil, no matter who the parents are or why they are in the United States. The 14th Amendment was adopted in post-Civil War 1868 to secure citizenship for freed slaves and their children. But who else is covered? Does that phrase cover children of illegal immigrants, tourists, or temporary visa holders? The prevailing interpretation has been that it does, and that it only excludes children of foreign diplomats, invading soldiers, and members of Native American tribes. (In the case of the latter, Congress passed legislation granting citizenship, just as it did for children born abroad to American parents who are not automatically covered by the 14th Amendment.) “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” Perhaps because it comes at the end, it has been treated as an afterthought, but careful reading shows how central the term “reside” is. The clause does not say “are born,” “are physically present,” or “pass through on a tourist visa.” Citizenship is granted only to those who actually “reside,” establishing a precondition for the clause’s application, with “reside” carrying a consistent legal meaning across many areas of American law, including taxes, jury duty, voting, school enrollment, in-state tuition, and family law. It refers to an established, settled presence, in other words, a place where you actually live. Although it is rarely presented this way, a plain reading of the Citizenship Clause creates a two-part test for eligibility. First, is the person “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, and second, does the person “reside” in one of the states, with “state” generally understood to include not just the 50 states but also D.C. and other federal territories. Framed this way, the discussion becomes far simpler than the jumble on display in the Supreme Court hearing, where everyone chased their own pet ideas. It is even more efficient when turned around so that the “reside” test comes first, because that is easier to resolve, and if someone does not reside, there is no need to even consider “subject to the jurisdiction.” Birth tourism, especially from China, has grown into a large industry. Agencies market packages to pregnant women who travel to the United States in their third trimester, deliver a child, get a U.S. passport, and fly home. These people do not reside in the United States by any definition or any stretch of the imagination. There is no residency, no home, no lease or mortgage, no driver’s license, no vehicle registration, no neighbors, no family doctor, no bank accounts, no pets, and no children in school. The mother arrives on a tourist visa and leaves with a child. Their connection to the United States begins at the arrival gate and ends at the departure terminal on the return flight. Even under the notoriously aggressive California Franchise Tax Board, people are not considered residents if they are in California temporarily or for a transitory purpose, exactly like birth tourists. This provides a clean, textual basis for limiting birthright citizenship without wading into the interpretive mess that dominates the debate, and there is no question that any honest justice who reads the 14th Amendment would find so. This leaves the arguably harder case of illegal immigrants. The term “reside” in the 14th Amendment implies lawful residence, in the sense that it is not logical that the Constitution contemplates someone whose presence is illegal. That said, someone living, for instance, in Texas for a decade, raising a family and working, could argue that, in the plain sense of the word, they “reside,” even if they have no lawful immigration status. That does not make the view sound, but the court may very well decide that the word “reside” reflects factual establishment, regardless of legal status. That may be why, at this week’s Supreme Court hearing, the Trump administration’s Solicitor General, John Sauer, focused on the broader term “domiciled,” which carries implications of legal status beyond mere residence. But none of that complexity touches the simplest case. But none of that complexity touches the simplest case. Under the broadest conceivable reading, there is no framework in which a temporary visitor satisfies the requirement of residence. The distinction between residing and merely being present is too deeply embedded in both legal doctrine and ordinary language to erase. Link to article in comments
NWRain-Judi tweet media
English
26
223
257
8K
Mike McCoy
Mike McCoy@kurdinoff·
@RepLuna I’d imagine they’ve been paid. That’s why they signed NDA’s.
English
0
0
0
23
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
Will Congress use their slush fund of tax payer dollars to pay off Eric Swalwell’s accusers to keep them silent? Like they have been doing since the 70s?
English
1.1K
6.4K
22.9K
165.9K
Thomas Sowell Quotes
Thomas Sowell Quotes@ThomasSowell·
John Kerry: "We don't have a president. We have a president who’s there, but he is not capable of doing the job or living up to the responsibilities. And that you can imagine what people all around the world are reading."
English
702
25
88
35.9K
Wide Awake Media
Wide Awake Media@wideawake_media·
"Three meals a day... That's not nature. That's Rockefeller marketing." "Our ancestors... ate once a day, sometimes three times a week." "And you know what? They thrived... Because the body is designed to function best in fasting." "Fasting activates cells that act like little soldiers. They march straight to the damage, clean it out, rebuild you stronger. That's real medicine." "The system isn't built for your health. It's built for your dependence."
