Fletch

1.6K posts

Fletch banner
Fletch

Fletch

@lemurific

Frink? Phtang. Oik!

GA Katılım Nisan 2008
339 Takip Edilen61 Takipçiler
Frank J. Fleming
What if you were unable to understand hypotheticals?
English
78
9
151
7.2K
Christian Heiens 🏛
Christian Heiens 🏛@ChristianHeiens·
We've so thoroughly shattered the minds of Libtards that their top-tier lawyers are now tweeting about starting a literal revolution in Virginia because they lost a court case on procedural grounds. The irony, of course, is that Marc's revolution would immediately devolve into a civil war, and lawyers like himself would automatically become completely pointless. Are you going to pick up your rifle and fight on the front lines?
Marc E. Elias@marceelias

VA Const. "whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal."

English
33
102
1K
24.3K
Fletch
Fletch@lemurific·
@fentasyl Brb setting LANG to en-RW.utf8
English
0
0
11
7.4K
Fletch
Fletch@lemurific·
@Nerdcognito DM: … and you find a scroll like this. *hands* Barbarian: NOM NOM CRUNCH.
English
0
0
3
1.1K
Nerdcognito
Nerdcognito@Nerdcognito·
Who wouldn't want to pass these out around the table at your next D&D session?
English
46
1.9K
8.2K
311K
el gato malo
el gato malo@boriquagato·
you're villifying the wrong people and arguing by false equivalence, simon. people still trust science, they just do not trust "science imposed upon them by experts at the point of a gun." no one is saying "airplanes don't fly" or "computers don't compute." they are saying "you lied about climate change, epidemiology, trade offs with products like roundup, GRAS designations, nutrition, race, gender, and 500 other topics>' and many of these criticisms have validity. and in response, the experts blame the questioner and demand deference. and those who refuse to engage on facts rarely have the facts on their side. trust was lost because "the experts" proved not only untrustworthy, but outright dictatorial. they faked evidence and data, made up wild pseudoscientific theories, and vilified sound science, and pushed utter fakery in its place. they censored opposition and claimed "the science was settled" to prevent investigation into their frauds. and they forced the whole world at the expense of lives and trillions of dollars of lost welfare to play along. it was high handed, dishonest, tyranny. have you stopped to consider that they earned this loss of faith? because they did. MIT wrote a literal article about "anti mask twitter" which it vilified by claiming “most fundamentally, the groups we studied believe that science is a process, not an institution.” as though it proved we had somehow turned our backs on science. but we did not. science is and must be a process. it is never an institution. that's dogma, not the methods of bacon. we did not stop trusting science, the experts stopped performing it and were dancing around in the flensed skinsuit of scientific method that they had stripped from the bones that made it valid: dispute, dissent, replication, validation - open and honest discourse. if you want to win back trust, you need to restore open debate and engagement, share methods, means, and data. wailing about "they won't trust us!" and blaming the folks who called out the deviation from sound science is just another arrogant presumption for institutions to dictate doctrine. you want to respect for sceince? start respecting to process of science again.
el gato malo tweet media
Simon Maechling@simonmaechling

The collapse of trust in science is going to go down in history as one of the most sad, bizarre, and destructive social contagions of modern times. We fed billions, cured diseases and powered nations - yet people ran toward conspiracies instead.

English
74
410
1.5K
56.2K
Gun Samurai
Gun Samurai@_Gun_Samurai·
How to Buy a Matchlock Gun in Japan
English
12
21
398
17.2K
Fletch
Fletch@lemurific·
@Jringo1508 @JohnCleese But at least we can chuckle about it and request the comfy chair. Won’t get it and will still be beheaded, but . . .
English
0
0
0
52
John Ringo SF Author
John Ringo SF Author@Jringo1508·
Msr Cleese. Huge fan. Have you ever studied the actual history of the Spanish Inquisition and why it started? It was to root out Islamics (heretics) after the post-Reconquista kingdoms tried FOR TWO HUNDRED YEARS to 'get along' with remaining Islamics in Spain. First it was 'we'll get along, you can have your heathn religion.' Then the Islamics rioted, raped Christian women and generally did Islamic shit. Finally, it was 'Okay, no more Islamics.' And they said 'We're not Islamics anymore! We're Christians!' Then the banner of Islam would go up, riots, rape Christian women. So after TWO HUNDRED YEARS the Spanish had enough and started 'putting people to the question' to push out Islam after trying for TWO HUNDRED YEARS to try to get along. You and England are about at 'We're on the way to be conquered.' (Happened to Spain. Happened to Greece.) The end state of this will be when your 10th generation grandchild dies.
GIF
English
10
25
238
1.6K
John Cleese
John Cleese@JohnCleese·
This is clearly intended to be a sign of domination Christians pray in their churches Why do the Muslims not pray in their mosques ? Why do many Islamic scholars teach that Britain will become a Muslim country ? Why is drawing attention to this as regarded as divisive ? The divisiveness clearly already exists Denying its existence means not doing anything to improve matters
Colin Brazier@ColinBrazierTV

