charlotte

1.5K posts

charlotte banner
charlotte

charlotte

@lottite

building @humfrid_com | swede in the bay area

Menlo Park, CA Katılım Temmuz 2011
649 Takip Edilen360 Takipçiler
charlotte
charlotte@lottite·
@nichochar i generally agree with the point that critics who don’t built anything themselves are not worth listening to but this guy is both funny AND quite educational in showing the limitations of ai
English
0
0
0
5
Nicholas Charriere
Nicholas Charriere@nichochar·
no offense but i loathe content like this do you know how hard it is to build things? do you know how easy it is to criticize things? build, don't criticize unless it's constructive
Nicholas Charriere tweet media
English
8
0
8
1.3K
charlotte
charlotte@lottite·
Nothing beats great user feedback
charlotte tweet media
English
0
1
0
28
charlotte
charlotte@lottite·
IMO the difference is in agency and what they did before FAANG. The curse of big tech is that you are 1) used to things taking time and needing approval and 2) systems and people being in place to do everything outside of your scope. But a FAANG also means they are outstanding at their craft, knows what great looks like and considers growth and scale the default. So it’s more personal than FAANG vs not FAANG. The difference is agency
English
0
0
2
112
idan levin
idan levin@0xidanlevin·
After 1-2 years of vibe coding out there, I’m not seeing -more games -more apps - generally the apps I’m using haven’t improved that much how come?
English
12
0
8
2.1K
charlotte
charlotte@lottite·
@lmrankhan Very well put! And the lack of domain expertise also causes confusion about what a market is.
English
0
0
0
70
Imran
Imran@lmrankhan·
I’ve noticed some startups pivot away from markets that feel overly hot because they think the contrarian move is to go somewhere less crowded. But the real issue is not the market. It is that the team lacks the domain expertise needed to break through. That quickly turns into negative self talk The market is too hot. Every competitor is already doing it. There is no margin left. It is not technically possible. Then an extremely domain specific team enters the same market and figures out every problem the other teams could not solve. This is why domain expertise or passion matters so much when choosing a startup idea.
English
45
12
291
23.1K
Omar
Omar@omarvvvr·
hot take: founders should talk to users before opening claude
English
26
0
34
1.1K
charlotte
charlotte@lottite·
@YesKhush_5 “Building a startup is realizing you were an idiot 6 months ago, over and over again”
English
0
0
1
44
Khush Mahajan
Khush Mahajan@YesKhush_5·
Nothing humbles you more than trying to build a business
English
13
1
54
1.5K
charlotte
charlotte@lottite·
@shreyas very well said! we built @humfrid_com with this at its core - identifying logical contradictions in data and decisions is the first step of aligning bets outside of the team.
English
0
0
1
111
Shreyas Doshi
Shreyas Doshi@shreyas·
Nearly everyone feels communication is their biggest problem at work — as we struggle to align, explain, negotiate, clarify, inform, persuade, inspire. But few understand that past a certain level the quality of your communication is bottlenecked on the quality of your thinking.
English
25
23
510
73.8K
emily is in sf
emily is in sf@emilyinvc·
the strangest part of elite sf circles is that any shortcoming in business is viewed primarily as a character defect yes, there are a million forces at play, but if only you were a greater man or woman, you probably could have figured it out
English
12
12
424
39.2K
charlotte
charlotte@lottite·
I’ve stopped telling my cofounder what needs to get done, I tell @humfrid_com who figures out where it goes in his calendar + makes sure it gets done without me mentioning it again
charlotte tweet media
English
0
0
2
575
charlotte
charlotte@lottite·
@maiab best car in the world! i feel bad for you
English
0
0
1
164
Maia Bittner
Maia Bittner@maiab·
ok well I flew to Portland to buy a car and someone else literally bought it while I had it out on a test drive
Maia Bittner tweet media
English
39
1
277
44.5K
charlotte retweetledi
Mathias Kleverud
Mathias Kleverud@mathiiias·
One of @humfrid_com's best qualities is his ability to push back. Most agents agreeable. Humfrid isn't agreeable. He's on your side.
GREG ISENBERG@gregisenberg

Every AI right now is a "yes man", and I'm soooo tired of it. Maybe you are too. I don't want an LLM that claps for everything I do. I want the one that tells me my writing is weak, my logic falls apart halfway through, and I've been lying to myself about the thing I keep dodging. You can engineer an AI with a spine. Here's the exact setup I use: 1. Write a "critic" skill. A markdown file whose only job is to attack the work. It hunts for the weakest claim, the dodged question, the thing you're avoiding. Every agent that loads it gets a spine by default. 2. Run two agents against each other. One builds, one tears it apart. The builder has to defend or fix. You get the truth from the friction instead of from a single agent trying to please you. 3. Score against evals. Give it a rubric with real criteria and have it rate the work 1-10 on each. A number tied to a standard forces honesty that "what do you think?" will always dance around. 4. Make it cite evidence for every criticism. Set a rule: no critique without a concrete example from the work and a reason it matters. It has to show its work, so it can flatter you or hand wave. 5. Give it a kill criterion. Tell it the exact condition where it has to recommend you stop entirely. "If X isn't true, tell me to shut this down." Most agents will optimize a doomed idea forever because you gave them permission to call it dead. I've learned that the default AI claps for you. That's cool for a bit but it gets old quick. If you actually want to build exceptional products, create top 1% work, and grow as a person, you need an AI that pushes you harder than it flatters you. We're in the age of agency. The people who win are the ones who go build the version that tells them the truth. Best time to build there's ever been. Go get 'em.

English
0
1
0
42
Peter Yang
Peter Yang@petergyang·
One thing that still annoys me about even the best AI models and agents: They’ll give an overconfident opinion. Then if you push back even a little, they’ll usually reverse it right away. It makes me feel like they weren’t thinking that hard in the first place. A good human teammate might change their mind too, but they’ll at least explain why or have a more principled approach to their thinking. Maybe there’s a way to fix this with a system prompt?
English
198
23
543
50.5K