English
60
619
1.6K
59.9K
Mike McCoy
Mike McCoy@kurdinoff·
@RnaudBertrand Seems like lots of expensive destruction to rescue a single airman.
English
5
0
7
772
Arnaud Bertrand
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand·
Iran's count is that the US lost 12 aircraft in the rescue operation (on top of course of the downed F-15 and A-10 Warthog) 👇 Which, if accurate, would be a disaster of unprecedented proportions. x.com/upholdreality/… Heck, even the count semi-officially acknowledged by the US (5-6 aircraft destroyed: 2 MC-130Js, 1-2 Little Birds, F-15E, A-10) is remarkably disastrous for what's being sold as a triumph.
COMBATE |🇵🇷@upholdreality

Iranian TV analysts break down how the US lost 12 aircraft in a single operation -- two C-130s, four Little Birds, four Black Hawks, and two MQ-9 drones. "I don't even know how to report this without laughing."

English
70
545
2.4K
267.4K
Arnaud Bertrand
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand·
So, if I got that right, here's the narrative: - A US F-15E fighter jet got shot down over Iran, despite Trump saying 2 days beforehand in his nationwide address that Iran has "no anti-aircraft equipment. Their radar is 100% annihilated." (apnews.com/article/donald…) - The plane's weapons systems officer - a "highly respected Colonel," according to Trump - ejected from the plane and got "seriously wounded" (still according to Trump: @realDonaldTrump/116351956955900185" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTru…) - He still managed to "hike up a 7,000-foot [2.1km] mountain ridgeline and hide in a crevice" in the Zagros Mountains, despite his wounds (time.com/article/2026/0…) - U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drones started killing all "Iranian military-aged males believed to be a threat who got within three kilometers of [the American's location]" (x.com/ByChrisGordon/…) - To retrieve him the U.S. managed to seize an "abandoned airport," 200 miles deep inside Iran, near Isfahan (bbc.com/news/articles/…), which happens to be where Iran's largest atomic scientific center is located (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isfahan_N…) - They landed two MC-130 military transport planes in that airport (theaviationist.com/2026/04/05/u-s…) in an operation involving "hundreds of special forces troops and military personnel" (time.com/article/2026/0…) - Both MC-130 planes got "stuck in the sand" and the U.S. destroyed them themselves "to prevent them from falling into Iranian hands" (theaviationist.com/2026/04/05/u-s…) - They deployed "three new aircraft to extract all the U.S. personnel" on the ground (theaviationist.com/2026/04/05/u-s…) - There are videos circulating online of "heavy clashes" with presumably Iranian missiles raining down in Kohgiluyeh County, in the Zagros Mountains during that night (x.com/Afshin_Ismaeli…) - Iran sent pictures of the aftermath at the "abandoned airport" and it's a sight of utter destruction, with US plane and MH-6 helicopter parts scattered all over the ground, still smoking (turkiyetoday.com/region/wreckag…). Iran claims they are the ones who in fact destroyed all the aircraft. - Meanwhile a second U.S. plane, an A-10 Warthog, also crashed on Friday near the Strait of Hormuz according to two U.S. officials speaking to the NYT (#47863db0-d61e-51bf-b7e1-6c4a9dc988e7" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">nytimes.com/live/2026/04/0…). In that instance too the lone pilot was apparently "safely rescued." - In all this, after the multiple planes and helicopters destroyed or shot down, the documented heavy clashes, the "hundreds of special forces troops and military personnel" operating deep inside Iran, not a single US soldier was reported killed "or even wounded" (according to Trump: @realDonaldTrump/116350133044957842" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTru…). - And the 'highly respected Colonel' this was all for? No name. No photo. No interview. Nobody has spoken to him nor knows who he is. So to sum up: anti-aircraft equipment that supposedly didn't exist shot down an F-15 (and, apparently, an A-10 Warthog the same day). A seriously wounded man climbed a 2.1km mountain. The US seized an airfield 200 miles inside a country it's at war with, next to one of its most strategic nuclear sites, and deployed hundreds of troops all apparently unimpeded. Lost two planes to "sand" and destroyed their own helicopters. Videos show heavy clashes, missiles raining down - but not a single person got "even wounded". And the man at the center of it all? Nobody knows who he is, completely anonymous, zero pictures, but Trump says he is "SAFE and SOUND." And so is the rescued A-10 Warthog pilot, who also remains anonymous. Trump concludes this all proves the US has "achieved overwhelming Air Dominance and Superiority over the Iranian skies" (@realDonaldTrump/116350133044957842" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTru…), despite the whole episode only happening because Iran shot his planes out of the sky. Basically, the only thing that's "overwhelming" here is the audacity of the storytelling...