At some point police need to grasp the nettle of Friday prayers which block public spaces. In tolerating the practise now, they only make it harder to outlaw in the future. It is a low-level and increasingly common territorial display which, left unchecked, will fuel tensions.

English
215
2.5K
11.1K
116.5K
Fletch
Fletch@lemurific·
@iowahawkblog In her defense you don’t always have a pot of boiling potatoes and water to use so it’s back to headbutts.
English
0
0
0
28
Fletch
Fletch@lemurific·
@skepticalone44 @paleochristcon I was thinking along similar lines; bait fire until the ammo runs out and they’re not going to be able to reload in time for the surge. Let alone if you’ve got one Alvin who manages to scrounge up a long gun of any sort.
English
1
0
0
14
skeptical american
skeptical american@skepticalone44·
@paleochristcon Unless you have had training on loading belt fed machineguns, they are not as intuitive as you might think. Just any man and any woman untrained? Swords. I dont think most people could load a belt fed without any training at all. They DEFINITELY could not headspace a M2
English
1
0
0
112
Andrew Wilson
Andrew Wilson@paleochristcon·
Ok. Let's assume the armies comprised of men starting with swords and women with machine guns. Who wins that?
John@Awakeningthesun

@paleochristcon Women would destroy men in this hypothetical scenario. All of you saying men would win are fucking idiots. You dont understand the power of technology. Its like a bunch of men with swords fighting a bunch of women with machine guns would be the equivalent.

English
544
25
907
103.6K
Fletch
Fletch@lemurific·
@DisaffectedPod I always dyslexia it to HaPsburg for some reason but I got it and thought it was funny.
English
0
0
0
39
Disaffected
Disaffected@DisaffectedPod·
Gonna use my own joke as an example of the vocabulary/literacy problem in the West. The ignorance of Western culture and vocabulary by Americans is astounding. There's no way to do this but to be "cringe" so here goes: This joke is funny *as hell*. Almost objectively, so long as the audience knows the reference. Most people who know the reference and *also* know online culture will find this hilarious. I'm not saying that to applaud myself, but to set up a point: if you don't get it, you're missing out on a whole bunch of humor and it's a shame. This kind of joke depends on having familiarity with: -The Western canon and recent modern European/American history. And yes, young people, "Modern" means "the modern era" which most reckon begins in the early 1500s. Yes. Stop gasping and don't reach for "lol." Listen and learn instead. -Online-very-modern culture. Knowing who the celebritarts du jour are. Knowing that the actress in this case, Rachel Zegler, has become her own meme as part of the Disney wokification of Snow White. When you put these two disaparate things together, you get *funny*. It's a clash of high and low culture, a standard humor trope. You're missing out if you don't get it, whether this kind of humor is to your taste or not. The guy on the right is Carlos II of Spain (king in the 1600s). He's from the famous Habsburg family dynasty. They were among the most inbred of European royalty, and the butt of jokes since their own time about their absurd jaws and other birth defects. If you haven't heard of the Habsburgs, you are severely under-informed about the kinds of things that were considered normal and standard for a moderately well educated citizen. Just in the past two generations. Saying "Habsburg jaw" 20 years ago, or 40 years ago, would have been recognized for the reference that it was. Not today. This isn't about changing fashion. The 1500s are still "relevant." Knowing where you came from, where your culture came from, is still "relevant" (God, that I have to write this). -Uncle Josh
Disaffected@DisaffectedPod

Habsburg-maxxing.

