Laszlo Zagyva

@WhiteHouse Please stop. The world is asking.

“Remember when I gave Iran ten days to MAKE A DEAL or OPEN UP THE HORMUZ STRAIT. Time is running out - 48 hours before all Hell will reign down on them. Glory be to GOD!” - President DONALD J. TRUMP

@robinmonotti Entire Ukr war is about gas and oil.and now people finally start to understand it.

"Russian gas will return to Europe once American financial funds take stakes in the pipelines. That’s how it will end. This is Trump’s plan. I can assure you. " Romano Prodi, former EU Commission President & Italy PM

@mdubowitz Please escalate then, until the China needs to enter the war. And then it's over.

I am a strong defender of Ukraine against Russia. I find it disturbing that some who defend Ukraine oppose military action against the regime in Iran — even though the IRGC is helping Putin kill Ukrainians. These are two fronts in the same war. Zelensky understands that.

@fs3indy @McFaul Look at the absurdity of the war in Iran and reevaluate the assesment.

@McFaul If you believe that Trump's flippant, profoundly unserious remarks regarding "invading NATO countries" were even remotely serious, you have removed yourself from the arena of rational adult debate.

Even if you did not support Trumps decision to launch of war of choice against Iran (like me), restricting the use of US airbases in NATO countries imprudently damages NATO unity. Yes, Trumps threats to invade/annex NATO countries does too. But 2 wrongs don’t make a right.

@piusadeleye1 @McFaul He did.

@McFaul He did not threaten to annex NATO countries. Was he too arrogant and extremely dismissive yes! But whether we like it or not, NATO will not remain the same again.

@shelley_curious @SildidInfo @McFaul Just a threat, nvm.

@SildidInfo @McFaul Invade Greenland and Canada? My goodness. That never happened. It was never going to happen. People are so stupid it hurts.

@SildidInfo @McFaul Also, coordinating with Israel on the war and not even notifying NATO.

@McFaul The days when European bases were used by America to project power to other continents - is over Blocking aid to Ukraine and attempting to invade Greenland and Canada - were very bad policy decisions

@AskMichaelTaiwo Pilot of the ship is the same as spacex first manned flight pilot. Still zero words.

I just went through Elon Musk's page. No word on the Artemis II crew's Moon landing or their beautiful Earth shots. If this was done by SpaceX, he would have been talking about it nonstop. The guy is petty. Come on, celebrate a good thing even if it not done by your company.

There weas no nuclear threat from Iran, there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq or Syria. There was literally NOTHING in Afghanistan. All the same fake reasons all the time. You know who has nukes? Israel. With a leader who has an arrest warrant by the International criminal court, with a recent history of deliberate genocide and attacking all of its neighbors.

Actually the majority of deaths are on the other side, kind of ashamed of it but we probably killed a million Afghans and Iraqis with 45% of them being civilians. All war is bad, both Afghan and Iraq wars were in fact stupid and a huge waste of life and money. But letting Iran get a nuke is something anyone with an IQ > 100 knows is a bad idea.

Total NATO defense spending (2025): United States: $980,000,000,000 Europe + Canada: $512,337,000,000 We pay almost twice as much as ALL the other countries COMBINED!! And who protects who? Anyone else tired of being the world's ATM?

@Dr_da_Vinci @Procruste3 @SaltyGoat17 I'll just leave this here: youtube.com/watch?v=Mzmtdw…

NATO was created as a defense alliance. But the US dragged NATO into its wars for oil and dominance. NATO countries did go along because of hope of some protection if needed. But Trump's talk about taking large territory of an other NATO country by force made the protection part less plausible - on the contrary, it presented the US as a threat. Then the USA started the Iran war without notifying NATO, but hand in hand with Israel (non-NATO). Israel's reputation in EU is close to 0. Certainly worse than Iran. Europe is affected badly by these wars they didn't start. Solution would be stopping the wars, not extending them.

@laszlo_zagyva @SaltyGoat17 These are NATO conflicts. US is leaving NATO have fun with Russia.

I have lived through a revolution where thousands were killed and injured. I always take with a grain of salt those facts about who shot whom, and why. Nothing is easier than creating more chaos when there is chaos. Especially if you plan to attack a month later. I dont know what happened.

If we are not the good guys, then who is? The country that slaughters 40K of its people because they protest? The country that that sponsors terror around the world? Who is are the good guys then? I have my issues with this war for sure, and do not like everything I see. I believe there is strong argument that we should have never started this war. However, if you believe the bad guy is the country that gives hundreds of billions of dollars a year of humanitarian aid to foreign countries, and is the #1 country in the world (by a long shot) that allows immigrants in, I would love to know who think the good guy is. I do not think the U.S is perfect by any means, but the world is a much better place because of the U.S.

America is no longer "the good guys." Reality hits hard. Our own nation has become the terror of the world.

@BagmanCFO @SaltyGoat17 That money is mostly spent on wars in the Middle East and elsewhere for oil and control.

@SaltyGoat17 American taxpayers should not be subsidizing European defense. The EU has the money and bodies to defend itself from external threats. Why the US has been subsidizing it the last 15 to 20 years is a mystery. It’s time to realign and reduce American military presence in Europe.

@Dr_da_Vinci @SaltyGoat17 Reason is US starting numerous wars and the others not.