English
1.2K
8.9K
28.8K
4.1M
Brandon Weichert
Brandon Weichert@WeTheBrandon·
Bottom line: the alternative explanation to the Official Story is that the Official Story was a cover, the aviators were recovered in smaller CSAR operations, and the real mission was a failed special-operations raid near Isfahan tied to uranium. It's very possible.
Armchair Warlord@ArmchairW

In making sense of a complex event, it's often best to start with the facts and then work backwards from there. So what are we to make of this weekend in Iran? My theory is we just saw an attempt to seize Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium unravel. Down the rabbit hole.⬇️ Let's run through the timeline and the location of key events first: The evening of April 2nd, the Iranian military released a video of them shooting down a USAF aircraft. This was initially claimed as having occurred over the Persian Gulf, but apparently occurred near Isfahan. Wreckage corresponding to an F-15E of the 494th Tactical Fighter Squadron was recovered from a site south of Isfahan the morning of April 3rd, although geolocation of the very barren crash site took some time (fig. 1). The afternoon of April 3rd, a number of USAF HH-60s and an HC-130 fueler (!) were spotted operating further south and west in Iran, over Kogiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province, as well as at least one A-10, an MQ-9 Reaper, and apparently an F-35. An antiaircraft battle developed and the Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) HH-60s (fig.2) and an A-10 were damaged, with the A-10's pilot ejecting over the Persian Gulf. The HH-60s were reported as "damaged" and one was photographed trailing smoke. Reports emerged at that time that the pilot of the F-15E (which had crashed near Isfahan, although this was then-unclear!) had been rescued, while the WSO remained at large. Provincial authorities in Kohgiluyeh asked civilians to be on the lookout for an American aviator around this time and numerous photos of militia searching for him emerged. The next day passed relatively uneventfully. The evening of April 4th, however, there was a report of more helicopter activity slightly further north, in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, accompanied by a washed-out photograph of an unknown helicopter flying very low on a very dark night (fig. 3). Later that night news emerged that the F-15Es WSO had been rescued... and that C-130s had been abandoned and scuttled at a forward base in the Isfahan area during the withdrawal of a company-size SOF force that had landed in the area, over 100 operators ostensibly having been sent to rescue one aviator. Photographs that emerged as dawn broke showed two burned-out C-130s and several destroyed MH-6 Little Bird SOF assault helicopters, in a scene reminiscent of the aftermath of Operation Eagle Claw (fig. 4). A USAF C-295 tactical transport was caught on video around that time flying in Iran - presumably outbound - at extremely low altitude. So, what are we to make of this? First and foremost, the official story - that a huge direct-action SOF force landed near Isfahan with assault helicopters and heavy transport aircraft to rescue one fugitive airman - is nonsense. Not because the USAF won't go to extreme lengths to recover isolated personnel - it can, will, and did in this case - but because that's an absolutely nonsensical way to accomplish that mission. It's a totally inappropriate force package for a mission to go in, extract a single person from a remote area, and leave. Ergo this SOF task force was there on other business. So how were the pilots actually recovered? In all likelihood, exactly the way you would expect them to be recovered - by USAF PJs in long-range helicopters, under cover of darkness. The rescue force probably recovered the pilot from the Isfahan area late at night on April 2-3 and were caught in daylight as they exfiltrated, leading to the aforementioned antiaircraft battle the morning of April 3rd and a high-risk refueling over Iranian territory that was filmed by many Iranians on the ground, as well as a shot-down A-10 trying to clear a path for the helicopters to exfiltrate. The WSO was likely recovered from his hide site near Isfahan by HH-60 in a quiet and deliberate operation the night of April 4-5. One or two birds, in and out under cover of darkness - a far cry from the gung-ho stories currently being spun. So what about the SOF rodeo happening at the same time? Well, why was an F-15 