lostinio

@akashnet when move to ETH?

Every compute transaction on Akash will now burn $AKT. Burn-Mint Equilibrium makes $AKT essential to every deployment while maintaining USD pricing and pegged payments for tenants and providers. The biggest upgrade in Akash Network's history is scheduled for March 23rd at 14:00 UTC. Full breakdown ↓ akash.network/blog/what-burn…

how science is made with grok

I can watch this forever 🥹❤️

@MoonixLoL to ETH?

Cosmos only hope was AKASH $AKT. Well they are leaving and probably rightfully tho :D

@AirdropGlideApp AKT still live there

As expected, Neutron is going into Maintenance Only mode. Sad day. So little left of the Cosmos ecosystem I love.

Not a company. Not traditional revenue. $AKT generated $18.2 million in 2025 from network fees and validator rewards. 2026 Q1 already at $4.3 million. Users = revenue generators 🤯 #BlockchainEconomics

ETH inflation: ~0.24% annualized. Lower than BTC. Lower than gold. But also programmable, yield-bearing, and securing the largest onchain economy. Sounds like the best store of value in history.

@WeAreWoke1776_3 it is ai

Remember…. When the dogs are let loose. It’s over before it even began.

@journoverax but it is commutative, how does it takes into account the order?

all prediction markets are built on one idea - that people think like a statistics textbook they don't. they never did. and that's the entire edge kolmogorov's probability theory 1933. beautiful math. works perfectly for coins and dice one problem - people are not coins bug #1 - conjunction fallacy ask someone: "probability trump wins?" -> 60% now ask: "trump wins AND market goes up?" -> they say 65% mathematically impossible. but people say it anyway. prediction markets are full of this mistake right now bug #2 - order effects ask A then B -> get probabilities X and Y ask B then A -> different probabilities same logic. just different order. news always arrives in sequence - markets react not to information but to how it was delivered classical math can't explain either of these it just calls people "irrational" and moves on quantum probability theory explains both precisely - not because the brain is a quantum computer, but because it's a more accurate mathematical language for describing human judgment P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) + 2√P(A)·√P(B)·cos(θ) θ = the angle between two beliefs inside someone's mind classical models set this to zero and call it a "rational market" it's not zero. it was never zero. the gap between zero and the real θ - that's unpriced alpha before resolution a trader simultaneously believes and disbelieves that's not weakness - it's a mathematically describable state the market collapses to a price instantly the belief collapses later the edge lives in that lag and it exists as long as markets aggregate human judgment meaning - forever the gap nobody has closed: the math -> already written the data -> 400M trades public. calibrating θ across market categories -> nobody has done it that's the opportunity markets assume people calculate like a textbook people calculate like quantum physics the gap between these two models is money sitting on the table every single day the only question is - who formalizes it first

This is how @akashnet has handled FUD for years. No overreaction. No drama. Just staying balanced and continuing to build decentralized compute infrastructure. The funny part? Most FUD eventually collapses under its own weight.😁 #DePIN #Ai #GPU $AKT #web3 #DeAI

The Aave protocol was originally designed by people that had user friendly architecture in mind and that's large part of the success. For example, If you try to withdraw collateral on Aave to a point that it would trigger a liquidation, the protocol will revert the tx. because there's no point of allowing that as it's only hurtful for the user. Product design must be at it's core, user friendly. Aave has now, new cooks in the kitchen, and mindset seems different.

How the fuck is CT grading this response on tone instead of product judgment? Thinking the issue is that a warning appeared, that a user checked a box, or that the trade could technically be completed, is stupid. The issue is that a leading interface in DeFi allowed a $50M order to move through a flow where catastrophic execution was an entirely predictable outcome. Once you know the order size, know the available liquidity, know the expected slippage, and know the probable output degradation, responsibility shifts to the system design itself. At that point, hiding behind user consent is weak as fuck. Consent inside a badly designed decision environment does not suddenly become good product architecture. Imagine using the same checkbox for acceptable slippage on a normal trade and on a trade that can lose $50M.... What they are doing, through lack of vision and lack of standards, is pushing liability downstream. What makes this worse is that the solution is obvious. Extreme order sizes should trigger a different class of interface behavior because they belong to a different class of risk. Hard execution thresholds, delayed confirmations, forced acknowledgment of minimum output in large font, segmented execution paths, deeper routing logic, stronger friction as size detaches from liquidity, and escalation rules for absurd trades. None of this requires a research breakthrough. It requires teams to stop acting like legality at the transaction layer is enough to claim integrity at the product layer. Aave has enough stature, enough resources, and enough industry visibility to know this. So when one of the flagship names in crypto answers an event like this with “the warning was shown and the system worked as intended,” what it really communicates is something much uglier: the mindset of too many crypto founders is complacent as fuck, and that is exactly why the industry still struggles to earn the trust it keeps claiming it wants.

The CowSwap slippage is punitive even on smaller transactions. It's considerable cheaper to withdraw collateral, swap, then re-deposit. I won't even start with the inability to pay loan in stable with collateral in different stable. The platform has lost much of its real efficiency and benefit. Just being honest as a user since 2021.

@akashnet @gregosuri @frontiertower @ethereumhouseSF @FundingCommons does it mean Akash is planning to migrate to ETH if so it is huge

Founder @GregOsuri is taking the stage at @frontiertower’s 'Funding the Commons' panel to discuss the critical infrastructure powering open AI. Tune in for the conversation this Sunday, March 15th at 3 PM PST ↓ luma.com/ftc-sf-2026

Crypto isn't considered a serious industry until Ethereum surpasses Bitcoin in market cap.

@CosmonautStakes @akashnet akash should move to ETH. ETH is the only chain ready to autonomous agents communications

$AKT waking up. 🔥 While people were distracted, @akashnet kept building. BME burn mechanics + AI compute demand + decentralized cloud narrative. ✅ Feels like the market is starting to notice. 🚀

Every time you read or listen to something, you're running untrusted code on your wetware with no sandbox. Reading is code execution. Text is the oldest exploit. Choose your inputs carefully. Including this post.

When Fyodor Dostoevsky said: “Isolate as much as you want to become stronger, even if you see that loneliness is an unbearable hell, it is much better than the multiple masks of humans.”