English
50
19
696
46.8K
Hatemonger
Hatemonger@Hatemonger_·
Why do aliens refuse to use headphones or earbuds
English
13
3
90
1.5K
Fletch
Fletch@lemurific·
B...B...But, mah norms. Looks for fainting couch.
English
0
0
3
246
Christian Heiens 🏛
Christian Heiens 🏛@ChristianHeiens·
Republicans in Congress could have voted to dissolve all the District and Appellate courts that were obstructing Trump with frivolous nationwide injunctions beginning in March 2025. This has been done before in American history. The Jeffersonians dissolved at least 16 circuit judgeships immediately after they took power in 1801 because they were all staffed by Federalist ideologues. They also could have allowed the Senate to go into recess for at least 10 days shortly after Tump took office in order to allow him to fully fill out his administration and avoid frivolous confirmation battles with Democrats. They did neither of these things. In fact, the Senate continues to hold pro forma sessions to this day for no other reason than to block Trump’s ability to make appointments without getting Senate approval, and they continue to allow rogue Biden judges to block every other action Trump takes. At a time when Trump’s biggest decline in the polls is driven by Republicans and GOP-leaning independents, themselves, the institutional apparatus of the Republican Party is essentially sabotaging the administration because they’re quietly at war with the Republican base itself.
English
27
346
2K
24.4K
Steve Sailer
Steve Sailer@Steve_Sailer·
@david_stewart The issue is whether the question is talking about overall average velocity or initial velocity. The ice hockey puck has the highest average velocity because it is slowed less by friction. But who knows which of the other 3 cover the first inch fastest?
English
9
1
262
62.7K
Devon Eriksen
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_·
@hoshizorarock Okay, that's it. You have lost your ramen privileges. No soup for you.
English
4
2
325
3.3K
Fletch
Fletch@lemurific·
@archfeywarlok @Devon_Eriksen_ @mcahogarth Was going to mention same author. Yes collectivism bad, get back to evil dark lord slaying (or whatever; stopped reading the series after the book with the didactic monologue and I don’t remember much about the series now)
English
0
0
0
13
M.C.A Hogarth
M.C.A Hogarth@mcahogarth·
My hottest take is that it's NPC behavior to hate Ayn Rand's books and in fact, hilarious, because she predicted NPC behavior and all the reasons people would hate her and then they continually demonstrate she was right🤷 Brought to you by my nth re-reading of The Fountainhead.
M.C.A Hogarth tweet media
English
22
2
137
7.1K
Fletch
Fletch@lemurific·
@sudoingX Question are you using 27b rather than 35b to fit on the 3090? I’m using the later across two m4s with exo but curious if maybe 27 might be worth it (for speed gain maybe?)
English
0
0
0
213
Sudo su
Sudo su@sudoingX·
watching qwen 3.6 27b dense build this entire elements simulator on a single 3090 and the part that hits me is not the code, the part that hits me is that the physics is correct. hermes agent drove the whole thing, build then test then iterate then serve, around 800 lines of code in about 30 minutes, 9 of 10 deterministic tests green at the end. a 24gb consumer card produced a working cellular automata sandbox from a paragraph of english, no human in the loop after the prompt, no cloud anywhere in the chain. local ai is not catching up anymore, it is here, you just have to run it.
Sudo su@sudoingX

if you are running local ai or thinking to start, if i could give you one single piece of advice it is this: choose your agentic harness carefully. it matters more than the model. i have lost count of how many people have dm'd me saying their local model is "dumb" or "broken" or "not as good as the cloud one." then they switch from openclaw or some other bloated framework to hermes agent and the same model suddenly works. just clean tool calls and the agent doing the thing it was supposed to do. hermes agent is the best general purpose agent i have used in 2026. drives my single 3090 with qwen 3.6 27b dense q4, drives my dgx spark with nemotron omni q8, and the same harness handles coding, research, video editing, automation, anything you point it at. packed with skills out of the box (browser tools, code, github, jupyter, multimodal, more than i have used yet), full tool calling that holds across long sessions, persistent memory, sub agents. if you tried local ai once or twice and gave up because it felt half baked, the issue might not have been the model. it might have been the harness wrapping it. swap the harness, run the same model again, and watch what changes. hermes agent is the one i recommend to everyone running local. and especially to anyone who almost gave up on it.

English
22
23
293
26.8K