flying downtown to Isfahan the evening of April 2nd to begin with? Probably because there was a huge direct-action raid planned in the Isfahan area for the night of April 4-5, likely going after enriched uranium at an underground facility in the region, and the Iranian air defenses around Isfahan weren't going to suppress themselves. The plan was likely to fly several MH-6 assault birds and a sizable force of operators via C-130 and C-295 to a forward staging area near Isfahan the evening of April 4th, hit a reported cache site or sites for enriched uranium, and try to make it out with the magic dust by daybreak on April 5th. In any event the USAF wasn't going to send transports somewhere it wouldn't send strike aircraft. So the Air Force cashed its check on claims of air superiority and in went the strike package the evening of April 2nd - and lo and behold one of the F-15Es went down because reports of the demise of the Iranian air defense network had been greatly exaggerated. Any rational planner would have scrubbed the SOF operation at this point because they'd lost control of the situation and the Iranian defenses had proven more effective than planned. We went ahead anyways and inserted the SOF task force the evening of April 4th. I strongly suspect that this force was immediately discovered by Iranian drones that would have been up and searching for this WSO, because five transport aircraft including at least two C-130s (about what would be required for a bunch of Little Birds and a company-sized element of operators with equipment) landing at a desert airstrip 50km from Isfahan (and in the same general area where the WSO was taking cover) would be pretty God-damn obvious to anything with thermals. Iranian troops immediately deployed and began converging, the task force probably took indirect fire, and the operational commander immediately aborted mission and retreated in the three remaining operational aircraft. Scuttling charges on delayed fuzes burned two C-130s and an unknown number of MH-6s that had been abandoned at the airstrip around dawn. The story that they were there to rescue the WSO was concocted at that time to cover the disastrously failed raid, as were logistically implausible claims that the task force had been rescued by three additional aircraft after the two C-130s got stuck on the LZ and were scuttled - perhaps to minimize the scale of the effort. Claims that a large battle took place appear to be similarly exaggerated - video has emerged of a single group of Iranian militia apparently killed in a drone strike, but nothing of the nonstop bombing and firefights that were rumored across Telegram all night. I remind the reader that the events of the last few days have proven quite conclusively that Iranians seem to have plenty of internet access to post photos and video when they actually have something worthwhile to film. I'd like to note that Hegseth fired General George - US Army Chief of Staff - on April 2nd, apparently because he just wasn't a good fit for the job and definitely not because he'd told him that this whole scheme was insane. It seems to me that the good General's advice should have perhaps been heeded.

English
30
119
678
33.6K
Mike McCoy
Mike McCoy@kurdinoff·
@FFT1776 @CL4WS_OUT Where is the investigative reporter like Nick Shirley chasing down all the Swalwell NDA’s?
English
0
0
0
64
Sherri Unfiltered™
🚨ANOTHER DAMNING Swalwell DROP! The women are TALKING! 🔥Eric Swalwell, you pathetic predator! More brave women are dropping the hammer on your ABUSE OF POWER! Cheyenne L. Hunt came forward with the full timeline, and it’s damning (video below) While this creep hides behind a defamation lawsuit threat and cries “election interference” over Fang Fang, real victims are exposing exactly who he is. National security risk. Serial abuser. It’s only a matter of time before MSM drops the hammer on YOU, Eric Swalwell🫵🏻 EVERYONE, please LISTEN AND SHARE!👇🏻
Sherri Unfiltered™@FFT1776

🚨Eric Swalwell caught red-handed AGAIN. Multiple women dropping receipts: this dude’s been sleeping with interns & young staffers, slapping NDAs on them to shut it down, and sliding into DMs like it’s his full-time job. One whistleblower: “He’s slept with so many … and they sign NDAs so they can’t talk.” The swamp is DEEP! 🔥How is this guy STILL in Congress?! 🔥GET LOUD! Call for a full investigation and Swalwell GONE. This is why we drain it! They can’t govern when they’re compromised and unethical!

English
317
6.1K
12.1K
344.5K