𝐿𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑥 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑟
13.2K posts

𝐿𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑥 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑟
@linuxuser1996
Linux & GrapheneOS • Monero • Spreading awareness of privacy rights • Locked and loaded against mass surveillance & censorship


We have received the recommendations from an expert panel on how to better protect and empower young people online. Leading academics, practitioners, youth and parent representatives, and specialists from across Europe, assessed the impact of social media on minors and set out practical measures for action.

Countries where a YouTube video critizing EU's Chat Control has been banned.



No time to lose! Since 3 April, platforms don't have a legal basis to detect child sexual abuse material. We can't go on like this. Europe must close this legal gap. Tune in for the latest episode of our podcast "EU Decoded" in which we explain the issue and potential solutions. 🎧Listen here: epp.group/s7e24

Statement Regarding the Suspension of t.me The .ME Registry works closely with law enforcement to monitor and mitigate issues across the .ME domain in accordance with applicable laws, including sanctions requirements. On 13 July, First VPN Service (1VPNS) was included as a sanctioned entity by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. A Telegram channel using the t.me domain was among 1VPNS identified infrastructure. Accordingly, the t.me domain was suspended. On 14 July, Telegram provided confirmation that it had removed its links and affiliations with 1VPNS. Once the confirmation was reviewed and verified, the suspension was removed from the t.me domain. We appreciate Telegram’s prompt cooperation in resolving this matter.


Countries where a YouTube video critizing EU's Chat Control has been banned.


Ursula von der Leyen rolling out an age verification app on April 15, 2026 and pushing Chat Controls for the EU is a massive red flag. It is just another attempt by an official (unelected by the people in this case) trying to use the protection of children as an excuse to obtain control by collecting IDs and scanning private messages. If your country is trying something similar, please pushback as this could also mean spillover into other countries. The age verification app turned out to be ridiculously easy to hack. An attacker only needed to delete specific values tied to the PIN from the app’s configuration files and restart it, then just set a new PIN while retaining access to the already created credentials. 🤦♂️ Despite this, the Commission doubled down on April 29 with a formal Recommendation urging member states to accelerate the rollout. Chat Controls would require scanning private encrypted messages across major platforms. This would likely flag completely normal photos such as holiday pictures as suspicious, producing too many false positives and overloading the authorities, leading to fewer real investigation successes. This governmental overreach is nothing new as we already have a major example from over a decade ago. Let’s dive in! The South Korean “Real Name” Disaster (2007-2012): The pretext was very similar: Celebrity suicides and cyberbullying. The government passed the “Internet Real-Name System,” requiring any site with over 100,000 daily visitors to verify users’ identities via their Resident Registration Numbers (RRNs) (that’s the Korean equivalent of a Social Security Number). Here is why it was catastrophic (and why it was reversed): The Great Data Heist (2011): Since the law forced companies to store the private ID data of millions, those websites became basically playgrounds for hackers. In 2011, hackers hit SK Communications (Cyworld) and stole the personal data, including names, phone numbers, and resident ID numbers, of 35 MILLION people! 😳 That was roughly 70% of the entire population of South Korea. Zero Effect on “Safety”: The most embarrassing part for the government was that the data showed the law didn’t even work. Studies conducted after the law was passed showed that “malicious comments” decreased by a grand total of… 0.9%. People didn’t stop bullying; they just did it using their real names or someone else’s stolen ID! 🤯 The Constitutional Death Blow (2012): In 2012, the Constitutional Court of Korea ruled the law unconstitutional. They noted that it stifled free speech, caused people to flee to overseas sites (like YouTube and Twitter), and, crucially, that the risk of data theft far outweighed any minor public benefit. Hackers Did Not Take a Break (2024-2025): Some might clap back that technology has improved since then, but hackers have not been idle. Just look at the massive 2024 Change Healthcare breach, the National Public Data breach that exposed approximately 2.9 billion data records impacting 1.3 billion individuals, and the 16 billion credential leak discovered in 2025. 😳 Centralized mountains of personal ID data still turn platforms into irresistible targets. The risks have not gone away. They have only scaled up. The history is clear, and the modern data proves it: centralizing our data makes us targets. You can read more here: Change Healthcare 2024: hipaajournal.com/largest-health… National Public Data (approximately 2.9 billion data records impacting 1.3 billion individuals): upguard.com/blog/biggest-d… 16 billion credential leak 2025: guardz.com/blog/top-recen…

Countries where a YouTube video critizing EU's Chat Control has been banned.
















