BirdsAreAliensSpaceships

686 posts

BirdsAreAliensSpaceships banner
BirdsAreAliensSpaceships

BirdsAreAliensSpaceships

@lonli4y

Hey! Hi, Let's be friends, I'm also a Red!

Katılım Aralık 2025
19 Takip Edilen3 Takipçiler
Dr. Scott M. Sullivan
Dr. Scott M. Sullivan@DrScotMSullivan·
Materialism is based on three key assumptions about consciousness: 1. Consciousness is entirely dependent on the physical brain. 2. If the brain ceases functioning, all conscious experience must also cease. 3. All experiences must be explainable in terms of neural activity. NDEs contradict all three of these claims.
English
9
2
9
462
Baptist Joshua
Baptist Joshua@BaptistJoshua_·
@HJarsz @NotEvolution1 Christians do not say no one has ever witnessed evolution, therefore it is false. We have other ways to invalidate Derpwinian Evilution. What we say is no one has ever seen it, therefore it is not science. Scientific method requires witnessed reproduction of an event/method.
English
3
0
2
33
Not Evolution
Not Evolution@NotEvolution1·
Not wanting God to exist
Not Evolution tweet media
English
104
42
899
11.4K
TheHistoryGuy 🇷🇴🇺🇸
TheHistoryGuy 🇷🇴🇺🇸@TheHistoryGuy07·
Studies have shown that people of faith have a greater purpose in life which is why they are happier. Observing the research evidence, it’s apparent that those who celebrate Easter & Christmas are happier than their atheist counterparts. Atheism provides loneliness & depression.
God Questioner@God_Questioner

English
49
3
42
2.1K
David Kicinski
David Kicinski@David_Kicinski·
I keep on finding more and more people who have blocked me haha You make a lot of enemies when you're a Christian on X.
English
30
0
17
791
Natural Theist
Natural Theist@AleMartnezR1·
@MartinTweats Yet, because if the universe had always existed, everything within it too, would be eternal, and in the same state.
English
3
0
3
194
Martin
Martin@MartinTweats·
"Things either exist or they don't, but things do not “move between” existence and non-existence." It follows as a corollary that your tweet always existed. There was never a moment in time when your tweet did not exist. It did not move between non-existence and edistence. On the contrary, there was a time when your tweet did not exist, and a time when it came into existence and had being, e.g: At time t1, your tweet did not exist. At time t2, your posted your tweet, and it came into existence. The event at t2 is a change from non-existence to existence, which negates your claim that things do not move between non-existence existence.
Dr. Tran@Leophilius

The Universe wasn't “brought into existence”, and nothing is ever “brought into existence”. Things either exist or they don't, but things do not “move between” existence and non-existence. That's just straightforwardly incoherent.

English
18
1
28
1.6K
Natural Theist
Natural Theist@AleMartnezR1·
Every constituent of the universe is non-eternal because each constituent is contingent and subject to change. Anything that is contingent does not exist by its own necessity; it depends on conditions or causes for its existence and can either begin to exist, cease to exist, or exist differently than it does. Every physical constituent of the universe exhibits precisely these features: it undergoes change, exists under particular conditions, and can be conceived as not existing without contradiction. No part of the universe possesses existence by its own nature. Therefore, every constituent of the universe is non-eternal.
English
5
0
2
98
Natural Theist
Natural Theist@AleMartnezR1·
Against an eternal universe 1. The whole (the universe) is nothing over and above its parts. 2. If every constituent of a whole (the universe) is non-eternal, then the whole (the universe) is non-eternal. 3. Every constituent (part) of the whole (the universe) non-eternal. Therefore, the whole (the universe) is non-eternal.
Natural Theist tweet media
English
13
1
12
751
Shawn "All Outta Bubblegum" McClure
It's always so adorable when they proudly regurgitate the oldest cliches in the remedial apologetics primer as if they were nuggets of the purest wisdom imaginable. 😆✝️🫏🤡
༺☦︎༻@bunn____ribbon

@McClureShawn atheist will say "there is no evidence God exists" all day and then get mad when being asked to show evidence that nothing created everything.

English
15
5
39
1.2K
ApoloJedi
ApoloJedi@ApoloJedi_·
Dawkins (and many other atheists) commit the category error shown below AND commit the fallacy of sweeping generalization when they say: “We’re all atheists to most gods; I just go one God further” 🙄 It’s like saying: “I believe 2+2=3 is wrong, I just go one numeral further and believe that all answers are wrong”
Hans Fiene 🦬@HansFiene

Once again, a perk of following me on Twitter is that you get early access to the latest @LutheranSatire videos: Here's Donall and Conall and Dawkins 3: One God Further

English
14
0
30
1.3K
Todd On High
Todd On High@ToddOnHigh_·
@bunn____ribbon @McClureShawn Of course the coward left a pathetic little soliloquy & immediately blocked me lol How can anyone take these spineless fuckwits seriously lmao
English
1
0
3
24
Brian Kachelman
Brian Kachelman@Guardians_Bane·
@McClureShawn Hey, I replied to her comment there. I think I'm shadow banned though. Are you able to see my reply? I did repost it also. But it seems none of my replies are posting. I think some idiot who got trapped in YEC claims being debunked reported me. Lol...
English
2
0
0
10
BirdsAreAliensSpaceships
@TheHistoryGuy07 U're talking as if god wasn't the one who decided to go on and make life knowing exactly what's gonna happen, nobody asked for this life for goodness sake
English
0
0
2
14
Not Evolution
Not Evolution@NotEvolution1·
In the beginning: Gen 1:31  And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
Not Evolution tweet media
English
35
3
35
1.9K
Brian Kachelman
Brian Kachelman@Guardians_Bane·
Another well thought out and beautifully explained article by @TherionWare ... Atheists are being assigned beliefs and views that simply aren't part of being an atheist. This new breed of apologists has been pushing these things to simply try and flip the burden of proof to atheists. It's not the "gotcha" they imagine it is. It's based on a want to "debunk" athesim as what they call a worldview or faith based position. It isn't. Atheism: Non-belief in a god(s) That's it. Nothing more, nothing less. It makes no claims. It doesn't even ATTEMPT to explain anything. We simply don't believe in gods. There are no prerequisites to not believe in gods.
Therion Ware #FBPPR #FBPE #HPLHS@TherionWare

x.com/i/article/2059…

English
1
0
2
31
Lulu | WC 🇪🇬
Lulu | WC 🇪🇬@muixyui·
Cabo Verde, you might have lost but you won everybody's hearts, this match was phenomenal and you'll go down in history
English
5
92
417
2.6K