
letsgetonchain
2K posts

letsgetonchain
@letsgetonchain
Everything onchain capital markets.













DeFi is where:
* Lenders get sub-risk-free rates for risky lending
* Borrowers are apparently unable to run profitable trades like “borrow at less than tbills and buy a tbill”
* Active, multi-strategy credit funds with struggle to provide yield competitive with an FDIC-insured savings account
What are we even doing here? Are we all just trapped onchain with no way out? Even if the lenders are stuck, why are the borrowers not able to sustain very low borrow rates by real-world standards?
And it’s not like we even built a DeFi that does what it was built for, which might justify the friction and low capacity for competent capital allocation.
We were all on the censorship resistant, permissionless finance highway, and then the wannabe hedge fund guys grabbed the wheel and drove us into the ditch because “non-custodial software” didn’t earn them performance fees for


One of DeFi's most rewarding strategies, once gated behind an hour long labour of buy, lend, borrow, repeat... is now open for everyone with just a mouse click. Enjoy.




there are a few ways to generate yield on stocks: - lend them out to shorts - options on top (covered call) any others that come to mind?



We just launched GOFR — the Galaxy Onchain Financing Rate. For the first time, institutions can access a single, continuously rebalanced rate across Aave, Morpho, Spark, and more. Dynamically optimized in real time and rebalanced across DeFi venues, a single Galaxy Rate.



@beeshal sounds like a big time saver. curious about the details!


Banks: - structurally perma-bankrupt - charge fees on your deposits which they borrow - have almost zero costs, maintain a spreadsheet - constantly get bailed out by the government - financialize economies, lowering productivity - most respected career in almost every country


PSA: I now consider *all* of DeFi unsafe. Coding agents are superhuman at finding vulnerabilities, and smart contract security is too asymmetric: defenders need to fix every bug while attackers need just one exploit to steal funds.









