咆哮猫咪🐱
1.5K posts



还在买啊,ShapeShift 创始人 Erik Voorhees 关联地址再次加仓 17084 $ETH 😲 地址 0x71D…8B9B8 过去 4 小时在链上以均价 $2148.8 买入价值 3671 万美元的 ETH;至此,他从 03.10 开始囤积的 ETH 数量已增长至 103,389.22 枚,总价值高达 2.22 亿美元,平均成本 $2,164.72 不过需要注意的是,@ErikVoorhees 03.17 否认了这是他的地址,不过从资金来源看的确存在关系,也可能是之前交互过的机构 / 巨鲸了 钱包地址 0x71DB37318092A962DE3398E17f13fc633b58B9B8




Introducing MuleRun 2.0. Your personal AI, act before you ask. It learns your habits, anticipates your needs, and works while you sleep — running 24/7 on your Personal Computer assigned to you alone. No complex setup. Just talk to it.



🚄AI Trading 的时代已经到来,不要让自己卡在第一步。 刚结束的 OKX Onchain OS 直播 由 @zakk_okx @banbendaan 深度讲解 由于大家学习热情高涨🔥 从1小时直接加播到2小时🤣 想入门 AI Agent 链上交易的,可以直接看回放👇 okx.com/ul/RznK1eB


复盘:总盈利4WU 少赚了几万U 很遗憾。 昨天我正在维权Concrete的时候, 核心群群友 @lifejustsoso tg上说让我看看 $BARD 有机会,可以去Bybit借点搞一下。 凑巧我还有一期 和 嘴撸的 $Bard 没解锁,所以对这个项目还比较熟,应该是不少用户在做空套保,等待18号解锁。 随即去bybit借了60多万个 $Bard 借贷利息−150%,同时在币安开了对应数量的多单资费−500%,想着吃个差价收敛就完事了。 没想到到晚上9点开启领取之后,价差扩大到了17%,空单资费马上就干到了−2%,可是这时候市面上的 $Bard 已经被借空了[感觉都是群友借的],只能作罢,爽吃一晚上了。 当时本可以多号在Bybit再杠杆吃价差,或者去 Aster换仓吃价差的,我还是懒了,在此反省🥹 图为:从一小时 300U吃到一小时10000U的资费。



纳闷了,这究竟谁控制了霍尔木兹海峡?! 美国财政部长斯科特・贝森特对CNBC 表示,允许伊朗油轮通过霍尔木兹海峡,以保障全球石油供应。




「黑客七擒 Venus」 1️⃣2021.05:XVS 价格操纵,损失 9500 万美元 2️⃣2022.05:预言机漏洞,1400 万美元坏账 3️⃣2022.10:跨链桥被盗引发 BNB 滥用,1.5 亿美元坏账 4️⃣2023.12:预言机漏洞,损失金额未披露 5️⃣2024.03:预言机漏洞,71.6 万美元坏账 6️⃣2025.06:MEV / 权限管理漏洞,损失 200 万美元 7️⃣2026.03:THE 价格操纵,215 万美元坏账 2021 年起 Venus 因攻击产生的可追溯坏账和损失共超 2.6 亿美元…要不,去灵隐寺拜一拜呢? 关于昨天 THE 的借贷事故,@Super4DeFi 整理的非常清晰,就不赘述了





JUST IN: Trader accidentally swaps $50 million $USDT for $36,000 $AAVE on Ethereum.


Earlier today, a user attempted to buy AAVE using $50M USDT through the Aave interface. Given the unusually large size of the single order, the Aave interface, like most trading interfaces, warned the user about extraordinary slippage and required confirmation via a checkbox. The user confirmed the warning on their mobile device and proceeded with the swap, accepting the high slippage, which ultimately resulted in receiving only 324 AAVE in return. The transaction could not be moved forward without the user explicitly accepting the risk through the confirmation checkbox. The CoW Swap routers functioned as intended, and the integration followed standard industry practices. However, while the user was able to proceed with the swap, the final outcome was clearly far from optimal. Events like this do occur in DeFi, but the scale of this transaction was significantly larger than what is typically seen in the space. We sympathize with the user and will try to make a contact with the user and we will return $600K in fees collected from the transaction. The key takeaway is that while DeFi should remain open and permissionless, allowing users to perform transactions freely, there are additional guardrails the industry can build to better protect users. Our team will be investigating ways to improve these safeguards going forward.





在Avenir 年会上,李林宣布回归创业状态!在现场感受到他对行业的激情!期待老大,再次引领行业,再创辉煌!🔥