@SaltyGoat17 Not just in money but also in blood.

@SaltyGoat17 Your high defence spending is simply the result of succesful lobby , chanelling your cash into the defence industry. Starting wars every few years to restock later. This is how the USA works. You are not protecting anyone. Everyone knows this. You know this.

@ManaByte Van Allen Belts versus NASA... James Van Allen literally worked at NASA and JPL.

If you’re wondering why so many people are drooling idiots now and truly believe we didn’t land on the moon, you can probably thank Joe Rogan:

@JasonBirdsell19 @Microinteracti1 Just like Europe wont forget Greenland.

@Microinteracti1 Europe will regret this decision. I dislike Trump and his handling of this war has been atrocious, and his diplomacy overall with allies even worse. But to deny access to skies is petty and is something Americans will not forget, even the ones who despise Trump wholeheartedly.

NATO just told America: not through our skies. A furious US general went on Fox News and confirmed it. Italy. Germany. Spain. France. Every single one of them. Airspace closed. Bases locked. Go find another way. The empire built 75 years of alliances for exactly this moment. And when the moment came, the allies watched from the window. Fighting alone. In the Middle East, nobody cares. Gandalv / @Microinteracti1

@Microinteracti1 This comes after US starting a war and not notifyling NATO, but siding with Israel instead. After threatening European "allies" with taking Greenland by force.

@Microinteracti1 Everyone cares. This war is a mistake.

@alexgroberman SEO?

The Artemis program has cost $93 billion. Ending hunger in America would cost $32 billion a year. Making school lunch free for every American student would cost $11 billion a year. Replacing every lead pipe in the country would cost $45 billion. Covering uncompensated healthcare for every uninsured American would cost $42 billion a year. NASA just used that $93 billion to send four astronauts around the Moon. They are flying all the way there, looping around the far side, and coming home. Ten days. That is it. Here's the logic behind that $93 billion spend: Artemis I launched in 2022. No crew. No humans anywhere near it. Just the rocket and the spacecraft flying unmanned for 25 days to prove the systems worked. The heat shield. The navigation. The separation sequences. 161 test objectives completed. It proved the foundation was sound. Artemis II is the mission that launched today. Four astronauts. First humans beyond low Earth orbit since 1972. First woman beyond low Earth orbit. First person of color beyond low Earth orbit. They will fly around the far side of the Moon and return to Earth at nearly 25,000 miles per hour. The mission proves the spacecraft can keep humans alive in deep space. That is all it needs to prove. Artemis III is next. The crew will launch into Earth orbit and dock with the SpaceX Starship lander and the Blue Origin lander for the first time. They will test the vehicles that will eventually carry astronauts to the surface. Still no landing. Just proving the docking systems work. Artemis IV is the actual landing. First humans on the Moon since 1972. But it only works because three full missions built every piece of infrastructure underneath it. The rocket. The spacecraft. The life support. The landers. The docking systems. None of it skipped. Every mission compounding on the one before it. Four missions over six years before anyone touches the surface. $93 billion invested in the infrastructure underneath the moment everyone is waiting for. This is exactly what is happening across most marketing budgets right now. Most businesses run marketing like standalone missions. Launch a paid ad campaign: one flight, measure the results, mission over. Post on social media: one burst of reach, gone in 48 hours. Send an email blast: one open rate, done. Run a PR campaign: one news cycle, forgotten. Pay an influencer: one burst of attention, then silence. Every campaign is its own Artemis I, except there is no Artemis II. There is no infrastructure building underneath. Nothing carries forward to the next mission. You start from zero every quarter. (If you want to see where your site stands across Google and AI search, start here: seo-stuff.com/free-audit) SEO and AI search visibility is the only marketing channel that operates like a program instead of a campaign. You publish one authoritative page. That is Artemis I. It proves the foundation works. It ranks. It earns backlinks. It gets indexed. Then you publish the next one. That is Artemis II. And because the first page already built authority for your domain, the second one ranks faster. It earns trust quicker. It gets cited more often. Each piece of content builds infrastructure the next piece uses to go further. When ChatGPT cites a source, it evaluates the authority of the entire domain behind it. When Google's AI Overview pulls a reference, it selects based on the depth of everything connected to that page. When Perplexity assembles an answer, it pulls from the sources with the deepest, most authoritative body of content on the topic. These systems do not evaluate each page as a standalone mission. They evaluate the program behind it. No ad budget influences that selection. No social following determines it. No campaign calendar controls the outcome. The depth of what you have already built is what makes the next piece more powerful. That is how a program works. That is why it compounds. Paid ads are a standalone mission every time you launch them. SEO and AI search visibility is a program where every mission builds the infrastructure for the next one. That is the gap SEO Stuff was built to close. seo-stuff.com NASA could have tried to land on the Moon with the first crewed Artemis flight. It would have been faster. It would have been cheaper in the short term. And it probably would have failed, because the infrastructure underneath was not ready. Instead they built a program. Four missions. Six years. Each one proving something the next one needs. And today, more than 53 years after the last human left the Moon, four astronauts are on their way back because every piece of the foundation was already in place. The question is whether your marketing budget is running standalone missions that reset every quarter, or building a program where every piece of work makes the next one more powerful.